The Bench Report

Send us a topic important to you.

This episode explores how the UK Parliament ends before a general election, a process called dissolution. We'll focus on the May 2024 dissolution, which was the first under the royal prerogative since 2010. Historically, the Monarch dissolved Parliament on the Prime Minister's request. This changed between 2011 and 2022 with the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, which set specific rules for dissolution. The 2022 Act brought back the old system. Learn the steps involved in 2024, from the Prime Minister's request to the King to the sealing of the official Proclamation.

Key Takeaways:

• Dissolution is the formal end of a Parliament, leaving all House of Commons seats empty before an election.
• The 2024 dissolution was based on the royal prerogative, meaning the King exercised the power following a request from the Prime Minister.
• The process began with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's request to the King on 22 May 2024.
• The legal dissolution happened on 30 May 2024, when the King signed a Proclamation at the Privy Council, which was then sealed by the Crown Office.
• This Proclamation triggered the 25-day timetable leading to the general election on 4 July 2024.
• Between 2011 and 2022, dissolution was governed by the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, which allowed for early elections only under specific conditions like a two-thirds vote or a no-confidence motion.
• The Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 repealed the 2011 Act and aimed to "revive" the historical prerogative powers.
• There is an academic debate about whether the prerogative power was truly revived or is now effectively based in statute.

Definitions

• Dissolution: The formal end of a Parliament before a general election, making all MP seats vacant.
• Royal Prerogative: Historically, the legal power to dissolve Parliament exercised by the Monarch on the Prime Minister's advice.

Source: Dissolution of Parliament: recent developments
Research Briefing
Published Wednesday, 21 May, 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

 This episode looks the vital contribution of mathematics to the UK, focusing on a debate happening in Westminster Hall. We explore how maths education is structured in England, from primary schools to universities, highlighting attainment levels and disparities for disadvantaged pupils. We'll look at popular qualifications like A Levels and programs like the AMSP and Multiply aimed at improving skills. Discover the economic impact of mathematical sciences, estimated at £495 billion in 2023, and hear about calls for a National Mathematics Strategy.

Key Takeaways:

• A Westminster Hall debate on the contribution of maths to the UK is scheduled for 5 June 2025.
• Mathematical sciences are estimated to have contributed £495 billion to the UK economy in 2023.
• While 73% of primary students met the expected standard in maths in 2024, only 59% of disadvantaged pupils did.
• At GCSE level in 2024, 65% achieved a standard pass in English and Maths, but only 43% of disadvantaged pupils met this threshold.
• Maths is the most popular A Level subject, but entries are majority male.
• The Advanced Mathematics Support Programme (AMSP) supports post-16 maths and is adapting its focus, partly towards maths for AI and machine learning.
• The Multiply programme offered free numeracy courses for adults but closed on 31 March 2025.
• There are calls for a National Mathematics Strategy and increased investment in teaching, research, and collaboration.

Important Definitions & Concepts:

• Maths Hubs: A network supporting state-funded schools in England to improve maths education, coordinated by the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics. They promote a 'teaching for mastery' approach.
• Advanced Mathematics Support Programme (AMSP): A government-funded program providing resources and support to improve post-16 maths teaching and increase participation, particularly for under-represented groups.
• Multiply programme: A £560 million government initiative (2022-2025) offering free numeracy courses to adults to improve functional maths skills.

Source: Maths: Contribution to the UK
Volume 768: debated on Thursday 5 June 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

The UK Government announced a significant expansion of free school meal eligibility for children in England, stating it's the biggest in a generation. The new policy extends entitlement to all children whose families receive Universal Credit. This aims to tackle child poverty, expected to lift 100,000 children out of poverty and save eligible families up to £495 annually. The expansion is presented as both pro-learning and anti-poverty, with expected benefits for children's attendance, behaviour, and academic attainment. This is described as a down payment on a wider child poverty strategy due later this year.

