Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Early Intravenous
Administration of Beta-Blockers in Patients Suffering from Acute ST-Segment Elevation
Myocardial Infarction without Heart Failure Undergoing Primary Percutaneous
Coronary Intervention: A Study-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical
Trials
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Apr 1.doi: 10.1007
Background: Several clinical studies have produced diverse results regarding
the efficacy and safety of early intravenous beta-blockers in patients with
acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A study-level
meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing early intravenous
beta-blockers versus placebo or routine care in STEMI patients undergoing
primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed.
Methods: A database search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, the
Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized clinical trials (RCTs)
that compared intravenous beta-blockers versus placebo or routine care in STEMI
patients who underwent primary PCI. The efficacy outcomes were infarct size
(IS, % of LV) and the myocardial salvage index (MSI) based on magnetic
resonance imaging, electrocardiographic findings, heart rate, ST-segment
reduction percent (STR%), and complete STR. Safety outcomes included
arrhythmias in the first 24 h (ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation
[VT/VF], atrial fibrillation [AF], bradycardia, and advanced atrioventricular
[AV] block), cardiogenic shock and hypotension during hospitalization, left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and major adverse cardiovascular events
(cardiac death, stroke, reinfarction, and heart failure readmission) at
Results: Seven RCTs with 1428 patients were included in this study, with
709 patients in the intravenous beta-blockers and 719 in the control group.
Intravenous beta-blockers improved MSI compared to the control group (weighted
mean difference [WMD] 8.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.12-13.80, P = 0.002,
I2 = 0%), but no differences were observed in IS (% of LV)
between groups. Compared to the control group, the intravenous beta-blockers
group had a lower risk of VT/VF (relative risk [RR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.94, P =
0.02, I2 = 35%) without an increase of AF, bradycardia, and
AV-block and significantly decreased HR, hypotension. LVEF at 1 week ± 7 days
(WMD 2.06, 95% CI 0.25-3.88, P = 0.03, I2 = 12%) and 6 months ±
7 days (WMD 3.24, 95% CI 1.54-4.95, P = 0.0002, I2 = 0%) was
improved in the intravenous beta-blockers group compared to the control group.
Subgroup analysis showed that intravenous beta-blockers before PCI decreased
the risk of VT/VF and improved LVEF compared to the control group. Furthermore,
sensitivity analysis showed that patients with a left anterior descending (LAD)
artery lesion had a smaller IS (% of LV) in the intravenous beta-blockers group
compared to the control group.
Conclusion: Intravenous beta-blockers improved the MSI, decreased the risk
of VT/VF in the first 24 h, and were associated with increased LVEF at 1 week
and 6 months following PCI. In particular, intravenous beta-blockers started
before PCI is beneficial for patients with LAD lesions