Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share The Feed & The Thread
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
The Feed & The Thread episodes
- The Feed & The Thread - March 10, 2026
We tackle the hard truth that if AI can build features instantly, your product's functionality is no longer your shield, leaving only deep user relationships as your real defense. Jeff Gothelf argues that accumulated trust is now the only defensible advantage, while we also explore why designers are increasingly preferring to iterate directly in code rather than staying in Figma. From the burnout of seniority to the fatigue of constantly re-explaining concepts, we dig into how the design community is finding its footing in a world where the tools and expectations are shifting beneath us.
Articles Covered- Leading design teams is easy, but we made it complicated — Startups create massive experience debt by letting engineers build rough interfaces before design teams arrive.
- Claude Code Best Practices — A guide to treating AI as a prototyping partner rather than a replacement for critical human design decisions.
- AI Made Relationships, Not Features, the Last Defensible Advantage — Accumulated user trust is now the only defensible advantage since superior functionality alone is obsolete.
Community Discussions- Constantly re-explaining concepts and flows — Systemic misalignment traps designers in a frustrating loop of repeating themselves to stakeholders who never retain context.
- Find myself enjoying iterating in code than in Figma — Designers shifting real work into code to escape the abstract friction of design tools.
- I hate being a Senior Designer. — The crushing weight of senior expectations versus the lost joy of hands-on execution.
- For those who work in a consultancy, do you hate it as much as I do? — Deep burnout across the consultancy sector is surfacing as open frustration.
Also in Today's Feed- Separate Writing and Formatting — iA Inc
- Persuasive Design: Ten Years Later — Anders Toxboe
- The Value of z-index — Amit Sheen
- Building a Scroll-Reactive 3D Gallery with Three.js, Velocity, and Mood-Based Backgrounds — Houmahani Kane
Also in Today's Thread- Senior/principal ICs that transitioned to management… how is it and would you recommend it? — r/UXDesign
- Where do you usually go when you need a background for a hero section or card? — r/UI_Design
- What are your favorite little tricks for making presentations pop? — r/UI_Design
- Have you ever tried joining or working with an open-source project? — r/UXDesign
- Senior/lead designers who moved into management, how did it change your day to day work — r/UXDesign
- Designer communities — r/UXDesign
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 9, 2026
If AI makes working a commodity, what is left for human designers to do? Today we tackle the sharp tension between design ambition and design accountability: from the argument that blueprints matter more than ever, to the case that design must create strategic value or become irrelevant. Then Apple drops Liquid Glass and the community asks whether the most influential design team just failed basic accessibility. And a designer shares what happens when hiring managers quietly down-level you. Two very different conversations with a common thread: the people making the decisions are not the ones living with the consequences.
Articles Covered- Stairways to nowhere: why AI makes blueprints matter more than ever — Scott Hines argues rapid AI generation risks building stairways to nowhere without a clear plan; we need human-centered architects before engineering begins.
- Design is not just how it works. Design is how it wins. — Elaine argues that if AI commoditizes functionality, designers must pivot from solving usability problems to creating strategic value; otherwise we are just building Frankenstein products.
- Get the Outcomes on Your Product Roadmap Right — Roman Pichler pushes teams to prioritize customer goals over fixed capabilities, showing how deriving outcomes from strategy stops stakeholders from competing for unrelated features.
Also publishing recently: Jeff Gothelf, UX Design.cc, UX Planet, and Chicago Camps posted Veronica Naguib s UX Camp Winter replay on Rigour and agility: Balancing both in UX Research.
Community Discussions- Is Apple s Liquid Glass UI ignoring accessibility principles? — The transparency effects and frosted overlays are drawing sharp criticism for creating serious issues for users with limited vision. The bigger question: did the most influential design team in the industry just ship something that fails basic contrast guidelines?
- Hiring managers, down-leveling a candidate is not the flex you think it is — A designer hired for a Principal role was quietly dropped to a lower tier and eventually resigned despite strong performance. The comments are sharp: middle management has disproportionate power right now, and down-leveling creates artificial ceilings that damage retention more than they protect budgets.
