Send us a text

What happens inside the courtroom walls tells a radically different story than what you're reading in the media. After witnessing firsthand the closing arguments in Diddy's sex trafficking trial, I'm struck by how sharply the defense strategy diverges from addressing actual evidence.

The prosecution's closing statement methodically laid out their case, explaining precisely what constitutes sex trafficking under federal law. They hammered home a critical point that many observers miss: you don't need hundreds of instances of coercion or force—just one incident is legally sufficient. "We have provided dozens of examples; you only need one," the prosecutor told the jury, a statement that perfectly frames the government's case. Whether examining the Intercontinental Hotel video showing Diddy assaulting Cassie, testimony about forced participation in "freak-offs," or evidence of drugs purchased and distributed through his enterprise, each charge was supported by multiple qualifying incidents.

By contrast, defense attorney Mark Agnifilio's closing argument was stunning in its approach. Rather than engaging with legal definitions, he repeatedly characterized the case as simply about Diddy's "swinger lifestyle" and personal choices. He called Diddy and Cassie's relationship a "great modern love story" despite evidence of violence, suggested Cassie was sexually adventurous by nature, and claimed there was "a nice quality to those evenings"—statements that visibly shocked many courtroom observers. When addressing drug distribution, he argued it was merely "personal use," ignoring the legal reality that quantity and profit motive are irrelevant to the charges. Perhaps most tellingly, he claimed escorts were paid "for their time, not for sex," despite extensive evidence to the contrary.

The jury now faces a fundamental choice: focus on the specific evidence tied to legal definitions, or be swayed by broader characterizations about lifestyle. Watching this case unfold in person has made one thing abundantly clear—what we see in that courtroom differs dramatically from the narratives dominating outside discussion. Follow along as we continue breaking down this landmark case that could reshape our understanding of how power, influence, and accountability intersect in the entertainment industry.

Support the show

Go to this link to subscribe to my podcast to get all the exclusive podcasts uncovering the celebrity scandals! Diddy/Clive connection! What really happened to Whitney Houston, Aaliyah and more!
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2419432/subscribe

for merch (hoodies, tees etc) go to my shopify linked below!

www.andidontlikeit.com

FOR ANY ISSUES with your subscription please reach out to [email protected] and they will be happy to assist you!


FOR ALL VIDEO VERSIONS OF "THE FLO SHOW NO FILTER" LIVE SUBSCRIBE TO MY PATREON! FloDaddyFlo | "Uncover the Stories Behind the Headlines: Exclusive Celebrity & | Patreon TAP THE LINK!