Poor Democrats. I feel bad for them. Not that bad though. Not that bad. The Democrats have this penchant, if you will, for gaslighting themselves.

They throw a spotlight on their weaknesses, on their weak points. Normally, you wouldn't see this. Right? You wouldn't see this normally. And it's nearly certain that individual Democrats probably can't perform as men.

So spare a moment of pity for Fang Fang and the personal cost of her dedication to her country. The party itself is likewise unable to form to perform as a party. They keep losing and then they publicize their loss as if their failure was a great success and their defeats were incredible victories. But you can't lose your way to the top. Can't lose your way to the you know, a conquering Roman council would ride in his triumph for the slave whispering in his ear, memento mori to keep him humble.

And the Democrats should have interns whispering in their ears, no, you're wrong. This is not actually a win, senator. They keep losing. And, normally, repeated failure brings with it humiliation. But, you know, this is all part of their kink.

The lefties rebel in them. They celebrate their impotence, guided by the same consultants who pocketed $20,000,000 to explain to the donkeys that way to win back normal men was to send them fat chicks as brand ambassadors and harangue them about the patriarchy and creative pronoun usage. Now, normally, if you make a mistake and lose, you take a moment and you regroup. You don't broadcast that you just lost and you don't broadcast like you're proud of it except this is what the democrats do. And what they're doing is mortifying to us because we're normal but it's their new normal.

Theater of the Fail, and their names are in top billing. So take a look at what the Democrats did in Texas. The party of Robin, sir Robin bravely ran away. Greg Abbott said he was gonna redistrict. Then he started to do exactly what he promised to do and they turned their tails and they ran.

And as they cowered under the massive shadow cast by JB Pritzker, They played it off as if they were defending the Alamo from the Mexicans, though the Democrats today would have surrendered to Santa Ana before he subjected them to the withering land acknowledgment. So instead of just being quiet, which was the smart play, this would have been the smart play. They decided to get up there and brag it up to 11 and then they looked ridiculous. It doesn't make sense to demand that your enemies come and take it but only if they can catch you before you get to Chicago. And those Democrats, they channeled the wrong Crockett.

They should have been channeling Davy Crockett but they channeled Jasmine Crockett. And they thought that was awesome. They were all announcing, we're fighting for democracy. Just like the French claim to be resisting the Nazis from Vichy. High fives all over the place.

But outside of that bubble, the normal people looked at them like they've lost their mind. It was obvious they ran away because they were going to lose and this was just to slow down the losing moment. It was obvious how this was going to end and there would not even be a participation trophy. It's like being on a blackjack table and, when you're get when you're dealt a 16 and the dealer shows a king. Normally, you would think they would have the dignity just to shut up.

But, no, we were subjected to the spectacle of them barging in front of every available camera and hopping on every social media platform to brag about how they had retreated in the face of defeat. Greg Abbott and Kenny Paxton, being man and potent ones at that, had they had were they they weren't having that. They were fully prepared to throw these doofuses in Brownsville if they didn't get their butts back to the lone star state to do their job. And then all of a sudden, out of nowhere, the brave braves of bravery folded like a house of damp cards and they're gonna be coming back with their tails between their legs ...

Poor Democrats. I feel bad for them. Not that bad though. Not that bad. The Democrats have this penchant, if you will, for gaslighting themselves.

They throw a spotlight on their weaknesses, on their weak points. Normally, you wouldn't see this. Right? You wouldn't see this normally. And it's nearly certain that individual Democrats probably can't perform as men.

So spare a moment of pity for Fang Fang and the personal cost of her dedication to her country. The party itself is likewise unable to form to perform as a party. They keep losing and then they publicize their loss as if their failure was a great success and their defeats were incredible victories. But you can't lose your way to the top. Can't lose your way to the you know, a conquering Roman council would ride in his triumph for the slave whispering in his ear, memento mori to keep him humble.

