The People’s Court Podcast

First, the plaintiff says the defendant’s large dog attacked his smaller dog at a local dog park, causing injuries that required medical treatment. He’s suing for the cost of the vet bills, which he says the defendant refuses to pay. The defendant claims the plaintiff’s small dog was antagonizing larger dogs and that what happened was just normal roughhousing. She is countersuing for two and a half years’ worth of dog park fees, claiming her pet was unfairly banned.

Then, the plaintiffs say they spent five days thoroughly cleaning their apartment before moving out, yet the defendant refused to return their full security deposit. They allege an altercation followed, during which the defendant’s son punched one of them. They’re suing for the full deposit refund. The defendant claims she was willing to return most of the deposit but says the plaintiffs became aggressive and demanded the full amount. She also cites broken windows, pet damage, and minor repairs as reasons for the partial withholding.

Plus, the plaintiff says he bought a car from the defendant, only for it to break down the very next day. He’s suing for a full refund. The defendant argues the vehicle was sold “as is” and says the plaintiff misunderstood or ignored the terms of the sale.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant, her ex-boyfriend, owes her money for activities and trips she paid for during their relationship. She is suing to be reimbursed. The defendant claims the only reason she is suing is because he broke up with her.

Then, the plaintiff says he repaired the defendant’s laptop, which was running slowly, but the defendant refuses to pay for the service. He is suing for the cost of the repair. The defendant says while the plaintiff did clean the hard drive, he failed to restore important data that was wiped in the process.

Plus, the plaintiff says her daughter passed away and the defendant, her daughter’s friend, refuses to return valuable belongings that she claims are rightfully hers. She is suing for the value of the items. The defendant says the plaintiff’s daughter asked her to keep those items from her mother. She is countersuing for harassment, slander, emotional distress, and malice.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says he and the defendant were friends, and that one day the defendant came to him in desperate need of money. He claims the defendant never repaid the loan and has left him struggling to afford food. He is suing for the amount owed. The defendant says he repaid everything and alleges the plaintiff is a hothead who once bashed his own head into a brick wall and fled as police arrived. He is countersuing for pain and suffering.

Then, the plaintiffs say the defendant, one of their yoga students, borrowed money for car repairs after her vehicle was vandalized. Once her car was working again, she allegedly refused to repay the loan. They are suing for the money owed. The defendant claims one of the plaintiffs offered to check the repairs but later charged her an excessive fee without her approval. She says he held her car “ransom,” but she retrieved it using her spare key. She believes this is why she is being sued.

Plus, the plaintiff says she hired the defendant for home repairs and mistakenly paid him in full before work began. She claims his work was sloppy and incomplete, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant insists he only has about an hour of work left and deserves full payment for what he’s done.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant let go of a shopping cart in a supermarket parking lot, and it hit his new car, causing extensive damage. When he confronted the defendant, he allegedly drove off. The plaintiff is suing for repair costs. The defendant claims the plaintiff’s wife caused the damage by squeezing her cart between parked cars. He believes the plaintiff is pinning the blame on him to avoid paying for his own repairs.

Then, the plaintiff says she hired the defendant to cater a birthday party that was canceled due to a hurricane. She claims the defendant has been uncooperative in rescheduling the event, so she is suing for a full refund. The defendant says she already spent most of the catering fee on food and supplies in advance. She offered to give the food to the plaintiff, but the plaintiff refused.

Plus, the plaintiff says she owns a two-family home and hired the defendants, real estate agents, to find tenants. She claims she set the rent at $1,500, but the tenants placed by the defendants are not paying that amount. She also alleges the tenants bring strange guests and the home now smells like marijuana. She is suing for misrepresentation. The defendants say they’ve worked with over 150 landlords, and this is the first time one has taken legal action over a tenant issue.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to help him find women to date, but the defendant didn't find any viable mates, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant insists he sent him on a date with a great woman, but he just changed his mind about her services for no reason. Besides, the defendant doesn't provide refunds.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendant pushed her shopping cart into his car, so he's suing for damages. The defendant argues the shopping cart had a bad wheel and that's not her fault.

Plus, the plaintiffs claim their neighbor's toilet overflowed and damaged their belongings. The plaintiffs hired the defendant to restore their belongings, but they ended up all gross and destroyed, so they're suing. The defendant claims he dried and cleaned everything properly. Besides, the plaintiffs signed off on everything.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims her ex-girlfriend borrowed money from her for a car when they were still together. After their breakup, the defendant refused to give back the money, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the reason she needed a car in the first place is because the plaintiff ruined hers.

Then, the plaintiff claims her neighbor flooded her apartment, so she's suing for damages. The defendant argues the flooding wasn't that bad, and he even sent a cleaner to help the neighbors.

Plus, the plaintiff helped the defendant find homes for kittens. However, the defendant hasn't paid the plaintiff the adoption fees, so she's suing. The defendant insists there was no agreement in place on any adoption fees.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff met the defendant at a pool tournament, and they started dating. The plaintiff alleges the defendant got upset with him one day and keyed his furniture and stole his DVDs, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant denies the allegations and thinks the plaintiff's friends probably did it.

Then, the plaintiffs purchased a vehicle from the defendant. They were told it was in pristine condition, but the car was not, so the plaintiffs are suing for false advertisement and repairs. The defendant argues the plaintiffs never complained about the vehicle until eight months later.

Plus, the plaintiff rented an apartment to the defendant, but he disappeared and stiffed him on rent, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues he paid the plaintiff everything he owes.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff agreed to rent a room in the defendant's house. The defendant always brought home strange women, so the plaintiff had to move out. The defendant refuses to return her security, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff moved out without any notice and damaged the carpet. Therefore, he had every right to keep the security deposit.

Then, the plaintiff stored her televisions at the defendant's house. When she went to retrieve them, the defendant said they were stolen, but the plaintiff believes the defendant had something to do with it, so she's suing. The defendant says he went out of his way to help the plaintiff, and he denies the allegations.

Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant damaged his vehicle's bumper outside a hospital, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff is making this all up and just assumed he caused the damage.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff alleges the defendant crashed her car into hers, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff is the one who hit her vehicle.

Then, the plaintiffs hired the defendant to cater their wedding at a historic museum. However, the plaintiffs say the defendant knew the museum was closing, and they had to hire somone else. The plaintiffs are suing for the return of their deposit. The defendant insists he showed the plaintiffs various locations, and he would have been happy to cater the wedding anywhere.

Plus, the plaintiff says her cousin owes her money for work she provided at her day care service, so the plaintiff's suing. The defendant argues she had to fire the plaintiff because she was always late. Besides, the defendant has proof she paid the plaintiff everything she was owed.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims the defendant's dog bit him three times, and his whole life has changed forever, so he's suing. The defendant feels bad for the plaintiff, but she insists the plaintiff went into her home knowing her dog was a bit jittery.

Then, the plaintiff gave his cousin, the defendant, a loan before Christmas. However, the defendant failed to pay him back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the money was a gift.

Plus, the plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to provide a D.J. for a party. However, the defendant called a day before and said the D.J. got into a car accident. The defendant hasn't provided a refund, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff is the one who canceled hours before the party.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices