“There is no loyalty except loyalty to the Party.” — George Orwell, 1984

They cheered when he put on the coal miner’s hat. They roared when he promised coal would come roaring back. They gave him the biggest margins in the country. And when their homes were underwater, when they were stranded in their cars for days, when their children were sleeping in emergency shelters, he ignored them for 10 days. This is what happens when a transactional con man no longer finds you useful.

Let’s talk about my home state of West Virginia’s ultimate FAFO moment because if there had ever been a state that should have received immediate federal disaster relief from Donald Trump, it would have been West Virginia. Instead, when record floods devastated McDowell, Mercer, Mingo, and Wyoming counties, Trump’s White House went radio silent for ten days. No press conferences. No dramatic Air Force One landing. No empty promises about how “nobody’s ever seen disaster relief like this before.” Just silence—while people sat in flooded homes, makeshift shelters, and cars parked above railroad tracks.

Meanwhile, Kentucky, hit by the same storm, got federal aid within 24 hours.

This isn’t an accident. It’s a pattern. Trump plays politics with disaster relief.

* When California burned, he threatened to withhold aid unless they “cleaned their forests.”

* When Puerto Rico was destroyed, he turned it into a WWE-style feud with local officials.

* When Hurricane Helen hit North Carolina, he used it as a stage to bash Biden.

* But when West Virginia, his most loyal state, drowned? He didn’t even acknowledge them.

Why? Because there was no political theater to be had. There was no easy scapegoat, no Democratic governor to attack, no liberal stronghold to blame. Just poor, working-class Trump voters suffering in silence—and they weren’t useful to him anymore.

Trump only rewards loyalty when it benefits him.

West Virginia’s entire MAGA Republican congressional delegation begged for help—Shelley Moore Capito, Jim Justice, Carol Miller, Riley Moore. Even MAGA Governor Patrick Morrisey publicly pleaded with Trump for a federal disaster declaration. Nothing. Not one word from Trump.

It took ten days for him to act.

By the time FEMA finally showed up, families had already lost everything. Some had already given up and decided to leave the only home they’d ever known. Others were simply relieved they wouldn’t have to keep sleeping in their cars.

Here’s the brutal reality: Trump doesn’t care about West Virginia. He never did.

He put on the hard hat for the photo op. He threw out red meat about coal jobs. And when it came time to actually help, he ghosted them like a bad Tinder date.

West Virginia f***ed around.

And now, they’re finding out.

If you thought American diplomacy couldn’t sink any lower, buckle up. In a jaw-dropping Oval Office spectacle, Donald Trump and J.D. Vance turned a high-stakes meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy into a public humiliation session. They belittled Ukraine’s war effort, fawned over Putin, and acted like Kyiv owed them a handwritten thank-you note. This wasn’t just a failure in foreign policy—it was an embarrassment on the world stage. Watch the worst moments for yourself.

Trump and MAGA need a constant villain to keep the outrage machine running. First, it was immigrants, then teachers, then DEI. Now? Federal workers. In this episode, we break down how the latest attack on bureaucrats fits the same old playbook—scapegoating everyday people while the real elites get a free pass. From Marjorie Taylor Greene’s latest rant to Elon Musk’s federal purge fantasies, we expose the absurdity of blaming the guy processing your passport for America’s problems. Who’s next on the hit list? Tune in to find out.

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." — H.L. Mencken

Picture it: A sinister cabal of federal workers—milling around the break room, microwaving day-old lasagna, quietly siphoning away America’s soul.

Yes, friends, Trump and his merry band of grievance merchants have picked their new Public Enemy #1: Federal employees. You know, the folks who ensure airplanes don’t crash, food isn’t laced with arsenic, and the IRS doesn’t let billionaires pay zero in taxes (okay, they’re still working on that last one).

The MAGA Cycle of Villainy: A Quick Recap

In case you missed it, here’s how the Trump Playbook works:

* Pick a group to vilify (bonus points if they can’t easily defend themselves).

* Blame them for everything wrong in America.

* Fire them, ban them, or make their lives miserable.

* Wait for reality to collapse because, whoops, those people actually did something useful.

* Find a new villain. Repeat.

Past targets have included immigrants, Black activists, LGBTQ+ people, teachers, librarians, and the entire field of epidemiology. But with DEI initiatives gutted and “wokeness” now a stale talking point, the MAGA outrage machine needed fresh meat. Enter federal workers.

The Deep State Becomes the Deep DMV

Trumpworld has long painted federal employees as a shadowy "Deep State," secretly working against the will of the people. But now? The attack has broadened to include literally anyone with a government badge and a cubicle.