And the Democrats should have interns whispering in their ears, no, you're wrong. This is not actually a win, senator. They keep losing. And, normally, repeated failure brings with it humiliation. But, you know, this is all part of their kink.

The lefties rebel in them. They celebrate their impotence, guided by the same consultants who pocketed $20,000,000 to explain to the donkeys that way to win back normal men was to send them fat chicks as brand ambassadors and harangue them about the patriarchy and creative pronoun usage. Now, normally, if you make a mistake and lose, you take a moment and you regroup. You don't broadcast that you just lost and you don't broadcast like you're proud of it except this is what the democrats do. And what they're doing is mortifying to us because we're normal but it's their new normal.

Theater of the Fail, and their names are in top billing. So take a look at what the Democrats did in Texas. The party of Robin, sir Robin bravely ran away. Greg Abbott said he was gonna redistrict. Then he started to do exactly what he promised to do and they turned their tails and they ran.

And as they cowered under the massive shadow cast by JB Pritzker, They played it off as if they were defending the Alamo from the Mexicans, though the Democrats today would have surrendered to Santa Ana before he subjected them to the withering land acknowledgment. So instead of just being quiet, which was the smart play, this would have been the smart play. They decided to get up there and brag it up to 11 and then they looked ridiculous. It doesn't make sense to demand that your enemies come and take it but only if they can catch you before you get to Chicago. And those Democrats, they channeled the wrong Crockett.

They should have been channeling Davy Crockett but they channeled Jasmine Crockett. And they thought that was awesome. They were all announcing, we're fighting for democracy. Just like the French claim to be resisting the Nazis from Vichy. High fives all over the place.

But outside of that bubble, the normal people looked at them like they've lost their mind. It was obvious they ran away because they were going to lose and this was just to slow down the losing moment. It was obvious how this was going to end and there would not even be a participation trophy. It's like being on a blackjack table and, when you're get when you're dealt a 16 and the dealer shows a king. Normally, you would think they would have the dignity just to shut up.

But, no, we were subjected to the spectacle of them barging in front of every available camera and hopping on every social media platform to brag about how they had retreated in the face of defeat. Greg Abbott and Kenny Paxton, being man and potent ones at that, had they had were they they weren't having that. They were fully prepared to throw these doofuses in Brownsville if they didn't get their butts back to the lone star state to do their job. And then all of a sudden, out of nowhere, the brave braves of bravery folded like a house of damp cards and they're gonna be coming back with their tails between their legs ...

Hour 1

Obamagate. I call it that because he had everything in front of him, and he didn't have to do what he did. And he decided to do it, and he had just two far too many willing playmates that came on board with that. He was trying to help Hillary Clinton. They needed to do something because all of this stuff about her server was gonna come out.

Everybody's gonna just they were discovering that nobody liked her and was weren't gonna vote for him. So they had to come up with a Russia collusion hoax. Now among our many political scandals, we've never had to contend with anything like this. Here you have a lame duck president. He abuses and politicizes the national intelligence gathering operation in order to blame an adversarial nuclear power for an election loss.

It was too embarrassing and set in motion a series of fraudulently predicated criminal investigations intended to force Trump's resignation from office or impeachment and removal, all based on the fact that she lost. And as enormous as this already is, the scandal is ongoing. It every time the former Obama officials, including Clapper and Brennan, Comey, every time they publicly lie about facts regarding the Russia collusion hoax, the clock starts over each and every time. So they're acting as coconspirators in a plot to defraud you, to overthrow a legitimately elected president, and to cover up past criminal activity. The only thing that comes close to how scandalous this is is the fact that the corporate news media continues to refuse to report this without fear or favor.

They just won't do it because they're indoctrinated and committed leftists. Right? They lack the requisite discernment to see beyond partisan political blinders and report facts that are personally troubling. Even worse, even worse, many journalists, you know, they, they've redefined their professional role away from any responsibility for being objective and, toward a kind of active agency in which they shape the truth to advance a particular worldview. Journalists love Obama, and I'm just using that to, I'm using that for you to understand that's the group that loves Obama.

