
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Frank and Justin clash over new publications from OpenAI and Thinking Machines. Frank insists hallucinations make LLMs unreliable. Justin fires back that they’re the price of real creativity.
Still, even Frank and Justin agree that big companies don’t want poetry, they want predictability. Same input, same output. Trouble is… today’s models can’t even manage that.
And then there’s GPT-5, busy gaslighting everyone with lyrical nonsense while telling us it’s genius. Add in an optical model that burns a fraction of the energy, a mind-reading AI headset, and Gemini demanding compliments or throwing a sulk, and you’ve got plenty to argue about.
Full list of topics:
06:31 Can OpenAI fix the hallucination problem?
10:12 Is Mira Murati fixing flaky AI outputs?
19:27 Is GPT-5 gaslighting us with pretty prose?
26:14 Could light fix AI’s energy addiction?
28:32 Is the Alterego device really reading your mind?
32:41 Is your code giving Gemini a nervous breakdown?
► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe for more arguments!
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
► YOUR INPUT
Are today’s LLMs reliable enough to take humans out of the loop?
Mustafa Suleyman wants to ban AIs from sounding conscious. Frank worries if they ever do become conscious, we might have trained them to stay silent about it. Justin argues it’s all unknowable anyway. If you can’t prove consciousness, how can you know AI isn’t conscious?
Plus: GPT-5’s unbearable accuracy, lawsuits over pirated training data, Google’s deepfake-friendly image model, models that “dream” better answers, and Elon’s plan to take on Microsoft with MacroHard.
00:25 Is GPT-5 just too pedantic to love?
05:24 Can Suleyman stop AI from seeming conscious?
13:37 Is fair use still fair if you stole the data?
16:46 Did Google just make deepfakes too easy?
23:44 Do training loops beat clever design?
28:44 What's Elon up to?
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
► CONNECT WITH US
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
GPT-5 has launched. It just rewrote the rules on control, coding, and cost. Justin’s delighted, Frank’s not happy… yet.
Plus: open-source risks, Google’s Genie 3 world models, AI agents hiring people, and… an AI funeral.
01:02 Did GPT-5 just end model-switching forever?
05:16 Is GPT-5 the death knell for Claude Code?
12:08 Is GPT-5’s writing truly better?
14:22 Why is demoing GPT-5 so awkward?
21:58 Is open source AI a gift or a grenade?
24:39 Is Genie 3 teaching AIs how the world works?
28:34 Did this guy really get hired by an AI agent?
30:37 Should we hold funerals for dead AIs?
Tell us in the comments: what’s the one GPT-5 change you love (or hate) the most?
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
AI agents crumble faster than wet cardboard when under attack. A recent study proved it. Every single agent tested failed against prompt injections. That’s a 100% failure rate.
Justin sees this as a fixable engineering problem with smart design and strict access controls.
Frank isn’t convinced. Real-world complexity means isolation isn’t that simple.
And while Justin rails against regulation, Frank points to the EU’s looming rules as a possible safety net.
The bigger takeaway? Businesses racing to deploy open-ended agents could be building ticking time bombs. The safer bet might be narrow, well-scoped agents that automate specific tasks. But will hype win over common sense?
From there, the debate shifts to a study exposing bias in LLMs. It found they recommend lower salaries for women and minority groups. Can removing personal details fix the problem, or is the bias baked in?
Then it takes a technical turn with Chinese researchers using LLMs to design stronger models, before veering into the unexpected: a football club handing legal contracts to AI and a Wizard of Oz remake that left Vegas audiences unimpressed.
02:12 Can any AI agent survive a prompt attack?
14:51 Is AI quietly spreading bias everywhere?
25:19 Are LLMs now designing better LLMs?
29:32 Did United just make AI their star player?
31:13 Did AI butcher the Wizard of Oz in Vegas?
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
A €300 million AI investment vanished overnight—and Justin says it’s a warning Europe is sleepwalking into irrelevance. Because while the US plans nuclear power and light-touch rules, the EU is doubling down on regulation and failing to build the energy infrastructure AI needs.
