Transcript:Since the Epstein Files were released in January, people have been poring through its millions of documents in an attempt to uncover the truth about a rumored secret cabal. Much that was previously unknown has come to light, and some mysteries have only deepened, but one thing is clear: many of those in Epstein’s orbit were more connected . and up to shadier business . than anyone previously realized. To that end, one recently unearthed FBI document contains the shocking allegations that Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner is “the real brains” behind the Trump organization and presidency. The file . an FBI Confidential Human Source (CHS) Reporting Document . makes wide-ranging assertions about Jeffery Epstein, attorney Alan Dershowitz, Jared Kushner and his brother Josh, Trump, and others in his orbit. It claims Dershowitz was an agent of the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, and that he once said Epstein “belonged to both U. S. and allied intelligence services.” It tied Trump and the Kushners to a number of dubious real estate deals, asserted that the brothers were students of Dershowitz, and linked them all to Russian collusion efforts that connected directly to Russian President Vladimir Putin. It even threw Henry Kissinger into the mix, claiming that the former Secretary of State had introduced the Kushner family to the Chinese ambassador, who may have helped Jared Kushner navigate a sketchy billion-dollar real estate deal, in which suspicions were raised that he traded influence for a financial bailout from Qatar. While all of this is intriguing, it is not the first suggestion that Epstein, Dershowitz, Trump, and their associates are possible intelligence assets for the U. S., Israeli, and Russian governments. But it does appear to be the first evidence of a previously unreported dynamic between Trump and Kushner. According to the document, the “CHS advised that this was a real collusion story . Trump has been compromised by Israel, and Kushner is the real brains behind his organization and his Presidency.”That is no small claim, as it would mean that Kushner . who the President has tasked with everything from brokering peace in the Middle East to reforming the criminal justice system to spearheading COVID response to solving the opioid crisis . is in fact manipulating the presidency from behind the scenes. The FBI source suggested that Kusher is part of a Russian-linked organization that is “doing everything they can to co-opt the Trump presidency.”The document contains nothing to imply that Trump realizes the extent of his son-in-law’s influence over the presidency, but implies that Kushner wields inordinate power within the American government, which he uses to further his own financial gain. According to the file, the source was blunt in its assessment, urging that “the FBI should investigate Kushner's family charities to find evidence of corruption and money laundering.”s

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:The flagrant racism bubbling out of the younger contingent of the Republican Party in the last few weeks is sending party leaders into a panic. But it’s becoming clear that not only are the kids not alright, they’re beginning to take control. Vice President J. D. Vance tried to downplay the prevalence of antisemitism in the young conservative movement, but the Dispatch reports that other Republicans at the national level “have raised alarm over the rise of antisemitism in their ranks, particularly among younger people.”“At a symposium last week co-hosted by the Republican Jewish Coalition and National Review, Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas castigated influencers who trafficked in antisemitism, but he also downplayed their power, noting the strong pro-Israel line the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress have taken,” the Dispatch reports.“They are not influential,” Cotton insisted in his speech. “They are at least not influential with Donald Trump, who continues to reject their kooky advice. They’re not influential with Republicans in the Senate, who continue to reject their kooky advice. And if you look at public opinion polls, they’re least influential of all with normal voting Republicans all across the country.”But the Dispatch reports that concern is brewing among party leaders that hate-curious younger members “will soon or already make up the staff in Republican offices and campaigns,” and they’re already voting for “GOP candidates [who] have fallen under their spell.”Senator Ted Cruz has been the loudest Republican voice warning about the threat of antisemitism among young people on the right, and he has called on the party to stem the tide before it hijacks the party.“Speak out. Take on directly the lies that are being pushed by the other side,” Cruz told The Dispatch when asked what GOP elected officials can do to combat antisemitism among young Republicans. “There is an organized and well-funded effort that is pushing this garbage, and the Democrats allowed it to destroy their own party. I don’t want to see the Republican Party go the same way.”Recent news suggests, however, that pushing back against racism in the younger generation of Republicans is no easy task. Florida Republican gubernatorial candidate James Fishback, who is gaining in popularity among young Republicans, fully opposes U. S. taxpayers funding Israeli wars . which Republican leaders compare to antisemitism. “[T]he crowds of young people at his campaign events indicate they are gravitating to him,” reports Dispatch. “… Fishback’s popularity among Florida’s youth stems in large part from his focus on affordability, an issue that plays to the economic anxieties of Gen Z voters. More recently, the political newcomer has also criticized the United States’ ‘reckless’ war with Iran.”And the racism goes much further than antisemitism. A local affiliate of the Florida Republican Party is already begging the state party for permission to eject a secretary that created a racist group chat named “Nazi Heaven.” “’Total N. . Death!’ wrote Dariel Gonzalez, a former board member of Florida International University’s College Republicans,” in a group chat created for conservative students last fall, according to Miami New Times. Miami-Dade County GOP secretary Abel Alexander Carvajal started the chat, but within a month it was choked with racist slurs. WhatsApp conversations leaked to the Miami Herald revealed participants using variations of the n-word more than 400 times, regularly describing women as ‘w****s,’ and using slurs to discuss Jewish and gay people. Other participants included some of the campus’ top conservative leaders: the county GOP secretary, Florida International University’s Turning Point USA chapter President Ian Valdes and the former College Republicans recruitment chair.s