Journalists. They're not really journalists. They despise Trump. They're happy to act as assets for for former Obama administration officials pushing lies and hiding facts. And journalists were and remain essential coconspirators in the Russia collusion hoax.

Now I get that you already understand that in some ways, they're never gonna be they're they're never gonna see justice. And, as far as that goes, that's fine if the journalist get away with it. Everybody else, so they gotta go. But understand that this is as bad, these preeminent news companies aiding and bedding the Clinton Obama information war against the American people. That's as bad as what Obamagate is.

Now journalism today resembles stenography. And famous, quote, reporters, end quote, celebrity ones, they simply copy paste and repeat what the corrupt members of the Obama intelligence community told them without actually saying, you know, that they were verifying this. They didn't even try. And if you press them to corroborate it, they habitually relied on anonymous sources from past or present government officials, word salad, the new word salad, as proof that they're they're very sloppy stuff. I'm not even gonna calls call it journalism.

Did it pass muster? And in exchange for acting as propaganda spreading disinformation and misinformation and misinformation, a hybrid war being waged by powerful Democrats and the intelligence community against you, the reporters, quote, unquote, receive promotions and celebrity recognition of book deals and Pulitzer prizes. And even after Gabbard's declassifications have exposed the news media's Russia collusion propaganda for the trash garbage, hot garbage that it was. The reporters refused to retract past lies, return Russia collusion related wards or renew that's not even the word I wanna use, or publicly admi ...

Well, as we do, it is time to sit down and have a chat with Greenville County Sheriff Hobart Lewis. Good afternoon, sir. Good afternoon, Bill. Now you had to go and, I guess, give a blunt briefing to the Greenville County Council last night, didn't you? I I did not.

You did not? Go and and attend that. What what they have was a community forum. Okay. And what I what I did have to do is give them some information, they requested before that meeting because of an email from a group that said they were showing up.

They would all be identified with red shirts, and a lot of misinformation has been put out there. So we tried to give them the facts as as they would need them to speak to these folks that showed up. Now this has to do with an animal rescue called Anakin's Trails Correct. Where they went and observed a dog, a 14 year old Cocker Spaniel that was under the care of a vet that was on medication for heart failure, that was in heart failure and he was in his favorite spot because he liked to lay in a nice cool depression outside and observe the swamp rabbit trail. Correct.

And he was observed by this animal rescue and they then cut the dog free, took the dog without letting the owner know, and had the dog euthanized. That's correct. They took him to a a local vet here Right. And, had two options, and and they chose to have the dog euthanized. Which the dog was, probably, you know I mean, dogs like to dogs like to be near their owners at that time, and this dog apparently was a had been a very big part of the owner's life, gotten her through a lot of things and everything else.

And but, now things are not exactly this was not like the Cape Crusaders coming in and saving the dog with this, was it? No. Pretty unique situation that, that this this group has gotten a lot of praise for finding animals and rescuing animals and doing some of that stuff in the past. So this particular situation is really unique, and and a strange turn of events for their reputation. Now they didn't tell the owner.

And in fact, they didn't tell the owner until the dog was dead, did they? No. That that's not that's not correct. That's not correct? Okay.

What what tell me what happened. There were there was four suspects involved Right. And three of them, went and cut the dog loose and took the dog while one knocked on the door and kinda created a bit of a distraction, if you will, and spoke to the owner. And and the owner got her phone number, And she told that this person at the door, this one particular individual said, we have rescued this dog, and we have taken it to the vet. We're gonna try to help it.

We're here to help you. We're here to help the animal. By this time, the dog was gone and, and taken to a vet, and a decision was made to euthanize the dog. The actual owner of the dog, finds dislocate this veterinarian office about two hours later, and the dog had already been euthanized. And the owner of the veterinarian office finds this out because it was scheduled for cremation to be sent off to be cremated.

