First, the plaintiffs bought a refrigerator from the defendants. It turned out to be a piece of junk, so the plaintiffs are suing for a refund. The defendants insist the refrigerator worked just fine when the plaintiffs picked it up.

Then, the plaintiff claims the defendants gave away her pottery items without her permission, so she’s suing. The defendants were asked to store the pottery equipment, but the plaintiff never picked it up, so they donated the items.

Plus, the plaintiff has been friends with the defendant for years. The plaintiff registered a car for the defendant, but the defendant racked up tickets, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues this lawsuit is bogus and the plaintiff has no proof of anything.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was walking his dog when the defendant’s dog mauled his, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the dog doesn’t even belong to him.

Then, the plaintiff says her friend, the defendant, sold her a car. However, the defendant never gave the plaintiff the car, so she's suing for a refund. The defendant insists he used to date the plaintiff, and she's just bitter that they broke up.

Plus, the plaintiff went to the defendant’s eyeglass store. The plaintiff believes the defendant overcharged him, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues his services aren’t free, so he’s not refunding anything.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant for pole dancing classes for a birthday party. However, the defendant was late and brought the wrong-sized pole, causing damages, so she's suing. The defendant insists she didn't cause any damages and she was very careful.

Then, the plaintiff parked his car at the defendant's parking facility. When he went to retrieve it, the plaintiff claims his car had a bunch of damage, so he’s suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff is lying, and he can't prove the scratch happened at his lot.

Plus, the plaintiff used to date the defendant. The plaintiff allowed the defendant to use his credit card, but she never paid him back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the money was a gift.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says he was driving his car when the defendant punched his window and shattered it. The plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant claims the plaintiff bumped into her car.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendant asked her to cash a money order for her. However, the money order was bad, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims she didn’t know it wasn’t legit.

Plus, the plaintiffs say the defendant ripped them off in a real estate deal, so they’re suing. The defendant claims the plaintiffs gave him a deposit on a home, but they're trying to back out of the deal after all the work he has done.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says her former landlords, the defendants, had her car illegally towed and kicked her out of the home, so she’s suing. The defendants claim the plaintiff was physically violent, and the town towed her car away. They believe they owe the plaintiff nothing.

Then, the plaintiff claims he loaned the defendant money for moving costs. However, the defendant never paid back the loan, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff is lying and that the money was a gift.

Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant invited her on a trip to Florida. The plaintiff claims the defendant kicked her off the trip and never refunded her money, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff is the one who canceled on them.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff said he and the defendant decided to live together. However, the defendant failed to pay rent, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff is the one who broke their lease, leaving him high and dry. The defendant is countersuing for the cost of finding a new home.

Then, the plaintiff was out walking her dog when the defendant's unleashed dog attacked hers. The plaintiff is suing for vet bills. The defendant insists the plaintiff's dog is the one who hurt hers.

Plus, the plaintiff went to a restaurant and used valet. The attendant allegedly stole the plaintiff's laptop, so she's suing. The attendant argues the plaintiff is making this all up, so he denies owing anything.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims the defendant illegally sublet her apartment to a tenant who trashed and damaged the place, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff agreed to the roommate. The defendant believes that since she didn't cause the damage, she doesn't owe the plaintiff a dime.

Then, the plaintiff bought a horse. However, the horse didn't look anything like the photo, and his hip was injured, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff agreed to buy the horse sight unseen. Additionally, the defendant argues the horse wasn't actually injured. He was just stiff from being on the road for so long.

Plus, the plaintiff says the defendant, the father of her grandchildren, borrowed her car. However, the defendant allegedly damaged the vehicle, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims he maintained the car just fine while he had it.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims the defendant's dog injured hers, so she's suing for missed work and vet bills. The defendant says he and the plaintiff agreed to split the vet bills because both their dogs were unleashed. The defendant doesn't believe he owes any more money.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendant hired him to play in his band. However, the defendant hasn't yet paid him, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says everyone in the band volunteered to play for free.

Plus, the plaintiff has lived in her apartment for 40 years. However, the defendant, her neighbor, has caused damage to her home, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff is exaggerating the damages.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant's daughter crashed a scooter into her, causing injuries. The plaintiff is suing for medical bills. The defendant insists the plaintiff walked into his daughter, and it was 100% the plaintiff's fault.

Then, the plaintiffs purchased baseball game tickets from the defendant, but the barcodes were already used, and they couldn't get in. The plaintiffs are suing for a refund. The defendant insists he doesn't even sell tickets, and this lawsuit is bogus. The defendant is countersuing for slander.

Plus, the plaintiff pawned his necklace at the defendant's shop. The defendant sold it right under his nose, so the plaintiff is suing for the value of the necklace. The defendant argues that the plaintiff didn't make any payments on his property, so he sold the necklace.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff used to date the defendant. The plaintiff purchased an iPhone and ring for the defendant. After their breakup, the defendant said she'd return the ring and iPhone but never did, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff gave her all sorts of gifts during their relationship. The defendant believes the plaintiff is just mad that they broke up. The defendant is countersuing for the deposit on the ring and defamation.

Then, the plaintiff says she was hired by the defendant to make quilts. The defendant hasn't yet paid the plaintiff, so she's suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff didn't listen to his instructions, so he doesn't want the quilts and refuses to pay.

Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to install a chimney in his house. The chimney is in violation, and now the plaintiff has to pay for the proper certification, so he's suing. The defendant claims he told the plaintiff he would do the work, but the plaintiff had to get the proper permits and talk to an architect.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices