
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


On April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court invalidated a Louisiana congressional map, holding that racial considerations cannot predominate in the drawing of electoral districts. The ruling narrowed Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by requiring plaintiffs to show intentional discrimination, not just discriminatory effects. In this episode, we explore the Court’s 6-3 decision and what it means for the future of the Voting Rights Act with two leading election law scholars: Edward Foley of The Ohio State University and Michael Morley of Florida State University College of Law. Julie Silverbrook, chief content and learning officer at the National Constitution Center, moderates.
Resources
Stay Connected and Learn More
Donate
By National Constitution Center4.6
10811,081 ratings
On April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court invalidated a Louisiana congressional map, holding that racial considerations cannot predominate in the drawing of electoral districts. The ruling narrowed Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by requiring plaintiffs to show intentional discrimination, not just discriminatory effects. In this episode, we explore the Court’s 6-3 decision and what it means for the future of the Voting Rights Act with two leading election law scholars: Edward Foley of The Ohio State University and Michael Morley of Florida State University College of Law. Julie Silverbrook, chief content and learning officer at the National Constitution Center, moderates.
Resources
Stay Connected and Learn More
Donate

8,474 Listeners

4,113 Listeners

3,530 Listeners

2,031 Listeners

146 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

2,550 Listeners

2,380 Listeners

32,354 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

746 Listeners

632 Listeners