I I could say it's not a good time to be a Democrat, but it hasn't been a good time to be a Democrat for a very, very long time. It's never a good time to be a Democrat, but right now, it's especially bad as the absolute lunatics in your party, Democrats, have taken over. And you guys are beginning to panic because the reality of that is setting in. Now don't get me wrong. It's a great time not to be a Democrat.

As a matter of fact, what what you have going on right now within the Trump administration is not a purely Republican administration. You have a former Democrat who's the president. You have a former Democrat who's in charge of DNI. You have a former Democrat who's in charge of HHS and you have a former Democrat who's running DOS because the things this is the best of all worlds here, what's going on here. Now the fools in the, in in in the Democratic Party, they're embracing terrorists.

And, I mean, this is one of those things you get out there and you say there's just no way. There's just no way. I never considered that to be something they would do. I knew they were sympathetic to them. I mean, go check out what's going on in Dearborn, Michigan.

But part of me just assumed that this was a ploy for votes. And maybe back then, they only meant it as a ploy for votes and now they mean it. They want to globalize the Intifada. So this is not and that's not about Jewish people. That's openly calling for murdering non believers.

Probably, the young people spray painting that on their bed sheets don't know what those words mean. Democrats have always found hateful uses for bed sheets, haven't they? But that doesn't change the fact that they, goose step through their their marches with people who do. Imagine getting out there and saying to yourself, okay. Well, I'm gonna put this on video and then I would share a suicide bomber as a martyred hero.

Well, I know there's a good chance that the radicals in The Middle East will soon be recruiting them to be that just that here in The United States and your complicity laid the groundwork for that recruitment. And the funny part is they don't think it'll happen to them and that's how they live with themselves. So rather than calling out and trying to diffuse the destruction they're unleash unleashing on the world, they're just going on ahead. They're just going on hoping the impact of future blast is gonna miss them. And in in the in part in pursuit of that particular destruction, they need money.

And daddy Soros bucks is gonna die soon and while his wiener cast off loving kid is just as dedicated to the anti American cause as evil old man is, he doesn't seem to have the intelligence intelligence that George does. And that will make getting his money easier but also means more radical elements will be dipping their fingers in the well and they will drain the pool. I mean, it's not infinite. The big money in the Democrat party is shifting towards the radicals and the activist organizations more so than the candidates and especially the semi sane ones. If you're out there and you're trying to be a, moderate democrat, you have to self fund.

As billionaires co pay revolution by proxy by shoveling their cash to bail funds and Antiva. This looks like a perfect perfect moment for a Rico case and should the dust justice department be interested in actually doing justice that, you know, that that that'd be where they could go. This leaves the party high and dry. Well, let's go to the phones real quick. Let's get over here so where you can go to the phones.

Let's go to Tim in Pelzer. Yes, sir. Hey, Ted in Pelzer. How are you doing, Bill? Alright.

I'm good. Yes, sir. Obviously yeah, Ted. The the climate change thing is not working good because I saw a video today where Greta Thunberg is, working with some, Hamas supporters Yeah. Talking about a flotilla.

Yeah. So, you know, I I guess I guess she's off the, the climate change drifting and moved on to the Hamas drifting. Listen. S ...

I I could say it's not a good time to be a Democrat, but it hasn't been a good time to be a Democrat for a very, very long time. It's never a good time to be a Democrat, but right now it's especially bad as the absolute lunatics in your party, Democrats, have taken over. And you guys are beginning to panic because the reality of that is setting in. Now don't get me wrong. It's a great time not to be a Democrat.

As a matter of fact, what what you have going on right now within the Trump administration is not a purely Republican administration. You have a former Democrat who's the president. You have a former Democrat who's in charge of DNI. You have a former Democrat who's in charge of HHS and you have a former Democrat who's running DOS because the things this is the best of all worlds here, what's going on here. Now the fools in the, in in in the Democratic Party, they're embracing terrorists.