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:Surveys and interviews keep shredding the idea that President Donald Trump built a lasting base with American white youth, according to Powers that Be podcast host Peter Hamby. Hamby told MS NOW anchor Katy Tur that young men in interviews now reveal severe “trust issues” with Trump, particularly in relation to his new Middle Eastern war.“They were worried about foreign wars. They were worried about being drafted. Maybe that sounds silly, but Trump won in part and built a coalition of young men, Hispanics, college educated white men, independent voters on top of MAGA, based on ending foreign wars and refocusing commitments over here,” said Hamby, citing “Austin,” a 26-year-old white man who voted for Trump in Pennsylvania. When asked about Trump’s attack on Iran Austin said, “just leave them be and let them choose whoever they want [as leader].” And when asked about regime change, he said: “why we got to put our noses in it, bro? For real? How about we worry about our own economic BS?”“Welcome to politics, bro,” said Paul Rieckhoff, founder, CEO and executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. “… [I]t's important to note that today is the anniversary of the Iraq war. And we got the Iraq war a present for its birthday: a whole new war. And now we've got a generation of young people who understand maybe a bit more that it's not a video game, that it's real.”“They've been in their mom's basement playing Call of Duty and maybe not trekking on politics, or maybe buying what Trump was pushing, and now he's actually saying ‘draft,’” said Rieckhoff. “[A]t the same time, that same demographic can't afford gas, is having a hard time finding a job, can't afford a house, and they see 1 billion dollars a day being spent in Iraq.”Rieckhoff added that Trump has “never been cool,” and whatever cool points he got with youth he glommed from podcasters and influencers like Joe Rogan.“He's an 80-year-old guy who's never served [in the military] himself, who's really out of touch with a lot of the culture, and now you're seeing that come apart at the seams,” Rieckhoff told MS NOW anchor Katy Tur. “… I think young people, and young men especially, know a fake when they see it and they can see the split screen … And it is blowing up in their face with young people.” Young men spot the 'fake’ as Trump’s support ‘comes apart at the seams’ youtu. bes

