Transcript:I never thought I’d see the day when an American president showed greater loyalty to a foreign adversary than to his own people, in a time of war. But this is where we’re at with Donald John Trump and his mysterious adoration for, and apparent shrinking fear of, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. It’s one of those love affairs that continues to defy logic yet is no longer questioned. Trump won’t say a nasty word about Russia and certainly not about Putin. What could Putin have on Trump that turned him into such an unquestioning kowtowing toady, submitting to his leader’s every whim, defending his every position? Trump somehow trusts the word of a murderous, deceitful thug, an international pariah, over any nonpartisan body in his own country. The suspicion is that whatever Putin has on Trump is very, very bad. Epstein-related, maybe. It has to be something serious, because it’s not as if Trump is the kind of guy who just turns and grovels in the presence of any old brute. I don’t buy the argument that it’s about respect, or fanboy support, even as Trump regularly calls Putin “strong,” “smart,” and “a genius.” No, this feels much more like persistent menace. But not only is Trump’s behavior surrounding Putin pathetic and maddening: it’s grown increasingly dangerous. This has become clear now that credible reports have surfaced about how Russia is sharing intelligence with Iran, to help it target U. S. military personnel and assets in the Middle East, providing locations of warships and aircraft. It isn’t that this is a surprise. Far from it. Russia is perhaps Iran’s strongest ally. Putin’s aides acknowledge they are on Iran’s side. It makes sense Russia would be doing all it can to help Iran vanquish its enemy. No, the only part that doesn’t easily compute is the reaction of the Trump administration. Instead of even pretending to be concerned by the news it has soft-peddled it, as if having been told that the countries are merely sharing opinions on their soccer teams. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to this news with a shrug and the head-scratching words, “It does not really matter.”What? It “does not really matter” that an enemy is feeding intel to a nation you are fighting, and the chief executive of the United States continues to treat that enemy’s leader like a treasured pal? She later expounded, “It clearly is not making any difference with respect to the military operation in Iran, because we are completely decimating them.”Here's the reality: The thing that actually does not really matter is how well America may or may not be doing in the war with Iran. That isn’t the point. The point is that Russia is doing this, and this administration is continuing to treat it as an ally. Of course, any flippant retort must be seen in light of the reality that Trump is and has always been Putin’s b***h. Everyone associated has gotten the memo and understands that Dear Leader will tolerate no dissing of Vladimir even if he is putting our troops directly in harm’s way. It’s even worse than that, actually. Since Trump (via the U. S. Treasury) issued a temporary waiver this month, allowing India to purchase embargoed Russian crude oil and petroleum products, the president is helping line Russia's pockets with money it can use to help gather information that will lead to endangering our troops. In effect, Trump is paying Russia to help Iran attack the U. S. Let that sink in. There’s a word for this: treason. How much more evidence do people need that for whatever reason Trump cares more about Russia than he does the nation he serves as president? This isn’t hyperbole. It’s right there to see. You have to imagine Russia might not be restricting its intel to the Middle East. It could be feeding Iran info on where we might be vulnerable to a 9/11-style attack. If that happens, I doubt the Trump response would be, “Doesn’t matter. It’s war, and innocent people are going to get hurt. If it weren’t Russia, it would have been somebody else.”But here is what Trump actually said about Russia over the weekend, onboard Air Force One: “If you take a look at what’s happened in Iran in the last week, if they’re getting information, it’s not helping that much.”Again, this is essentially a confirmation that reports of Russian assistance to Iran may be accurate. Everyone associated with Trump, including Trump, understands that this read on the situation is senseless, but saying anything even remotely negative about Russia and Putin is out of bounds. As usual, what Trump cares about most is taking care of Trump. During Saturday’s dignified transfer returning the remains of six U. S. soldiers killed in the conflict with Iran, he wore a white USA baseball cap, on sale for 55 dollars in his campaign store. If you’re Trump, there is no such thing as demonstrating class or even the thinnest volume of compassion for people who die for their country. Unless, of course, the country in question is Russia. Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.Our Analysis:Trump's Unwavering Adoration for Putin: A Dangerous LiaisonIn an era where the line between political intrigue and geopolitical farce seems ever-blurring, the relationship between former President Donald Trump and Russian dictator Vladimir Putin emerges as a case study in bewildering allegiance. The article in question doesn't merely scratch the surface of this perplexing bond. it dives headfirst into the murky waters of Trump's seemingly unshakeable loyalty to Putin, a stance that, as the author argues, borders on treason.Trump's Mysterious Devotion to Putin: Beyond Fanboy AdmirationThe narrative that Trump has never uttered a harsh word against Putin or Russia isn't just troubling. it's alarmingly unprecedented for an American president. The speculation around what leverage Putin might hold over Trump is rampant, and for a good reason. It's not everyday that you see a leader of the free world, as Trump once was, kowtowing to the whims of a leader known for his authoritarian grip and disregard for democratic norms. To reduce Trump's admiration for Putin to mere respect or fanboy enthusiasm is not only simplistic but dangerously naive. The author rightly points out that this dynamic feels more like a "persistent menace" than any form of mutual respect.The Dangerous Implications of Trump's Russia StanceThe discussion takes a darker turn when addressing the tangible repercussions of Trump's stance on Russia. Credible reports indicating that Russia has been aiding Iran with intelligence to target U. S. military assets in the Middle East are brushed aside by the Trump administration with an alarming indifference. The Press Secretary's dismissive response to these reports is not just a failure of diplomacy. it's a blatant disregard for the safety of American troops and the principles upon which the country stands.Treasonous UndertonesThe author's assertion that Trump's actions. or lack thereof. constitute treason is a bold claim, yet not unfounded. By facilitating transactions that effectively line Russia's pockets, Trump is indirectly financing operations that could harm U. S. military personnel. This isn't just poor judgment. it's a betrayal of the highest order. The term "treason" is not used lightly, but in this context, it seems disturbingly apt.A Legacy of Self-InterestPerhaps the most damning aspect of Trump's relationship with Putin is the underlying motive of self-preservation and enrichment. Trump's behavior, as depicted in the article, suggests a man more concerned with personal gain and standing in Putin's good graces than with the welfare of his country or the lives of its soldiers. The image of Trump at a dignified transfer ceremony sporting a campaign-branded baseball cap as if it were just another marketing opportunity is emblematic of his tenure. profit and publicity over principle and patriotism.Conclusion: A Dangerous PrecedentThe article paints a grim picture of a presidency compromised by foreign influence and personal agendas. Trump's unwavering allegiance to Putin has set a dangerous precedent for American politics, where loyalty to foreign despots can supersede national security and democratic values. As the author suggests, this isn't merely a case of misguided politics. it's a stark warning of the vulnerabilities within the highest office in the land. In the face of such revelations, one must question, how did we get here, and more importantly, how do we ensure it never happens again?s
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com
