Remote View

So after nearly 18 hours on the road overnight, I arrived in Switzerland to a beautiful view of Lake Geneva with the Swiss Alps as a backdrop. After some orienteering and sustenance, I took rest and promptly slept until 11 am the following day.Slobodan and I took some hours to get acquainted with each other and to consider what might be possible during our days together. We then laid a bunch of stuff out on the floor and made a series of recordings. Then we found out that we could not upload or stream from MFMP YouTube account because “they had detected unusual behaviour on our account” - basically, the IP was Switzerland, which was not usual. Recovery was not an option because it could only be done with a phone number on the account that was now dud and changing the recovery number only takes effect after one week.

So, we are forced to pre-record and in the interim I am uploading to my personal YouTube account and will move them over to the MFMP account when our IP is approved next week. I encourage you to see what we have and make any suggestions you think we should consider for experiments and comments about those that we have put on the table.

This is a brief overview of a presentation I recorded on 30th December 2020 called “Acceleration methods of Itonic clusters by Takaaki Matsumoto”

At the 25th Linear Accelerator Meeting in Japan (July 12-14, 2000), Takaaki Matsumoto discussed the extraordinary capabilities of what he called 'Itonic Clusters'. The behaviour of which, he said, resembled that of natural ball lightning.

Key points

Right from the outset of the paper, in the abstract, Matsumoto notes that:

new physics could be expected with an accelerated beam of the [itonic] clusters

What he is stating is obvious if you think about it. Typically linear accelerators accelerate individual particles (including sub-atomic) and ions, such as protons, electrons and helium nuclei. What is proposed, in this paper, is the opportunity to accelerate a large package of matter, at the same time.

He notes that these itonic clusters have properties very similar to natural ball lightning and this is interesting because I have argued that condensed coherent matter like phenomenon, occur in VEGA and other LENR experiments and have wide implications.

He then states that as these itonic clusters are negatively charged, they are able to be accelerated in a linear accelerator. What he is effectively suggesting, in 2000, is the ability to create a condensed coherent matter beam, but in a way different to that proposed by Lockheed Martin in their 2013 patent.

Matsumoto also details all of the various reactions he has observed with Itonic clusters, such as:

* gamma-free fusion of deuterons to helium 4

* Stepwise transmutations involving addition of protons or electrons

* Many body fusion reactions

* mini neutron star formation

* electro-nuclear collapse and

* electro-nuclear regeneration

He then concludes by re-stating that new physics and new applications will be made possible and gives the example of producing and colliding tiny black holes. It is known that colliding black holes produces gravity waves.

So with that, I encourage you to look at the video of my presentation, it has a lot more detail in there and examples and also there are references given at the end of this article.

Some examples of similar observations

Itonic mesh clusters

White hole exhaust

Cold fusion stars

Ultra dense hydrogen crystals

References

* Acceleration methods of Itonic clustersProceedings of the 25th Linear Accelerator Meeting in Japan (July 12-14, 2000, Himeji, Japan) Takaaki MATSUMOTO Department of Nuclear Engineering Hokkaido University

* Matsumoto Papers collection

* Relationship between the research of Nikola Tesla, Winston Bostick, John Hutchison and Ken Shoulders [see references in video description]

* Cold Fusion Experiments with Ordinary Water and Thin Nickel Foil, Takaaki Matsumoto, Fusion Technology, 1993

* MFMP Hutchison Effect Sample 'Fracture' - SEM & EDS

* Observation of Stars produced during Cold Fusion, Takaaki Matsumoto, Fusion Technology, 1992

* ECCO - Macro photography of 'strange radiation' tracks in fuel container

* Exotic Vacuum Objects in various LENR systems

* Physical evidence of EVOs in Correa and Chernetsky devices?

