Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica with Andrew Wildes

Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica with Andrew Wildes

By The Frequency Network: The WaveSociety & CultureNewsTrue Crime
Download on the App Store

Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica with Andrew Wildes episodes

  • When Two Jurors Say “Not Guilty” and It Doesn’t Matter

    Dr. Nisha Waller is the racial justice lead at the UK legal charity Appeal and co-author of Doubt Dismissed, a report tracing the hidden history of non-unanimous jury verdicts. She explains why “majority verdicts” are not neutral reform but a structural shortcut that makes convictions easier—often at the cost of fairness.

    Waller’s research focuses on England and Wales, where unanimous jury decisions were replaced in 1967 with majority verdicts under a public claim of stopping jury tampering. But in the archives, she found something else: anxiety about immigration, race, and class—plus open contempt for working-class and Caribbean jurors. Her argument is simple: if one or two jurors heard the same evidence and still doubt guilt, that doubt is real—and the system is designed to ignore it.

    The conversation connects directly to Jamaica. Jamaica now allows conviction even when the jury is split, and the jury itself has been reduced from 12 to 7—meaning 5 people can decide someone’s fate for life. Waller warns that “efficiency” arguments (backlog, speed, cost) routinely beat “accuracy” arguments, even though the damage of wrongful conviction is permanent. She frames it as state violence: when the state cages an innocent person for decades, that is harm on the same scale as street violence—just dressed up as procedure.

    Waller also explains why the public is kept in the dark. In the UK, strict jury secrecy rules block researchers from studying real deliberations and can even stop courts from investigating allegations of racism inside the jury room. Her position: secrecy should not override justice. If courts can’t investigate bias and researchers can’t study decision-making, governments are rewriting jury rules without evidence.


    Key Themes

    ➤ Why “majority verdicts” inherently dismiss reasonable doubt

    ➤ The 1967 UK shift and the racial/class panic behind it

    ➤ Jamaica’s 7-person jury and the risk of 5–2 convictions

    ➤ Backlog “efficiency” vs. fairness and accuracy

    ➤ Jury secrecy blocks research and shields racism claims

    ➤ Ramos v. Louisiana and how the US ended split verdicts

    ➤ Why Waller calls wrongful convictions “state violence”

    ➤ The larger system: policing, charging, disclosure failures

    ➤ Joint Enterprise and racial disparity in convictions

    ➤ The need for data: verdict tracking and independent review


    Chapter Breakdown

    00:00 — Conviction at All Costs

    00:33 — Jamaica’s Split-Jury Reality

    01:35 — Meet Dr. Nisha Waller

    02:47 — Why She Studies Wrongful Convictions

    05:42 — Doubt Dismissed: UK’s 1967 Switch

    09:15 — Jamaica Cuts the Jury to Seven

    14:12 — 56+ Cases and No Official Data

    18:04 — Jury Secrecy Stops Real Oversight

    22:06 — Ramos Ends Split Verdicts in US

    25:02 — The Whole System Creates Miscarriages


    Connect with Dr. Nisha Waller

    LinkedIn: Dr Nisha Waller - APPEAL

    Brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.


    More About Andrew Wildes

    Explore the work of⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
    • For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.


      Production, Distribution, and Marketing

      Produced by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
      • For inquiries/sponsoring: email ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠[email protected]⁠

        Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

        42 min
      • The Top Causes of Wrongful Convictions — Dr. Rebecca Helm Explains Why Innocent People Get Found Guilty

        Rebecca Helm breaks down the quiet driver behind wrongful convictions: the pressure to plead guilty—even when you didn’t do it. Helm is a law professor and empirical legal studies researcher at the University of Exeter, working in an evidence-based justice lab. She explains what the data shows about how wrongful convictions happen across common-law systems, and why Jamaica should pay close attention.

        Her biggest finding is blunt: guilty pleas are highly incentivized, and that pressure can corner innocent people into taking deals just to avoid the risk of prison. She points to the UK Post Office scandal as a modern warning—where faulty software helped fuel accusations, and some people pleaded guilty to dodge harsher outcomes at trial.


