Known as one of the greatest entertainers in movie history, Charlie Chaplin rose to fame in the silent films of the nineteen-hundreds, and created one of the most iconic characters ever seen on the screen. But his career was derailed after being caught in the crossfire of political turmoil and mired in scandal. As a result, he was exiled from the U-S during the post-war Red Scare. On today's final installment of Watching America, best-selling Hollywood biographer and film historian Scott Eyman takes us behind the scenes of the tumultuous life of this famed cinematic genius. We’ll explore Chaplin’s politics, his controversies, and the relentless pursuit of his artistic vision.

Scott Eyman on Charlie Chaplin Beyond The Screen

['Hosted by British born host Dr. Alan Campbell, Watching America combines interviews, engaging audio, and deep dive talks in to our local and national culture through the eloquent and ever-curious lens of a ‘Brit’ who has spent over two decades ‘figuring it all out’; Watching America.', 'In 1996, Dr. Alan Sokal, a physics professor, wanted to test the intellectual rigor of “postmodern cultural studies.” To do so, he wrote an article titled “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.” \nThis article was full of absolute nonsense—but Dr. Sokal believed it would be accepted by an academic journal anyway. And he was right. \nThis hoax—called the “Sokal Affair” or “Sokal Hoax”—caused an uproar in academia because it questioned the validity of social science commentary on scientific inquiry.\nFast forward to 2017. \nThree academics, editor Helen Pluckrose, mathematician  James A. Lindsay, and philosopher Peter Boghossian, did something similar but bigger. And with a similar purpose—they wanted to test the intellectual rigor of academic journals in the fields of gender, queer, race, and fat studies—what they call as a whole, “grievance studies.” \nThey wanted to see if they could produce absurd articles using the catch-phrases and biases they observed in cultural studies academic journals—and get them published.\nOf the 20 nonsense articles the trio wrote, 7 passed peer review and were published, and one even received recognition. Seven more were on the verge of publication before their hoax was uncovered. \nThis academic project has been dubbed “Sokal Squared” as a nod to Dr. Alan Sokal’s hoax article from 1996.\nWhile it may sound like this topic is only of interest to academia, the authors believe it is relevant—in fact, crucial—for everyone to understand the implications of what is going on in universities and academic journals because the knowledge produced there affects us all. \nWe spoke with all three of the “Sokal Squared” hoaxers, or “academic whistleblowers” as they would say, for today’s program. \nWe should have the extended conversations with our guests posted by the evening of March 2, 2019.']

Society & Culture

['Hosted by British born host Dr. Alan Campbell, Watching America combines interviews, engaging audio, and deep dive talks in to our local and national culture through the eloquent and ever-curious lens of a ‘Brit’ who has spent over two decades ‘figuring it all out’; Watching America.', 'In 1996, Dr. Alan Sokal, a physics professor, wanted to test the intellectual rigor of “postmodern cultural studies.” To do so, he wrote an article titled “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.” \nThis article was full of absolute nonsense—but Dr. Sokal believed it would be accepted by an academic journal anyway. And he was right. \nThis hoax—called the “Sokal Affair” or “Sokal Hoax”—caused an uproar in academia because it questioned the validity of social science commentary on scientific inquiry.\nFast forward to 2017. \nThree academics, editor Helen Pluckrose, mathematician James A. Lindsay, and philosopher Peter Boghossian, did something similar but bigger. And with a similar purpose—they wanted to test the intellectual rigor of academic journals in the fields of gender, queer, race, and fat studies—what they call as a whole, “grievance studies.” \nThey wanted to see if they could produce absurd articles using the catch-phrases and biases they observed in cultural studies academic journals—and get them published.\nOf the 20 nonsense articles the trio wrote, 7 passed peer review and were published, and one even received recognition. Seven more were on the verge of publication before their hoax was uncovered. \nThis academic project has been dubbed “Sokal Squared” as a nod to Dr. Alan Sokal’s hoax article from 1996.\nWhile it may sound like this topic is only of interest to academia, the authors believe it is relevant—in fact, crucial—for everyone to understand the implications of what is going on in universities and academic journals because the knowledge produced there affects us all. \nWe spoke with all three of the “Sokal Squared” hoaxers, or “academic whistleblowers” as they would say, for today’s program. \nWe should have the extended conversations with our guests posted by the evening of March 2, 2019.']

Share Scott Eyman on Charlie Chaplin Beyond The Screen

Sign up to save your podcasts

Scott Eyman on Charlie Chaplin Beyond The Screen

Scott Eyman on Charlie Chaplin Beyond The Screen

More shows like Watching America

Hunter At Sunrise Acoustic Sessions

48 Hours

Vietnam: Stories From the Wall

Crime Junkie

Born at the Do-Drop Inn: An Oral History

Something Was Wrong

Dateline NBC

WHRO Reports

What We Do

I Survived

The Binge Cases: Doctor's Orders

Ms. Martha Reads

At A Crossroads

Open Channel

The Secret War Of Willis Hodges

Today in Rock History with Paul Shugrue

Betrayal: Weekly

Fear Thy Neighbor

Rural

Innovation Now

Who Took Misty Copsey?

What Came Next

Virginia Voices

Education Matters

WHRO Weekly Edition

The Dream Conductor

Crosswinds

Betrayal: Seasons 1, 2, 3 & 4

Democracy at Work

Blink | Jake Haendel's Story

What Happened to Holly Bobo?

Unicorn Girl

Devil in the Desert

Revolution 250: Stories From The First Shore