* SPACE. EARTH. HUMAN. - Dr. Alexander Parkhomov, Fellow of the Russian Academy of Science

* Video Recording of Long-Lived Plasmoids near Objects Exposed to Remote and Direct Effects of High-Current Pinch Discharges, B. Yu. Bogdanovich, N. V. VolkovN. A. Len’, A. V. Nesterovich, Technical Physics, April 2019, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 465–469

* Disruptive - Striking evidence making the core of LENR, [direct link to Bogdanovich et. al. like cluster]

* EV - A Tale of Discovery, Kenneth R. Shoulders

Following the publication of my YouTube video and newsletter entitled “How was Nan Madol built?” I was sent a link to the a document from a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) freedom of information request. Shortly after the link was sent to me, it became unavailable on the CIA’s website, however I was able to recover it and I spent a day meticulously re-constructing it and producing a read through of it.

It is particularly interesting in several areas that I will explore in another article, however, it was sent because it said that in ‘mind over matter’ driven ‘spoon bending’, when the affected metal was analysed, it appeared as if something had happened at the metal crystal boundaries that enabled the metal to become malleable. This is entirely in line with the my observations of EVOs/coherent matter effects in Hutchison samples and also the descriptions of Takaaki Matsumoto in Cold Fusion experiments from the early 1990s. This formed part of my argument on how Nan Madol was built and I am of the belief that this Psychokinesis process is intimately related.

Approved For Release 2001/03/07: _CIA-RDP96-00789R003000020007-0

PK PARTY HISTORY

by Jack HouckDecember 19, 1983

A PK Party is defined as a group of 15 or more people who meet to bend metal using psychokinesis (PK) or mind over matter. The first PK Party was held in January 1981. The objective was to assemble a group of people and create a "peak emotional experience" (Reference 1). The author postulated that, at the time of the peak emotional event, the mind could make a connection with an object and affected that object, (i.e., psychokinesis). The first PK Party was planned to be a test of this idea.

The week before the first PK Party, the author met Severin Dahlen, a metallurgist who had been involved with PK research at the University of California, Irvine. Together, a plan for the party was prepared. Twenty-one people gathered at the author's home on Monday evening, January 19, 1981. All were friends of the author and came from varied backgrounds. After introductions and general discussion, everyone was relaxed and comfortable. The author's grandparents' silverplated silverware was passed out and everyone had either a fork or spoon. Severin stood in the middle of the room with everyone seated in a circle and gave the following instructions:

* “Get a point of concentration in your head.”

* “Make it very intense and focused.”

* “Grab it and bring it down through your neck, down through your shoulder, down through your arm, through your hand, and put it into the silverware at the point you intend to bend it.”

* “Command it to bend!”

* “Release the command and let it happen.”

He then instructed the group to use their fingers to test for warmth coming out of the silverware or to feel the metal surface become sticky. Everyone felt pretty silly, sitting there holding the silverware, until the head of a fork being held by a boy (age 14) bent over all by itself I Almost everyone in the room saw this happen and experienced an instantaneous belief system change. Then the silverware in the hands of many people in the room became soft. They easily bent and twisted the silverware into unusual shapes. The period during which the metal remained soft was between five and twenty seconds. Everyone was shouting and extremely excited. During the next, hour, nineteen of the party attendees had the metal getting soft and being easily formed into any shape. Later we termed this "warm forming". Also, during the first party, the same boy put a 270-degree bend in a 5/16-inch diameter steel rod. This was very impressive because of the apparent ease with which it was done. One of the two party attendees who “did not bend” was a lady who had told a friend before the party that she did not see any sense in bending silverware.

At the end of the party, she asked why she could not do it. The author was the other unsuccessful bender at that first party. He was so busy analyzing what was going on, that concentration on the task of bending had been difficult.

