The topic of AI comes up a lot for me because I work as a software developer. It's something I see kind of all day, every day. And so I am constantly reflecting on what potential does AI have in the life of an artist and as a creative individual.

Now, most of you hearing that are probably going to immediately—those who are hearing that as creatives—are going to be like, "well, it has no place."

But does it?

Now, I will say this: using it to replace a thing that you love to do does not have a place in your life. And that's one of the things that I've been reflecting on.

I've mentioned it before on this podcast, but there is the meme: "I want an AI that does my dishes so that I have more time for my art, not an AI that does my art so that I have more time for my dishes." It's one of my favorite quotes when it comes to AI because I feel like it represents the core issue really well.

Now, I want to look at the people who created AI briefly—and I don't mean like Elon Musk or any specific people by name, I'm talking about the mindset and the problem.

The problem for the people who came up with image generators... let's look at that first. These are not individuals who love to draw or paint. They might enjoy it, but they don't love it in the same way. I know that's a bit of a blanket statement—there might be some exceptions—but for the most part, they had a problem they wanted to solve. They wanted to automate the thing that they didn't love to do so that they could focus their energies on the things that they do. For these individuals, it is coding, it is programming, it is creating software and generating output through that software.

For them, having to stop the development process to produce a piece of art was a problem that they were trying to solve and automate away. And they did it. In doing so, they solved the problem for every like-minded individual. And I think that is an important thing to consider as well. AI image generators were never meant, in my opinion, to be really used by artists. They're meant to solve the problem of creating art for those who don't want to create art.

Now you might be thinking—and it's a valid question—"well, why not pay someone else to do so?" That was another problem that they were solving. The problem was, how do I get art that I'm content with without having to pay someone else? You see, these people are not the ones who would have been your clients who would have paid you anyways.

It is true that some artists have lost their jobs to AI, but the people who fired them or let them go or stopped hiring them are not people who wanted to be paying you in the first place. Now, in some ways, yes, this could be perceived as a problem because it means an artist has lost a job. But it could also be viewed as a thinning of the clientele. There will be fewer less-than-ideal clients to work with; less, hopefully, people trying to take advantage of you because they didn't want to hire you to do the art in the first place.

Anyways, I don't want to make this about—this isn't to be a discussion about the business of running an art business in an AI world. Rather, it's meant to point out the detail that the people who created AI image generators were trying to solve a problem, and that problem was they didn't want to have to stop to create art and they didn't want to have to pay someone else to do it. And in solving that problem for themselves, they solved it for everyone who was like-minded.

Now, this is where I struggle. Do I, as an artist, perceive their efforts as an attack or not?

I have the luxury—I say luxury, it doesn't always feel like a luxury—of not having art be my source of income. I pursued a career in software development and that brings its own headaches and miseries with it. Other times it can be absolutely fun, but a lot of the time I'm like, "this isn't what I wanted. I wanted to be an artist." I am grateful that God has blessed me with a means to provide for my family, but I wanted—I've always wanted to be an artist in some capacity.

So, going from there, I think we need to go back to the same question that the people who created AI image generators started with: What is the problem I'm trying to solve and how do I automate it away?

One of the big challenges, and I think one of the reasons so many artists feel attacked right now, is artists are not inherently technical—a lot of them anyways. There's some like myself who walk in both worlds, some who are programmers and artists as well. There's others who are not; they're just into the art side of things. I think that in and of itself, though, is the core problem.

And let me explain what I mean by that. When we only have one side producing results, it's going to feel like an attack on the other. Without more artists also becoming programmers, the automation of creativity is going to feel very one-sided. It will always feel like an attack on the arts as long as there aren't more artists who are also programmers.

You see, in the mind of a software developer who's trying to automate away having to create art, it's not a concern to him "how do I automate away my programming so I have more time to create art?" Does that make sense? He has automated away doing the thing he doesn't love so that he can focus on the thing he does: programming.

We need artists to take on learning how to develop so they can go the other way and start automating away the things that take time away from creating art. In my mind, the purpose of AI is to automate away the things that I don't love to do so I have more time for the things I do love to do. And that is the direction that our world is going.

If we only have people automating away art because they don't love to create art and they want to focus on the things they do love to create, where does that leave artists?

I'm going to invite and challenge those artists listening to this to start learning something about development. Start learning how to use AI tools, not to create art, but to figure out how to automate away the things that keep you from making art.

