Reviewer 2 does geoengineering

Reviewer 2 does geoengineering

By Andrew LockleyTechnology
Download on the App Store

Reviewer 2 does geoengineering episodes

  • Getting it up - Wake Smith
    Wake Smith explains two recent papers on aviation to @geoengineering1. The first deals with low altitude (13kms) polar deployment, using existing aircraft concepts. The second deals with deployment at 25kms, which adds cost and complexity over the usual 20kms injection patterns in the literature. Links https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1663044/v1 and https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/ac4f5d
    1 hr 7 min
  • Carbon negative oil - Wilson
    It's all about fracking! Sasha Wilson explains carbon negative oil to the covid-zombie formerly known as @geoengineering1. Paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292722001494
    Unlocking the potential of hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water for CO2 removal via mineral carbonation
    Bizhou Zhu, Siobhan A. Wilson, Nina Zeyen, Maija J. Raudsepp, Ashkan Zolfaghari, Baolin Wang, Ben J. Rostron, Katherine N. Snihur, Konstantinvon Gunten, Anna L. Harrison, Daniel S. Alessi
    1 hr 8 min
  • Using tropospheric COS emissions for SRM - Quaglia
    Ilaria Quaglia explains what's potentially the most important SRM paper in over 10 years to @geoengineering1 Paper: https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5757/2022/
    An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide
    Ilaria Quaglia, Daniele Visioni, Giovanni Pitari, and Ben Kravitz
    24 min
  • When to quit researching MCB - Diamond
    Michael Diamond gives a very one-sided interview with a muted @geoengineering1, explaining when we should stop researching MCB. Paper: To assess marine cloud brightening's technical feasibility, we need to know what to study—and when to stop
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118379119
    52 min
  • Space mirrors: experts' views - Baum
    Chad M. Baum discusses his expert elicitation work on space mirrors. (Reading list / glossary below paper link) Paper: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
    Volume 158, April 2022, 112179
    Between the sun and us: Expert perceptions on the innovation, policy, and deep uncertainties of space-based solar geoengineering
    Authors: Chad M.Baum, Sean Low; Benjamin K.Sovacool.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112179.
    Acronyms
    CDR Carbon Dioxide Removal
    GEO Geosynchronous Orbit
    GENIE (project) GeoEngineering and Negative Emissions Pathways in Europe
    IPSS Inter Planetary Sun Shade
    ISS International Space Station
    LEO Low-Earth Orbit
    NETs Negative Emissions Technologies
    RSER (journal) Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (since I messed it up initially)
    SAI Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
    SEL Sun-Earth Lagrange point
    SRM Solar Radiation Management
    Other peer-reviewed articles from the GENIE project:
    Low, S., Baum, C.M., & Sovacool, B.K. (2022). Rethinking Net-Zero systems, spaces, and societies: “Hard” versus “soft” alternatives for nature-based and engineered carbon removal. Global Environmental Change, 75, 102530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102530
    Low, S., Baum, C. M., & Sovacool, B. K. (2022). Taking it outside: Exploring social opposition to 21 early-stage experiments in radical climate interventions. Energy Research & Social Science, 90, 102594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102594
    Sovacool, B.K., Baum, C.M., & Low, S. (2022). Risk-risk governance in a low-carbon future: Exploring institutional, technological, and behavioral tradeoffs in climate geoengineering pathways. Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13932
    Solar sails:
    Matloff, G., Bangs, C., & Johnson, L. (2014). Harvesting Space for a Greener Earth. Springer: Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9426-3
    Roy, K I. (2001). “Solar Sails: An Answer to Global Warming?” presented at STAIF 2001 Albuquerque, NM, February 11-14. Available at: http://www.ultimax.com/whitepapers/2001_3a.html.
    On some of the more interesting proposals, these are relevant:
    Kennedy, R. G., Roy, K. I., & Fields, D. E. (2013). Dyson Dots: Changing the solar constant to a variable with photovoltaic lightsails. Acta Astronautica, 82(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.10.022
    Angel, R. (2006). Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 17184-9.
    IRS and Airbus (2020). International Planetary Sun Shield (IPSS) - Gigasails in Space. IPSS High-level Concept. The Institute of Space Systems (IRS) and Airbus Defence & Space: Bremen, Germany
    And concerning modelling studies, here are the two I specified:
    Lunt, D. J., Ridgwell, A., Valdes, P. J., & Seale, A. (2008). “Sunshade World”: A fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(12), L12710. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033674
    Sánchez, J.-P., & McInnes, C.R. (2015). Optimal Sunshade Configurations for Space-Based Geoengineering near the Sun-Earth L1 Point, PLoS One, 10(8), e0136648.
    Various SciFi ones:
    https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250264930/sweepofstars
    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13651.The_Dispossessed (and what failed me in the moment, was The Hainish Cycle, as the name for the whole series)
    https://www.kimstanleyrobinson.info/content/mars-trilogy
    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/414999.Childhood_s_End
    1 hr 8 min
  • Moral hazard & sunk costs - Grant
    Will Grant explores moral hazard, and capital & cultural lock in. Hosted by Aryan Gupta https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614529211069839
    What do we mean when we talk about the moral hazard of geoengineering?
    Katelyn Tsipiras, Will J. Grant
    36 min
  • Ozone changes in GeoMIP - Tilmes
    Simone Tilmes discusses ozone changes in the geoengineering model Intercomparison project (GeoMIP) with @geoengineering1. Paper: https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4557/2022/
    Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations
    Simone Tilmes, Daniele Visioni, Andy Jones, James Haywood, Roland Séférian, Pierre Nabat, Olivier Boucher, Ewa Monica Bednarz, and Ulrike Niemeier
    1 hr 7 min
  • Low-carbon DAC heat (& fibre sorbents) - Realff
    In this fact-packed monster episode, Matthew Realff brings news of Georgia Tech's amazing fibre DAC sorbents. Then he EVENTUALLY gets round to talking about his actual paper, as well as explaining lots about the fundamental cost and energy efficiency limits of DAC. @geoengineering1 was loving all the new info. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ghg.2136
    Assessing the physical potential capacity of direct air capture with integrated supply of low-carbon energy sources
    Steffen Fahr, Julian Powell, Alice Favero, Anthony J. Giarrusso, Ryan P. Lively, Matthew J. Realff
    1 hr 39 min
  • Governing novel environmental technologies - Rabitz
    Florian Rabitz speaks to @geoengineering1 about AI, gene drives, SRM and how these can be regulated. Paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000039
    A preliminary framework for understanding the governance of novel environmental technologies: Ambiguity, indeterminateness and drift;
    Florian Rabitz, Marian Feist, Matthias Honegger, Joshua Horton, Sikina Jinnah, Jesse Reynolds
    1 hr 9 min
  • Pimp my CDR - Deschamps on vacuum swing optimization
    Thomas Deschamps explains to @geoengineering1 how to race-tune the Climeworks DAC plant, using Aspen chemical engineering software. Paper: Modeling of Vacuum Temperature Swing Adsorption for Direct Air Capture Using Aspen Adsorption
    https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4020015
    1 hr 8 min

About Reviewer 2 does geoengineering

From the publisher's feed

Reviewer 2 quibbles with actual experts in Solar Radiation Modification and Carbon Dioxide Removal, before rejecting their work on spurious, spiteful and capricious grounds. You'd expect nothing less…