
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Daniel Klein explains how on regular issues of policy reform—presupposing a stable integrated polity— Hume, Smith, and Burke were liberal in the original political meaning of “liberal.” Thus, on policy reform, although they accorded the status quo a certain presumption (as any reasonable person must), the more distinctive feature is that they maintained (even propounded, most plainly in Smith’s case) a presumption of liberty in matters of policy reform.
How are Hume, Smith, and Burke similar? How did Burke, Hume, and Smith interact? What is the difference between polity and policy?
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Libertarianism.org4.6
299299 ratings
Daniel Klein explains how on regular issues of policy reform—presupposing a stable integrated polity— Hume, Smith, and Burke were liberal in the original political meaning of “liberal.” Thus, on policy reform, although they accorded the status quo a certain presumption (as any reasonable person must), the more distinctive feature is that they maintained (even propounded, most plainly in Smith’s case) a presumption of liberty in matters of policy reform.
How are Hume, Smith, and Burke similar? How did Burke, Hume, and Smith interact? What is the difference between polity and policy?
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

8,127 Listeners

10,253 Listeners

64 Listeners

55 Listeners

12 Listeners

2,177 Listeners

28,439 Listeners

35 Listeners

28 Listeners

89 Listeners

33 Listeners

3 Listeners