
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this video, I review and break down one of the most referenced articles in cool-season turfgrass pathology: “Severity of Gray Leaf Spot in Perennial Ryegrass as Influenced by Mowing Height and Nitrogen Level” by Williams, Burrus, and Vincelli (2001).
This study investigated how two major management practices—mowing height and nitrogen rate—affect the intensity of gray leaf spot (Pyricularia grisea) epidemics in perennial ryegrass managed under golf-course conditions.
I walk through the methods, results, and implications of the research, and I discuss how the findings align—or don’t align—with common industry assumptions twenty years later.
🔬 Topics I cover in the review:
The study design and why the researchers chose fairway- and rough-height mowing
💡 Why this article matters today:
👇 Join the discussion:
Do you agree with how the authors interpreted their data?
Share your thoughts in the comments. Critical evaluation of research—new and old—is how we advance turfgrass science and avoid assumptions that fail in the field.
If you enjoy evidence-based turfgrass breakdowns, hit LIKE and SUBSCRIBE.
Become a member of Turfgrass Epistemology and support turfgrass research:
Voicemail:
Apple Podcast
Spotify Podcast
iHeart Radio Podcast
Podbean
Online consulting
Twitter
Email
Turfgrass Programs and Extension Service Information:
By Travis Shaddox4.7
1919 ratings
In this video, I review and break down one of the most referenced articles in cool-season turfgrass pathology: “Severity of Gray Leaf Spot in Perennial Ryegrass as Influenced by Mowing Height and Nitrogen Level” by Williams, Burrus, and Vincelli (2001).
This study investigated how two major management practices—mowing height and nitrogen rate—affect the intensity of gray leaf spot (Pyricularia grisea) epidemics in perennial ryegrass managed under golf-course conditions.
I walk through the methods, results, and implications of the research, and I discuss how the findings align—or don’t align—with common industry assumptions twenty years later.
🔬 Topics I cover in the review:
The study design and why the researchers chose fairway- and rough-height mowing
💡 Why this article matters today:
👇 Join the discussion:
Do you agree with how the authors interpreted their data?
Share your thoughts in the comments. Critical evaluation of research—new and old—is how we advance turfgrass science and avoid assumptions that fail in the field.
If you enjoy evidence-based turfgrass breakdowns, hit LIKE and SUBSCRIBE.
Become a member of Turfgrass Epistemology and support turfgrass research:
Voicemail:
Apple Podcast
Spotify Podcast
iHeart Radio Podcast
Podbean
Online consulting
Twitter
Email
Turfgrass Programs and Extension Service Information:

229,277 Listeners

38,073 Listeners

1,402 Listeners

16 Listeners

9,632 Listeners

45,658 Listeners

15 Listeners

18 Listeners

15,955 Listeners

32 Listeners

41 Listeners

14 Listeners

7 Listeners

48 Listeners

11 Listeners