First, the plaintiff loaned the defendant, a former business partner, money for products for his store. However, the defendant has avoided the plaintiff and hasn’t paid it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff gave him the money and is only suing him because they are no longer romantically involved.

Then, the plaintiff is suing the defendant for a broker’s fee because the apartment he was moving into wasn’t ready. The defendant argues an act of God in the form of Hurricane Sandy hit, so the plaintiff moved in late.

Plus, the plaintiff says his ex-girlfriend’s mother owes him money for car parts he stored behind her freezer. The defendant sold the parts, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists there were no car parts behind her freezer, and she believes the plaintiff is only suing her because her daughter broke up with him.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says he and the defendant were roommates, and there were issues right from the start. He was told the defendant wasn’t totally clean, but the defendant was in fact a heavy smoker. The plaintiff got kicked out after two months with no deposit in sight and is suing to get it back. The defendant says all he asks of tenants is to be clean, pay bills on time, and don’t do damage to the unit. Apparently, the plaintiff didn’t follow any of those, and he doesn’t owe money.

Then, the plaintiffs say they provided temporary housing to the defendant’s cats after some bad storms. The cats brought pesky little fleas with them, and the plaintiffs had to get an exterminator to solve the issue, but the defendant is refusing to pay them back. The defendant says she got flea medication AND provided flea extermination bombs for the plaintiffs’ home, but they decided to get the exterminator on their own. A lawyer told her she was being bullied for money, and she doesn’t owe anything.

Plus, The plaintiff claims he bought a car from the defendant, who knowingly sold him a lemon. Three catalytic converters in the engine were blown and he wants his money back, so he’s suing. The defendant says the plaintiff bought the car with a warranty, and he did the right thing by repairing the car after the issues came up. He does not believe he owes any money.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff has been neighbors with the defendant for the past four years. He says he provided her two loans when she needed some financial help, but she’s never paid him back. He says she even made a pass at him in the hope of getting the loans forgiven. He is suing to get his money back. The defendant claims that the plaintiff was the one to make several moves, not her. She was led to believe the money was gifts, not loans.

Then, the plaintiff says she confronted her husband about his affair while at a party. She says the defendant, her husband’s mistress, followed her out to her car and beat on the vehicle with a shoe, causing extensive damage. She is suing for the $7,200 she’s owed for repairs. The defendant says the plaintiff has been harassing her for years because she had a child with the husband and is now a woman scorned. She claims it was the plaintiff who stormed into the party and tried to blame the car damage on her, but she didn’t do any of it. She owes nothing. She is countersuing for pain and suffering.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff sold the defendant an authentic collector’s edition New England Patriots jersey. Two months later, the defendant reached out and said he wanted to return it because he didn’t think it was real. The plaintiff stands behind his business, so he wired back the money, only to not receive the jersey from the defendant. He is suing to get the cost of the item back. The defendant says he’s been collecting jerseys for 10 years, and the plaintiff gave him both a fake name and a fake check. The plaintiff is just a con artist.

Then, the plaintiff says he was driving down the road one day when the defendant’s dog dashed out in front of him, and he was hit by the car. The dog then ran off, leaving behind the plaintiff and a car with a damaged bumper. He says the defendant refuses to believe her dog caused the damage and won’t pay the plaintiff for repairs. He is suing for the repairs. The defendant says the plaintiff is just trying to get money out of her and bumpers don’t cost what he’s charging to repair.

Plus, the plaintiff and her boyfriend rented an apartment from the defendant, and she couldn’t afford the rent anymore after they broke up. Since she was on a month-to-month lease, she moved out and is now having a hard time getting the security deposit back, so she’s suing. The defendant says the plaintiff and her boyfriend ruined the apartment by getting gum in the carpet and tearing up the linoleum flooring in the kitchen. He believes he has every right to hold on to the security deposit.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff met the defendant when she was a go-go dancer at a club. They used to date and got engaged, but they broke up due to the defendant’s cheating ways. The plaintiff is suing for the return of his engagement ring. The defendant argues the plaintiff is an abusive man. When they split up, the defendant insists the plaintiff told her she could keep the ring.