Right. And the the the doctor, the veterinarian finds out and that the owner had came. So the next day, they contacted the owner. The owner was able to go out there and get an explanation of what happened. And keep in mind, the vet they took it to had never dealt with this dog before.

Right. It was certainly not the veterinarian that serviced his family. This was in a neighborhood that like Facebook posts and some of that stuff claimed that it was made it sound like it might be out in the country. They spoke to the owner who said they didn't own the property, they didn't own the dog. That's how this whole thing started on social media, and it does sound like a very compelling story.

And to see pictures of the dog, it looks like it's wrapped on a cable around a a light pole. Right. That's not the case at all. This is a subdivision where neighbors are familiar with the homeowner and the dog. The the walking trail goes around the ...

So I am speaking with the sheriff of Greenville County, Hobart Lewis. We're talking about this Anacond Trail thing, and, I was just getting bombarded with a bunch of, questions about, how do you know that they did not call animal control? We don't have any records through our IT system, showing any calls. There's a voice mail also for animal control that they could have or voice machine. They could have left a voice mail.

We don't have anything that we found for animal control until after the dog had been euthanized. That's when the call started coming in as for us to investigate the owner, was the request from this group after the dog had been euthanized. So so we have phone records. They have phone records just like we do here through dispatch if you had called 911. Like, you know, that again, this and keep in mind, the the actual owner of the dog who had it for fourteen years Right.

We got vet records from last year where she took it to her vet and said, yeah. He's got some heart issues, heart failure, and you can take him home or have him euthanized. She chose to medicate him, treat him, and take him home. These folks who kidnapped the dogs, stole the dog, they take him to a vet, and they raise money through a GoFundMe as, you know, to pay for this medical care for the canine. They chose to euthanize him.

When they had the same option according to the this vet, they took him to, you can treat him or you can euthanize him. Right. They chose to put the dog down. Why not keep the dog alive and treat the dog, leave it with the vet if necessary, call us, and let us investigate this case. That never happened.

They they made a decision to put this dog down within about two hours from the time they took the dog. So why not call us? She called her friend who was back at the house. She called her. We got a video recording audio recording of that as well.

I think when this case comes out and and they go to court and they have their court date, whatever the outcome, and that conversation is released of her phone call back to the friend who was still at the home the dog owner's home, I think this changes things for the public perception of what happened because those are facts. Those are facts from the four people who took the dog, not from us. That conversation pretty much tells you everything you wanna know about how this came about. And and the homeowner didn't know, initially before they took the dog. They didn't make a request.

Hey. We're here to help your dog. Can we take it wherever? Can we help you with the dog? That was never discussed.

And according to the homeowner, again, this is in a subdivision. She never said this isn't my property. It's it's pretty clear that's her property. Right. If you look at a topo map on the property tax records, you can clearly see the dog and the runner, the cable that's in the backyard, and it's not a old post, telephone post.

It's a four by four post where this runner was stretched out across there for the dog. It's obvious. It it would be like me having a playground or a swing set in the backyard for my kids. It would be obvious that's my playground. So Right.

Again, they they, you know, kinda got their narrative out there quick and got a lot of people. And, you know, I feel bad for a lot of people who care about animals and wanna support folks like this and wanna support animals who donated to this to find out Now they're mad because they were charged. They committed a crime. What if they came on your property and did this? Like, you you can't that's that's, you know, the first amendment, second amendment, fourth amendment protects you from those kind of things.

Yep. This is this turned criminal very quickly. Now the the they're also they were also saying the dog was covered with fleas and, and it was 97 degrees outside and all this other stuff. Do you have any any information about the condition of the dog when they took the dog? I saw pictures of the dog that they posted on F ...

Well, as we do, it is time to sit down and have a chat with Greenville County Sheriff Hobart Lewis. Good afternoon, sir. Good afternoon, Bill. Now you had to go and, I guess, give a blunt briefing to the Greenville County Council last night, didn't you? I I did not.