And, I mean, this is one of those things you get out there and you say there's just no way. There's just no way. I never considered that to be something they would do. I knew they were sympathetic to them. I mean, go check out what's going on in Dearborn, Michigan.

But part of me just assumed that this was a ploy for votes. And maybe back then, they only meant it as a ploy for votes and now they mean it. They want to globalize the intifada. So this is not and that's not about Jewish people. That's openly calling for murdering non believers.

Probably, the young people spray painting that on their bed sheets don't know what those words mean. Democrats have always found hateful uses for bed sheets, haven't they? But that doesn't change the fact that they, goose step through their their marches with people who do. Imagine getting out there and saying to yourself, okay. Well, I'm gonna put this on video and then I would cheer a suicide bomber as a martyred hero.

Well, I know there's a good chance that the radicals in The Middle East will soon be recruiting them to be that just that here in The United States and your complicity laid the groundwork for that recruitment. And the funny part is they don't think it'll happen to them and that's how they live with themselves. So rather than calling out and trying to diffuse the destruction they're unleash unleashing on the world, they're just going on ahead. They're just going on hoping the impact of future blast is gonna miss them. And in in the in part in pursuit of that particular destruction, they need money.

And daddy Soros Bucks is gonna die soon and while his wiener cast off loving kid is just as dedicated to the anti American cause as evil old man is, he doesn't seem to have the intelligence intelligence that George does. And that will make getting his money easier but also means more radical elements will be dipping their fingers in the well and they will drain the pool. I mean, it's not infinite. The big money in the Democrat party is shifting towards the radicals and the activist organizations more so than the candidates and especially the semi sane ones. If you're out there and you're trying to be a, moderate Democrat, you have to self fund as billionaires co pay revolution by proxy by shoveling their cash to bail funds and Antiva.

This looks like a perfect perfect moment for a Rico case and should the dust justice department be interested in actually doing justice that, you know, that that that'd be where they could go. This leaves the party high and dry. Well, let's go to the phones real quick. Let's get over here so where you can go to the phones. Let's go to Tim in Pelzer.

Yes, sir. Hey, Ted in Pelzer. How are you doing, Bill? Alright. I'm good.

You said Obviously yeah, Ted. The the climate change thing's not working good because I saw a video today where Greta Thunberg is, working with some, Hamas supporters Yeah. Talking about a flotilla. Yeah. So, you know, I I guess I guess she's off the, the climate change drifting and moved on to the Hamas drifting.

Listen. She's ...

So what would you get if you breed senator Tom Tillis, alleged Republican, with senator Mazie Hirano, raging Democrat from somewhere? What would you get if you bred those two? Well, you would actually produce a senatorial moron, a legislator so unbelievably stupid that it needs a constant reminder to breathe. Now while it's very amusing to think about those kind of things out loud and everything else, we, we absolutely need to think about how do we help North Carolina get rid of Tom Tillis. Right?

He needs to go. The republicans need to stop messing around with politicians like him. Republicans of North Carolina, you need to primary this jerk. Now just like our own Lindsey Graham, Trump has to be nice and polite, at least for now. But you and I don't.

He's a loser. But is he a Machiavellian supervillain? I don't know. Is he Ernest Stavo Blofeld or is he Ernest p Worrell Blowhart? This is how bad it is.

It is never a good idea to sit here and say to ourselves, we're going to dump an incumbent Republican. That's never the thing that you should ever wanna do. The preferred thing we would be seeking would be for him to listen to his constituents and do do what his constituents say to him they want him to do. And stop listening to the guys at the country club. It seems like he gets reelected, barely, sometimes, and and he always does.

But this is a guy who has, he has delusions of grandeur, but when in fact he has fully embraced mediocrity. A tar heel punk who imagines himself as a statesman. We don't need statesmen. We have a statesman in charge of the executive branch. We need soldiers that will get in there with our commander in chief and get out there and run and get this kind of stuff done.

