Risk Roundup

John Saucer, Vice President of Research and Analysis at Mobius Risk Group participates in Risk Roundup to discuss Global Energy Markets and Security Risks.

When we look at the advances in energy technology — especially in oil and gas, renewables, nuclear, and other emerging sectors, there is clear and visible evidence that advances in technology have changed the geopolitics of the energy industry dramatically and rapidly. It is due to the advances in energy technology that nations have now made a convincing move from an era of energy resource scarcity to an era of energy resource abundance. As a result, the geographical concentration of energy resources is now replaced with the universality of its access, causing energy markets and security risks.

However, the most important development in the global energy markets is perhaps the weakening of oil and gas monopoly–as oil and gas do not hold the monopoly power anymore. This is mainly because of the stiff competition between shale, oil, renewables, nuclear and other sectors of energy that is intensifying and becoming very rewarding to consumers.

Having said that, the rapidly changing geopolitics of energy security is still a bitter reminder that the supposedly golden age of energy security, where each nation will have the ability to secure affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy supplies, to maintain their respective nation’s power requirement is still more of an illusion!

Even today, in a digital global age, “energy security” is a complex challenge. So the question that comes to mind is “Are each nation’s energy security challenges the same”? Perhaps not, as global energy security challenges are very unique and very different for each and every nation.

So when we evaluate “energy security” in a digital global age, the biggest obstacle to energy security is not a lack of energy resources; there is plenty of energy (both fossil and non-fossil) resources all across nations. It is the policy choices that nations make, and how they manage their security risks that have always impacted and will always impact the energy security of each nation, not only today but also in the coming tomorrow. Time is now to talk about energy markets and security risks.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

John is the Vice President of Research and Analysis at Mobius Risk Group.

His research focuses on commodity markets, derivatives, fundamental research, risk and discretionary portfolio management, global energy markets, trading, and risk management.

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

The post Energy Markets And Security Risks appeared first on Risk Group.

Prof. Valerio De Luca, Director of Global Security and Foreign Affairs program, a joint program Academy Aises and American studies center of Rome participates in Risk Roundup to discuss The Digital Global Age – Contested Commons.

The revolution in information, communication and digitalization technologies, processes, and connected computers are altering everything in cyberspace, geospace, and space. Everything is changing: from how we communicate to how we work, how we bank, how we shop, how we teach and how we go to war, and much more.

The emergence of this whole new world of cyberspace has given nations: its governments, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA) great opportunity as well as a great risk.

The evolution in cyberspace will offer each nation as many opportunities as it does challenges! The world is undergoing a profound and perhaps permanent shift in the relative balance of power among nations: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA).

The connected computers, information technology, and digitalization capability of information that is revolutionizing every aspect of NGIOA—have leveled the opportunity playing field and brought nations a possibility of progress, prosperity, and pride. What needs to be seen is whether, in the leveled opportunity playing field, nations will be able to compete and lay a new foundation for lasting prosperity or decline and descent.

In cyberspace, what is common to all is access to technology and information. But what is not common is how one uses that information, for what purpose and goals. While the internet and connected computers have given nations the same starting point in access to technology, information, and opportunity, there are many other variables that will determine whether a nation will be able to use the opportunity and information to develop, progress, and succeed.

So the question is, what can nations: their government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA) do independently and collectively to improve their competitive and innovative positions in the world, thereby tipping the scale of cyberspace in its favor? Time is now to talk about the digital global age-contested commons.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

Prof. Valerio De Luca, Director of Global Security and Foreign Affairs program, a joint program Academy Aises and American studies center of Rome. He is also the Secretary-General at DIPLOMATIA, Rome, and Executive President at LEADER PLATFORM, London.

He is also the Founder and Chairman of the International Academy for Social and Economic Development (AISES) and Director of the Global Rules Ethics and Economics Network (G.R.E.E.N.), which involves research centers at London School of Economics, Science Po of Paris, La Sapienza University of Rome, Strathmore Business School of Nairobi.