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:The war with Iran is eroding President Donald Trump's ability to "defy political gravity," according to a new analysis from the Economist, but he will only become more dangerous as his second term is brought "crashing to earth."In a piece published Thursday, The Economist outlined how Trump's "ill-judged, heedless war against Iran" was a situation "precisely engineered to intercept the trajectory of his presidency," presenting a major impediment to his long-observed ability to escape scandals and failures with minimal damage."The reason is that the fight against Iran diminishes Mister Trump’s three political superpowers," the piece explained. "His ability to impose his own reality on the world, his remorseless use of leverage and his dominion over the Republican Party. Even without Iran, the potency of these Trumpian strengths was likely to wane after the midterm elections. Wars accelerate change."On the first count, despite Trump's efforts to twist reality to his own ends, "the war tells a truth of its own." The president's spin will also become harder for voters to stomach as the conflict wears on and gas prices soar even higher."If anything, time is on Iran’s side," The Economist's report argued. "America and Israel will gradually run out of useful targets to strike from the air, or run low on interceptor batteries to see off Iranian weapons. By contrast, Iran appears still to have plenty of drones. For as long as it restricts traffic in the strait, oil prices will climb and the damage to the world economy will grow."Meanwhile, Trump's ability to leverage other countries to do his bidding is also running up against harsh realities. In the face of his demands for allied countries to help escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz to ease the oil supply crisis, all of whom said no."He quickly reversed course, pretending he had never needed help," the piece noted. These issues will further compound his ability to enact control over the GOP, with lawmakers and MAGA voters alike "seething" over the betrayal of his pledge to avoid foreign wars. As things get worse for Trump, however, he may vary well lash out harder in an attempt to seize more strength."Mister Trump’s politics depends on the strength that comes from winning," The Economist explained. If he seems a loser, expect him to exact retribution. A weaker president could become a more dangerous one... It is hard to see how Mister Trump ends up a winner in Iran. Be warned: he makes a very bad loser."s

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:Darren Indyke is one of the lawyers who serves as the executor of the estate for Jeffrey Epstein, one of several lawyers who swears he "had no knowledge whatsoever" of the crimes. Democrats claimed he perjured himself with the statements, revealing in real time that he had knowledge. Indyke spoke to the House Oversight Committee on Thursday over the work he did for Epstein, where he testified, among many things, that he did have some concerns about Epstein after he was caught by law enforcement in Florida and became a convicted sex offender. After that, Indyke said that Epstein swore he "didn't know she was underage," CNN reported on air, citing Oversight Committee Chair James Comer , Republican from Kentucky. Brianna Keilar reported on air that Indyke said "Epstein told him it was a mistake, meaning after the 2008 plea deal that he agreed to. He said it was a one-time deal. He didn't know the girl was underage . the one that he got convicted of in West Palm Beach. And Indyke said he [Epstein] convinced him he would never do it again and that he had remorse."The Guardian confirmed the reporting, saying that after Epstein pleaded guilty and served his light one-year sentence, Epstein appeared to him “to be devastated and extremely contrite."“He was adamant that he had no idea anyone involved was underage, and personally assured me he would never again let himself be in that position,” Indyke said. “I believed him, and I made the mistake of believing Mister Epstein that he would not again commit a crime. I deeply regret doing so.”Indyke concluded the opening remarks, saying, “That I did not know what my client did in his private life may be difficult for some to believe, but it is true.”Democrats didn't understand how both things could be true. Representative David Min (D-Calf.) told reporters that the statement claimed Indyke knew nothing, "and yet that doesn't account for the fact that numerous women have described how he helped them fix their problems. One woman described how ... he had helped her get an apartment. He helped women with their immigration issues."James Marsh, attorney for some of the Epstein accusers, told CNN that by 2008, anyone who could Google would see what Epstein was up to. - YouTube www. youtube. coms

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:Republicans in the Senate continue to devolve into infighting over the SAVE America Act, with one prominent lawmaker telling The Hill that the situation has become like a "circular firing squad."President Donald Trump has placed immense pressure on Congress to pass the bill, which would impose sweeping new voting reforms, requiring proof of citizenship for registration and photo IDs at polling places. Critics have lambasted the bill as an effort to push millions of people out of the voting process, given their lack of easy access to things like passports or their original birth certificates. Trump has argued that the bill is the "no. 1 priority," based on his long-debunked claims that non-citizens are committing widespread voter fraud. Despite passing in the House, the SAVE Act has stalled out in the Senate due to Democratic resistance and the filibuster threshold. Several Republicans have also become increasingly uncomfortable with the bill as Trump has pushed for it to also restrict mail-in voting. As the bill's MAGA backers have pushed for the party to take more drastic actions to pass it, tensions have flared up more and more. Representative Mike Lee, a Utah Republican and sponsor of the bill, recently urged voters to punish lawmakers who oppose the SAVE Act by voting them out of office, a statement that went down poorly with many of his colleagues."That threat is angering Senate GOP critics of the bill, who think it’s poorly drafted and has no chance of passing," The Hill reported. "They say threats to punish them for not rallying behind the bill will only backfire as the party heads into a midterm election facing strong political headwinds, such as Trump’s low approval ratings and voter dissatisfaction over inflation and the economy."“Circular firing squads never end well,” Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican and noted Trump critic, told the outlet. "To me, it’s disingenuous to say we’re going to go out here and we’re going to bring the bill, make [its virtues] apparent to the American people, and then he’s out there the night before we’re about to go on the bill and threatening primaries for people who don’t get on board for something he knows he doesn’t have support for."Another anonymous GOP senator told The Hill that the threat from Lee "doesn’t do much for camaraderie." "I don’t have a great appreciation for that," the lawmaker added. "The frustration should be focused on Democrats coming into the election year and not on Republicans."s

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:President Donald Trump welcomed the new Prime Minister of Japan, Sanae Takaichi, where the two discussed the aid Japan can provide to the United States regarding the Strait of Hormuz. Trump explained that 90 percent of the oil Japan gets is from the Strait of Hormuz. Japan agreed to step in and work on securing the strait and helping ships get through, but only once fighting stops. A Japanese press person asked, "Japan and the U. S. are very good friends, but one question: Why didn't you tell U. S. allies in Europe and Asia, like Japan, about the war before attacking Iran? So, we are very confused..."Trump responded, saying that it was a strategic decision and that he didn't want to signal to anyone that they were going to strike."We went in very hard and we didn't tell anyone about it because we wanted surprise," Trump said. "Who knows better about surprise than Japan. Why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?"Trump withdrew embassy staff from Israel but not those in other countries around the Persian Gulf. U. S. soldiers also were not all in secure locations. Six American soldiers were killed while working in a triple-wide trailer when a drone hit them from above.s

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders . a MAGA Republican who became her state’s first female chief executive after receiving an endorsement from President Donald Trump. was kicked out of a restaurant in her own state on Friday the 13th last week. Sanders was told to leave a Little Rock restaurant called The Croissanterie after spending more than an hour eating there with her State Police Executive Protection Detail, according to a report by the local news affiliate TVH-11. In a written statement, the restaurant’s owners explained they were "surprised and uncertain how best to respond" when they saw Sanders and her detail had entered their establishment. Because they soon ordered and started eating, they felt compelled to allow them to stay, but soon began to feel uncomfortable. According to the restaurant, after a little more than an hour they politely asked Sanders and her guests to leave. Sanders and her detail claim they were told her presence was “making employees threatened and uncomfortable because of her political views.""Arkansans are known for their warm hospitality, and while that restaurant certainly doesn't meet that standard, my administration will continue to focus on lifting Arkansans up, not tearing others down with discrimination and hate,” Sanders explained in a subsequent statement. The restaurant, by contrast, said that while they felt “regret” for needing to “make a difficult decision," they ultimately “stand by our choice to support our employees and guests."They added that despite not wanting to deny her service because of her different political beliefs, allowing her to stay "risked being perceived as a lack of support for the community that makes up" the restaurant’s staff. The Croissanterie is a pastry-based restaurant with food produced by two chefs, Wendy Schay and Jill McDonald, who are certified by the American Culinary Federation, America's premiere chef association. The website described the restaurant as “unstoppable with the savory pastry combination” and the chefs as “born and raised in Arkansas” whose menu is “not only built upon the authentic French pastries, but it also has a Southern cuisine comfort that we all crave.”Sanders has been very controversial since assuming office as Arkansas governor, which she won following a stint as Trump’s press secretary. Her controversies include alienating conservatives in her own party by proposing an 825 million dollars state prison, opposing local Republicans who oppose her policies, urging state high schools and colleges to open Turning Point USA chapters, spending 19 dollars,000 on a lectern and trying to circumvent term limits for her judicial picks by encouraging them to run for each other’s seats. That said, it is unclear which specific political issues upset the staff at The Croissanterie.s