Make America great again. But not Tom Tillis. He thinks his thoughts are important. He thinks that his ideas are significant. He thinks he makes a difference and he has here recently but only in the worst way.

And that's a problem that I'm beginning to see as a unique characteristic of the senate. The senators out there, they think they're like in the Roman senate where they walk around with them, you know, you know anyway, they got a bunch of staffers and lobbyists that cater them, butter them up. They smooch their Shumers. And some imagine it's because they are truly great men and women and non binaries instead of just being the one filling a slot, which is all they are. That's all they are.

They may get into that slot like a tick, like a tick on a mission. You'll never dislodge me. But they're just filling the slot. They think they're leaders, but they're supposed to be led by you. You're the one that leads them.

And the voters expect them to do what the voters want rather than based upon their vastly overrated intellect. Now see if tell us or any of them, any of them, if they get out there and they vote the right way, I don't care how big they think they are. I don't care how serious they try to be. I don't care how many portraits they sit for in their office already surrounding themselves with portraits of themselves as long as they wrote right. But Tillis is a throwback to the two early two thousands GOP which had the fully embraced instinct to fail.

He tried to tank peak Hegseth. He was all in with the John Cornyn gun control scheme and now he's actually doing damage. He's doing it in two ways. He's disrespecting the pulled. And now he's got Jeanine Pirro in there.

And he says he likes her, but we'll see what he does. Tillis was mad because, Ed refused to abandon the j six political prisoners as Tillis did. He abandoned them as Graham did. He said shoot him in the head, you know. Now all of this for any of these guys would be to their shame if they had the capacity to feel it.

If they had the introspection and the the the self awareness that's necessary to be able to look deep in your own soul, not look at everybody else but look at yourself. If they could do that, then this would be, you know, he'd be sitting around i ...

So what would you get if you breed senator Tom Tillis, alleged Republican, with senator Mazie Hirano, raging Democrat from somewhere? What would you get if you bred those two? Well, you would actually produce a senatorial moron, a legislator so unbelievably stupid that it needs a constant reminder to breathe. Now while it's very amusing to think about those kind of things out loud and everything else, we, we absolutely need to think about how do we help North Carolina get rid of Tom Tillis. Right?

He needs to go. The republicans need to stop messing around with politicians like him. Republicans of North Carolina, you need to primary this jerk. Now just like our own Lindsey Graham, Trump has to be nice and polite, at least for now. But you and I don't.

He's a loser. But is he a Machiavellian supervillain? I don't know. Is he Ernest Stavo Blofeld or is he Ernest p Worrell Blowhard? This is how bad it is.

It is never a good idea to sit here and say to ourselves, we're going to dump an incumbent Republican. That's never the thing that you should ever wanna do. The preferred thing we would be seeking would be for him to listen to his constituents and do do what his constituents say to him they want him to do. And stop listening to the guys at the country club. It seems like he gets reelected barely sometimes and and he always does.

But this is a guy who has, he has delusions of grandeur, but when in fact he has fully embraced mediocrity. A tar heel punk who imagines himself as a statesman. We don't need statesmen. We have a statesman in charge of the executive branch. We need soldiers that will get in there with our commander in chief and get out there and run and get this kind of stuff done.

Make America great again, but not Tom Tillis. He thinks his thoughts are important. He thinks that his ideas are significant. He thinks he makes a difference and he has here recently but only in the worst way. And that's a problem that I'm beginning to see as a unique characteristic of the senate.

The senators out there, they think they're like in the Roman senate where they walk around with them you know the you know anyway, they got a bunch of staffers and lobbyists that cater them, butter them up. They smooch their Shumers. And some imagine it's because they are truly great men and women and non binaries instead of just being the one filling a slot, which is all they are. That's all they are. They may get into that slot like a tick, like a tick on a mission.

You'll never dislodge me. But they're just filling the slot. They think they're leaders, but they're supposed to be led by you. You're the one that leads them. And the voters expect them to do what the voters want rather than based upon their vastly overrated intellect.