Then, the plaintiff says he sold a vehicle to the defendants, but they stopped payment on a check, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendants insist the car was a piece of junk, and they’re countersuing for storage fees.

Plus, the plaintiff says she was wiped out after Hurricane Sandy, and everything from the apartment she rented was gone. The plaintiff had to move out. The defendant promised to return the security deposit, but the check was short, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff left a bunch of her wet belongings behind, so the defendant believes she had every right to withhold some money. The defendant is countersuing for the cost to remove the belongings.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to paint his plane. However, the paint doesn’t match the fabric, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant argues the plaintiff is just impossible to please, and everything matches just fine.

Then, the plaintiff purchased an unhealthy Rottweiler from the defendant. There were so many issues with the dog, the plaintiff wants to return him. The plaintiff is suing for the value of the dog and vet bills. The defendant argues the plaintiff was thrilled when she first got the puppy but changed her mind after having to deworm him.

Plus, the plaintiff legally parked his BMW and found out the defendant illegally towed it, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff’s tags were expired, so he denies owing.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant, who he alleges stopped paying him, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues he caught the plaintiff trying to steal on the job, and they got into a fistfight. The defendant is countersuing for items the plaintiff never returned.

Then, the plaintiff booked a trip through the defendant. There was a change in itinerary, and the plaintiff had to foot a hotel bill unexpectedly, so she’s suing the defendant. The defendant argues the airline changed the itinerary last minute, not him. The defendant says he has no control over the situation and denies owing.

Plus, the plaintiff says he bought a vacation house one week before Hurricane Sandy. The plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to make repairs. However, he learned the defendant didn’t know what he was doing and is suing for a refund. The defendant insists he had every intention of doing the job, but the plaintiff wasn’t happy with the cost.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant stole valuable items from her aunt’s apartment as she was dying in the hospital, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists she didn’t steal anything. The defendant is countersuing for pain and suffering.

Then, the plaintiff says her cousin, the defendant, lived with her. The defendant got mad during a party one time and threw a brick through a window, so the plaintiff is suing for the damages. The defendant argues she already paid her cousin for the window.

Plus, The plaintiff says the defendant fell into his car, denting it, so he is suing. The defendant insists her brother pushed her into the car, so the damages aren’t her fault.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims she was hired by the defendant for painting services but is still owed money, so he’s suing. The defendant insists she kept a strict log of all of the plaintiff’s work hours, and the plaintiff is lying.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendant did some work on his car but botched the job, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff’s complaints have to do with the paint job, not the work he had done.

Plus, the plaintiff rented a room in the defendants’ apartment, but she had to move out due to issues with the bathroom. The plaintiff is suing for rent. The defendants argue the plaintiff kept monopolizing their private bathroom for 90 minutes at a time, so they had to put a 30-minute limit on it.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff owns a high-end breastfeeding equipment company, and the defendant purchased a pump online from her. She got a confirmation of delivery, and then two weeks later the defendant said it was never delivered. The package ended up at the defendant’s mother’s house, and the defendant disputed the charge for the product. Now the plaintiff doesn’t have the money and the defendant has the breast pump, so the plaintiff is suing.

Then, the plaintiff says he parked his vehicle in the loading dock of the building he’s worked at for over a year, but the manager of the building called the defendant and had it towed. When the defendant investigated the event, he discovered the defendant actually broke into the vehicle, hotwired it, and drove it to his tow yard! He is suing the defendant for the cost of the tow and damages. The defendant says his business has been around for 20 years, and they did the tow job correctly, so they don’t owe anything.

Plus, the defendant was the plaintiff’s landlord for three years, and just as the plaintiff was about to move out, Hurricane Sandy hit, forcing her to stay in place for a little longer. The defendant is now giving her a hard time over returning the security deposit, so she’s suing to get it back. The defendant claims the plaintiff kept stalling on her moveout date, and even left property behind, so he was owed a portion of the security deposit.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices