https://future.figucarolina.org/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_910 https://videos.figucarolina.org/w/eDYcC8cmQVZsnJjGCtMGD9
"spirit", Why the traditional terms only become open after many decades - Excerpt from CR 910
Explanation:
Why the traditional terms only become open after many decades
after learning and understanding the ancient teachings are openly
named and taught in their effectively true value
'Teaching of the Truth, Teaching of Creation-energy, Teaching of the Life'
According to the teaching of the sage, my teacher Sfath, and according to the instructive journeys with him into the past, I was taught that various traditional terms and their value, such as in the main 'spirit', 'spirit-form' and 'spirit-teaching', 'spiritual life', 'God', 'gods' and 'holy', 'saints', etc., correspond to old word values, which are called 'Indo-European roots' and have been completely falsified. With regard to 'spirit', this was invented and created from the Indo-European term 'gheis' as the original word, although this originally had the meaning “to be upset”, 'to shudder' as well as “to be frightened” and “to be excited”, but also “to be afraid” and “to be completely horrified” as well as “to be seized”, etc.
When the word “spiritus” is considered in Latin, it does not mean “spirit”, but translated into German it does not mean “spirit”, but “vapour”, “breath or also breath sound”, “hiss”, “sound”, “breath of air”, “sigh”, “wind”, “act of life” or “breath”.
So wherever research is carried out, nowhere does the word “God” emerge from these terms, as is falsely claimed, but rather something that is of a different value and corresponds to pure human impulses. This is also the case with the Latin word “spiritus”, which means nothing other than “breath”, or the ancient Greek “pneuma”, etc. So, for example, the word value of “Spiritus Mundi” from Latin does not have the value of “world spirit” as is wrongly explained, but rather the value of “world wind