Now see if tell us or any of them, any of them. If they get out there and they vote the right way, I don't care how big they think they are. I don't care how serious they try to be. I don't care how many portraits they sit for in their office already surrounding themselves with portraits of themselves as long as they wrote right. But Tillis is a throwback to the two early two thousands GOP, which had the fully embraced instinct to fail.

He tried to tank peak Hegseth. He was all in with the John Cornyn gun control scheme and now he's actually doing damage. He's doing it in two ways. He's disrespecting the president and his own voters by opposing nominee Ed Martin who's been pulled. And now he's got Jeanine Pirro in there.

And he says he likes her, but we'll see what he does. Tillis was mad because, Ed refused to abandon the j six political prisoners as Tillis did. He abandoned them as Graham did. He said shoot him in the head, you know. Now all of this for any of these guys would be to their shame if they had the capacity to feel it.

If they had the introspection and the the the self awareness that's necessary to be able to look deep in your own soul, not look at everybody else but look at yourself. If the ...

What a wonderfully rainy morning we have today. I always have to look for the best in life. I go out there and I'm like, oh, well, I don't have to water the bonsai tonight. Then again it's really cool right now too. This is you know, when everybody somebody, whenever somebody asks you hey what's the weather like down there in the Upstate?

Just remember to tell them that they can get all four seasons in a week. Paramount. Buffalo Barack Hussein Obama deported 400,000 illegal immigrants per year when he was in office and nobody said a word. If we were to hold it at a mere 400,000 per year right now after the Biden era 21,000,000 illegal aliens, just the new ones during those four years, We would, that would take fifty two point five years to clear America. And that means to complete deportation, we'll need 13 more consecutive Trump presidential terms.

I'm sure that there's gonna be a lot of people getting out there saying, well, that's that's liable to test that whole, constitutional thing. Plus, that would mean Trump would have to live for another two hundred years, or give or take. Now, creatively, since he has to slow down on actually kicking him out of the country, he's decided to reopen Alcatraz. While the courts sit out there struggling to remember that the Supreme Court and the constitution have already ruled and answered illegal immigration questions. But we have article four section four.

The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion and on application of the legislature or the executive branch when the legislature cannot be convened against domestic violence. Nowhere do they mention the judiciary. In fact, the 1849 Supreme Court ruling of Luther v Borden. And, you know, when whenever somebody gets out there and says, why do we keep going back to all these old decisions? Well, that's where legal precedent is set and this is, you know, when when a lawyer is going to law school, they have to learn about this stuff depending on what their discipline is gonna be, what their what their area of specialty is gonna be.

So they have to learn about some of these things and some of these things hold as much weight today as the day they were actually, you know, published. But going back to Luther v Borden, Chief Justice Roger Taney held that the political branches of government and that the federal courts should decide such questions pertaining to the application of article four section four. So right now, this means these judges and justices encroaching on the power of the executive branch are vile they're the ones violating the separation of power because the president has a duty to protect The United States against invasion even if it's by invitation. They are breaking laws and been the laws to let this happen. Now if you wanna go and try to figure out what invasion means, just go to Johnson seventeen eighty five English dictionary.

Invasion is the hostile entrance upon the right or possessions of another. Hostile encroachment. This is what the founders understood the definition of the word invasion to be when article four section four. And, you know, all you know, in Texas, guy went out, went to supper, came home to find a group of illegal aliens in their home using their bathroom, wearing their clothes, and pretending not to speak any English. They were not willing to leave, so they had to call the police to have the illegal aliens forcefully ejected from the home while still wearing the stolen clothes.

Next morning, when the father came out of work only to find illegal aliens sleeping in the bed of his truck, They had to be called to eject those illegal immigrants. Would you call that an invasion? Yes. You would. Yes.

The 1785 definition of invasion is hostile entrance upon the rights or possessions of another hostile encroachment. Consider, if you will, consider all the illegal alien criminal gang members in The United ...