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

Future of Work – Battle between Human Work Force and Machine Work Force

The post The Digital Global Age – Contested Commons appeared first on Risk Group.

David Moschella from Leading Edge Forum participates in Risk Roundup to discuss Machine Intelligence Impact on Human Society.

When individuals and entities across nations: its government, industries, organizations, and academia are presented with a new innovation, new technology, or new way of doing things, a number of factors influence their decision-making process.

Now when we evaluate Artificial Intelligence (AI) from the perspective of whether this extraordinary innovation will be accepted by nations: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA), it brings forth very complex challenges and independent and interdependent security risks that will likely be very difficult to manage for any NGIOA.

It is certain that the potential of AI realized will likely depend on how it is understood and received by NGIOA, its social and political impact, understanding of the benefits and risks, and willingness on part of NGIOA to accept the fundamental changes brought on by the AI.  In short, the potential of AI will be heavily influenced by individual human choice and opinion.

Generally, an “individual”, a “human being”, a “common man” across nations is largely taken for granted when it comes to technology trends or acceptance. However, when it comes to AI, nations should not make any mistake of taking the “common man”, an “individual” component of a nation for granted.

While some studies are underway to understand the effects of artificial intelligence on society, including efforts to understand its effects on the economy, war, crime, jobs, and so on, we, the humans still have to understand how will we reshape human roles, responsibilities, purpose, and plan. Time is now to talk about Machine Intelligence’s impact on human society.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

David Moschella is the Research Director at Leading Edge Forum

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

Machine Learning Based Market Forecasting
Machine Learning on Insurance Data to Predict Hospitalization
Future of Work – Battle between Human Work Force and Machine Work Force
Machine Learning Bias – An Existential Risk
Understanding Cognitive Computing
Cloud Powered Artificial Intelligence Platform
Blockchain & Machine Learning Based Content Platform
Powering Collective Human Intelligence
Collective Intelligence
Collective Machine Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence based Healthcare System
Machine Learning for Medical Diagnosis
Science of Intelligence – Human Intelligence to Computational Intelligence
How will Deep Learning Disrupt Financial Sector?
Social Media Based Predictive Analytics
Credit Scoring using Machine Learning
Cancer Detection to Credit Lending – Intelligent Machine Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Advances in Artificial Intelligence – Human and Non-Human Gesture and Action Recognition
Financial Industry Moves Towards Artificial Intelligence Based Machines
Man-Machine Interaction – Communicating with Computers
The Rise of Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence driven Cyber-Security
Advances in Artificial Intelligence – Human and Non-Human Gesture and Action Recognition
Agricultural Robots
Computational Intelligence & Security Risks
Business Logic Monitoring and Automation
Societal Impact of Robotics
Enterprise Digital Intelligence Risks – Need for Smarter Search Tools

The post Machine Intelligence Impact On Human Society appeared first on Risk Group.

Adrian Pearmine, National Director for Smart Cities and Connected Vehicles (DKS Associates) participates in Risk Roundup to discuss Automotive Cyber- Security Risks.

When millions of automobiles are being intertwined into a network of connected devices to the internet, the increasing incorporation of in-vehicle computer systems is with a hope that connected automobiles, will take nations toward a mode of transport, that is safer, smarter, and more efficient for its citizens. However, it also simultaneously increases many new concerns and questions about cyber-security and privacy.

As of today, nations lack an effective, security-centric, infrastructure and framework for the “automobile industry”. In the absence of an effective, integrated, security-centric risk management framework, infrastructure, tools, technologies, and processes; the computer code, connected computers, and information, communication, and digitalization technologies seem to be creating a perfect formulation for cyber-attacks, espionage, and ransom.

The digital global age has brought us the reality that connected cars and security breaches are becoming an actuality of life. When the security vulnerability of one entity or industry, has the potential, to negatively impact, assets in cyberspace, geospace, and space (CGS); managing the security risks become a fundamental necessity for each nation: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA).

So the big question, today is, when the level of, sophistication, and brilliance, among cyber-criminals are getting similar, if not more, with the cyber defense community, how do we secure automobiles or anything that is connected to the internet? Now is the time to talk about Automotive Cyber-Security Risks.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

Adrian Pearmine is the National Director for Smart Cities and Connected Vehicles.

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

Securing Internet of Things (IoTs) in a Post Quantum Computer Era
Securing the Internet of Things using Blockchain Convergence
The Convergence of Blockchain and Internet of Things
Emerging Technologies Geopolitics
4G/5G Wireless and Internet of Things Security
Internet of Things to Internet of Everything
Will Blockchain Secure the Internet of Things
The Outcome Economy Unleashing the Potential of Internet of Things
Embracing the Internet of Things
Complex Security Challenges of Critical Infrastructure Protection
Securing The Internet of Things (IoT)
What is Internet of Things
Securing Internet of Things : Government Readiness

The post Automotive Cyber- Security Risks appeared first on Risk Group.

David Moon, Chief Executive Officer @ Tripath Media participates in Risk Roundup to discuss Cyber-Security Risks Beyond Technology – Human Factor.

Cyberspace has brought complex, chaotic, and challenging times for each nation: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA) in cyberspace, geospace, and space (CGS). As cyberspace gets deeply embedded across geospace and space, its crowded interconnections with each component of a nation: that is its government, industries, organizations, and academia are catching nations off guard.

These interconnections and inter-dependencies are raising an important question, on whether our understanding of security risks is adequate and whether our current security risk management framework, tools, technologies, approach, and processes are effective in managing the integrated security risks of NGIOA in CGS.

Across nations, there is an intense effort going on to manage the security risks of cyberspace. Significant investment is pouring into developing technology that can secure cyberspace. While hi-tech efforts in technology development and deployment are ongoing- (and in spite of all the advances in cyber-security technology), most entities across NGIOA are still faced with complex security risks – that cannot be reduced or eliminated.

As cyberspace shifts the security landscape rapidly, the traditional security perimeters that technology leaders relied upon are becoming outdated, fragmented, and ineffective due to the complex inter-dependencies cyberspace brings to NGIOA in geospace and space.

These complex inter-dependencies raise critical security risks that vary by the enterprise, by industry, by leadership, by the approach, and much more. So what are these security risks that go beyond Technology? How does it impact you, your entity, your industry, and the nation?

Time is now to talk about cyber-security risks beyond technology.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

About the Guest
David Moon is the Chief Executive Officer @ Tripath Media

About Risk Group

Risk Group is a strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

Changing Face of Communication – 2018 Trends and Predictions
Cyber Crimes and Laws Challenges
Catastrophic Impact of Cyber Crimes
Password Protection
Cyber Future
Asymmetrical Hybrid Warfare
Cyber-Security Risk Intelligence
Medical Device Security Risks
Challenges of Confined Space Security in Securing Stadiums
Automated Penetration Testing
Advanced Phishing Attacks
Brain Fingerprinting- Science for Security
Cyber Underground and Deep Web
Web Application Security
Corporate Boards Need Cyber-Security Expertise
Encryption Driven Data Security
Complex Security Risks of 4G to 5G Evolution
How to Prevent Cyber-Crimes
Digital Communication – Current State, Trends, Risks and Opportunities
Understanding Data Security Risks
Cyber-Security Risks Beyond Technology – Human Factor
The Democratization of Encryption
Growing Risks of Cyber-Crime, Cyber-Terrorism and Cyber-Warfare
Digital Government fit for a Digital Global Age
Traditional Anti-Malware Software Effectiveness
The New World of Cyber-warfare
Growing Risks of Network Security
Mobile Security Risks
Security First Architecture
Encryption and Security Risks
Technology Super Convergence and Security Risks
Economic Impact of  Cyber-Security Risks
Data Security Risks
Information Security Risks
Energy Cyber-Security Risks
Enterprise Security Risks

The post Cyber-Security Risks Beyond Technology – Human Factor appeared first on Risk Group.