        The conversation digs into who gets hit hardest. Helm describes children as one of the most overlooked groups in criminal justice—pushed by parents, lawyers, peers, and even judges to “just plead” to end the process. She also flags other vulnerable defendants, including neurodivergent people and abuse survivors. Beyond pleas, she outlines two more recurring causes: testimony-heavy cases that lean on eyewitness confidence, and the growing misuse of digital forensic evidence when lawyers and judges lack the technical literacy to challenge it.


        Key Themes

        ➤ Guilty pleas as a leading cause of wrongful convictions

        ➤ The “trial penalty” and why innocent people take deals

        ➤ The Post Office scandal as a tech-driven miscarriage of justice

        ➤ Children pressured into pleading guilty

        ➤ Neurodivergence, abuse survivors, and vulnerability in court

        ➤ Eyewitness confidence and testimony-driven cases

        ➤ Digital forensics: misread tech evidence and low tech literacy

        ➤ One fix Helm would prioritize: reduce plea incentives

        ➤ Why registries and case data change policy conversations


        Chapter Breakdown

        00:00 — “I Pled Guilty to Survive”

        00:10 — Why Innocent People Plead

        00:18 — Meet Dr. Rebecca Helm

        01:06 — Jamaica’s 3 Big Questions

        02:58 — Cause #1: Guilty Plea Pressure

        03:30 — Post Office Scandal: Tech Failure

        04:40 — Why Kids Say “Guilty”

        07:25 — Other Vulnerable Defendants

        09:10 — Testimony, Eyewitness Confidence

        10:54 — Digital Forensics Gone Wrong

        Brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.


        Connect with Rebecca Helm

        LinkedIn: Rebecca Helm

        More About Andrew Wildes

        Explore the work of⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
        • For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.


          Production, Distribution, and Marketing

          Produced by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

          • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
          • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
          • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
          • For inquiries/sponsoring: email ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠[email protected]⁠

            Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

            22 min
          • King’s Counsel Andrew Pilgrim: The Case That Forced Barbados to Record Interrogations

            King’s Counsel Andrew Pilgrim breaks down how Barbados nearly railroaded an innocent man — even after the victims said police arrested the wrong suspect.


            Pilgrim has spent 32 years defending the accused and challenging convictions built on shaky confessions. He tells the unbelievable story of Derrick Crawford: two tourist victims went to police and court to say the man charged was not their attacker, yet the case kept moving and Crawford stayed locked up. Pilgrim explains why this happens in small Caribbean states—pressure to “solve” high-profile crimes fast, overreliance on confession evidence, and a culture that treats police narratives as truth.


            He also walks through Haynes and Edwards, a murder case where the only real evidence was a disputed, unrecorded confession. That case reached the Caribbean Court of Justice and helped force a major shift: Barbados finally moved toward mandatory audio-video recording of interrogations in serious cases, cutting down the space for coercion, fabrication, and “he said, they said” convictions.


            Key Themes

            ➤ How confession-driven policing fuels wrongful convictions

            ➤ Why “solve it fast” pressure leads to bad arrests and prosecutions

            ➤ The Derrick Crawford case: victims tried to free the accused

            ➤ Haynes & Edwards and the CCJ’s warning on confession-only cases

            ➤ Why recording interrogations changes everything

            ➤ Judge-alone trials, jury reform, and shrinking bail in the region

            ➤ Remand time credit, plea deals, and the push for real evidence


            Chapter Breakdown

            00:00 — Victims Say “Wrong Man”

            03:49 — Confessions Ran the System

            07:09 — How Crawford Became the Target

            10:31 — Why the Case Kept Going

            14:11 — Rare Exoneration: Child Returns

            15:46 — CCJ: False Confessions Are Real

            16:21 — Haynes & Edwards Explained

            18:49 — CCJ Raises the Evidence Bar

            20:28 — Barbados Finally Records Interviews

            21:48 — Juries, Bail, and Backlog Fights


            Brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

            Connect with Andrew Pilgrim
            https://kctchambers.com/our-team-2/
            https://dm.linkedin.com/in/andrew-pilgrim-b962855b

            More About Andrew Wildes

            Explore the work of⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
            • For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.


