
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


First, The plaintiff met the defendant when they worked as showgirls in Las Vegas. They decided to start a business together, but she claims the defendant backed out of the business. The plaintiff alleges the defendant stole costumes and other inventory from their business, so she’s suing for stolen property. The defendant denies abandoning the business. She’s countersuing for unreturned property and harassment.
Then, The plaintiff dated the defendant while he was separated from his wife, and they were on and off. She’s suing him for an unpaid loan. The defendant says they were on and off because she cheated on him constantly, including with a friend of his 19-year-old son, so he refuses to pay anything.
Plus, The plaintiff says she was close with the defendant and they partied together. She’s suing because she claims the defendant’s daughter damaged her TV. The defendant says the plaintiff is bougie and looks down on her. She insists her daughter isn’t the only one responsible for the broken TV, so she shouldn’t have to pay.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Telepictures4.6
1616 ratings
First, The plaintiff met the defendant when they worked as showgirls in Las Vegas. They decided to start a business together, but she claims the defendant backed out of the business. The plaintiff alleges the defendant stole costumes and other inventory from their business, so she’s suing for stolen property. The defendant denies abandoning the business. She’s countersuing for unreturned property and harassment.
Then, The plaintiff dated the defendant while he was separated from his wife, and they were on and off. She’s suing him for an unpaid loan. The defendant says they were on and off because she cheated on him constantly, including with a friend of his 19-year-old son, so he refuses to pay anything.
Plus, The plaintiff says she was close with the defendant and they partied together. She’s suing because she claims the defendant’s daughter damaged her TV. The defendant says the plaintiff is bougie and looks down on her. She insists her daughter isn’t the only one responsible for the broken TV, so she shouldn’t have to pay.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

5,170 Listeners

14,236 Listeners

368,930 Listeners

99,358 Listeners

2,142 Listeners

2,976 Listeners

18,315 Listeners

10,076 Listeners

9,659 Listeners

11,683 Listeners

1,304 Listeners

985 Listeners

220 Listeners

269 Listeners

19 Listeners