What a wonderfully rainy morning we have today. I always have to look for the best in life. I go out there and I'm like, oh, well I don't have to water the bonsai tonight. Then again it's really cool right now too. This is you know, when everybody somebody whenever somebody asks you, hey what's the weather like down there in the Upstate?

Just remember to tell them that they can get all four seasons in a week. Paramount. Buffalo Barack Hussein Obama deported 400,000 illegal immigrants per year when he was in office and nobody said a word. If we were to hold it at a mere 400,000 per year right now after the Biden era, 21,000,000 illegal aliens, just the new ones during those four years. We would, that would take fifty two point five years to clear America.

And that means to complete deportation, we'll need 13 more consecutive Trump presidential terms. I'm sure that, there's gonna be a lot of people getting out there saying, well, that's that's liable to test that whole constitutional thing. Plus, that would mean Trump would have to live for another two hundred years or give or take. Now, creatively, since he has to slow down on actually kicking him out of the country, he's decided to reopen Alcatraz while the courts sit out there struggling to remember that the Supreme Court and the constitution have already ruled and answered illegal immigration questions. But we have article four section four.

The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion and on application of the legislature or the executive branch when the legislature cannot be convened against domestic violence. Nowhere do they mention the judiciary. In fact, the 1849 Supreme Court ruling of Luther v Borden. And, you know, when whenever somebody gets out there and says, why do we keep going back to all these old decisions? Well, that's where legal precedent is set.

And this you know, when a when a lawyer is going to law school, they have to learn about this stuff depending on what their discipline is going to be, what their what their area of specialty is going to be. So they have to learn about some of these things and some of these things hold as much weight today as the day they were actually, you know, published. But going back to Luther v Borden, Chief Justice Roger Taney held that the political branches of government and at the federal courts should decide such questions pertaining to the application of article four section four. So right now, this means these judges and justices encroaching on the power of the executive branch are vile are they're the ones violating the separation of power because the president has a duty to protect The United States against invasion even if it's by invitation. They are breaking laws and bending laws to let this happen.

Now if you wanna go and try to figure out what invasion means. Just go to Johnson seventeen eighty five English dictionary, invasion is the hostile entrance upon the right or possessions of another, hostile encroachment. This is what the founders understood the definition of the word invasion to be when article four section four. And, you know, all you know, in Texas, guy went out, went to supper, came home to find a group of illegal aliens in their home using their bathroom, wearing their clothes, and pretending not to speak any English. They were not willing to leave, so they had to call the police to have the illegal aliens forcefully ejected from the home while still wearing the stolen clothes.

The next morning, when the father came out of work only to find illegal alien sleeping in the bed of his truck, they had to be called to eject those illegal immigrants. Would you call that an invasion? Yes. You would. Yes.

The 1785 definition of invasion is hostile entrance upon the rights or possessions of another hostile encroachment. Consider, if you will, consider all the illegal alien criminal gang members in The ...

Well, it's Friday. If I can do it on Fridays, I try to get somebody from the Freedom Caucus come on. And joining me now is, well, he's my favorite Freedom Caucus guy. Representative Jake Hill Martin from District 85, which is, what is that? That's Columbia, Chapin, and Irmo.

Yeah? You're you're killing me, Bill. I've had people on the other side of the aisle say I'm the favorite Freedom Caucus guy, and I'm like, I must not be doing something right if I'm your favorite. So Yeah. But how many of them how many of them be in your favor.

Yeah. Well, how many of them introduced you to Hickok forty five? Oh, that's right. That's right. See, my sister Whenever whenever you get discovered Yeah.

Oh, go ahead. No. I was gonna say whenever you get some whenever you do somebody a favor that has a little power, you gotta constantly remind them of that favor. Yes. So so when my sister got in her CWP down in Florida, she goes, I discovered this guy online, Hickok forty five.