Michael Frey (Co-Founder/CEO FACT Encryption) and Michael Goldstein (Co-Founder/President of FACT-Encryption) from Germany participate in Risk Roundup to discuss The Democratization of Encryption.

The digital global age has brought nations the democratization of encryption.  Each nation: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA) now faces a situation where almost everyone has access to advanced encryption in their electronics watches, phones, ipads, laptops, and more. What does this accessibility, affordability, and effectiveness of “encryption” mean for nations’ governance, defense, and security?

Encryption is not a new innovation or a phenomenon of a digital global age. Nations: its governments, military, businesses, and even individuals have been communicating with unique codes and signs for thousands of years, using basic encryption methods to protect trade secrets, nation secrets, defense secrets, personal secrets, and more. Digital Global Age has however promoted and popularized strong encryption and anonymity across nations: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA).

When across nations today, connected computers and the digital global age allow each internet user, each individual, each common man the ability to encrypt their most basic transactions and communications, their private and personal data and communication which are undecipherable without accurate keys, it brings complex security challenges to nations governance.

At the same time when security breaches seem to be regularly making the news, lack of effective encryption of data at rest and data in motion becomes a cause of concern for national security.

While there are some efforts to demonize strong encryption, it is important to evaluate whether nations should restrict strong encryption and anonymity, which fundamentally facilitates and enables the rights to freedom of opinion and expression to each and every individual across nations in cyberspace and geospace. Time is now to discuss the democratization of encryption.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

About the Guests

Michael Frey is the Co-Founder/CEO of FACT Encryption located in Germany.  Michael Goldstein is the Co-Founder/President of FACT-Encryption located in Germany.

About Risk Group

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

Changing Face of Communication – 2018 Trends and Predictions
Cyber Crimes and Laws Challenges
Catastrophic Impact of Cyber Crimes
Password Protection
Cyber Future
Asymmetrical Hybrid Warfare
Cyber-Security Risk Intelligence
Medical Device Security Risks
Challenges of Confined Space Security in Securing Stadiums
Automated Penetration Testing
Advanced Phishing Attacks
Brain Fingerprinting- Science for Security
Cyber Underground and Deep Web
Web Application Security
Corporate Boards Need Cyber-Security Expertise
Encryption Driven Data Security
Complex Security Risks of 4G to 5G Evolution
How to Prevent Cyber-Crimes
Digital Communication – Current State, Trends, Risks and Opportunities
Understanding Data Security Risks
Cyber-Security Risks Beyond Technology – Human Factor
Growing Risks of Cyber-Crime, Cyber-Terrorism and Cyber-Warfare
Digital Government fit for a Digital Global Age
Traditional Anti-Malware Software Effectiveness
The New World of Cyber-warfare
Growing Risks of Network Security
Mobile Security Risks
Security First Architecture
Encryption and Security Risks
Technology Super Convergence and Security Risks
Economic Impact of  Cyber-Security Risks
Data Security Risks
Information Security Risks
Energy Cyber-Security Risks
Enterprise Security Risks

The post The Democratization Of Encryption appeared first on Risk Group.

James McFarlin, Author on Cyber-Security and Cyber-Warfare, participates in Risk Roundup  to discuss Growing Risks of Cyber-Crime, Cyber-Terrorism, and Cyber-Warfare

As Panama Papers begin to trigger mass protests, the biggest ever leak of “secret data information” is causing chills across nations!

While the computer code, connected computers, information, communications, and digitalization technology, and internet have brought a positive impact on all aspects of nations: its government, industries, organizations (NGIOA), academia, and human life, it has also brought new vulnerabilities to each and every component of a nation, our society, and human life in cyberspace, geospace, and space (CGS).