              Production, Distribution, and Marketing

              Produced by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

              • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
              • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
              • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
              • For inquiries/sponsoring: email ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠[email protected]

                Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                39 min
              • Bonus: Krista Mason-Smith on the Privy Council Reversal and Custody Reform in the Bahamas

                Bonus episode today: Bahamian defense lawyer Krista Mason-Smith breaks down a landmark Privy Council wrongful-conviction reversal. She explains how custody abuse and inconsistent confession evidence derailed justice, why prosecutors dropped related charges, and how recordings and early access to counsel are shifting Caribbean policing. A must-listen on reform and accountability.

                Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                31 min
              • He Confessed to a Murder He Didn’t Commit | The Vincent Ariste Case

                When veteran Jamaican journalist Lloyd B. Smith admitted he once pled guilty to a traffic offense he didn’t commit, it sparked a deeper question: why would anyone confess to something they didn’t do? That question sits at the heart of a shocking case from the Bahamas—one that exposed how false confessions can destroy lives.

                In July 2010, 20-year-old Vincent Ariste was arrested—not because he was a suspect, but because police couldn’t find his brother. Days later, without a lawyer and while in custody, he confessed to multiple serious crimes, including robbery and murder. There was no evidence against him except his own words. Those “confessions” led to 12 lost years behind bars—until Bahamian attorney Krista Mason-Smith fought to have his conviction overturned before the UK’s Privy Council.

                In this episode, host Andrew Wildes unpacks how a system built to protect can instead coerce, how the absence of legal counsel and recording safeguards can lead to devastating injustice, and how one lawyer’s persistence changed the trajectory of Caribbean jurisprudence on wrongful convictions.

                Content Note: References to police violence, coerced confessions, imprisonment, and wrongful conviction.

                Key Themes

                ➤ Why people confess to crimes they didn’t commit
                ➤ How lack of legal representation enables false confessions
                ➤ The significance of the Privy Council’s ruling in Ariste’s case
                ➤ The shift in the Bahamas toward recording police interrogations
                ➤ The role of defense counsel in protecting human rights


                Chapters

                (00:00) Would You Lie on Yourself?

                (02:00) The Arrest of Vincent Ariste

                (04:00) Confessions Without Evidence

                (06:00) The Voir Dire and Legal Oversight

                (09:00) The Court of Appeal’s Three-Paragraph Ruling

                (12:00) The Privy Council Steps In

                (16:00) Krista Mason-Smith Joins the Case

                (20:00) Police Culture and Reform in the Bahamas

                (24:00) The Fight for Representation and Accountability

                (28:00) What This Means for Justice in the Caribbean


                Brought to you by⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.


                Connect with Krista Mason-Smith

                Krista Mason-Smith | Managing Partner, Murio Dusseel & Co

                More About Andrew Wildes

                Explore the work of⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
                • For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.


                  Production, Distribution, and Marketing

                  Produced by⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                  • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
                  • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
                  • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
                  • For inquiries/sponsoring: email ⁠⁠⁠⁠[email protected]

                    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                    1 hr 16 min
                  • Death Penalty on Trial: Trinidad’s Brent Winter on Wrongful Convictions

                    A Trinidad attorney raised alarms after a simple conversation sparked a national question: what if innocent people are behind bars? Brent Winter began his career as a prison officer, spent a decade prosecuting cases, and now defends the accused. In 2020, after a friend in Jamaica asked him about Netflix’s The Innocence Files, he wrote to the Trinidad and Tobago Newsday warning that “police can kill a man in more ways than by placing a knee on his neck.”