Learn how to automate the spreadsheets. Learn how to automate the programming. If you're like me, I work a software development job. I'm trying to learn how to use AI to automate as much of my development process as possible so I have more time for drawing. That is the thing that brings me joy. That is the thing I'm not going to give up. I love putting my pencil to the paper and producing an outcome that way. I don't want to automate my art away.

But I'm going to look at my life and see which parts of my life can I automate away so that I have more time to dedicate myself to the craft that I actually want to be manual.

I do think it would also likewise be a problem if we automated every part of our life. I believe God gives us talents and interests because he knows they'll bring us joy. Creating art brings me joy. It just does; it always has. It makes me smile, it makes me happy. Not that it doesn't have moments of frustration, but I have found as I have gotten better at art, I experience more of these feelings of joy.

I think that as we get better at a skill, whatever that skill might be, more joy comes. And I think that's by design. It's to see how much we want it, how much work we're willing to put in, and the joy is a direct reflection of the work that we've put into it. As I've gotten better as an artist, I can draw more of what I want from my mind, and the more I can draw of what I want, the more joy there is because I'm not fighting with myself as much about:

I put in enough time that those become less and less and less of an issue. They don't ever go away, but they're far less of an issue than they used to be, and so in their place, the joy steps in. You also have to allow yourself to be okay with the imperfections of the work you're creating so that you can experience the joy that comes from the good of those things.

Anyways, what in our lives as artists are things that we would want to automate away? And are we as artists going to step up and figure out how to use these same tools to automate those things so that we have more time for the things that we love to do?

If you look at it that way, it's never been a more exciting time. In the past, there was no way to really automate away the things that you don't like to do, but now there are.

We can automate the parts of our lives—maybe not all of them, but a lot of them—so that we have time to do the things we love. But we need more minds. We need more people out there figuring these things out because you might be the person to figure out how to automate something that other people are struggling to or unable to. You might be the one who can recognize the need that needs to be automated and figure out how to automate it. You might be the one who brings it to attention so that someone else can automate it.

But to simply be fully at odds with AI is going to keep us in a place where we can't automate away the things that keep us from creating art.

Support Samuel Reyes by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/samuelreyes

Find out more at https://samuelreyes.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

What do you do when you have no time to create, but you desperately want to?

This is a problem that I have been dealing with in my own life right now. My job is very time-consuming. Some weeks I'm putting in the standard 40 hours, and other weeks I might be putting in 50, 60 hours or more. I know that there are some people who put in even more than that. Between managing a career, being a husband, raising five kids, and balancing church responsibilities, trying to squeeze in time for creative passions is a constant challenge.

I get to the end of the week sometimes and I just kind of feel like: What did I even do with myself this week? Where did all the time go? Then the next week starts and it feels like, Here we go again.

I am a creative person. I love to draw, and I love to paint. I love to write fiction, and I write song lyrics (I can't actually write music, but I do like to write lyrics, and on a very rare occasion, maybe some poetry). I also like to read, though I rarely get to pick up a book.

Sometimes we just feel trapped. We might find ourselves on our knees, if we're religious, saying, "God, what do I do in this situation? You put into me these desires to create and I have no time to act on them in any way or fashion. You gave me these desires because they bring me joy, and because there's no time to create, I feel a lack of joy in my life at this time. I feel stuck."

That is how I feel right now in my life in a lot of ways. I feel stuck. But I feel stuck with Jesus—and I would rather feel stuck with Jesus than without Him.

This last week, I looked for little bits of time that I had here and there. I got myself a fresh pack of sticky notes last time I was at Walmart (one of the nice, tall stacks). Now, at the start of a meeting, I might doodle something quick and little. If it looks like it's a meeting that's going to be very attention-consuming—meaning I've got to pay attention—I'll do something small and fast just because I need to scratch that creative itch.

I need to get a little bit of joy from doing so. I know the meeting is about to be draining, and I know that I need to prep myself mentally for it. A little sticky note sketch sometimes is enough to give me that extra bit of joy before doing something intensive.

I have the benefit of working a desk job now, and I have for just about my entire career. But one of my very first jobs was working at a tire shop.

I got pretty good at changing tires, but one day the business computer was stolen. My boss kept all of his receipts for years, but his only digital copy of the business records was on that machine. (It wasn't even that great of a computer for the time, but someone still stole it. It would do thieves good to learn more about the hardware they're taking before they make the effort to break in somewhere—though that's not advice for thieves. Don't steal. That's my real advice.)

