
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


First, The plaintiff met the defendant when they worked as showgirls in Las Vegas. They decided to start a business together, but she claims the defendant backed out of the business. The plaintiff alleges the defendant stole costumes and other inventory from their business, so she’s suing for stolen property. The defendant denies abandoning the business. She’s countersuing for unreturned property and harassment.
Then, The plaintiff dated the defendant while he was separated from his wife, and they were on and off. She’s suing him for an unpaid loan. The defendant says they were on and off because she cheated on him constantly, including with a friend of his 19-year-old son, so he refuses to pay anything.
Plus, The plaintiff says she was close with the defendant and they partied together. She’s suing because she claims the defendant’s daughter damaged her TV. The defendant says the plaintiff is bougie and looks down on her. She insists her daughter isn’t the only one responsible for the broken TV, so she shouldn’t have to pay.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Telepictures4.6
1616 ratings
First, The plaintiff met the defendant when they worked as showgirls in Las Vegas. They decided to start a business together, but she claims the defendant backed out of the business. The plaintiff alleges the defendant stole costumes and other inventory from their business, so she’s suing for stolen property. The defendant denies abandoning the business. She’s countersuing for unreturned property and harassment.
Then, The plaintiff dated the defendant while he was separated from his wife, and they were on and off. She’s suing him for an unpaid loan. The defendant says they were on and off because she cheated on him constantly, including with a friend of his 19-year-old son, so he refuses to pay anything.
Plus, The plaintiff says she was close with the defendant and they partied together. She’s suing because she claims the defendant’s daughter damaged her TV. The defendant says the plaintiff is bougie and looks down on her. She insists her daughter isn’t the only one responsible for the broken TV, so she shouldn’t have to pay.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

62,910 Listeners

5,249 Listeners

14,246 Listeners

83 Listeners

1,382 Listeners

13,764 Listeners

1,276 Listeners

47,540 Listeners

2,276 Listeners

2,211 Listeners

1,143 Listeners

232 Listeners

306 Listeners

7,030 Listeners

270 Listeners