Key Takeaways:

• Expanded Eligibility: Free school meals will be extended to all children in households receiving Universal Credit.
• Financial Relief: Eligible families could save up to £495 per child each year.
• Poverty Reduction: The measure is expected to lift 100,000 children out of poverty.
• Educational Benefits: Access to healthy meals is linked to improved attendance, focus, behaviour, and grades.
• Part of a Larger Plan: This is described as a key step within a broader child poverty strategy.
• Criticisms: Concerns were raised about the funding source, potential impact on school budgets (specifically the link to Pupil Premium), and the ending of transitional protections in 2026.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Free School Meals (FSM): Government-funded meals provided to eligible children at school.
• Universal Credit: A UK welfare benefit for people on a low income or out of work.
• Pupil Premium: Additional funding for schools in England to support disadvantaged pupils, historically linked to FSM eligibility.

Discussion and Reflection Question:

Considering the announced expansion of free school meal eligibility and the concerns raised about funding and transitional protections, what are the potential long-term impacts of this policy on schools and families?

Source: Free School Meals
Volume 768: debated on Thursday 5 June 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

This episode discusses the critical importance of breast cancer screening for saving lives through early detection. While breast cancer mortality rates have fallen since the 1970s, around 11,400 women and 85 men still die annually in the UK. The NHS offers free screening for women aged 50-70. However, attendance has dropped significantly, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers include fear, embarrassment, accessibility issues in rural areas, and lack of awareness. Efforts are underway nationally and locally, like the "Bassetlaw love your boobs" campaign, to encourage more people to get checked and attend appointments.

Key Takeaways:

• Early detection of breast cancer through screening significantly improves treatment effectiveness and survival rates. The five-year survival rate is nearly 98% if found at stage one, but drops to under 27% at stage four.
• The NHS invites women aged 50 to 71 for a mammogram every three years. Mammograms can find cancer before it is felt as a lump.
• Breast screening uptake across the UK dropped after the COVID-19 pandemic, with many areas not returning to pre-pandemic levels. Bassetlaw saw attendance drop to below 50% from 78% before the pandemic.
• Factors like fear, embarrassment, and difficulty accessing services in rural areas can prevent people from getting screened.
• Breast cancer can affect men too; almost 400 men are diagnosed annually.
• People of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage have a higher risk due to the BRCA gene mutation. Genetic testing is available.

Definitions:

• Mammogram: An essential tool in breast cancer screening. It is an X-ray that can identify breast cancer before it is large enough to be felt as a lump.
• BRCA gene mutation: A genetic change known to significantly increase the risk of developing breast cancer. People of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage have a higher chance of carrying this mutation.

Discussion: What specific steps do you think communities, healthcare providers, and individuals could take to help more people attend their screening appointments?

Source: Breast Cancer Screening: Bassetlaw
Volume 768: debated on Monday 9 June 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

This episode looks at the critical state of support for people with ADHD in the UK, drawing on a recent parliamentary debate. We highlight the significant challenges within the NHS, including exceptionally long waiting lists for diagnosis, which can stretch for years.

The discussion covers difficulties in accessing treatment, such as problems with shared care models for medication and the lack of essential specialist reviews. The real-world impact of untreated ADHD on education, employment, and mental health is stressed. We also touch upon government efforts, like the ADHD taskforce, aimed at addressing these issues and improving services.

Key Takeaways:

• NHS waiting lists for ADHD assessments can be extremely long, notably reaching 7.5 years for adults in parts of Oxfordshire and 5-8 years in Northern Ireland.
• Due to overwhelming demand and safety concerns, some NHS adult assessment waiting lists have been closed.
• Even with a diagnosis, accessing ongoing medication can be difficult because required annual specialist reviews are not always commissioned services.
• There are problems with shared care agreements, making it challenging for individuals with private diagnoses to receive NHS medication.
• Untreated ADHD has serious consequences, linked to higher school exclusions, lower academic success, substance misuse, and disproportionate representation in the prison population.
• An independent ADHD taskforce has been commissioned to understand challenges and propose recommendations for improving services.
• There have been recent shortages of some ADHD medications, although issues for several types have reportedly been resolved.

