
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Summary
Eric Rubenstein and Ron Chapman join The Compliance Guy to discuss the implications of a recent dismissal of a False Claims Act case based on the appointment clause.
The guys explore the historical context of key tam cases, the role of relators, and the complexities surrounding the appointment clause. The conversation delves into the differences between dismissals with and without prejudice, the potential for Supreme Court involvement, and the impact of venue shopping on key tam cases.
The episode concludes with a discussion on judicial appointments and their political implications.
Takeaways
07:03 Exploring the Appointment Clause and Its Implications
14:03 Dismissal with Prejudice vs. Without Prejudice
16:19 The Future of Key Tam Cases in the Supreme Court
24:13 The Impact of Venue Shopping on Key Tam Cases
30:29 Judicial Appointments and Political Implications
4.9
3636 ratings
Summary
Eric Rubenstein and Ron Chapman join The Compliance Guy to discuss the implications of a recent dismissal of a False Claims Act case based on the appointment clause.
The guys explore the historical context of key tam cases, the role of relators, and the complexities surrounding the appointment clause. The conversation delves into the differences between dismissals with and without prejudice, the potential for Supreme Court involvement, and the impact of venue shopping on key tam cases.
The episode concludes with a discussion on judicial appointments and their political implications.
Takeaways
07:03 Exploring the Appointment Clause and Its Implications
14:03 Dismissal with Prejudice vs. Without Prejudice
16:19 The Future of Key Tam Cases in the Supreme Court
24:13 The Impact of Venue Shopping on Key Tam Cases
30:29 Judicial Appointments and Political Implications
38,734 Listeners
1,840 Listeners
18 Listeners
33,958 Listeners
199 Listeners
24 Listeners
39 Listeners
4,404 Listeners
47,230 Listeners
25 Listeners
6 Listeners
4,263 Listeners
2,367 Listeners
15 Listeners
5 Listeners