                    Winter’s experience revealed a troubling truth: wrongful convictions are almost invisible in the Caribbean. Existing legal avenues are narrow, reliant on recanted eyewitness testimony, and rarely successful. Without independent bodies like the UK’s Criminal Cases Review Commission, the system leaves innocent people with no real chance at justice—even as the death penalty remains on the books.

                    Host Andrew Wildes examines how public indifference, political will, and systemic failures collide in Trinidad and the wider Caribbean, why wrongful convictions undermine true crime prevention, and why the debate on capital punishment cannot be separated from the risk of executing the innocent.

                    Content note: References to wrongful conviction, imprisonment, police misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, and the death penalty.

                    Key Themes

                    ➤ Why wrongful convictions in the Caribbean remain invisible

                    ➤ The dangers of eyewitness testimony and recanted evidence

                    ➤ The political and cultural barriers to reform in Trinidad and beyond

                    ➤ How wrongful convictions undermine crime prevention

                    ➤ The death penalty debate when innocence is not guaranteed

                    Chapters

                    00:00 — Letter That Sparked a Debate

                    03:00 — From Prison Guard to Prosecutor

                    05:00 — Public Pushback on Innocence

                    08:00 — Why Appeals Rarely Succeed

                    11:30 — Lessons from the UK Model

                    13:30 — Crime, Politics, and Injustice

                    16:00 — Death Penalty and Wrongful Convictions

                    19:30 — Police Pressure and False IDs

                    22:00 — Need for Independent Review

                    24:30 — Disclosure Failures and Bias

                    28:00 — Plea Deals and Long Remand Times

                    30:00 — Call to Action for Reform

                    Brought to you by⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.


                    Connect with Brent Winter

                    • Brent David Winter | LL.B, LEC, LLM
                    • Brent D. Winter - Attorney-at-Law in Private Practice
                    • More About Andrew Wildes

                      Explore the work of⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

                      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                        For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.

                        Production, Distribution, and Marketing

                        Produced by⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                          For inquiries/sponsoring: email ⁠⁠⁠[email protected]

                          Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                          35 min
                        • Dr. Dan Krane Explains How DNA Evidence Misleads Juries

                          A Bermuda murder case unraveled under scrutiny. Julian Washington was convicted of killing Stefan Burgess, jurors persuaded that DNA on bullets was more reliable than any eyewitness. Prosecutors told them the odds were “1 in 46 million” that the DNA belonged to anyone else. With no defense expert to question the analysis, Washington was sentenced to life in prison.


                          He spent ten years behind bars before outside intervention revealed the truth: the DNA interpretation was deeply flawed. Independent expert Dr. Dan Krane uncovered eight major errors, from “suspect-centric” testing to statistical misuse. His findings persuaded the UK’s Privy Council to overturn the conviction and force Bermuda to review more than 400 other cases tied to the same forensic lab.


                          Host Andrew Wildes explores how flawed science and unchecked authority led to a decade lost, the systemic risks wrongful convictions pose in the Caribbean, and why access to independent expertise is essential to protect justice.

                          Content note: References to gun violence, wrongful conviction, imprisonment, and systemic failures in access to justice.


                          Key Themes

                          ➤ DNA evidence as courtroom gold—and why it failed

                          ➤ “Suspect-centric” interpretation and painting the bullseye

                          ➤ Why courts defer to experts, even when they’re wrong

                          ➤ The ripple effect: 400+ cases under review in Bermuda

                          ➤ Access to experts as a safeguard, not a privilege


                          Chapter Breakdown

                          00:00 — Case opens: Bermuda, Burgess shooting, and arrests

                          02:30 — DNA emerges as the decisive evidence

                          05:00 — Prosecution’s claim: 1 in 46 million odds

                          08:15 — Jury convicts, Washington gets life

                          11:00 — Appeal court calls the DNA “rock-solid”

                          13:30 — A decade served before new scrutiny

                          15:00 — Dr. Dan Krane steps in: eight fatal flaws

                          17:00 — “Suspect-centric” testing and confirmation bias

                          19:30 — Privy Council overturns conviction, orders release

                          21:00 — Lessons for the Caribbean: experts, access, and justice

                          Brought to you by⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.