Source:  Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Volume 768: debated on Tuesday 10 June 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

Today we discuss a UK parliamentary debate on animal welfare in farming. Key themes include ending the use of cages and crates for farmed animals, like enriched cages for hens and farrowing crates for sows. Speakers highlight concerns about low-welfare imports undermining UK farmers and standards, calling for mandatory animal welfare labelling to inform consumers. The debate also touches on insufficient enforcement of current laws and the rise of intensive farming, including 'mega-farms'. The discussion emphasizes supporting farmers during the transition to higher welfare practices.

Key Takeaways:

• Millions of farmed animals in the UK endure confinement, pain, and neglect.
• A significant number of UK hens are still in "enriched cages" that restrict natural behaviours, and many sows are kept in farrowing crates where they cannot turn around.
• Prosecutions for animal welfare violations in farming are rare despite numerous breaches.
• There is concern that imports from countries with lower animal welfare standards disadvantage UK farmers and may not align with British values.
• Mandatory animal welfare labelling is proposed to help consumers make informed choices and support higher standards.
• The rise of intensive farming, including 'mega-farms', raises concerns about animal welfare, staffing ratios, and environmental impact.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Enriched Cages: Cages for laying hens, used by about 28% of the UK laying flock, which severely restrict natural behaviours. Also referred to as "confinement cages".
• Farrowing Crates: Small metal cages used on pig farms where sows are confined to give birth and nurse young, preventing them from turning around or expressing natural maternal behaviours.
• Mandatory Animal Welfare Labelling: A proposed scheme where labels on meat, eggs, and dairy would clearly communicate the welfare standards used in production, enabling consumers to make informed choices.

Source:  Animal Welfare in Farming
Volume 768: debated on Tuesday 3 June 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

Today we explore the role and limitations of the Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA), which oversees fair trading between large UK supermarkets and their direct suppliers. Despite being intended to protect producers and consumers, many argue its remit is too narrow, covering only the largest retailers and often missing primary producers further down the chain. Suppliers fear retaliation if they complain. Proposals include widening the GCA's scope, reducing the turnover threshold for covered businesses, giving it more powers (like initiating inquiries and regulating prices), or creating a new regulator for the entire supply chain. The goal is to ensure fairness, support domestic producers, and enhance food security.

Key Takeaways:

• The Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) was established to ensure fair trading between large retailers and suppliers.
• It currently applies only to the largest grocery retailers (turnover over £1 billion).
• Many believe the GCA's powers and scope are too narrow and that it needs "more teeth".
• There are calls to extend the GCA's remit to include more retailers, food service providers, manufacturers, and even the ornamental sector.
• Producers and farmers often feel left out, as the code primarily covers direct suppliers to the large retailers.
• A significant fear of reprisal or being "blacklisted" prevents many suppliers and farmers from raising complaints.
• Some propose giving the GCA power over price floors and ceilings or initiating its own investigations.
• There is a call for a more holistic regulator that covers the entire food supply chain, from farm to shelf.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA): A body set up to enforce the groceries supply code of practice, ensuring fair dealing between designated large retailers and their direct suppliers.
• Groceries Supply Code of Practice: The set of rules that designated grocery retailers must follow in their dealings with suppliers, which the GCA enforces.

Source: Groceries Code Adjudicator
Volume 768: debated on Tuesday 3 June 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

Discover why local pubs are vital community hubs, providing jobs, supporting local businesses, and boosting social connection. Learn about the financial challenges pubs face, like rising costs and taxes, leading to many closures. This episode explores how communities are stepping up to save beloved pubs, often aiming for community ownership. We discuss past government support like the Community Ownership Fund and proposed new rights and funding streams to help preserve these important assets for the future.