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:President Donald Trump is targeting former FBI Director James Comey in what the administration alleges is a wide-ranging “grand conspiracy” case but which his critics claim is lawfare against his perceived political enemies. Comey was subpoenaed in an investigation that “has produced more than 130 subpoenas since cranking up last year,” according to Axios, “and targets top officials who worked under former presidents [Barack] Obama and [Joe] Biden.”They note that the case was assigned to a loyal pro-Trump judge, Aileen Cannon, who is highly controversial for repeatedly making what critics say were partisan rulings in Trump’s favor during highly sensitive cases. In 2023 she threw out the federal prosecution against him in a case where he allegedly stole classified documents, and is now overseeing the grand jury in this case.“Florida's Southern District also has a more pro-Trump jury pool than the other federal districts that previously handled the cases” involving people targeted by Trump like Comey, Axios added. “An attempted prosecution of Comey failed in the Eastern District of Virginia.”Trump’s pattern of directing his Justice Department to prosecute people he personally dislikes has aroused tremendous concern. Writing for MS NOW, journalist Steve Benen explained that all of Trump’s prosecutions, such as against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, have spectacularly failed.“It was roughly two months ago when the public learned that Donald Trump’s Justice Department had opened a criminal investigation into Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair,” Benen explained. “Even by contemporary standards, the whole endeavor was ridiculous: There was no credible evidence of wrongdoing, and it seemed rather obvious that the administration was targeting Powell because he was on the White House’s growing revenge list.”Similarly US District Court Judge James Boasberg, when throwing out one of Trump’s cases, harshly criticized the president in his ruling.“Being perceived as the President’s adversary has become risky in recent years,” Boasberg wrote. “In his second term, Trump has urged the Department of Justice to prosecute such people, and the Department’s prosecutors have listened.”Even grand juries, which traditionally follow prosecutors’ recommendations, have frequently declined to prosecute the cases Trump brings against his targets.“This is how grand juries were meant to work,” wrote UC Berkeley Criminal Justice Center Director Chesa Boudin and UC Davis Law Professor Eric S. Fish in The New York Times about the subject, describing grand juries as “a primary security to the innocent against hasty, malicious and oppressive persecution.”s