You did not? Go and and attend that. What what they have was a community forum. Okay. And what I what I did have to do is give them some information, they requested before that meeting because of an email from a group that said they were showing up.

They would all be identified with red shirts, and a lot of misinformation has been put out there. So we tried to give them the facts as as they would need them to speak to these folks that showed up. Now this has to do with an animal rescue called Anakin's Trails Correct. Where they went and observed a dog, a 14 year old Cocker Spaniel that was under the care of a vet that was on medication for heart failure, that was in heart failure and he was in his favorite spot because he liked to lay in a nice cool depression outside and observe the swamp rabbit trail. Correct.

And he was observed by this animal rescue and they then cut the dog free, took the dog without letting the owner know, and had the dog euthanized. That's correct. They took him to a a local vet here Right. And, had two options, and and they chose to have the dog euthanized. Which the dog was, probably, you know I mean, dogs like to dogs like to be near their owners at that time, and this dog apparently was a had been a very big part of the owner's life, gotten her through a lot of things and everything else.

And but, now things are not exactly this was not like the Cape Crusaders coming in and saving the dog with this, was it? No. Pretty unique situation that, that this this group has gotten a lot of praise for finding animals and rescuing animals and doing some of that stuff in the past. So this particular situation is really unique, and and a strange turn of events for their reputation. Now they didn't tell the owner.

And in fact, they didn't tell the owner until the dog was dead, did they? No. That that's not that's not correct. That's not correct? Okay.

What what tell me what happened. There were there was four suspects involved Right. And three of them, went and cut the dog loose and took the dog while one knocked on the door and kinda created a bit of a distraction, if you will, and spoke to the owner. And and the owner got her phone number, And she told that this person at the door, this one particular individual said, we have rescued this dog, and we have taken it to the vet. We're gonna try to help it.

We're here to help you. We're here to help the animal. By this time, the dog was gone and, and taken to a vet, and a decision was made to euthanize the dog. The actual owner of the dog, finds dislocate this veterinarian office about two hours later, and the dog had already been euthanized. And the owner of the veterinarian office finds this out because it was scheduled for cremation to be sent off to be cremated.

Right. And the the the doctor, the veterinarian finds out and that the owner had came. So the next day, they contacted the owner. The owner was able to go out there and get an explanation of what happened. And keep in mind, the vet they took it to had never dealt with this dog before.

Right. It was certainly not the veterinarian that serviced his family. This was in a neighborhood that like Facebook posts and some of that stuff claimed that it was that made it sound like it might be out in the country. They spoke to the owner who said they didn't own the property, they didn't own the dog. That's how this whole thing started on social media, and it does sound like a very compelling story.

And to see pictures of the dog, it looks like it's wrapped on a cable around a a light pole. Right. That's not the case at all. This is a subdivision where neighbors are familiar with the homeowner and the dog. The the walking trail goes aroun ...

I try very hard not to be superficial. I mean, you can't just likes dislike somebody because of their look. Right? Because of the way they look. You know, so but then there's Adam Schiff, which I kinda think sort of blows all that hole.

Just the fact that he exists just blows that whole supposition out of the water. Makes me wonder about our friends in California who voted for him though. I mean, I really wonder about that. He's always had a very smug I know something you don't know smirk. Quite the smirking guy he is.

And, turns out what he allegedly knew was how to weaponize classified information for political gain. And then or now, he's acting all kinds of shocked because he's being told, you can't do that. It's illegal. So this week, a Democratic whistleblower, someone who worked in Schiff's own house orbit for more than a decade, told the FBI that Schiff personally approved leaked classified material in order to smear Donald Trump. Donald Trump.

Now that's the kind of thing that you look at and you say to yourself, you're really an idiot for doing that. See, at the particular time, we were we were poking the Russian bear to make all this happen. Had to do it because we didn't like Trump. Yeah. There was a risk involved.

