
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In more ways than one, The Fantastic Four: First Steps did not perform as expected. In spite of superhero fatigue, Matt Shakman’s retro futuristic adaptation of Marvel’s first family was well-received by many critics. Brandon Yu of the New York Times, for example, called it a “refreshingly new direction” and Amy Nicholson of the LA Times said she felt comforted by the film’s evocation of “classic sci-fi.” The box office, however, took a turn for the worst after opening weekend, with a 66% drop-off in sales. Currently, it ranks ninth in the worldwide box office for this year. That’s just before the other two MCU movies this year, Captain America: Brave New World and Thunderbolts*, both of which have been deemed financial disappointments.
But that doesn’t mean we at The Long Take Review were personally disappointed in the slickly styled summer blockbuster! In this episode, we share a range of reactions to the film, and then proceed to debate what works and what doesn’t work. Did we favor Reed Richards/Pedro Pascal, Sue Storm/Vanessa Kirby, Johnny Storm/Joseph Quinn, or Ben Grimm/Ebon Moss-Bacharach? How did we feel about the ethical dilemmas the film proposes? And what do we think this film indicates about the future of the MCU? We talk everything from stingers to the Silver Surfer!
We go into SPOILER MODE at the 28:25 minute mark. If you are not ready to launch into outer spoiler space, you can listen safely until then. (We WILL protect you.)
Image Credit: IndieWire
You can listen to The Long Take Review on Substack, Spotify, Apple, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.
All music licensed through Epidemic Sound.
Logo art: Illustration 73265080 © Worldofvector | Dreamstime.com
5
77 ratings
In more ways than one, The Fantastic Four: First Steps did not perform as expected. In spite of superhero fatigue, Matt Shakman’s retro futuristic adaptation of Marvel’s first family was well-received by many critics. Brandon Yu of the New York Times, for example, called it a “refreshingly new direction” and Amy Nicholson of the LA Times said she felt comforted by the film’s evocation of “classic sci-fi.” The box office, however, took a turn for the worst after opening weekend, with a 66% drop-off in sales. Currently, it ranks ninth in the worldwide box office for this year. That’s just before the other two MCU movies this year, Captain America: Brave New World and Thunderbolts*, both of which have been deemed financial disappointments.
But that doesn’t mean we at The Long Take Review were personally disappointed in the slickly styled summer blockbuster! In this episode, we share a range of reactions to the film, and then proceed to debate what works and what doesn’t work. Did we favor Reed Richards/Pedro Pascal, Sue Storm/Vanessa Kirby, Johnny Storm/Joseph Quinn, or Ben Grimm/Ebon Moss-Bacharach? How did we feel about the ethical dilemmas the film proposes? And what do we think this film indicates about the future of the MCU? We talk everything from stingers to the Silver Surfer!
We go into SPOILER MODE at the 28:25 minute mark. If you are not ready to launch into outer spoiler space, you can listen safely until then. (We WILL protect you.)
Image Credit: IndieWire
You can listen to The Long Take Review on Substack, Spotify, Apple, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.
All music licensed through Epidemic Sound.
Logo art: Illustration 73265080 © Worldofvector | Dreamstime.com
3,951 Listeners
37,860 Listeners
3,558 Listeners
966 Listeners
328 Listeners
5,989 Listeners
29,999 Listeners
489 Listeners
1,822 Listeners
111,096 Listeners
13,827 Listeners
5,537 Listeners
2,829 Listeners
15,546 Listeners
10,650 Listeners