Global Warming is . . . 

Not at all. In fact my model explains this evidence. See Bill Chapter One Air Brakes for details:

The discussion involves the validity of three concepts associated with Meteorology's Model of Storms: 1) Convectioin 2)Dry Layer Capping and 3) Latent Heat.  The claim here is that these are all story-telling tactics and do no represent valid physics/science.

Words have meaning.  Sometimes words have meanings.  Sometimes some scientist use this ambivalence as a tactic to get you to believe that they understand what they don't.

Defeating the Bias of Being a Living organism

Meteorologists Refuse to Discuss Details of their Intentionally Vague Hypothesis on Storms.  I am happy to discuss details of my theory, which depends on advanced understanding of hydrogen bonding in water.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=255#p122459

Jet streams are conduits that tunnel through the friction and general incoherence of the gases in the atmosphere to balance out what would otherwise be some extremes of heat/high pressures and cold/low pressures. Constructed from layers of spinning microdroplets of H2O with maximized surface tension, jet streams are a consequence of the principle that maximization of the surface area of H2O maximizes the tensional forces of H2O. These conduits emerge along moist dry wind shear boundaries, especially those associated with the extensive, flat boundary between the top of the troposphere and the bottom of the stratosphere, prime conditions for wind shear. The ensuing vortices of surface tension maximized spinning microdroplets provide a slick hydrophobic inner surface that channels moist air at speeds up to 300 mph.