                          Connect with Dr. Dan Krane

                          • Dan E. Krane, Ph.D.
                          • Dan Krane - Interim Dean, Wright State University
                          • More About Andrew Wildes

                            Explore the work of⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

                            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                            • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                              For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.

                              Production, Distribution, and Marketing

                              Produced by⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                              • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                              • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                              • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                For inquiries/sponsoring: email ⁠⁠[email protected]

                                Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                31 min
                              • DNA Expert Told Jurors: 1 in 46 Million Chance It Wasn’t Him. She Was Wrong—Julian Washington Served 10 Years.

                                A Bermuda shooting turned a young man into a convicted killer overnight. Jurors were told the DNA evidence was stronger than an eyewitness: a 1 in 46 million chance the bullets could have been touched by anyone but Julian Washington. With no defense expert to challenge the science, the prosecution’s narrative prevailed. Washington was sentenced to life, serving ten years before independent review exposed serious flaws in the DNA interpretation and forced his release.

                                Host Andrew Wildes unpacks how a single expert’s testimony led to a decade lost, why “suspect-centric” DNA analysis undermined objectivity, the role of the Death Penalty Project in correcting injustice, and why access to independent experts is essential if the Caribbean is to prevent future wrongful convictions.

                                Content note: References to gun violence, wrongful conviction, imprisonment, and systemic failures in access to justice.


                                Key Themes

                                ➤ DNA evidence as “bullet-proof” testimony—and why it wasn’t

                                ➤ Suspect-centric interpretation and statistical misuse

                                ➤ Appeals courts’ deference to expert authority

                                ➤ The Death Penalty Project’s role in exoneration

                                ➤ Access to experts as an issue of justice, not luxury


                                Chapter Breakdown

                                00:00 — Bermuda, bullets, and the shooting of Stefan Burgess

                                02:30 — DNA at the scene; suspects rounded up

                                05:00 — Expert testimony: “1 in 46 million” odds

                                08:15 — Jury verdicts and a life sentence

                                11:00 — Court of Appeal calls DNA “rock-solid”

                                13:30 — Ten years in prison, then outside help

                                15:00 — Dr. Dan Krane reviews the case: eight flaws

                                17:00 — “Suspect-centric” testing and painting the bullseye

                                19:30 — Privy Council, immediate release, official reckoning

                                21:00 — Lessons: experts, imbalance, and access to justice


                                Brought to you by⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                                More About Andrew Wildes

                                Explore the work of⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

                                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                  For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.

                                  Production, Distribution, and Marketing

                                  Produced by⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                                  • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                  • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                  • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                    For inquiries/sponsoring: email ⁠[email protected]

                                    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                    26 min
                                  • ACCUSED of the worst crime, they proved their innocence. Jamaica refuses to pay

                                    A notorious St. James case turned two young men into pariahs overnight. Lawyers wouldn’t touch it, judges hesitated on bail, and even after DNA excluded them, the stigma stuck. Defense attorney Lambert Johnson took the case, pushed for DNA testing, and watched the prosecution’s narrative unravel—yet more than a decade later, the brothers are still awaiting compensation while the state prepares to contest their civil claim at trial.

                                    Host Andrew Wildes sits down with Johnson to unpack why defense counsel matters in preventing wrongful convictions, how identification evidence can be compromised, what the DPP’s obligations are when DNA excludes defendants, and why “justice” delayed through years of administrative and legal resistance remains justice denied.
                                    Content note: References to sexual assault, detention, custodial violence, and prolonged legal proceedings.
                                    Key Themes
                                    ➤ Defense counsel’s duty—taking the “unpopular” case
                                    ➤ DNA as exculpatory evidence and prosecutorial obligations
                                    ➤ Bail decisions under public pressure and media heat
                                    ➤ ID parades, photo contamination, and witness fallibility
                                    ➤ Compensation, aggravated damages, and state accountability
                                    Chapter Breakdown
                                    00:00 — Stigma After Bail
                                    00:15 — Case & Guest Intro
                                    02:40 — Civil Suit; DNA Finds Culprit
                                    04:15 — DPP Duties After DNA
                                    05:30 — Bail Battles Amid Outrage
                                    07:00 — Why Johnson Took the Case
                                    07:58 — ID Parade Falls Apart
                                    10:15 — Due Process vs. Jungle Justice
                                    11:30 — 2013 Flaws: Photos & Mismatched IDs
                                    15:20 — Accountability, Damages, Next Steps