Key Takeaways:

• Pubs are important community assets that contribute significantly to local economies and social cohesion.
• Rising costs, taxes, and changing consumer behavior are causing many pubs to close.
• Community ownership allows local people to buy and run pubs for community benefit, not just profit.
• The Community Ownership Fund previously helped groups buy assets, including pubs, but is no longer available.
• New government plans include a Community Right to Buy for assets like pubs and potential new funding or support through initiatives like the Plan for Neighbourhoods.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Community Pub: A pub run for the benefit of the local community, often reinvesting profits back into community initiatives.
• Community Ownership Fund: A past government fund that provided money to community groups to help them purchase important local assets, including pubs.
• Community Right to Buy: A proposed new legal power allowing local authorities to require landlords to rent out persistently vacant commercial units, potentially enabling communities to take them over.

Discussion: Considering the challenges pubs face and the potential for community ownership, how can communities and government work together effectively to save valued local pubs and ensure they thrive as community hubs in the future?

Source: Pubs and Community Funding
Volume 767: debated on Monday 19 May 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

 This episode explores the significant issue of banking fraud in the UK. We'll cover the two main types: unauthorised fraud, where criminals make payments without permission, and authorised push payment (APP) fraud, where victims are tricked into sending money themselves. Learn about the scale of losses – £1.2 billion stolen in 2023. We'll discuss how law enforcement and the government are working to tackle fraud, including criticisms of past efforts. Crucially, we examine the banking industry's role and recent changes like mandatory reimbursement for APP fraud victims.

Key Takeaways

• Criminals stole £1.2 billion through banking fraud and scams in 2023.
• Fraud accounted for over 40% of crimes against individuals in England and Wales in 2024.
• Unauthorised fraud involves payments made without the account holder's permission. Payment providers almost always reimburse victims.
• Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud is where a victim is tricked into sending money.
• From October 2024, payment service providers are legally required to reimburse APP fraud victims up to £85,000, subject to conditions.
• The police response to fraud has been criticised, with a low percentage of reported cases leading to investigation.
• The government published a Fraud Strategy in 2023 aiming to stop fraud, pursue criminals, and help victims.
• Banking industry actions include the Banking Protocol scheme, sharing intelligence with police, and implementing Confirmation of Payee.

Important Definitions and Concepts

• Authorised Push Payment (APP) Fraud: Occurs when a victim is tricked into sending money directly from their account to an account controlled by a criminal.
• Action Fraud: The national reporting centre for fraud in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, which collects reports before they are analysed by the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB).

Source: Banking fraud
Research Briefing
19 May, 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....

Send us a topic important to you.

UK MPs recently debated the future of public libraries, highlighting their vital role as community hubs providing books, digital access, study spaces, and support. Despite facing real-terms cuts since 2010, leading to closures and reduced hours, libraries continue to deliver immense educational, economic, and social value. Speakers stressed the need for better funding, improved national data collection, and implementing recommendations from the Sanderson review, such as a national strategy and increased recognition. The debate explored how libraries adapt through innovation, community involvement, and providing non-transactional safe spaces.

Key Takeaways:

• Public libraries are seen as essential community hubs offering diverse services beyond books.
• Libraries face significant challenges including funding cuts and closures since 2010.
• Local authorities have a statutory duty to provide a comprehensive library service, though the definition is vague.
• There is a strong call for a national strategy for libraries, supported by robust data collection.
• Libraries play a crucial role in supporting digital inclusion, tackling isolation, and promoting lifelong learning.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Statutory Duty: A legal requirement for local authorities in England and Wales to provide a comprehensive and efficient library service under the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964.
• Sanderson Review: An independent review of public libraries in England commissioned by the government, which made several recommendations including a national data hub, national branding, and a Libraries Laureate.
• Community Hubs: Libraries are evolving beyond just borrowing books to offer diverse services like digital access, study spaces, community events, and support, acting as central points for local residents.

Discussion: Given the evolving role of libraries and funding pressures, what innovative approaches could ensure libraries remain vital and accessible resources for all community members in the future?

Source: Future of Public Libraries
Volume 767: debated on Wednesday 14 May 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack 

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: [email protected]

Follow us on YouTube,  X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.  

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....