
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


With oral argument just days away, we interview Prof. Morrison who filed an amicus brief urging SCOTUS not to decide whether Dodd-Frank’s limits on the President’s authority to remove the CFPB Director are constitutional and dismiss the case. We examine his arguments that Seila Law has no standing to challenge the limits' constitutionality and there is no longer a case or controversy that gives a federal court jurisdiction to hear the challenge.
By Ballard Spahr LLP4.9
4545 ratings
With oral argument just days away, we interview Prof. Morrison who filed an amicus brief urging SCOTUS not to decide whether Dodd-Frank’s limits on the President’s authority to remove the CFPB Director are constitutional and dismiss the case. We examine his arguments that Seila Law has no standing to challenge the limits' constitutionality and there is no longer a case or controversy that gives a federal court jurisdiction to hear the challenge.

32,156 Listeners

30,650 Listeners

25,874 Listeners

8,768 Listeners

9,177 Listeners

8,474 Listeners

372 Listeners

6,295 Listeners

112,617 Listeners

1,450 Listeners

10,261 Listeners

16,241 Listeners

16,056 Listeners

10 Listeners

13 Listeners