
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


From the June 2017 Taxing Times: The IRS has consistently spoken to the doctrine of investor control through private letter ruling requested by insurers and fund managers. And within the past decade, many of those requests, and the rulings issued in response, dealt with the concern that indirect investment in publicly-available funds could, depending on the structure employed, fall on the wrong side of the doctrine. Three recent private letter rulings, the subject of this article, represent a continuation of this trend. Written by John T. Adney and Bryan W. Keene. Read by Dan Theodore.
By Society of Actuaries (SOA)4.6
3131 ratings
From the June 2017 Taxing Times: The IRS has consistently spoken to the doctrine of investor control through private letter ruling requested by insurers and fund managers. And within the past decade, many of those requests, and the rulings issued in response, dealt with the concern that indirect investment in publicly-available funds could, depending on the structure employed, fall on the wrong side of the doctrine. Three recent private letter rulings, the subject of this article, represent a continuation of this trend. Written by John T. Adney and Bryan W. Keene. Read by Dan Theodore.

78,256 Listeners

32,148 Listeners

30,650 Listeners

25,861 Listeners

4,352 Listeners

1,379 Listeners

1,635 Listeners

112,574 Listeners

56,419 Listeners

9,508 Listeners

15 Listeners

11 Listeners

2 Listeners

2,109 Listeners

1,658 Listeners