This special quickisode unpacks Haddon's 10 energy countermeasures.

This approach provides an alternative or compliment to the hierarchy of control, and focuses directly on eliminating, minimising or marshalling the exchange of hazardous energy.

No specific reference - except for William Haddon Jn's legendary work. Check out his 10 countermeasures:

1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1067540/pdf/injprev00009-0043.pdf
2. http://www.mtpinnacle.com/pdfs/Revisiting%20Haddon%E2%80%99s%20Conceptualization.pdf

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen (PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

We chase certifications, implement systems, but what impact are we really having on operational performance?

Is achieving certification, like ISO 18001 or 45001, really about improving the governance, assurance, or performance of systems, or is it more about window dressing and legitimacy, being seen to be doing the right thing?

Today's pod covers: Dyreborg, J., Thorsen, S. V., Madsen, C. U., & Hasle, P. (2024). Effectiveness of OHSAS 18001 in reducing accidents at work. A follow-up study of 13,102 workplaces. Safety Science, 177, 106573.

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen (PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

We often put leadership on a pedestal - the silver bullet for all organisational ills.

But what does the evidence suggest? What influence does various aspects of leadership have on various organisational safety measures?

This episode explores the research behind leadership, before we move into a couple of more critical leadership studies in future eps.

Today's pod covers: Lyubykh, Z., Turner, N., Hershcovis, M. S., & Deng, C. (2022). A meta-analysis of leadership and workplace safety: Examining relative importance, contextual contingencies, and methodological moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(12), 2149.

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen (PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

Risk in safety is often framed in matrices as likelihood x consequences. It holds an allure of (semi)objectivity - the numbers are the numbers.

But what is the role of emotion and feelings within our risk judgements? Today's article argues that what we 'feel' about risk precedes and influences what we 'think' about risk.

This pod's article is: Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2013). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. In The feeling of risk (pp. 21-36). Routledge.Feel free to shout me a coffee to support my site &podcasts: https://buymeacoffee.com/benhutchinson

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen (PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

Why did they do that, what an idiot! What if our inability to understand the apparent stupidity of an action, after the fact, is more an issue with us, than with the decisions or actions of the person you're judging?

What are better ways--specific tools--to unpack the critical decisions and actions, and make sense of the local rationality of people caught within these situations?

Today's pod unpacks two articles:

1. Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & Macgregor, D. (1989). Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 19(3), 462-472.
2. Roe, L. Why it made sense at the time: Local rationality questions for healthcare investigations.

Feel free to shout me a coffee to support my site &podcasts: https://buymeacoffee.com/benhutchinson

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen (PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

Do construction investigations take broader systems perspectives of accident causation, or stuck in the mud focused on local factors, people and behaviour?

Further, do investigations help organisations navigate complex, often entangled sociotechnical matters, or hinder progress in safety capacities?

Today’s paper is from Woolley, M. J., Goode, N., Read, G. J., & Salmon, P. M. (2019). Have we reached the organisational ceiling? a review of applied accident causation models, methods and contributing factors in construction.  Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 20(5), 533-555.

Feel free to shout me a coffee to support my site &podcasts: https://buymeacoffee.com/benhutchinson

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen (PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

Many organisations rely on their root cause analyses (RCA) to help learn about incidents, and, ideally, prevent incident reoccurrences.

So the logic goes. But does the published evidence support RCA approaches as effective means for preventing incident reoccurrences?

Today's paper is Martin-Delgado, J., Martínez-García, A., Aranaz, J. M., Valencia-Martín, J. L., & Mira, J. J. (2020). How much of root cause analysis translates into improved patient safety: a systematic review. Medical Principles and Practice, 29(6), 524-531.

Feel free to shout me a coffee to support my site &podcasts: https://buymeacoffee.com/benhutchinson

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen (PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

We've all heard about or been part of them - leader walkarounds.

Are walkarounds backed by solid evidence - do they build break down silos, enhance trust, and foster psychological safety, or more symbolic peacocking activities to be *seen* to care, rather than *actually* caring?

Today's article is Foster, M., & Mazur, L. (2023). Impact of leadership walkarounds on operational, cultural and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. BMJ Open Quality, 12(4), e002284.

Feel free to shout me a coffee to support my site &podcasts: https://buymeacoffee.com/benhutchinson

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen (PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

Conventional wisdom suggests investigating and circulating knowledge of near misses. These 'free lessons', so it goes, are supposed to help us learn without the need for injury or damage.

But can near misses also lead to a desensitisation of risk over time, focusing on the achieved success, rather than the near loss?

Today's paper is from Dillon, R. L., & Tinsley, C. H. (2016). Near-miss events, risk messages, and decision making.  Environment Systems and Decisions, 36(1), 34-44.

Feel free to shout me a coffee to support my site &podcasts: https://buymeacoffee.com/benhutchinson

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen(PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and if you find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.

How do you consider the role of people within your barrier or critical control system - threat or adaptable strength?

What are some fallacies of human performance, like being unreliable bad apples, and how best to incorporate the strengths of people, while limiting performance variability?

Today's paper is from McLeod, R. W. (2017). Human factors in barrier management: Hard truths and challenges. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 110, 31-42.

Feel free to shout me a coffee to support my site &podcasts: https://buymeacoffee.com/benhutchinson

More research at SafetyInsights.Org

Intro/Output "Dark Synth Wave" by ElephantGreen(PixaBay.com)

Make sure to subscribe to Safe As on Spotify/Apple, and ifyou find it useful then please help share the news, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

I also have a Safe As LinkedIn group if you want to stay up to date on releases.