In addition to cyber-activism, cybercrime, and cyber-terrorism, there is a vicious power struggle raging on in cyberspace. This new cyber battleground is full of unknowns, including major players, minor players, rules of war, and reasons for war. In these cyber- battlefields, the war casualties have been quietly piling up. It seems every nation: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA) has been hit and is at risk of being hit. No one is being spared, including common citizens.

This cyber battleground brings each NGIOA, the good, the bad, and the unknown.

With the world getting immersed in rapid advances in artificial intelligence, information, communication, and digitalization technology, the activities in cyberspace have become inseparable from activities in geospace and space. The blurring boundaries of cyberspace with geospace and space has pushed each nation to a significant decision point today, as they must continue to defend their current systems and networks in the geospace and space, while simultaneously struggle, to get out in front of their challenges and competitors in the cyberspace.

So, when computer code, connected computers, and the internet fundamentally transform warfare between nations, the new reality of cybercrime, cyber terrorism, and cyberwar are causing panic across NGIOA-I.

So the question is how can any nation contain the threats posed by human and non-human intelligence, computer code, connected computers, information and communication technology, and the internet? Time is now to talk about cyber-crime, cyber-terrorism, and cyber-warfare.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

James McFarlin is a national speaker and author on cyber-security and cyber-warfare.

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

The post Growing Risks Of Cyber-Crime, Cyber-Terrorism, And Cyber-Warfare appeared first on Risk Group.

Mark Bernard, Author of the NIST Cyber-Security Foundation, Canada participates in Risk Roundup to discuss the Need for an Effective Cyber-Security Risk Management Framework.

The rapid advances in cyberspace are bringing complex, chaotic, and challenging times for each nation: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA) in cyberspace, geospace, and space (CGS).

As cyberspace is getting deeply embedded across each component of a nation: that is its government, industries, organizations, and academia, its crowded interconnections within and across NGIOA in CGS are catching nations off guard.

These interconnections and interdependencies raise an important question, on whether our current risk management framework, tools, technologies, and processes are effective in managing the security risks within and across nations’ geographical boundaries in cyberspace, geospace, and space.

How can we visualize and understand the complexity of cyberspace and its interconnections? In simple terms, cyberspace can be visualized as a neural network of a human brain—that runs through all the components of a nation, enabling them to connect, communicate, collaborate, and function. Each connection and its interconnectedness and interdependencies within and across the CGS network brings its own security challenges.  Managing the security risks of this complex digital neural network is vital for each NGIOA.

The independent and interdependent cyberspace, geospace, and space bring each individual and entity across NGIOA risks and risks are inevitable. So what are these risks and how do we identify, understand, evaluate and manage them? It is time to discuss the need for an effective cyber-security risk management framework.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

Mark Bernard is a cyber-security thought leader, author of the NIST cyber-security foundation and practitioner courses, Canada.

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

Cyber-Security- 2018 Trends and Predictions
Competitive Intelligence and Risk Management
Blockchain Based Risk Transfer
Security- Centric Integrated Risk Management Framework
Security Centric Integrated Risk Management Framework
Triangular Linkages between Risk Management, Security and Peace

The post Need For An Effective Cyber-Security Risk Management Framework appeared first on Risk Group.

Prof. Jack Pitney, a Claremont Mckenna Professor of American Politics participates in Risk Roundup to discuss Digital Government fit for a Digital Global Age.

The rapidly evolving digital technological landscape is bringing both an opportunity as well as a challenge for each and every component of a nation—and the government is no exception. Like every other component of a nation: industries, organizations, academia, and individuals, the promise and expectations of the digital global age are pushing the governments at all levels, across nations, to deliver public services, in a cost-effective, efficient and accessible manner.

Building a government, governance model and integrated governance framework that is data-driven and fit for a digital global age requires each nation and its innovators to think beyond political ideology, divide, computer code, technology, or the internet.

