This executive order, issued by the President on January 20, 2025, mandates an "America First" foreign policy. The order directs the Secretary of State to align all Department of State activities with this prioritization of American interests. It emphasizes putting America and its citizens first in all foreign policy decisions. The order clarifies that it does not override existing legal authorities or budgetary processes. Finally, it specifies that the order itself does not create any new legal rights or benefits.

This executive order from January 20, 2025, mandates a 90-day pause on US foreign development assistance. The order stems from a belief that current aid programs are misaligned with US interests and values, potentially destabilizing global peace. Comprehensive reviews of all programs will determine whether to continue, modify, or terminate them based on alignment with US foreign policy. The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget, will oversee this process. The order aims to realign foreign aid with the President's foreign policy goals.

This executive order, issued on February 7, 2025, prioritizes the protection of Second Amendment rights. It directs the Attorney General to review federal actions from 2021-2025, assessing potential infringements on gun rights. A comprehensive plan will be developed to address these concerns, considering various regulations, litigation, and agency policies related to firearms. The order aims to safeguard the right to bear arms while maintaining existing legal authorities. Finally, the order clarifies that it does not create new legal rights or benefits.

President Trump's 2025 executive order imposes sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) due to its investigations targeting U.S. and Israeli personnel. The order cites the ICC's lack of jurisdiction over both nations, which are not members of the court, and argues the investigations threaten national security. Specific sanctions include blocking assets and suspending entry into the U.S. for ICC officials and their families. The executive order declares a national emergency to justify these actions, asserting the ICC's actions pose an unusual and extraordinary threat. The order also outlines procedures for implementing and reporting on the sanctions.

A January 2025 White House memorandum directs the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to fully utilize the Migrant Operations Center at Guantanamo Bay. The goal is to increase detention capacity for high-priority criminal aliens and address related immigration enforcement challenges. The stated purpose is to curb illegal immigration, weaken criminal organizations, and strengthen national security. Importantly, the memo clarifies that it does not create any legally enforceable rights. The document originates from the White House and is officially titled "Expanding Migrant Operations Center at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay to Full Capacity."

President's Executive Order of February 6, 2025, establishes a task force to investigate and address alleged anti-Christian bias within the U.S. government. The order cites examples of perceived discrimination against Christians under the previous administration, including prosecutions of pro-life protestors and alleged inaction regarding attacks on Catholic institutions. The task force's responsibilities include reviewing government actions, recommending policy changes, and submitting reports to the President. Its ultimate goal is to protect religious freedoms and ensure fair treatment of Christians. The order's scope is broad, encompassing various federal departments and agencies.

This executive order, issued on January 20, 2025, aims to redefine sex as a strictly biological binary, male and female, and to reverse policies recognizing gender identity. It mandates changes in federal law and agency practices to reflect this definition, including revising government-issued identification and rescinding previous executive orders promoting transgender rights. The order seeks to protect women's rights and single-sex spaces by prioritizing biological sex over gender identity in all federal matters. It further directs agencies to cease funding and promotion of “gender ideology,” which it defines as the concept that gender identity can differ from biological sex.

This executive order, issued on January 20, 2025, aims to restore freedom of speech in the United States. It condemns the previous administration's alleged censorship of speech on online platforms, characterizing it as unconstitutional government overreach. The order prohibits federal agencies from engaging in such censorship and mandates an investigation into past actions. It emphasizes the importance of the First Amendment and seeks to prevent the misuse of taxpayer funds for unconstitutional speech restrictions. Finally, it clarifies that the order does not create new legal rights or benefits.

This executive order aims to restore names to landmarks that honor American greatness, specifically renaming Mount McKinley back to its original name and the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. It directs the Secretary of the Interior to implement these changes and instructs the U.S. Board on Geographic Names to prioritize names reflecting the contributions of "visionary and patriotic Americans." The order also calls for additional consideration of names that celebrate American history, particularly in the context of upcoming anniversaries. Finally, it includes provisions to ensure the changes are implemented legally and consistently across federal agencies.

An executive order aiming to restore America's fighting force is analyzed, outlining its purported benefits—enhanced meritocracy, improved unit cohesion, and streamlined bureaucracy—and potential drawbacks—reduced diversity initiatives, potential morale issues, and possible legal challenges. The order prioritizes a merit-based system and emphasizes equal treatment under the law while eliminating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. This approach, however, is expected to generate considerable debate regarding its effects on diversity, inclusion, and military effectiveness. The document ultimately presents a balanced view of the potential positive and negative consequences of the policy.