So I send my the picture of me with him Yeah. Thanks to you when we were at the, NRA convention. Yeah. Jay's tall enough to where Hickok didn't look that tall. When I stand beside the Hickok, you're just looking at him thinking, maybe he takes long walks in the woods and that's just who they think Sasquatch is because Hickok is a tall guy.

He and his he and his son are are very tall people. Yep. Yep. Yep. So tell me about this family caucus drama.

So so I'll give you my version. I've been in the family caucus for about three years now, and and I don't know how much of the backstory you need, but, basically, probably, you know, along with the members of the Freedom Caucus, he's very, very pro life and, the big issue has been abortion and trying to get stronger abortion laws passed. So an activist group called Students for Life went to the church parking lots on Easter Sunday and put pamphlets out against House Speaker Merle Smith and Weston Newton who had the judiciary. Right. And I think they hit a nerve because they blamed, you know, people politicians, we're not allowed to work with packs and super packs.

So he can't direct them to do that, but they blamed him and then they blamed him for not being strong enough in his rebuttal of it. So we've had in the middle of all the busy end of season stuff, just complete chaos, with the family caucus. Supposedly, the speaker of the house was personally calling people because he was so butthurt over this and telling them to leave the family caucus. And when the, your dear leader speaks, when you're in the Republican caucus, you do as he says or he will punish you. Oh.

He will he'll take away your parking space. It's it's all it's all so silly, but, you know, the people down there take it very seriously. They wanna climb climb the ladder. They wanna stay in his good graces. So, the manufactured outrage I saw from some of the family caucus people defending the speaker, you just don't go into a church parking lot.

That that's off limits. I'm like, I think that was pretty good strategy whether or not John had anything to do with it. Right. You know, it's it's not his fault, but it but it happened. And they work with, you know, they work on the same issues as John.

They don't work with John, but they support John. So, yeah, it was a a little bit of drama in the middle of a busy week. Yeah. And, I I I got into a little tuffle with a couple representatives who are, I would say, are not Freedom Caucus, but they call themselves Republicans. Oh.

And I said it's not where they got attacked, it's who they attacked. And it is the two guys that could easily get some abortion bills taken up, and they decided not to. You know, we passed that $1,300,000,000 VW Scout deal in twelve days. Right. All three committees I'll send it on the governor's desk.

They can they can take up an abortion bill. I I just don't think they have the intestinal fortitude to fight. Well, while I got you here, since you were at the SC GOP convention the sa ...

Well, it's Friday. If I can do it on Fridays, I try to get somebody from the Freedom Caucus come on. And joining me now is, well, he's my favorite Freedom Caucus guy. Representative Jake Hill Martin from District 85, which is, what is that? That's Columbia, Chapin, and Irmo.

Yeah? You're you're killing me, Bill. I've had people on the other side of the aisle say I'm the favorite Freedom Caucus guy, and I'm like, I must not be doing something right if I'm your favorite. So Yeah. But how many of them how many of them be in your favor.

Yeah. Well, how many of them introduced you to Hickok forty five? Oh, that's right. That's right. See, my sister Whenever whenever you get discovered Yeah.

Oh, go ahead. No. I was gonna say whenever you get some whenever you do somebody a favor that has a little power, you gotta constantly remind them of that favor. Yes. So so when my sister got in her CWP down in Florida, she goes, I discovered this guy online, Hickok forty five.

So I send my the picture of me with him Yeah. Thanks to you when we were at the, NRA convention. Yeah. Jay's tall enough to where Hickok didn't look that tall. When I stand beside the Hickok, you're just looking at him thinking, maybe he takes long walks in the woods and that's just who they think Sasquatch is because Hickok is a tall guy.

He and his he and his son are are very tall people. Yep. Yep. Yep. So tell me about this family caucus drama.

So so I'll give you my version. I've been in the family caucus for about three years now, and and I don't know how much of the backstory you need, but, basically, probably, you know, along with the members of the Freedom Caucus, he's very, very pro life and, the big issue has been abortion and trying to get stronger abortion laws passed. So an activist group called Students for Life went to the church parking lots on Easter Sunday and put pamphlets out against House Speaker Merle Smith and Weston Newton who had the judiciary. Right. And I think they hit a nerve because they blamed, you know, people politicians, we're not allowed to work with packs and super packs.