* Marjorie Taylor Greene just declared war on them, stating in a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing that federal workers "don’t deserve" their paychecks. "Those are not real jobs producing federal revenue, by the way. They’re consuming taxpayer dollars. Those jobs are paid for by the American tax people, who work real jobs, earn real income, pay federal taxes and then pay these federal employees,” Greene ranted, as she herself enjoyed her taxpayer-funded salary.

* Elon Musk, in his new role as self-appointed bureaucratic overlord, is pushing for mass firings, framing basic job functions as proof of “government waste.”

* Steve Bannon & Co. are gleefully spinning conspiracy theories about how the Department of Agriculture is somehow the final boss of globalist tyranny.

Why This is (Obviously) Insane

* Federal employees are normal people, not Bond villains.

* The EPA scientist who tests your tap water isn’t plotting against freedom. Neither is the Social Security worker processing your grandma’s benefits.

* Firing government workers doesn’t make the government “efficient”—it makes it dysfunctional.

* Think airline safety, national security, food inspections. Now imagine those things run by unpaid interns and Musk's Grok.

* The real “elites” never get blamed.

* Wall Street, Big Pharma, billionaires dodging taxes? They’re doing just fine, while your cousin who works for the Department of the Interior is now a traitor for processing hiking permits too efficiently.

Who’s Next?

Once they’ve gutted the federal workforce, who’s left to blame? Small business owners? Auto mechanics? Baristas? At some point, MAGA voters might realize the real villains aren’t their neighbors but the people hoarding wealth while telling them to be mad at the mailman.

But until then, buckle up. The outrage train stops for no one—except Trump, of course, because someone has to run the grift.

Elon Musk’s demand that 2.3 million federal employees justify their jobs wasn’t some harmless accountability measure—it was a stress test for a government purge. First came the anonymous DEI snitch line. Then, the “What did you do last week?” directive. Now? The next stage of the game begins. In this video, we break down why this is really happening, what’s coming next, and how Musk and Trump are using chaos to dismantle the federal workforce—one elimination round at a time. Welcome to The Musk Trials.

In this episode, we dive into Elon Musk’s controversial directive that demanded every federal employee report their weekly accomplishments in just five bullet points—or risk being deemed resigned. We break down how this oversimplification of complex federal operations not only exposes a fundamental misunderstanding of government work but also raises serious legal and ethical questions about authority and due process. With insights from experts, reactions from Trump loyalists, and a look at the broader impact on morale and public service, we explore how this reactionary power play is turning established bureaucracy into a battleground of chaos.

Elon is doing a great job, but I would like to see him get more aggressive. Remember, we have a great country to save, but ultimately, to make greater than ever before. MAGA! — Donald, J. Trump

Over the weekend, Elon Musk—ever the mischief-maker—took to X to announce that every federal employee must report what they accomplished last week in approximately five bullet points. Yes, you read that right: five bullet points. The fallout was immediate and chaotic, sparking confusion across the entire federal workforce. What was intended as a “pulse check” quickly devolved into an administrative farce that reduces the complexity of federal operations to a simplistic checklist.

Air traffic controllers, for example, aren’t simply tallying landings—they orchestrate the safe, dynamic ballet of our nation’s airspace, managing thousands of flights and coordinating real-time responses to emerging challenges. Likewise, postal workers do far more than sort and deliver mail; they manage a critical, nationwide logistics network that is the backbone of daily communication and commerce. And then there are CIA agents, whose work involves layers of covert intelligence gathering and sensitive operations that defy any attempt at reduction to a few neat bullet points, definitely one that could not be put into an unclassified email to OPM. This directive, widely criticized as nothing more than harassment, exposes a profound misunderstanding of the specialized nature of federal work.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The legal basis for Musk’s order is equally perplexing. Under what authority does a private tech mogul issue a command that affects the entire federal workforce? According to multiple sources, numerous agencies—including the FBI, State Department, and Pentagon—have instructed their employees to pause or ignore the directive. They emphasize that Musk has no formal decision-making power over civil servants, who are protected by federal employment laws that guarantee due process and the voluntariness of resignations. Legal experts argue that non-response cannot legally be treated as a resignation.

Critics have labeled this move as reactionary theater—a crude power play designed to thin out the federal workforce by sowing confusion and fear rather than promoting genuine accountability. Even some of Trump’s staunchest supporters, such as the newly confirmed FBI Director Kash Patel, have pushed back, insisting that performance reviews and personnel decisions remain firmly within the established chain of command. Rather than serving as a thoughtful reform, this mandate appears to be an impulsive, ideologically driven stunt—one that reflects a severe lack of strategic planning. It seems more aimed at creating chaos and demoralizing workers than at identifying real inefficiencies.

