Following on from our introductory episode this second and final part (for now!) considers:
What is it that Province is advocating for the Inclusionary Housing policy – isn’t it just another method of taxation?
What are the negotiable variables and thresholds that have been used in Joburg?
Why do the NGOs suggest that micro-units aren’t helpful in the Inclusionary Housing debate?
How has the language and skill sets of contemporary planners been challenged by the Inclusionary Housing negotiations on policy and applications?
What have been the unintended and unresolved aspects from the Joburg experience?
How have the tribunals who adjudicate on applications responded?
What the response to the Provincial policy been so far?
What does the research in SA since 2007 tell us?Our guests are Eric Raboshakga, City of Johannesburg, Dylan Weakley Senior Specialist: Strategic Urban Planner, City of Johannesburg; Lorraine Nzimande: Masters Graduate University of Witwatersrand and former CoJ; Robyn Park-Ross, researcher, Ndifuna Ukwazi; Willard Matiashe Lead Researcher, Development Action Group; and Catherine Stone Director Spatial Planning (Western Cape Provincial Government.
There’s still an opportunity to respond to the Provincial policy via: https://www.westerncape.gov.za/eadp/news/western-cape-inclusionary-housing-policy-framework-open-comment
Learn more about Ndifuna Ukwazi’s perspective and position: https://jumpshare.com/v/tid8aqhyeIQ4uNnSGS7S