My boss was a man who liked to help young people from less fortunate backgrounds, often hiring those who had been in trouble with drugs or the law to help them get their lives back on track. I went to the same church as him, and he knew I needed work, so he offered me a job. After the theft, he pulled me aside and said, "All of my records are gone. I need them all recreated. You're the only person in this shop who doesn't come from a problematic background, and I know I can trust you. Would you be willing to rebuild all of this for me?"

He pointed to a massive pile of semi-organized receipts. I said yes.

That was my first desk job. It took me weeks to get through it all. The other guys in the shop would look at me and say, "Why does he get to sit at a computer?" I’d reply, "Well, come look at the work that I'm doing," and they’d immediately back peg: "Okay, yeah, I'm gonna go back to changing tires." I always thought that was amusing. They thought they wanted to do it until I showed them the numbers and how I was balancing them. Then they decided they were better off changing tires and talking to people.

Ever since then, through a church mission, college, tech support, and eventually entering the tech ecosystem as a developer, I’ve been at a desk. But my first love was never development.

I pursued a career that I honestly never intended to. When I first felt prompted to become a developer, I argued: You want me to do this professionally? I didn't even enjoy this the first time I tried it when I was 16. But the impression I got back was clear: Yes, because it will let you provide for a family. And it has done that very well, allowing my wife the option to stay home and raise our five kids, which was a situation we intentionally sought and prioritized.

But even though my primary job is technical, I’ve realized that coding in and of itself is still quite a creative endeavor.

People think of software development as a purely technical pursuit rather than an artistic one. Sure, companies hire entire user experience (UX) and user interface (UI) teams because you need visual art to go with the technical side. But even the actual art of writing code itself—or architecting a solution—is an art form.

I consider it a work of art when I can build a solution that works so cleanly that I won't have to spend a lot of time coming back to modify it later because of how it was built. When you can build something where you control the behavior through metadata or configuration files rather than constantly changing code here and there, that is a form of art.

I have a friend I play tabletop RPGs with who is an incredibly talented tech architect. We were talking recently, and he mentioned wishing he had more interest in creative pursuits, claiming, "I'm all left brain. I got no right brain."

I told him I don't think that's true. We put a lot of emphasis on the idea that the right side is creative and the left side is technical, but there isn't any creativity that isn't first technical.

Even when I am drawing, there are strict principles and elements of art at play. Even if I don't explicitly think of the terms, a part of my brain is keeping track of line weight, value, composition, and narrative structure. Am I communicating the right emotion? These are ultimately technical questions, and they are stored in the left side of the brain.

The right side of the brain is simply the part that takes that technical knowledge and does something creative with it. That is just as true for technical architects as it is for painters. You store your technical knowledge on the left, but when you problem-solve and architect a clean system, you are accessing that knowledge through the creative right side of your brain. That’s how you come up with creative solutions.

Anything can become an art when creativity is applied to it—whether your art is creating applications, building perfect spreadsheets that are a beauty to look at, or architecting a perfectly connected system.

If your time is heavily limited, the "when" and "how" of creativity becomes a strict choice.

Personally, I don't watch a lot of TV. I know many people want to come home after a long day, sit in front of a screen, and unwind without thinking. That is a valid choice. But you could also choose to do something creative.

When we think about making time to create, we often fall into a black-and-white trap: “I only have an hour before bed, and I want to relax, not spend an hour working on a project.”

But it doesn't have to be all-or-nothing:

You don't have to completely disrupt your routine. Sometimes you just need to insert creativity in a micro-form.

This last week, I didn't have the capacity to commit to a whole, finished drawing. But I wanted to get better at drawing noses. So, during and between meetings, I focused entirely on that. By the end of the week, I filled two and a half standard printer pages just practicing noses. I pursued micro-growth as an artist within my limited time, and I have a much better grasp of it now than I did on Monday.

Some weeks I focus on technical growth, some weeks I focus on a specific anatomy part, and other weeks I just draw for pure fun. And some weeks, if it's really not the right time for it, I don't force it at all.

Our time is limited. Not every free second has to be spent pursuing a single avenue of joy. I love to read, I love video games, and above all, I love spending time with my family. My family gets the first slice of my free time, and I squeeze in art, gaming, or reading into whatever micro-moments are left over.

What could you do differently in your day-to-day to squeeze a little bit of creativity in here and there?

We have to break out of the all-or-nothing mindset that keeps us paralyzed. Creativity isn't an all-or-nothing game. It’s about finding small, imperfect moments to create, however brief they may be.

Find those moments. I promise that as you build a small habit of capturing these micro-moments, you will experience an increase of genuine joy in your day.