So what if we vaporize some of you guys? Well, we're talking about Trump. I mean, Trump just talking about Trump took down tenacious d, didn't they? It's not a rumor and it's not a guess. Not and I heard it from a guy.

The whistleblower alleges Schiff gave the order in a general staff meeting. Translation, he wanted an audience for this treachery. And the whistleblower didn't mince words about this at all. He called the acts treasonous, illegal, and unethical. And that's actually sort of, generous.

Because if the allegation is true, Schiff didn't just cross the line. He sprinted past it. Then he set it on fire. And then he threw the constitution on the fire. But let's not stop there.

Let's not stop with Schiff. Mister Mackey can't be the only one. What about Cancos Clinton? You know, for a very long period of time during her her campaign. She gave up the box chardonnay to at least appear lucid, and, she's the one that handed him the playbook.

Her her campaign and the DNC paid for the Steele dossier, a steaming pile of fiction, which they were passing around as intelligence. They fed it into the bloodstream of the security apparatus, and it produced a FISA warrant, political surveillance, and years of baseless headlines. And then there's Buffalo Barack Hussein Obama. Ever wonder why I call him Buffalo Barack? If you remember in silence of the lambs, Buffalo Bill wanted to wanted to make a sweater.

Right? He wanted to make a sweater with breasts on it. He wanted to transform himself. Well, Buffalo Barack Hussein Obama wanted to transform the nation. See, this came at a really good time, the the Hillary Clinton Steele dossier, because the ICA that had come to them, the intelligence community assessment, it didn't go the way he wanted it to.

So this came in to where he could try to he take that took that one and put it in the shredder, and they started writing a new one. And then they used the Steele dossier as the basis for it being there. And, you know, then they used it as a blunt force weapon against a political opponent. This is not misjudgment. That's political arson with the nation's trust being used as the kindling.

But here's the thing. Schiff and Hillary and Obama, they all know exactly what they do did. They all knew exactly what they were doing. They weren't mistaken. They weren't misled.

They were knowingly and willfully manipulating the intelligence system to settle political scores. Let's go to Ted in Pelzer. Yes, sir. Hey, Bill. Thanks for taking my call.

Yes, sir. You know, I think Trump should sue the DNC for defamation of character. He he could probably win that. I mean, especially with the documents that have been released, they could probably go after Schiff, Clinton, ev ...

Now and and this was bound to happen. I I've told you before about the whole Washington. George Washington never wanted to see political parties. And the more I'm looking at this, the more I'm beginning to believe that Trump is probably the closest one to that that we've that we've ever seen up to this point. He may be the prototype of things to come because of the coalition.

See, we know that, you know, we get out there and we hear about the richest 1%, which means the other 99% of us are not. And that stretches across political, lines, doesn't it? And there's a lot of people out there that just wanna live their life and not be bothered by the federal government. Some of them are Democrats, some of them are Republican, and with Trump they found the common ground and that began the Trump coalition. So here we are sixteen years later and we're in the you know, it's been the most consequential political revolution in the history of The United States.

The ruling class's domination of the two major political parties is in shambles and the Democrat party is now controlled by the true believers in the wokeism of the Marxist and the Republican party has been taken over by Trump and the America First popular populists. So the tentacles of the ruling elites have been cut. Now, over the years, the current ruling class which traces back to the beginning of the Woodrow Wilson administration has, you know, it's been very the the choreography has been very heavy and the two parties have been shaped into unique and complementary roles. Democrat party was the party of the people and the superior political strategists and tacticians promoting an increasingly active government. The Republican Party's role was to be the token to limit while still accommodating the big government policies of the Democrat Party and thus the ever increasing power of the ruling class.