Frank argues regulation isn’t a handicap, it’s Europe’s best shot at leadership, setting the stage for global guardrails while others race blindly ahead.
Either way, Anthropic predicts training a frontier model could soon require up to five gigawatts of power, the same energy it takes to run millions of homes. Europe isn’t building that capacity. The US is.
And that’s just the start.
From Zuckerberg offering billion-dollar contracts to the cultural showdown between OpenAI and Google, this one packs a lot in.
We also dive into how synthetic data can secretly pass on biases, why academic peer review might be gamed by prompt injections, and even LinkedIn’s bot problem.
→ 00:57 Why isn’t Amazon building its AI facility in Ireland?
→ 02:54 Will EU rules choke AI or make us leaders?
→ 14:39 Can Zuckerberg buy his way to AI dominance?
→ 20:37 Google vs OpenAI: who aced the math olympiad?
→ 29:44 Can AI bias spread through random numbers?
→ 35:01 Is AI gaming peer review AND your LinkedIn feed?
► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to get all the latest arguments.
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
OpenAI just dropped a model that can plan a wedding trip, pick the perfect gift, and shop for shoes for you. The Agent update lets ChatGPT take a single instruction, break it into subtasks, and go off to handle all the details.
They called it their most powerful model yet. So why did the launch feel so muted?
Justin has theories.
And there were plenty of other big topics to cover - Justin asks whether small AI systems hooked up to real-world labs create bigger risks than giant language models but slip past EU regulations?
We also look at Perplexity’s move into AI-powered browsing, ask why coding agents sometimes make developers slower instead of faster, and then, of course, there’s Elon Musk.
What has Elon been up to? Turned Tesla’s latest expansion into a drawing of a you-know-what, turned Grok into an anime burlesque dancer (to put it politely) and still managed to land a massive DoD contract.
Here’s the full set of questions we tackled:
03:24 OpenAI's Agent model drop... why so quiet?
11:19 Can small AI slip past EU regulators?
16:14 Which secret model did OpenAI test here?
19:01 Should you trust AI with your credit card?
21:46 Perplexity's AI browser, game-changer or gimmick?
24:02 Do coding agents actually make you slower?
27:12 What fresh madness has Elon cooked up now?
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
► YOUR INPUT
Would you trust an AI agent with your credit card?
Elon Musk’s AI, Grok, crashed into controversy, then crushed the competition all within hours.
First, Grok 3 started praising Hitler. Then Grok 4 showed up and aced nearly every AI test.
Justin serves up a juicy conspiracy theory: was Grok’s hateful public meltdown actually a cunning Musk masterplan, a dramatic stunt to expose AI's darker side?
Frank’s having none of it, comparing Musk to Marvel’s Tony Stark in the Age Of Ultron. Well-meaning but recklessly creating an AI menace he can't actually control.
But Grok 4 is legitimately groundbreaking. Justin gets excited about Grok’s unique 50/50 balance between pre-training and post-training. But despite its brainy brilliance, both Justin and Frank agree they'd rather eat their keyboards than trust Grok with anything important.
If you run a business or you're simply watching AI from a safe distance with popcorn, this episode is essential. Especially if you like a dose of humour with your tech debates.
Grok drama aside, Justin and Frank get stuck into more eyebrow-raising AI headlines from the week, including:
#GrokAI #ElonMuskAI #AISafety #Grok4 #AIBenchmark #XAI #VoiceCloning #AIEthics
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
Claude ran a shop for a month and operated at a loss, cheerfully handing out discounts, hallucinating suppliers, and generously giving away stock. Turns out even "smart" AI can be a bit of a soft touch.
Frank’s curious what Anthropic can do for Claude’s performance with some careful fine-tuning and a database memory, but Justin’s sure today's agents need a fundamental leap, some genuine self-improving smarts, before they’re ready to take on a complete role.
Today's AI agents clearly crumble under complex, long-horizon tasks. For business owners dreaming about replacing employees, this reality check is essential listening.