                                    Brought to you by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                                    More About Andrew Wildes

                                    Explore the work of ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

                                    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                    • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                      For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.

                                      Production, Distribution, and Marketing

                                      Produced by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                                      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                      • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                        For inquiries/sponsoring: email [email protected]

                                        Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                        26 min
                                      • He was a victim. Jamaican police saw a killer.

                                        A young Jamaican mechanic—“R.C.”—is caught in the crossfire of a nighttime gunfight. Shot and near death, he’s rescued by a Good Samaritan, taken to the hospital, and wakes up to learn his right leg has been amputated. Instead of care and due process, he’s handcuffed to a bed, charged with multiple gun offenses, and held for weeks before seeing a judge. What follows: years of grueling bail conditions, over a thousand mandatory police check-ins, and a six-day trial that collapses under a “no case” submission. He’s acquitted—then inexplicably processed again—before suing the state and winning exemplary damages years later.

                                        Host Andrew Wildes explores how tunnel vision, bail conditions, and prosecutorial discretion can turn a victim into a defendant—and what “justice” looks like when it arrives too late.
                                        Content note: Contains descriptions of gun violence, amputation, detention, and legal process.
                                        Key Themes
                                        ➤Tunnel vision and wrongful prosecution
                                        ➤Bail conditions that function like punishment
                                        ➤The human cost of slow trials and administrative delay
                                        ➤Exemplary damages as a signal to the state
                                        ➤Systems accountability vs. individual rights
                                        Chapter Breakdown
                                        00:00 — The question: “How much is a leg worth?”
                                        01:15 — May 16, 2000: A walk down Jakes Road
                                        03:05 — Shot, rescued, and rushed to hospital
                                        04:15 — Amputation and immediate arrest
                                        06:10 — Charges filed; no gun, no residue
                                        08:00 — Days in lockup; no court appearance
                                        10:00 — Half-Way-Tree Court: humiliation without mobility aids
                                        11:30 — Bail granted—daily reporting condition
                                        14:00 — 1,000+ check-ins over nearly five years
                                        16:30 — Trial opens; prosecution’s case frays
                                        18:10 — “No case to answer”: full acquittal
                                        19:15 — Post-acquittal processing and fingerprints
                                        20:10 — The lawsuit: malicious prosecution and exemplary damages
                                        22:30 — Appeal upholds award; what the judges said
                                        24:00 — Did R.C. receive justice? System lessons and the cost of delay
                                        25:30 — Closing: Why these stories matter
                                        Brought to you by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Wave⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Frequency Network⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                                        More About Andrew Wildes

                                        Explore the work of ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Andrew Wildes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠—Jamaican lawyer, journalist, and host of Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica. His mission is to expose systemic injustice, amplify the voices of the wrongfully imprisoned, and drive meaningful legal reform through storytelling and advocacy.

                                        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                        • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                          For updates, insights, and behind-the-scenes content, follow Andrew across platforms and join the conversation on justice in Jamaica.

                                          Production, Distribution, and Marketing

                                          Produced by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio & Production⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Tallawah Group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

                                          • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif Studio Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                          • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Massif on LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                          • ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Tallawah Website⁠⁠⁠⁠

                                            For inquiries/sponsoring: email [email protected] 

                                            Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                            39 min

                                          About Stuck: Wrongful Convictions in Jamaica with Andrew Wildes

                                          From the publisher's feed

                                          What happens when the justice system gets it wrong?