So as long as there was peace and prosperity, that went unnoticed by the vast majority of an very apathetic electorate as the wealth and influence of the nation's elites increased geometrically. But nothing exists in a in a vacuum. While the ruling class reveled in their power and influence, they ignored the gradual infiltration of the dying wool Marxists into the hierarchy of the Democrat Party. They were certain that this comparatively small cadre of true believers would never be able to take over a major political party. They believed over competently that they would always be able to maintain their hedge of money within the Democrat party.

And as long as they maintain their influence within the Republican Party hierarchy, the Marxist gradual infiltration into the upper reaches of the Democrat Party could be tolerated. There's an awful lot of ifs built into that one, isn't it? In 02/2008, Barack Obama's election lit the fuse of a bloodless revolution that would eventuate into the decline and the fall of the current ruling class. See, in the run up to the February, the ruling elites preferred candidates were Hillary Clinton and John McCain. They knew that a glib, Barack Obama was steeped in Marxist ideology and was a foot soldier for the cause.

But two factors they could not control was his ability to portray himself as a moderate and his skin color, which would almost certainly guarantee he's winning the Democrat nomination against an unlikable Hillary Clinton and the presidency against a very feckless John McCain. So they were forced to endorse his candidacy despite being uncertain if they could control him or his radical left ring policies and his declared intent to transform the Democrat party and the nation. And then he was elected and then things really got interesting. He and his minions almost immediately exploited his unique position as the first black president, a weapon Obama himself never failed to wield in order to manipulate, intimidate and marginalize the ruling class who were the ultimate target of dedicated Marxist truth believers. During the length of his ...

I try very hard not to be superficial. I mean, you can't just likes dislike somebody because of their look. Right? Because of the way they look. You know, so but then there's Adam Schiff, which I kinda think sort of blows all that hole.

Just the fact that he exists just blows that whole supposition out of the water. Makes me wonder about our friends in California who voted for him though. I mean, I really wonder about that. He's always had a very smug, I know something you don't know, smirk. Quite the smirking guy he is.

And, turns out what he allegedly knew was how to weaponize classified information for political gain. And then or now, he's acting all kinds of shocked because he's being told you can't do that. It's illegal. So this week, a Democratic whistleblower, someone who worked in Schiff's own house orbit for more than a decade, told the FBI that Schiff personally approved leaked classified material in order to smear Donald Trump. Now that's the kind of thing that you look at and you say to yourself, you're really an idiot for doing that.

See, at the particular time, we were we were poking the Russian bear to make all this happen. Had to do it because we didn't like Trump. Yeah. There was a risk involved. So what if we vaporize some of you guys?

Well, we're talking about Trump. I mean, Trump just talking about Trump took down tenacious d, didn't they? It's not a rumor and it's not a guess. Not an I heard it from a guy. The whistleblower alleges Schiff gave the order in a general staff meeting.

Translation, he wanted an audience for this treachery. And the whistleblower didn't mince words about this at all. He called the acts treasonous, illegal and unethical. And that's actually sort of, generous. Because if the allegation is true, Schiff didn't just cross the line.

He sprinted past it. Then he set it on fire. And then he threw the constitution on the fire. But let's not stop there. Let's not stop with Schiff.

Mister Mackey can't be the only one. What about Cancos Clinton? You know, for a very long period of time during her, her campaign, she gave up the box chardonnay to at least appear lucid. And, she's one that handed him the playbook. Her her campaign and the DNC paid for the Steele dossier, a steaming pile of fiction which they were passing around as intelligence.

They fed it into the bloodstream of the security apparatus and it produced a FISA warrant, political surveillance, and years of baseless headlines. And then there's Buffalo Barack Hussein Obama. Ever wonder why I call him Buffalo Barack? If you remember in silence of the lambs, Buffalo Bill wanted to wanted to make a sweater. Right?

He wanted to make a sweater with breasts on it. He wanted to transform himself. Well, Buffalo, Barack Hussein Obama wanted to transform the nation. See, this came at a really good time, the the Hillary Clinton Steele dossier, because the ICA that had come to them, the intelligence community assessment, it didn't go the way he wanted it to. So this came in to where he could try to he take that took that one and put it in the shredder, and they started writing a new one.

