
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In the face of electoral upsets and viral black swans, Anne McElvoy asks the cofounder of the Good Judgement “superforecaster” project whether today’s future-gazers should still rely on historical precedent. As pollsters compete to predict who will win the US presidential election, what lessons have yet to be learned from 2016? And, where to spot the next black swan—or at least a dark grey one.
Please subscribe to The Economist for full access to print, digital and audio editions:
www.economist.com/podcastoffer
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By The Economist4.3
37633,763 ratings
In the face of electoral upsets and viral black swans, Anne McElvoy asks the cofounder of the Good Judgement “superforecaster” project whether today’s future-gazers should still rely on historical precedent. As pollsters compete to predict who will win the US presidential election, what lessons have yet to be learned from 2016? And, where to spot the next black swan—or at least a dark grey one.
Please subscribe to The Economist for full access to print, digital and audio editions:
www.economist.com/podcastoffer
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

7,913 Listeners

930 Listeners

296 Listeners

584 Listeners

363 Listeners

96 Listeners

108 Listeners

684 Listeners

232 Listeners

2,592 Listeners

47 Listeners

1,089 Listeners

1,409 Listeners

153 Listeners

115 Listeners

102 Listeners

37 Listeners

496 Listeners

892 Listeners

371 Listeners

499 Listeners

78 Listeners

194 Listeners

146 Listeners

72 Listeners

100 Listeners

263 Listeners