Support Samuel Reyes by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/samuelreyes

Find out more at https://samuelreyes.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

My kids had one of their friends over yesterday. They're about ten or eleven years old. Since their visit, I've been reflecting on a conversation that was had.

One of the thoughts that I keep having is: Who and what is God?

The reason that comes to mind is because we were briefly talking about God. The boy who was visiting was telling us that his family believes that God is a beam of light that exists inside of everyone. They believe that Jesus Christ was the light given a body.

I have been reflecting on this for hours (well, it could only be hours because the conversation was only yesterday). I don't actually know this kid's parents. They live in another town. I've met his stepdad a couple of times. His biological dad, as far as I know, doesn't talk about God a whole lot, but in his mother's home with his stepdad, they do quite a bit.

I asked him a question: "Well, what does it say about God in the book of Genesis? And what does it say about us?"

He looked at me and said, "I don't really know anything about Genesis. We don't talk about it. We only look at Jesus and the New Testament."

My mission here is not to criticize him or anyone else who takes that approach to the scriptures. My mission is to ask a question: What are we missing about who God is, and who we are, by not investing more of our time in the Old Testament?

There is a lot of focus on the New Covenant versus the Old Covenant. But the Old Testament is not simply an old covenant; it also provides a bunch of foundational knowledge about who God is and why He does the things that He does. The Old Testament gives the New Testament a foundation on which to stand. Jesus Himself regularly quotes the Old Testament.

As an example, I'm going to turn to the very beginning of the book of Genesis:

"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth."

God didn't say anything about being a beam of light. He says, "I have an image. I'm going to create man after my own image." I think that is really important. This is not a discussion about who and what God is; this is a discussion of foundational knowledge.

When I read the New Testament, can I really say that I understand it in full if I don't understand the foundation? If I haven't spent time building my foundation?

I know that when Jesus was talking to Peter, He says, "Upon this rock, if you build, you shall not fall." There are different discussions about what that rock is. Some believe the rock is literally Peter; some believe that the rock is a testimony of Jesus Christ; others believe that the rock is our ability to receive truth directly from God—because right before that, Jesus had asked, "Do you know who I am?" and Peter said, "Yes." That answer came through God's Spirit.

I am inclined to believe it's a bit of the latter—that upon this rock of receiving witnesses through the Holy Ghost, we will build our foundations. But it's also upon the rock of Jesus Christ Himself. Part of that rock is looking at what God has already given us. Why would I start building my foundation completely from scratch when God has already given me most of the foundation to start building on? That's what the scriptures are. You hold them in your hands; they are a ready-to-go foundation.

By "ready-to-go," I mean we have it in the Bible. It's written, it's recorded, it's history, it's certain, it's sure. We can hold it in our hands, read it, and put it in our minds and hearts. As we do, we build a foundation that God desires us to have.

I don't doubt that Jesus Christ did this Himself in many ways. If you look at His life, you will see patterns where He was applying principles from the Old Testament as well, using them as His foundation for following His Father. We see this when Satan tempted Jesus in the wilderness, and Jesus responds by quoting the Old Testament. He was intimately familiar with it; it was a foundation for Him, and it will also be a foundation for us.

Most of what I focus on has to do with being creative. So, I want to ask this question: How does this idea of knowing about the foundation affect our ability to be creative?

For me, as I know more about who God is and why He does the things that He does, I find it easier to align myself with Him. I believe that creativity, to the varying degrees that we have it, are invitations for us to become a little bit more like God. It's a little bit of Him that He has put into us.

I have been going through Leviticus, working my way through right now after starting in Genesis. I've been thinking about all the sacrifices and how much effort must have gone into all of them. I just finished reading about leprosy, and then read chapter 18, which is about sexual purity, keeping your hands off of people that don't belong to you, and being faithful to your spouse.

But I've been thinking about a lot of the differences. One of the big differences between the Old Testament and the New Testament is the spirit in which things are talked about. It's the same God from whom it all comes, but the Old Testament is so performative. Yet, it's not without intention, and it's not without design. You can see Jesus Christ in the Old Testament as you look for Him.

There is so much focus on the blood when we are looking at Leviticus and talking about the burnt sacrifices and offerings. There is the very well-known verse:

"For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul."

It's not just about the burning. The burning is like it raises the offering up to God so that He can smell it and is aware of it; it's very symbolic. And then the spilling of the blood is symbolic of the blood of Christ. But it would not have been an easy or fast process. It would take time to either catch the animals or find someone to purchase them from, gaining the funds or trading to do that. There was a process that went into acquiring the animals, then bringing them to the place of sacrifice at the Tabernacle. There was the killing of the animal, and the priests had to dismember it, rigorously remove fat, and separate sections. There was spreading the blood around the altar and putting it on the horns, and sometimes on the right ear, thumb, and big toe of a person. It was very involved.