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com

Transcript:WASHINGTON . A frustrated Senator John Fetterman , Democrat from Pennsylvania took a page out of President Donald Trump's book on Wednesday and lashed out at reporters asking him tough questions about the Iran war and Senator Markwayne Mullin's nomination to head up the Department of Homeland Security. Fetterman has faced fierce criticism in recent months from many even within his own party over his seeming cozying up to Trump, including his support of strikes on Iran and of efforts to suppress voters in the name of baseless widespread voter fraud allegations. Among the entities that have hammered Fetterman: Drop Site News, which has hit the senator multiple times, especially over foreign policy and immigration. In January 2025, the outlet accused Fetterman, "whose wife was famously undocumented," of "pushing to deport people like her," with his support of the GOP-backed Laken Riley Act."The Democratic capitulation accelerated on Wednesday morning when freshman Senator Ruben Gallego, from the border state of Arizona, announced on X that he would join Democrat John Fetterman as a co-sponsor. Fetterman, famously, has celebrated the fact that his wife came to the country as an undocumented immigrant," the site wrote at the time."Fetterman’s support broke a promise he made to the immigrant rights community, namely that during his first two years in the Senate he would avoid supporting legislation that harms Dreamers, beneficiaries of what’s known as DACA," the report added. The criticism from Drop Site predates this week's confrontation . last month, reporter Julian Andreone caught up with Fetterman in the hallway to press him on the Iran war, and whether he'd vote "no" on the War Powers Resolution."How exactly would strikes on Iran benefit the American people, like on the ground? In Pennsylvania for example?" Andreone asked in a clip shared on social media. As Fetterman insisted, "it absolutely does," and makes the Middle East safer, Andreone refused to let him off the hook."But in Pennsylvania?" he inquired. "How so? Like how does it benefit them? Does it put more money in their pockets?" "I'm voting it no," the senator replied. Talking with reporters again this week, Fetterman apparently didn't forget the past confrontations. As a Drop Site News reporter started asking him a question, Fetterman cut her off."The president has indicated that his timeline for ending the war, he decided was kind of based on . " the reporter began. But Fetterman wasn't having any of it."Oh, are you Drop Site?" he interjected."Yes," she replied. Fetterman unloaded after confirming her employer."Yes? Ok. I celebrate all those Iranian leadership killed. I want you to run that, ok? You're part of this very anti group, so I absolutely celebrate that they keep wasting all those Iranian regime leaders. I'm not sure how you guys feel about that. But following me with the phone, it's just like, find a new way," the senator attacked. Fetterman doubled down that he remains very supportive of [Operation] Epic Fury, and lashed out at what he called "gotcha" journalism."These weird gotcha in the hall things..." he trailed off. As the reporter tried to ask another question, a Fetterman staffer jumped in and shut her down."He's answered your questions."Our Analysis:The Real Story Behind the ScandalThe article in question paints a vivid picture of political tensions, journalistic confrontations, and the intricate dance between policy decisions and their public perceptions. At its core are Senator John Fetterman's controversial stances and interactions with the media, specifically Drop Site News, against a backdrop of broader political debates on Iran and immigration policy.Institutional Power and Decision-Making1. Institutional Power:At the heart of these controversies lie questions about institutional power. The President, presumably Donald Trump based on the context, holds the executive power, especially in matters of foreign policy such as military strikes on Iran and decisions on war timelines. Congress, where Senator Fetterman serves, wields legislative power, including the authority to vote on War Powers Resolutions, which can limit or extend the President's military actions.Senator Fetterman's support for Trump's actions, as well as controversial legislation like the Laken Riley Act, places him within the complex interplay of power, where individual lawmakers can significantly influence policy and public opinion.2. Decision-Making:The decisions at play involve Senator Fetterman's public support for military action in Iran and controversial immigration policy. His backing of the President's strategies and specific pieces of legislation reveals his personal stance, but it's crucial to differentiate between his individual decisions and the broader institutional actions. While Fetterman's positions are significant, they are but a single component in the larger machinery of government decision-making.Misdirection of Responsibility?The article's framing suggests Fetterman is a central figure in the controversy surrounding the Iran war and immigration policies. However, this might misdirect responsibility toward him and away from others with potentially more direct control over these issues, such as the President or the broader legislative body.Fetterman's clash with the media, particularly his confrontation with Drop Site News, underscores a tension between accountability and what he perceives as "gotcha" journalism. His response to the reporter, while aggressive, highlights his frustration with the media's focus on him amidst a larger political context.Analysis ConclusionFalse Equivalence and Scapegoating:The narrative risks falling into the trap of false equivalence by overemphasizing Fetterman's role in complex issues like war decisions and immigration policy without adequately scrutinizing the roles of more directly empowered actors, such as the President or the collective Congress.Misplaced Criticism:While criticism of Fetterman's stances and rhetoric is valid, especially given his public support for contentious policies, it's crucial to maintain perspective on his relative position of power. Fetterman, as a senator, contributes to the legislative environment but does not unilaterally dictate policy.The True Culprits:The real story demands a broader lens, focusing on the distribution of power within the government and how it's exercised. It requires holding the executive branch and the legislative majority accountable for their roles in the decisions that shape the nation's direction, rather than disproportionately spotlighting individuals like Fetterman.In conclusion, while Senator Fetterman's actions and interactions with the media warrant scrutiny, a nuanced understanding of institutional power dynamics is essential. The narrative must not misdirect responsibility but should instead aim for a comprehensive examination of all influential actors and their roles in the unfolding political drama.s

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com