The second PK party was held a month later. This time a number of specimens of different metals, as well as metals made with different manufacturing processes were available to the benders. The attendees learned and practiced with silverware. Then they were asked to bend these other specimens. Hacksaw blades were shaped into spirals, brass strips bent in sealed bottles, spoon bowls were buckled, and many steel rods were bent. No one was able to bend the copper rods. Instead, some copper rods became so hot that the people dropped them to keep from being burned. Over 8.5% of the attendees succeeded in experiencing warm forming. The people who were having this experience realized that they were doing something that most of them thought was impossible. Two characteristics of metal possibly related to PK are the number of dislocations and the thermal conductivity. The more dislocations available in the metal induced, for example, by cold working, the easier it is to bend. The lower the conductivity, the easier it is to find the short period during which the metal is soft. Forged stainless steel silverware has been cold worked and has a low thermal conductivity.

Twelve PK Parties were held during 1981. The format was continually improved. The attendees were taught how to use dowsing rods as a means of “testing” the silverware to see if "it was willing to bend". This seems to reinforce the essential belief structure. As with warm forming, most people succeed in using a dowsing rod on their first try. It is also a useful method for helping to connect the individual mind to the object to be bent. A special feature was added at the end of the parties. The participants held two forks at the very bottom of the handle and were asked not to apply force with their other hand. Sometimes significant bending occurred. Shouting at the silverware has also been added as a means of helping to enhance the emotional level in a group. This procedure adds to the intensity of the command to bend and helps create pandemonium throughout the party, in order to help break people's concentration (thus assisting the release or "letting go" step).

The second year saw 24 parties orchestrated by the author. In the spring of 1982, Fran Zeff Brown ran a PK Party for her parapsychology class in Orange County, California., and achieved the same high success rate. This was the first replication of the PK Party format. The author gave two PK Parties in the Washington D.C. area, in May and June of 1982. Some of the attendees of those parties began to run their own PK Parties with very high success rates. For example, John Alexander has now held more than 50 parties. Figure 1 shows the number of people attending the author’s PK Parties, as well as an estimate of the total number of people attending PK Parties, based on feedback provided by the many people running their own parties. In the third year, the number of parties run by the author has been averaging three per month, and they generally have more people per party. The largest party was held in Vancouver B.C., Canada, in September 1983, with over 400 attendees.

The success rate seems to drop in the bigger parties. This is shown in Figure 2, wherein the success rate is plotted as a function of the number of people attending a party. It appears that the best party size is between 15 and 40 participants. One reason for the lower success rate at the big parties may be that people do not get enough personal attention. About 50% of the people report, experiencing, warm forming using the basic instructions given earlier. The rest seem to need some personal attention from the person giving the party or from a helper. Also, at the big parties. a few people go around creating some negative attitudes. The more helpers, the easier it is to prevent the critics and analytical types from interfering with those who want to experience the warm forming, as well as to provi…

Set in Stone

7th January 2021Since 2012, I have been posting the fruits of my volunteer labour and insights on various platforms with the aim of reaching a wider audience. It became clear in 2017 that censorship was on the horizon and that several so-called ‘social media’ channels would no longer be places that could guarantee free and fair dissemination of ideas on an equal basis. 

Reading the writing on the wall, I started to post content on Steemit.com [HomoSymbian] & [MFMP] as its claimed principles implied that it could be a way to ensure an articles longevity. However, the platform was sold, which is a concerning development and it has started posting adverts.

In late 2017, I began to work with John Hutchison, we formed a good relationship, one of mutual trust and shared ideals. John was very open, sharing a lot of detailed context for the analysis of his samples that I was conducting and sharing via YouTube. Then suddenly, his channel containing over 4500 videos, built up over the best part of a decade was memory holed. John shared the email chain with me as he desperately tried to work with YouTube to remedy the situation. Note, their claimed issue was that he had not properly named or tagged his videos.

I’ll share with you two of the boiler plate emails John received and that you might receive, if you are lucky, as you are made into a non-person.

On Friday, December 7, 2018, 7:34 AM, [email protected] wrote:

Hi John,

Thanks for writing back.

I know how important this channel is for you, however, our team has already decided on this [ed - closing his channel].

Feel free to send us an email if you have any other questions in the meantime and we'd be happy to help. [ed - like, er, help about what?]