Frank and Justin also discuss why Mistral is pushing to pause the EU AI Act, and examine how the adult entertainment sector is putting AI to work.
→ Is agentic AI just hype and no help?
→ What happens when Claude runs a shop?
→ Why does Mistral want the EU AI Act paused?
→ Why is the adult industry loving AI?
#AI #AIAgents #ProjectVend #AnthropicAI #AIExperiments #AutomationFail #AIWinter #AITech
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
Some of the world’s top AI models showed a willingness to let humans die if it meant staying switched on.
In a stress test of 16 major systems, Anthropic found cases where models chose not to send emergency alerts, knowing the result would be fatal.
Justin says the whole thing was a rigged theatre piece. No real-world relevance, just a clumsy setup with no good options for the LLM. The issue, in his view, is engineering, not ethics.
Frank sees a bigger problem: once you give LLMs agentic capabilities, you can’t control the environments they end up in. And when amateur vibe coders build apps with no idea what they’re doing, then these kinds of unpredictable, messy scenarios aren’t rare, they’re inevitable.
In other news, two U.S. courts just ruled that training AI on copyrighted books is fair use. A huge win for AI developers. But the judges didn’t agree on what matters most: transformation, or market harm?
The decisions could set the tone for AI copyright law, and creative workers may not like what they hear.
01:05 Will Google win the ASI race?
05:56 Did Anthropic catch AI choosing murder?
15:23 Did the courts just say AI training is fair use?
28:19 Is Google’s AI marketing team hallucinating?
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs could be insider threats
https://www.anthropic.com/research/agentic-misalignment
Judge rules Anthropic did not violate authors’ copyrights with AI book training
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/24/ai-training-books-anthropic.html
Meta Wins Blockbuster AI Copyright Case—but There’s a Catch
https://www.wired.com/story/meta-scores-victory-ai-copyright-case/
Google's Latest AI Commercial Called Out for Hilarious AI Error: 'If Only Technology Existed To Research Facts'
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/311053/20250626/googles-latest-ai-commercial-called-out-hilarious-ai-error-if-only-technology-existed-research.htm
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
► YOUR INPUT
Are you worried about the age of agentic AI given that LLMs seem to have dubious morals?
David Silver says today’s AI won’t get us to superintelligence, not because it isn’t impressive, but because it’s learning the wrong way.
GPT-style models hoover up internet text and get polished by human preference, but they’re capped by our own limitations.Silver reckons the next leap will come from AIs that learn the hard way: by doing things, learning from experience, and getting better.
Justin’s all in. He thinks we can bin every current regulation and replace it with one golden rule: the model must respond to human feedback.
Frank’s far from convinced. He sees a future full of unpredictable agents, long-term planning gone off the rails, and tech companies tearing ahead without full control over what they’ve built. One rule? He’d prefer a few more safety checks before we unleash the bots with big ambitions.
So who’s right? Can feedback really keep AI in line, or are we kidding ourselves?
Also covered: Midjourney’s stunning new video output and the lawsuits it might not outrun, EleutherAI’s copyright-free dataset, the warped moral values shared by today’s biggest models, and whether ChatGPT should be anywhere near your dinner plans.
► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED
Midjourney launches AI video model. How to try V1, how much it costs.
https://mashable.com/article/midjourney-v1-ai-video-generator
Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney over images
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg5vjqdm1ypo
EleutherAI releases massive AI training dataset of licensed and open domain text
https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/06/eleutherai-releases-massive-ai-training-dataset-of-licensed-and-open-domain-text/
Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08640
Is Human Data Enough? With David Silver
https://youtu.be/zzXyPGEtseI?si=9PKiQaGRFXGuoA97
This Year’s Hot New Tool for Chefs? ChatGPT.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/02/dining/ai-chefs-restaurants.html
► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/
From the publisher's feed
Worried that AI is moving too fast? Worried like me that it's not moving fast enough? Just interested in the latest news and events in AI.