Beyond its legal and operational flaws, Musk’s five-bullet mandate risks a much broader impact: undermining public trust in government institutions. By attempting to reduce complex, multifaceted tasks to a handful of simplistic points, the directive insults federal employees' expertise and jeopardizes essential services' stability. As federal workers face the prospect of being forced to justify their existence on paper, morale plummets, and uncertainty spreads throughout the ranks.

In the end, Musk’s mandate is not an exercise in accountability—it’s an oversimplified, legally dubious, and demoralizing stunt. It exemplifies the reactionary chaos that has come to define this administration’s approach, echoing Trump’s own penchant for impulsive, unstrategic moves. Rather than catalyzing meaningful reform, this directive risks destabilizing federal operations and eroding the foundational trust between government employees and their leadership, leaving us all to wonder what real accountability will look like in a system under siege.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This article is a deeply personal reflection from a veteran who, after 30 years of military service, finds himself questioning whether his sacrifices were ever truly honored in the America of today. Attending a Ukraine rally at the Lincoln Memorial, he witnesses both unwavering European resolve and the stark contrast of a U.S. leadership steeped in transactional politics and authoritarian admiration. Through the emotional moments of a grieving woman holding a banner for Ukraine’s kidnapped children and a battle-scarred soldier speaking of a future free from war, he grapples with his disillusionment. As the administration echoes Kremlin talking points and diminishes the values of duty and service, he confronts the painful reality that his patriotism now aligns more with foreign diplomats than with his own government. The piece is a call to purge the toxic MAGA influence that has warped American ideals and to restore leadership that truly inspires, unites, and honors the spirit of service.

“Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction.” — Ronald Reagan

I arrived at the Lincoln Memorial on February 22, 2025, in the biting cold—temperatures in the upper 30s deepening the palpable chill of disillusionment. Among approximately 2,000 determined souls gathered to support Ukraine’s fight for freedom, I felt the weight of my 30-year military service collide with today’s crisis of American leadership. Standing before the grandeur of the Lincoln Memorial, the backdrop of the reflective pool, and the towering Washington Monument, it felt fitting—an iconic symbol of American ideals and unity, juxtaposed against a nation deeply divided over its role in the world.

Two moments seared into my memory. First, I noticed a young, blonde woman holding aloft a banner with a singular, heart-wrenching message dedicated solely to Ukraine’s children—a stark reminder of the 20,000 kidnapped lives lost. Her emotional display during the Ukrainian national anthem, which she sang flawlessly, revealed a profound personal connection to Ukraine’s suffering. It wasn’t just a rally sign; it was as if those children embodied a personal loss that compelled her to stand and fight, not from a distance, but with every fiber of her being.

Equally unforgettable was the appearance of a battle-scarred soldier—missing limbs and all—who took to the podium, speaking in English with a calm, resolute demeanor. His speech was not an appeal for sympathy over his personal losses but instead offered a vision toward a better future. He meticulously detailed a week in the life of an ordinary citizen in a future renewed society, free from the relentless blare of sirens signaling bombardments from the Russian aggressors, and his measured tone conveyed no desire for pity. Yet, coming from a military background, I couldn’t help but feel uneasy about using physical scars as mere symbols to rally sympathy. But that was not the case; rather, his message was a call to build a renewed society—a free Ukraine and a Russia punished for its aggression and effectively neutered from further hostility.

What struck me most, however, was the painful contrast between the unwavering resolve of European delegates and our current U.S. leadership. Their determined solidarity—quietly rebuking an administration steeped in transactional, MAGA-driven policies—felt like a resounding “fuck you” to leadership that has lost sight of true patriotism. For me, patriotism has never been about empty chants or superficial gestures; it’s the quiet, steadfast commitment to sacrifice, honor, and duty. Trump’s extortionate, authoritarian leanings and transactional worldview have stripped away the soul of service I once held dear, leaving me to wonder if the ideals I fought for are fading into irrelevance.

I also noticed that, despite the charged atmosphere, none of the speakers directly named Trump. Instead, their diplomatic language focused on familiar refrains—remarks that politicians claim Zelenskyy is a dictator or that Ukraine was the aggressor, when, in reality, it is Russia that bears the blame. In that moment, I found myself silently aligning with their critique rather than that of my own government. Their carefully measured words resonated deeply, serving as a stark reminder that true patriotism is rooted in sacrifice and duty, not in transactional politics or empty slogans.

After 30 years in uniform, I now question whether my lifetime of sacrifice was ever truly worthwhile. In a society marred by the MAGA influence of transactional authoritarian politics, I can’t help but wonder if our sacrifices have been devalued by leadership that either forgets or simply has no idea what it means to serve. The path to restoring genuine patriotism lies not in fleeting political expediency but in purging these toxic influences and rekindling the timeless values that once defined our nation—a call for leadership that inspires, unites, and elevates this great country.

Join me for my next live video in the app