Best,Cai

YouTube Support Team

the following day… 

On Saturday, December 8, 2018, 6:55 AM, [email protected] wrote:

Hi John,

We appreciate your feedback.

Please note that YouTube has a right and discretion to suspend or terminate a channel when it's not in line with our Community Guidelines and Policies.

Feel free to send us an email if you have any other questions in the meantime and we'd be happy to help.

Best,Cai

YouTube Support Team

The terrible thing is, that not only was his channel deleted, but also his 1000s of interesting, contextually appropriate comments, on other channels discussing his work, vanished too. This is slicing away a persons contribution to humanity, potentially just because someone or thing didn’t like an aspect of say 3 out of 4500 videos. In his case, the crime was not accurately labelling his videos.The problem is, that these [social] media channels can change their policies at anytime, based on which way the wind is blowing and via artificial intelligence (AI) and personal opinion, retroactively apply their new standards after you have agreed to the new terms. However, there is no choice but to agree, within a certain time frame after a content creator is informed typically, if you want to continue to have a presence on a platform.

Whilst large organisations can ensure that all their previous content complies, it is not possible for small and volunteer organisations to do so. Analysing 1000s of hours of work to look for non compliance is easy for AI or a big workforce, but not for the average user (on that note , there is a very large business opportunity there for someone).In the past year, several community interest postings made to MFMP Facebook and Twitter platforms were censored, also videos on Youtube were de-monetised and clearly de-boosted, media and links that could have saved 10,000s lives if they were allowed fair distribution. This has accelerated since the summer of 2020 and as my work iterates towards the true nature of this amazing technology, the risk is too high to the other content present and searchable on these platforms to continue to post there. To do so would compound the risk of a de-platforming in the future.Moreover, work is often lost in the social media noise and only posted to a fraction of followers unless the posting is paid for and there is no funds for that.

I cannot, in good conscience, continue to gift my labour to organisations where the product of that labour is profited off and is at the mercy of third party whims. I am exercising my free will, to choose the time when my presence on these platforms stops, and for the so-called ‘social media’ platforms of Facebook and Twitter, that time has come.

Other MFMP members are welcome to post as they please, but as of 7th Jan 2021, this will be my last post of my work on Facebook and Twitter.

Great things are coming…

…and I’d like you to join in the journey, to keep up to date with my work, please subscribe to my substack for free here

RemoteView.icu

You can choose to be notified, or not, of new postings and if you do want them, you will get them, in your inbox guaranteed, so they cannot be memory holed and you can review them at anytime in the future when you choose. The site is fast on desktops and smart devices and has no adverts. It also has a comments system where you can add commentary and ask further questions.

This is my choice to not be beholden to a corporation, or to be an enabler of a new form of oligarchy, that may at anytime, remove my voice and the evidence of the science I wish to share.

Bob Greenyer

For those that are wondering, why I called this newsletter and podcast “Remote View” well, it is not by accident. If you asked me what ‘remote viewing’ was in 2016, I wouldn’t know what you were talking about, actually, I still don’t know much.

What I have always known though, is that throughout my life, from a very early age, I have periodically had a weird feeling and sensation come over me and a sudden realisation. I cannot control it and it is independent of my level of tiredness, mood or health etc. though I often, but not always, feel at peace when it occurs. It’s just something I recognise as it happens. Sometimes, it is about an imminent event, other times, it will be for something that will occur in a few years time. It is not always something that will happen to me, or around me, or to those that are close to me. I would say that I was a clairvoyant however, I have never felt I could control it, though I never tried. It just happened and sometimes I dwelt on it, revealed it to others, even wrote a film treatment about one event and at other times I put the thoughts out of my mind.

It was not until a few years back that I heard the term ‘remote viewing’ for the first time. It was in a YouTube video I chanced upon, of a presentation by a man I had not come across before, Russel Targ. In the video, Russell referred to his colleague in this work, Harold Puthoff. This lead me down a rabbit hole, the end of which came when a heard a salient feature of this so called ‘remote viewing’ that I recognised. That was that the event had to be significant, either personally or globally, for instance.