So he can't direct them to do that, but they blamed him and then they blamed him for not being strong enough in his rebuttal of it. So we've had in the middle of all the busy end of season stuff, just complete chaos, with the family caucus. Supposedly, the speaker of the house was personally calling people because he was so butthurt over this and telling them to leave the family caucus. And when the, your dear leader speaks, when you're in the Republican caucus, you do as he says or he will punish you. Oh.

He will he'll take away your parking space. It's it's all it's all so silly, but, you know, the people down there take it very seriously. They wanna climb climb the ladder. They wanna stay in his good graces. So, the manufactured outrage I saw from some of the family caucus people defending the speaker, you just don't go into a church parking lot.

That that's off limits. I'm like, I think that was pretty good strategy whether or not John had anything to do with it. Right. You know, it's it's not his fault, but it but it happened. And they work with, you know, they work on the same issues as John.

They don't work with John, but they support John. So, yeah, it was a a little bit of drama in the middle of a busy week. Yeah. And, I I I got into a little tuffle with a couple representatives who are, I would say, are not Freedom Caucus, but they call themselves Republicans. Oh.

And I said it's not where they got attacked, it's who they attacked. And it is the two guys that could easily get some abortion bills taken up, and they decided not to. You know, we passed that $1,300,000,000 VW Scout deal in twelve days. Right. All three committees I'll send it on the governor's desk.

They can they can take up an abortion bill. I I just don't think they have the intestinal fortitude to fight. Well, while I got you here, since you were at the SC GOP convention the sa ...

Gotta pay a lot of attention when you see one of these guys, one of these jacks, one of these smiling jacks smiling at you and talking to you. It's always a mistake to forget that word usage is used against you in a rhetorical battlefield, and it's used to change the way you're thinking about a topic. Now a lot on my side over the course of time on the second amendment side, for example, a lot of them tend to go on the pro gun, anti gun formulation. Or even worse, they get out there and they start talking about, you know, common sense human rights as one of inanimate objects, stuff like that. And see, that's a mistake because leftist love guns.

They just don't want you to have any. In the same way, they don't want you to have any any rights, any freedom, any money. That's why there's been a sea change in their control scheme from outright bans to selective persecution. Right now, the winds of change favor the pro freedom side of the political spectrum and they've suddenly started arming up. I have no idea what and we have several stunning examples to prove that.

Although, I tell anybody that buys anything that is, a a defensive item, you can't go out and I I said this last night on the, Get to Steppin' podcast. You can't go out and buy a karate uniform and be Bruce Lee just because you bought it. Now from the New York Times Magazine, there's a piece most patriots on the pro freedom side of the fence thought they would never see. An article includes an illustration that would be at home in any prep or publication. Three, break the glass in case of emergency boxes with the first aid in one, a fire extinguisher in another, and the outline of a gun in the third.

That's a pretty bold statement which goes along with our contention that a firearm is just another piece of emergency equipment. But the piece is entitled, My Husband Fears Political Violence, Should We Buy a Gun? And here's a couple of paragraphs. My husband and I are Democrats and we live in a large left leaning city. Concerning the current political climate in The United States and deepening concerns that it will only get worse, my husband wants to purchase a gun for safety reasons.

To be clear, we don't have general safety concerns. We live in the heart of the city, and I feel safe. He's concerned about political or ideologically motivated violence. I think guns are evil and I believe the world would be a better place without weapons. But I would hate to regret not having a gun if things get so chaotic that people need to protect themselves.

Should I go against my own beliefs because of a possible future threat? Name withheld. Well, why are you, why are you confused on this? I mean, you you sound like the classic, it can't happen to me kind of person. Guns are not evil.

