
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


What changed in artificial intelligence in 2026, and what comes next? From AI agents helping build better AI to advances in robotics, the State of AI Report 2026 examines the breakthroughs, businesses, and risks shaping the field.I’m Nathan Benaich, founder of Air Street Capital and author of the State of AI Report. In this 34-minute walkthrough, I explain the findings that matter most across research, industry, politics, and safety, then share our predictions for the next 12 months.In this video:• The competition between OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, and the rise of Chinese open models• AI agents automating research and taking on longer tasks• Robotics, world models, and autonomous driving• AI adoption, company growth, and the impact on jobs• NVIDIA, GPU demand, and the data center buildout• Sovereign AI, government policy, and control over frontier models• AI safety, cybersecurity, and the risks of agents acting in real systems• Our predictions for the year ahead, including AGI in 2027Read the full report, including charts and sources: https://www.stateof.ai/Get ongoing AI analysis through the State of AI newsletter on Air Street Press: https://press.airstreet.com/Learn more about Air Street Capital: https://www.airstreet.com/Which prediction do you disagree with most? Tell me in the comments.
Jack & Jill has raised a $40 million Series A led by Air Street Capital to build AI agents for careers and recruiting. In this episode of State of AI, Nathan Benaich explains why he backed founders Matt Wilson and Saaras Mehan, and the opportunity to make personal talent representation available to everyone.
Jack gets to know your skills, passions, and career ambitions. Jill learns what companies need from their next hire. Together, they have arranged 25,000 interviews without candidates submitting applications. Nathan explores how ongoing conversations can lead to better introductions, why both talent and employers need a brand they trust, and how your next opportunity could extend beyond a conventional job search.
Explore Jack & Jill.
From Air Street Press. Subscribe to State of AI with Nathan Benaich, read the State of AI Report, and leave a rating - it helps the show.
0:00 Why we invested in Jack & Jill
1:21 A candidate is much more than their resume
3:38 Meet Jill, your company’s recruiting agent
4:58 Your next move might surprise you
Europe is promising to rearm, but its defense startups often cannot access the realistic test ranges needed to win contracts. Drawing on conversations with a dozen founders and operators, Nathan Benaich examines the scarce slots, fragmented permits, unsuitable facilities and missing procurement follow-through slowing new systems. He argues for mission-ready ranges, clear paths from successful tests to orders and a cross-border campaign passport for reusable paperwork.
Scientific papers preserve the happy path and lose the abandoned experiments and arguments that produced it. Starting with Alasdair Russell's genome editing group at the CRUK Cambridge Institute, Nathan Benaich examines whether scientific search histories could teach AI research taste. The essay explains why logs are not automatically training data, how selective labels hide the outcomes of rejected experiments, and what autonomous laboratories and Registered Reports can contribute. From Air Street Press. Subscribe at press.airstreet.com, read the State of AI Report at stateof.ai, and leave a rating - it helps the show.
Poolside trained Laguna S 2.1 on 4,096 NVIDIA H200s and published the open weights sixty days later. The 118-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model runs multi-hour autonomous coding sessions, handles up to a million tokens of context, and fits quantized on a single desktop-class machine.
Nathan Benaich of Air Street Capital walks through the Model Factory that made that schedule possible, the system co-founders Jason Warner, GitHub’s former CTO, and Eiso Kant built to take a research idea to a production run in under a week. The episode covers the 409,000 training environments behind the model, the 50-minute session in which it built a browser rendering engine with no human intervention and no ability to see its own output, why the licenses attached to open weights differ so sharply between Poolside, Tencent and Moonshot, and what it means for a company to run a capable coding model inside its own security boundary rather than renting one through an API.
Read the full piece: press.airstreet.com Poolside’s launch post: poolside.ai/blog/introducing-laguna-s-2-1 Evaluation trajectories: trajectories.poolside.ai RAAIS 2025 - Eiso Kant, Inside poolside’s path to AGI: press.airstreet.com/p/eiso-kant-poolside-ai-raais-2025
From Air Street Press. Subscribe at press.airstreet.com, read the State of AI Report at stateof.ai, and leave a rating - it helps the show.
Description:
Black Forest Labs has launched FLUX 3, a multimodal foundation model that learns jointly from images, video and audio within a single architecture, and mimic robotics has released FLUX-mimic, a video-action model built on that backbone and being tested on real assembly work in Audi's Production Lab. Nathan Benaich of Air Street Capital, an investor in Black Forest Labs, reads his Air Street Press essay on why a model trained to predict how scenes evolve turns out to be a usable robot controller. Covers the FLUX 3 preference results against Runway Gen-4.5, Grok Imagine Video, Kling v3 Pro, Seedance 2.0 and Gemini Omni Flash; how a lightweight action decoder reads the video prediction path without ever generating video; the frozen-backbone ablation against π0.5; the 101-millisecond system reaction time on a single RTX 5090; and what Air Street's own robotics deal flow says about where the constraint really sits.