And then they used the Steele dossier as the basis for it being there. And, you know, then they used it as a blunt force weapon against a political opponent. This is not misjudgment. That's political arson with the nation's trust being used as the kindling. But here's the thing.

Schiff and Hillary and Obama, they all know exactly what they do did. They all knew exactly what they were doing. They weren't mistaken. They weren't misled. They were knowingly and willfully manipulating the intelligence system to settle political scores.

Let's go to Ted Impelzer. Yes, sir. Hey, Bill. Thanks for taking my call. Yes, sir.

You know, I think Trump should sue the DNC for defamation of character. He he could probably win that. I mean, especially with the documents that have been released, they could probably go after Schiff, Clinton, everybody. You know? T ...

Obamagate. I call it that because he had everything in front of him, and he didn't have to do what he did. And he decided to do it, and he had just two far too many willing playmates that came on board with that. He was trying to help Hillary Clinton. They needed to do something because all of this stuff about her server was gonna come out.

Everybody's gonna just they were discovering that nobody liked her and was weren't gonna vote for him. So they had to come up with a Russia collusion hoax. Now among our many political scandals, we've never had to contend with anything like this. Here you have a lame duck president. He abuses and politicizes the national intelligence gathering operation in order to blame an adversarial nuclear power for an election loss.

It was too embarrassing and set in motion a series of fraudulently predicated criminal investigations intended to force Trump's resignation from office or impeachment and removal, all based on the fact that she lost. And as enormous as this already is, the scandal is ongoing. It every time the former Obama officials, including Clapper and Brennan, Comey, every time they publicly lie about facts regarding the Russia collusion hoax, the clock starts over each and every time. So they're acting as coconspirators in a plot to defraud you, to overthrow a legitimately elected president, and to cover up past criminal activity. The only thing that comes close to how scandalous this is is the fact that the corporate news media continues to refuse to report this without fear or favor.

They just won't do it because they're indoctrinated and committed leftists. Right? They lack the requisite discernment to see beyond partisan political blinders and report facts that are personally troubling. Even worse, even worse, many journalists, you know, they, they've redefined their professional role away from any responsibility for being objective and, toward a kind of active agency in which they shape the truth to advance a particular worldview. Journalists love Obama, and I'm just using that to, I'm using that for you to understand that's the group that loves Obama.

Journalists. They're not really journalists. They despise Trump. They're happy to act as assets for for former Obama administration officials pushing lies and hiding facts. And journalists were and remain essential coconspirators in the Russia collusion hoax.

Now I get that you already understand that in some ways, they're never gonna be they're they're never gonna see justice. And, as far as that goes, that's fine if the journalist get away with it. Everybody else, so they gotta go. But understand that this is as bad, these preeminent news companies aiding and bedding the Clinton Obama information war against the American people. That's as bad as what Obamagate is.

Now journalism today resembles stenography. And famous, quote, reporters, end quote, celebrity ones, they simply copy paste and repeat what the corrupt members of the Obama intelligence community told them without actually saying, you know, that they were verifying this. They didn't even try. And if you press them to corroborate it, they habitually relied on anonymous sources from past or present government officials, word salad, the new word salad, as proof that they're they're very sloppy stuff. I'm not even gonna calls call it journalism.

Did it pass muster? And in exchange for acting as propaganda spreading disinformation and misinformation and misinformation, a hybrid war being waged by powerful Democrats and the intelligence community against you, the reporters, quote, unquote, receive promotions and celebrity recognition of book deals and Pulitzer prizes. And even after Gabbard's declassifications have exposed the news media's Russia collusion propaganda for the trash garbage, hot garbage that it was. The reporters refused to retract past lies, return Russia collusion related wards or renew that's not even the word I wanna use, or publicly admit any wr ...