Nothing is evil that isn't in in only people are evil. People can be evil. And the ethicist or ethicist tries to dissuade the letter writer from being able to exercise a common sense human right. Few months ago, that same New York Times had another surprising piece. They never planned on buying a gun until they did.

And there's an interesting point in that one. We quickly learned that some gun owners don't like the word gun, preferring firearm in part because they felt it carried less baggage. I found myself thinking more consciously about my own language, wondering if I would alienate sources by saying gun or be pandering if I avoided it. We use both words in our project, a kind of compromise. That's a nonsensical fact pattern that they developed on their own.

It's not even really a fact pattern. We see the left is tuned in to the language war far better than the pro freedom right. Guns are demonized as evil everywhere you turn. And the leftist propagandize you with ridiculous phrases like gun violence as if the inanimate object is the problem. Now, it's not just the New York Times pushing their people to arm up From Politico, they had they're afraid they're buying guns but they're not voti ...

Gotta pay a lot of attention when you see one of these guys, one of these jacks, one of these smiling jacks smiling at you and talking to you. It's always a mistake to forget that word usage is used against you in a rhetorical battlefield, and it's used to change the way you're thinking about a topic. Now a lot on my side over the course of time on the second amendment side, for example, a lot of them tend to go on the pro gun, anti gun formulation. Or even worse, they get out there and they start talking about, you know, common sense human rights as one of inanimate objects, stuff like that. And see, that's a mistake because leftist love guns.

They just don't want you to have any. In the same way, they don't want you to have any any rights, any freedom, any money. That's why there's been a sea change in their control scheme from outright bans to selective persecution. Right now, the winds of change favor the pro freedom side of the political spectrum and they've suddenly started arming up. I have no idea what and we have several stunning examples to prove that.

Although, I tell anybody that buys anything that is, a a defensive item, you can't go out and I I said this last night on the, Get to Steppin' podcast. You can't go out and buy a karate uniform and be Bruce Lee just because you bought it. Now, from the New York Times Magazine, there's a piece most patriots on the pro free freedom side of the fence thought they would never see. An article includes an illustration that would be at home in any prep or publication. Three, break the glass in case of emergency boxes with the first aid in one, a fire extinguisher in another and the outline of a gun in the third.

That's a pretty bold statement which goes along with our contention that a firearm is just another piece of emergency equipment. But the piece is entitled, my husband fears political violence, should we buy a gun?' And here's a couple of paragraphs. My husband and I are Democrats, and we live in a large left leaning city. Concerning the current political climate in The United States and deepening concerns that it will only get worse, my husband wants to purchase a gun for safety reasons. To be clear, we don't have general safety concerns.

We live in the heart of the city, and I feel safe. He's concerned about political or ideologically motivated violence. I think guns are evil, and I believe the world would be a better place without weapons. But I would hate to regret not having a gun if things get so chaotic, the people need to protect themselves. Should I go against my own beliefs because of a possible future threat?

Name withheld. Well, why are you, why are you confused on this? I mean, you you sound like the classic, it can't happen to me kind of person. Guns are not evil. Nothing is evil that isn't in in.

Only people are evil. People can be evil. And the ethicist or ethicist tries to dissuade the letter writer from being able to exercise a common sense human right. Few months ago, that same New York Times had another surprising piece. They never planned on buying a gun until they did.

And there's an interesting point in that one. We quickly learned that some gun owners don't like the word gun preferring firearm in part because they felt it carried less baggage. I found myself thinking more consciously about my own language, wondering if I would alienate sources by saying gun or be pandering if I avoided it. We use both words in our project, a kind of compromise. That's a nonsensical fact pattern that they developed on their own.

It's not even really a fact pattern. We see the left is tuned in to the language war far better than the pro freedom right. Guns are demonized as evil everywhere you turn. And the leftist propagandize you with ridiculous phrases like gun violence as if the inanimate object is the problem. Now, it's not just the New York Times pushing their people to arm up From Politico, they had they're afraid they're buying guns but they're ...