To meet the needs of the time and to keep up with the pace of change in ideas, innovation, and technology, innovators across some nations have already begun to experiment with ideas and innovation for better and effective data-centric digital governance models. However, the inter-connectedness and inter-dependencies of a digital global age require each government at every level (global /regional/ national/ local) to securely design their governance systems for interoperability at all levels within, between, and across nations boundaries in cyberspace, geospace, and space (CGS). Time is now to talk about digital government fit for a digital global age.

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

John J. Pitney Jr. is the Roy P. Crocker Professor of American Politics at Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, California. He received his B.A. in political science from Union College, where he was co-valedictorian. He earned his Ph.D. in political science at Yale, where he was a National Science Foundation Fellow.

From 1978 to 1980, he worked in the New York State Senate. From 1983 to 1984, as a Congressional Fellow of the American Political Science Association, he worked for Senator Alfonse D’Amato of New York and the House Republican Policy Committee, chaired by Representative Dick Cheney of Wyoming.

From 1984 to 1986, he was a senior domestic policy analyst for the House Republican Research Committee. He joined the Claremont McKenna College faculty in 1986. From 1989 to 1991, during a leave of absence, he worked at the Research Department of the Republican National Committee, first as deputy director, then as an acting director.

He has written articles for The New Republic, The Weekly Standard, The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, and Roll Call, among others. His scholarly works include The Art of Political Warfare, published in 2000 by the University of Oklahoma Press, and (with Joseph M. Bessette), American Government and Politics: Deliberation, Democracy, and Citizenship (Cengage).

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

The post Digital Government Fit For A Digital Global Age appeared first on Risk Group.

Prof. Arun Sood, the CEO @ SCIT Labs and Professor of Computer Science and Director of the International Cyber Center at George Mason University participates in Risk Roundup to discuss Cyber Resilience and Recovery.

Rapid advances in computers, computer code, connected computers and information, communication, and digitization technologies are transforming the ability of each nation: its government, industries, organizations, and academia (NGIOA) to better identify, collect, evaluate, manage and use its information and data as never before in cyberspace, geospace, and space (CGS).

The ongoing rapid advances in the interconnected and inter-dependent digital networks across CGS have removed the traditional communication barriers to effectively share data and information, unleashing the capacity of digital technology to revolutionize the economic, professional, personal, and social lives of each one of us across nations.

This transformative phenomenon has given rise to the cyber ecosystem: a complex and connected cyberspace-geospace and space (CGS) community of interconnected and interacting devices, networks, things, people, and entities across NGIOA: and the environment and ecosystem of its associated infrastructure, processes, and technologies supporting these complex interactions.

While the cyber ecosystem’s ability to simplify the sharing of data and information has simultaneously given each NGIOA its greatest advantage as well as disadvantage, the disadvantages come directly from the security vulnerability of critical infrastructure, and the theft, alteration, manipulation, or destruction of data by criminals or other malicious actors.

Irrespective of geographical location, any localized disruptions in cyberspace or through cyberspace can rapidly trigger a cascading sequence of events that can cause widespread disasters across entire CGS networks and communities. This is a cause of great concern as each entity across NGIOA is been unwillingly and unknowingly exposed to the “unwanted contagion effects” that are prospering in the rapidly expanding cyber ecosystem.

While each entity across NGIOA needs to transform their use of information, communication, and digital technology to maximize benefits, they must also develop cyber resilience: the ability to powerfully resist, react to and recover from potentially catastrophic cyber-security threats, and reshape their CGS environments for increasingly secure and sustainable cyber operations.  How can that be achieved?  How can cyber resilience and recovery be achieved?

For more please watch the Risk Roundup Webcast or hear the Risk Roundup Podcast

Prof. Arun Sood is the CEO of SCIT Labs. He is also a Professor of Computer Science and Director of the International Cyber Center at George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

Risk Group is a leading strategic security risk research and reporting organization.

Copyright Risk Group LLC. All Rights Reserved

Building A Resilient Nation’
Resilience and Security

The post Cyber Resilience And Recovery appeared first on Risk Group.