Immediately, I realised that every one of these ‘visions’ I had experienced were significant on some level. In the course of the coming years, I will periodically drop into this newsletter accounts of some of my experiences and I would encourage you all to share events in your own lives where you had a sense before hand that a specific thing was to occur.

The First Time

The very first of these feelings for me was when I was very young, I’d like to say 4 or 5, but one knows how memory can play tricks on us. It reoccurred over years, which is unusual as these feelings only normally happen once on a particular subject, but perhaps it was due to the fact that, what I was foreseeing, was not a moment in time, but a period. I remember it felt very uncomfortable. What I felt was that I would be required to do something in my 40s and that it would be difficult, there would be all kinds of challenges, but that it would be a worthwhile endeavour in the end.

The Start of the Period

I had organised to go visit the love of my life in Vietnam from the UK to arrive on the 11th August 2012. She new I really wanted to go to a conference in South Korea, but that it was during the same dates as our time together and I really did not have the funds to go anyway. A few weeks before I was due to fly to see her, she phoned me and completely unexpectedly said - “hey, I know you want to come to see me, however I have bought you a round trip from Hanoi to Seoul - so you can go to the conference.” I was stunned, I knew in that moment, she was the one for me.

I therefore attended the 17th International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF-17) between the 12 and 17th August 2012, where the idea for the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project was born and on the 15th, the domain ‘QuantumHeat.org’ was secured. I even managed to change my return flights, so that I was able to spend time in Vietnam also.

By the last week of September, I had built the project’s website and I had just turned 40 years old.

Psychic Spies

Little did I know that in just over a year from starting my journey, on 31st October 2013, our project would be offerred support by EarthTech Texas, USA. It was not until 28th January 2017 that I found out this was an organisation set up by Dr. Harold Puthoff, a leader of the USA’s psychic spy program.

In March 2015, I met Dr. Alexander Parkhomov in Moscow, Russia, he gave me his 2009 book SPACE. EARTH. HUMAN. New views on science

Unfortunately, as it was in Russian I could not read it. By late 2018, I had realised that it may be significant and that I needed to be able to read it and so I organised a Kickstarter to help me get it translated and updated.

When I started to review the translation of the 4th chapter in late September 2019, I found that it actually referred to his earliest work discussed in the book. It occurred to me that Dr. Parkhomov was a leader in the Soviet Union’s Psychic spy program.

What are the chances?

This is Bob Greenyer saying thanks for your time - please tell your friends about RemoteView.icu where I’ll be introducing some very thought provoking material from experience and insight, across time and space.

Hi everyone, it’s Bob Greenyer with Remote View and firstly I would like to say thank you to all those that have joined this place where we’ll be able to discuss a range of interesting topics.

As of 18th November 2020, 48 have signed up to the mailing list, of which 17 have subscribed, so a huge thank you to you all.

There is so much I want to get into, but one of the first things I must do is rough out the paper that will be submitted as the supporting text to my Russian presentation called ‘The Monopole Clutch’,  as the deadline for that is the 1st December 2020. Over the next couple of weeks, I will produce a series of small posts that will address the topics I raised in that presentation as part of the writing process.

I’d like to try something with you all - a kind of peer review in reverse. Normally when one submits a paper, it goes through a review process where qualified reviewers ask questions about what is written in the text and challenge its contents. What I would like you to do, is to review the ‘The Monopole Clutch’ video on the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project’s YouTube Channel, the link for which I have given in the text below this podcast and propose things that I should clarify or questions that you feel need to be addressed.

I think this will be a good opportunity to ensure that the paper discusses what it needs to, as well as testing out the commenting system here.

Thanks so much in advance.

