This is the practical follow-on to episode 22 — and it starts with the thing most people think but few say out loud. Corporate values are often marketing, written for strangers, with no real grip on day-to-day behaviour.
The distinction Nigel draws is worth keeping. Corporate value statements are usually written for outsiders. Culture, by contrast, is written by what happens on a wet Tuesday when something goes wrong. Culture is not what you say you believe — it is what you tolerate, reward and promote. When those two things diverge, the values statement stops being a guide and starts being a credibility problem.
What you'll take from this episode:
The copy-paste test: if your values could appear on a competitor's website without anyone noticing, you've written filler, not something that guides decisionsFive elephant traps that quietly kill even well-intentioned values: two-tier standards, values with no trade-offs, language too vague to measure, the brilliant jerk problem and slow organisational driftA five-step framework for making values live — limit them to four or five, write the trade-off for each, define green and red flags, add a weekly ritual and decide in advance what happens when someone violates themThe Matt Baker rule: how a shared cultural reference gives people a practical shorthand they can reach for under pressureA structured approach to hiring for values — behavioural questions, scenario questions with real trade-offs, a short work exercise and references that go beyond the standard questionsAlso in this episode: the One Minute Rant tackles trying to buy a coffee through a QR code that turned into an app, a loyalty scheme, an email capture and a tip prompt before the drink arrived. The Superhero of the Week is Peter Magyar, who defeated Viktor Orbán through message discipline and a story people could repeat in one sentence.If you haven't heard episode 22 with Paul Ingram, start there — the two work well as a pair.
Subscribe to Standing Apart.