But it was designed to show us that we are covered by the blood of the sacrifice. The going around the altar and the sprinkling of the blood around the altar is an example—they were covering it with the blood, just as Christ covers us. The whole purpose of the Law of Moses was to point others to Jesus Christ so that He, being creative, could create better lives and better futures for the people that follow Him, choose to believe in Him, and seek after Him.

The creativity that we carry inside of us, if you think about it, is meant to do the same thing—not to redeem us from sins, but to create better futures and better lives for ourselves and for others. That's why God put a little bit of Himself into us, so that we could experience the joy that comes from serving others, bringing them joy, and bringing ourselves joy in the process.

Not every ability that we are blessed with, not every creative attribute, is one that is made to serve others in the same ways. I love to draw and paint, but it's a lot harder in some ways to just give all my art away for free. Realistically, I don't like giving up creative control; I don't like to create commissions and freelance work.

So the question becomes: How do I use this gift in the way God intended me to? Often, we want to say, "I'm putting my own will aside to do God's will," and so I could go start freelancing and creating. But did I stop to think that that might not be His will for me? What if this unwillingness to give up my creative control is the way that He intends for me to create?

It sounds like selfishness at first to say, "I'm unwilling to give up my creative control." But what if it's more God saying, "You were not meant to give up your creative control. I need you to retain this so that you can use this creative gift in the way I intend for you"?

There are a lot of fine artists who are gallery painters who create these wonderful works of art, and they don't give up their creative control to do it, and people still buy their art. They still reach people, share messages, and bring people closer to Christ. There is a Korean painter, Yongsung Kim, who is a wonderful painter of Jesus Christ. I don't know if he takes commissions, but I know that a lot of what he does are depictions of Jesus Christ that he comes up with himself, and people buy them anyway because he is walking in the mission that God gave him, using his creative abilities.

The Old Testament gives us examples in which people were given performative things to do to follow God. As we study it, we start to see in our own lives places where we can implement some of these performative acts to follow God in the way that He needs us to. Yes, salvation is through Jesus Christ; that is a fact, that is true. We get nearer to Jesus Christ by reading the New Testament than we usually do the Old Testament because we have His words directly in the New Testament. But there are patterns in the Old Testament that we can apply to our lives to take the gifts that God has given us and live them to the fullest.

Whatever your form of creativity is—whether it's with a paintbrush, a pen, in front of a computer, standing in front of others speaking, or something else—there are things in the Old Testament that will teach you about who God is, help you understand Him better, and help you follow Him. They will help you be creative in the ways that He made you to be: in His image.

Support Samuel Reyes by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/samuelreyes

Find out more at https://samuelreyes.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

Perfect love casts out fear. But we are imperfect beings, often selfish and self-thinking. Our limited ability to love makes it so we cannot overcome fear on our own. But there is a source of unlimited love, that when we let ourselves be filled with it, enables us to overcome all fear through God.

Support Samuel Reyes by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/samuelreyes

Find out more at https://samuelreyes.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

As creatives how does AI fit into our lives? Not AI art. Not AI that does the things you love to do. But AI that does the things you don't enjoy doing. Where does THAT fit?

Support Samuel Reyes by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/samuelreyes

Find out more at https://samuelreyes.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

In the New Testament, the Greek term often translated as "repentance" is metanoia (μετάνοια), which literally signifies a "change of mind" or a fundamental shift in one's mental framework and outlook. It is not merely a stopping of behavior, but a restructuring of the internal lens through which we view God, ourselves, and the world. Have you ever thought about applying that to your own artwork? To your unfinished projects? What clarity can it give you about who you are as a creator that helps you move forward as a creator?

Support Samuel Reyes by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/samuelreyes

Find out more at https://samuelreyes.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

When we look at the book of Genesis do we see that God made us to create? When we read Exodus and God is providing in great detail how he wants the tabernacle to be created, do we see that as a list of instruction? Or do we see it as a divine opportunity for those being instructed to grow themselves as creative individuals? What can we learn from that?

Support Samuel Reyes by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/samuelreyes

Find out more at https://samuelreyes.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

DO we think about how the ability to create is a gift from God?

It is part of him that he put into each of us.

Support Samuel Reyes by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/samuelreyes

Find out more at https://samuelreyes.pinecast.co

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.