Chapters (estimated at ~150 wpm, slide proportionally against final audio):
Links: FLUX 3 · FLUX-mimic (BFL) · FLUX-mimic (mimic) · Odyssey Series B · BFL Series B ·
Raia Hadsell, VP of Research at Google DeepMind, makes the case that intelligence is more than language: the same recipe that learns the patterns of text can learn the patterns of any complex system. She walks through DiffusionGemma and text diffusion, the Genie world models, and DeepMind's robotics stack, where world models now generate training data you cannot tell from the real thing. Recorded at RAAIS 2026.
Timestamps
0:00 Introduction (Nathan Benaich)
0:35 From philosophy to DeepMind: the frontiers of intelligence
2:37 The twenty-year lesson: one recipe for complex systems
4:34 DiffusionGemma and the Gemma 4 open models
5:32 How text diffusion works
7:34 Speed, self-correction, and the sudoku test
10:51 World models: better agents need better worlds
12:56 Genie 1 to Genie 3
15:01 Genie 3 demos: typing a world into being
18:20 World models for education
19:38 Grounding Genie in Street View
20:41 Robotics: a brain and a spine
23:14 Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 and Boston Dynamics' Spot
24:42 The vision-language-action model
25:45 The data bottleneck and closing the loop
27:24 Beyond language: the domains still to crack
At RAAIS 2026, Nathan Benaich sits down with Hadrien Canter, co-founder and CEO of Alta Ares, the air-defense company building AI-guided interceptors to shoot down cheap drones and cruise missiles. They get into why Europe has lost air superiority for the first time in modern history, what the data loop looks like when you run it on a freezing front line instead of a laptop, why "quantity is the quality" in the industrialization race, and how the talent pool is shifting toward European defense. Recorded live at RAAIS 2026 in London.
Chapters
00:00 — Introducing Hadrien Canter and Alta Ares
00:47 — 2022 in Ukraine, and how Europe lost air superiority
03:23 — The Series A and the Airbus partnership
05:13 — The data loop, edge AI, and the three phases of a mission
08:22 — What no simulation can reproduce
10:09 — Hiring for the mission; defense as the precondition for peace
12:36 — Open research questions and the human in the loop
14:22 — How the adversary uses AI: evasive Shaheds, drone mesh, China
17:27 — Two interceptors, and why quantity is the quality
20:50 — Iron Dome math, budgets, and peace-time vs war-time
23:41 — Q&A: keeping pace with a fast-changing front
26:31 — Q&A: talent and the shift toward European defense
29:30 — Q&A: re-arming without permanent war
32:56 — Freedom doesn't come for free
World models are the bet that AI should learn the world by watching it and acting in it, not just by reading about it. At RAAIS 2026, Odyssey co-founder and CTO Jeff Hawke makes the case: a world model is a neural simulator - an interactive stream of pixels that runs in real time, models physics, and answers back.
He walks through Odyssey's four research fronts - streaming interactive pixels (Odyssey-2), joint audio and video (Starchild-1), shared multiplayer worlds (Agora-1, demoed live as a fully generated game of GoldenEye), and PROWL, which sends a reinforcement-learning agent to find and fix a world model's own failures - and argues the field is at its GPT-2 moment: promising, but pre-ChatGPT, with the GPT-3-style commercial unlock still ahead.
Recorded at the 10th Research and Applied AI Summit (RAAIS), London, June 2026.
Timestamps
00:00 Intro: Nathan on Odyssey and world models
01:05 Jeff Hawke: from self-driving to world models
01:40 The bet — a missing form of intelligence
02:40 Why world models suddenly matter (the late-2025 flip)
03:16 What a world model actually is (and isn't)
04:45 The neural simulator
06:34 Two principles: end-to-end learning and generality
07:19 The "GPT-3 of world models" and four research themes
08:46 Odyssey-2: streaming, interactive pixels
10:33 Starchild-1: generating audio and video together
13:03 Agora-1: multiplayer world models
13:57 Live demo: the room plays GoldenEye
16:20 PROWL: improving the model by breaking it
18:39 Where Odyssey goes next
19:55 Still the GPT-2 era
21:30 Q&A: physics limits, safety, compute cost, merging with LLMs
Ted Moskovitz leads the Science of Scaling team at Anthropic, the group that works out how to turn compute into smarter models. In this RAAIS 2026 fireside with Air Street Capital's Nathan Benaich, he argues that frontier scaling has become an empirical science - a discipline for cutting uncertainty before spending the compute, not just buying more of it.
They get into the honest measure of AI acceleration (it's the counterfactual, not the benchmark), why a bigger model can be cheaper than splitting a task across small ones, whether a model can have research taste, and why safety and capability turn out to be the same axis. Plus the highest-leverage AI work to do in 2026, and why Anthropic's London office no longer feels like a satellite.
Recorded live at RAAIS 2026 in London.
Timestamp:
00:00 - Meet Ted Moskovitz and the Science of Scaling team
00:45 - What "the science of scaling" actually means
01:18 - Why scaling is a science, not an art
02:55 - Big labs vs the new "neo labs"
04:47 - How a research finding reaches the product
06:44 - What neuroscience carries over to AI (and what doesn't)
09:12 - "When AI builds itself" and the real measure of acceleration
10:33 - Trust, bypass mode, and the latest model jumps
11:42 - One big model vs many small ones
13:13 - Can a model have research taste?
15:39 - How safety research makes products better
17:36 - Emergent misalignment and the alignment race
19:14 - The highest-leverage AI work in 2026
20:21 - Inside Anthropic's London office
21:34 - Audience Q&A
From the publisher's feed

540 Listeners

1,090 Listeners

5,548 Listeners