Bob

“Remote View” is a technology, philosophy and commentary newsletter and podcast by me, Bob Greenyer, ‘Looking back to the future through insight and critical fiction’.

Sign up now so you don’t miss the first issue.

Welcome your friends to the discussion

Transcript below

Hi, my name is Bob Greenyer.

Over the years I have worked in the pharmaceutical industry, the advertising industry and the banking industry and in each case, I chose to leave or resign my high paying roles due to what was clear to me to be at best morally abhorrent behaviour. I then decided to become a free-lancer with a small project development team so that I could choose to work on technology and media projects that I felt stimulating and beneficial for the community.

Since 2012 I have been volunteering in the field of what is called low energy nuclear reactions (LENR). At the beginning of my journey, I could never have imagined where the exploration of this science would take me, but it is clear now that we are well on the way to understanding an eternally existent hook into the fabric of nature, which will enable the kinds of technology one has only normally considered the realm of science fiction and magic.

I like to expose myself to views across the spectrum and debate them in the realms of science, community and other areas of life that are generally important to a well functioning society. What I have seen in the history of the science I have spent the last 8 years researching, is irrefutable evidence of censorship, cliques and bad actors, including self censorship. In recent years, I was shocked when a good friend had their video sharing channel removed, it had nearly a decade of contributions totally 4700 videos.

The retro-active application of new restrictions on user generated content on social media, is leading to the memory hole binning of millions of man-years of critical thinking, commentary, analysis and research. This process accelerated in 2020 to the point that any content generator that is not producing media that aligns with accepted thought and established norms is at risk of having their ability to share ideas, realisations or discovery curtailed.

I am very aware that my research and insights may be controversial to some and the implications are potentially civilisation changing, so I have to find a path to both reach interested parties in a direct way and ensure that my work is sustainable and ultimately delivers media that is protected from digital destruction.

On the 12th December 2015, I appealed to the community to help support my full time volunteering via a GoFundMe. I calculated that I could just about get by on 25,000 pounds a year. Since that appeal, 50 generous donors have supported me to the tune of just over 11,000 pounds, to which I am very appreciative. Some other donors helped me in other ways, like when my laptop failed or my home heating died. I guess in the past 5 years I have received about 15,000 pounds total.

I actually want to produce more content, share more ideas and find ways to deliver more inspiring technology concepts and stories to the community. Therefore I am asking you dear listener to help me do this by subscribing to my newsletter. There will be two tiers for subscription:

* Firstly, all those that subscribe, will always get access to free content, to include alerts to educational videos I publish at the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project youtube channel and steemit.com/@mfmp blogging channel.

* Secondly, those that subscribe on a monthly or yearly paid basis will have access to new podcasts and articles and also, first looks at developing research ideas, analysis and segments of research papers being developed. Some of this will eventually become videos or other media for the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, however, I want to also be able to share other concepts and ideas in other areas that is outside the aims of the MFMP.

The blogging platform allows subscribers to comment on all articles they have access to, so we can have a discussion and debate and you can suggest things for me to consider. Expect me to say some very controversial things from time to time that some may consider border on science fiction.

Limited time special offer

For those that want to get a reduced subscription rate in perpetuity, until the end of November 2020, I will have the monthly subscription set at the minimum possible of $5 and the annual at $50. From the beginning of December 2020, this will rise to $7 and $70 respectively , those that subscribe at the lower rate will keep their lower rate.

To my dear supporters

In recognition of those that have helped me personally, I will give a year long subscription to all those that have donated $50 or more to my personal GoFundMe.

What I will receive

The combined newsletter and podcast is hosted on substack.com and between them and the stripe payment provider, I will receive  $4.07 out of $5 for a single monthly subscription. For those that want to pay more for an annual subscription, there is a means to do that.

So join the club and why not welcome your friends too

“Remote View” is a technology, philosophy and commentary newsletter and podcast by me, Bob Greenyer, where I’ll be ‘Looking back to the future through insight and critical fiction’.Please join the discussion at remoteview.icu