
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of Turfgrass Epistemology, I critically examine the article “Exploratory Study on the Foliar Incorporation and Stability of Isotopically Labeled Amino Acids Applied to Turfgrass” (Agronomy, 2020) and use it as a case study in how “science” can be used to persuade without truly informing.
On the surface, this paper uses isotopic labeling to show that foliar-applied glutamate can be absorbed and incorporated into creeping bentgrass metabolism. But in this video, I explain why the study’s publication in a predatory journal, its direct funding and involvement by one of the product’s commercial stakeholders, and its failure to follow essential agronomic methodology make it a weak foundation for product claims.
The paper does not measure turf performance, stress tolerance, growth response, or field-level outcomes—yet it is often cited to imply real-world biostimulant benefits. I walk through how mechanistic tracer data can be presented in a way that sounds rigorous while sidestepping the fundamental question: does this improve turf performance in meaningful, reproducible field conditions?
This episode is for golf course superintendents, turfgrass professionals, and lawn care managers who want to understand how conflicts of interest, journal quality, and experimental design influence the credibility of research. Not all published studies are equal—and learning to evaluate methodology is essential for evidence-based turfgrass management.
Subscribe for more deep dives into turfgrass research, critical analysis of industry claims, and discussions focused on how we know what we know.
#Turfgrass #SoilScience #LawnCare #GolfCourseManagement #TurfgrassScience #SoilFertility #CriticalThinking #TurfTok #TurfgrassEpistemology #EvidenceBased #LawnCareTips
📌 https://www.gofundme.com/f/TurfgrassEpistemology
Thank you for being part of this community and for supporting evidence-based turfgrass science.
Join Turfgrass Epistemology to get access to perks:
Voicemail:
Apple Podcast
Spotify Podcast
iHeart Radio Podcast
Podbean
Online consulting
Twitter
Email
Turfgrass Programs and Extension Service Information:
Diagnostic Criteria for Turfgrass Bullshit Disorder:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y_GeVPQ237pzm0ImTP4eVij6I9D0PHPn/view
By Travis Shaddox4.8
2121 ratings
In this episode of Turfgrass Epistemology, I critically examine the article “Exploratory Study on the Foliar Incorporation and Stability of Isotopically Labeled Amino Acids Applied to Turfgrass” (Agronomy, 2020) and use it as a case study in how “science” can be used to persuade without truly informing.
On the surface, this paper uses isotopic labeling to show that foliar-applied glutamate can be absorbed and incorporated into creeping bentgrass metabolism. But in this video, I explain why the study’s publication in a predatory journal, its direct funding and involvement by one of the product’s commercial stakeholders, and its failure to follow essential agronomic methodology make it a weak foundation for product claims.
The paper does not measure turf performance, stress tolerance, growth response, or field-level outcomes—yet it is often cited to imply real-world biostimulant benefits. I walk through how mechanistic tracer data can be presented in a way that sounds rigorous while sidestepping the fundamental question: does this improve turf performance in meaningful, reproducible field conditions?
This episode is for golf course superintendents, turfgrass professionals, and lawn care managers who want to understand how conflicts of interest, journal quality, and experimental design influence the credibility of research. Not all published studies are equal—and learning to evaluate methodology is essential for evidence-based turfgrass management.
Subscribe for more deep dives into turfgrass research, critical analysis of industry claims, and discussions focused on how we know what we know.
#Turfgrass #SoilScience #LawnCare #GolfCourseManagement #TurfgrassScience #SoilFertility #CriticalThinking #TurfTok #TurfgrassEpistemology #EvidenceBased #LawnCareTips
📌 https://www.gofundme.com/f/TurfgrassEpistemology
Thank you for being part of this community and for supporting evidence-based turfgrass science.
Join Turfgrass Epistemology to get access to perks:
Voicemail:
Apple Podcast
Spotify Podcast
iHeart Radio Podcast
Podbean
Online consulting
Twitter
Email
Turfgrass Programs and Extension Service Information:
Diagnostic Criteria for Turfgrass Bullshit Disorder:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y_GeVPQ237pzm0ImTP4eVij6I9D0PHPn/view

793 Listeners

5,461 Listeners

1,359 Listeners

1,730 Listeners

19 Listeners

13 Listeners

14 Listeners

49 Listeners

740 Listeners