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 8, 2026
In today's episode, we explore Nick DiLallo's argument that removing UX writers harms product quality, Rachel Banawa's distinction between statistical and practical significance, and MeasuringU's innovative banner table demo for complex data. We also dive into community debates ranging from the validity of UX as a discipline and the rise of AI-free development to practical advice on managing freelance workflows.
Articles Covered- When design teams get rid of writers, nobody wins — UX Design.cc (RSS)
- Statistical Significance Isn’t the Same as Practical Significance — Nielsen Norman Group
- Banner Table Demo — MeasuringU
Community Discussions- Name for this aesthetic?
- [Showoff Saturday] had to make a website for a tattoo shop. With not a lot of great inspirations to go off of online, thought I’d share wha we came up with and built in just html and css.
- UX does not exist
- UC Berkeley MDes vs. Illinois Institute of Technology MDes — which would you choose?
- I built a CLI tool to generate design system specifications for skill files
- How do freelance designers manage their work?
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 7, 2026
Today, we explore how the UX landscape is shifting from legacy architectures to AI-driven paradigms, examining how designers are evolving from output creators to strategic directors of intent. We also dive into community discussions where practitioners grapple with the challenges of being handed solutions instead of problems, navigating isolation in government roles, and seeking feedback on balancing minimal aesthetics with personality. Ultimately, this episode highlights the critical tension between leveraging AI for efficiency and maintaining the human-centric strategy that defines great experience design.
Articles Covered- You’re still designing for an architecture that no longer exists — UX Design.cc (RSS)
- Transformation in action: When support becomes the blueprint for company-wide AI — Intercom Blog
- Experience Strategists Approach UX Differently — UIE / Center Centre
- Obys: The Small Studio Designing Big Digital Narratives — Codrops
- Tami Evnin – Beyond Templates: Using AI as a Thought Partner for Design Leadership — Chicago Camps
- The Most Exciting Development in GenUI: Buttons and Checkboxes — Nielsen Norman Group
- Human Strategy In An AI-Accelerated Workflow — Smashing Magazine
Community Discussions- Is it common that you’re presented with solution rather than a problem when you’re assigned on a task?
- need some fresh eyes on this landing page i made. what would you change to make it pop more?
- How to make this feel more eclectic and less formal?
- Woodstock Typewriter Company logo and wordmark (1907-1922)
- Advice for a UX team-of-one working in government?
- I am once again asking for feedback
- Dealing with incompetent designers
- What are you doing while job hunting?
- seeking feedback. >positive and negative space study. (fake film opening)
- Why does this mobile footer link section looks clapped {HELP!}
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 6, 2026
Today, we explore how to effectively communicate product value and navigate the ethical complexities of AI while admiring a portfolio that blends Swiss design with WebGL innovation. Our community joins the conversation to address the harsh realities of the current job market, and the devaluation of professional expertise. We also dive into practical strategies for avoiding generic design tools and finding sustainable ways to thrive as experts in an increasingly noisy landscape.
Articles Covered- Want people to pay for your stuff? Show the value like this — UX Design.cc (RSS)
- Product ethics have never mattered more — UX Design.cc (RSS)
- Inside Corentin Bernadou’s Portfolio: Swiss-Inspired Layouts, WebGL Geometry, and Thoughtful Motion — Codrops
Community Discussions- post layoff: how many months did it take before you got your UX job?
- Execs say "everyone is a designer, everyone is an engineer" now. I'm spent.
- I was having a hard time finding real use cases for AI, so I’m doing research here and on other platforms to see how designers are using it. These are the use cases I’ve found so far:
- Revolut's design interview process
- WTF is Taste?
- How do you deal with being the expert and still getting overlooked? (Staff level vent)
- How bad is to just not wanting to grow?
- Autistic UX Designers--how do you survive?
- Even Apple messes up there MockUps sometimes… at least i think its not intentional
- I also had this problem, I have been using Canva's templates and my clients recognize them immediately. So I ended up switching to Visme for any of my client-facing documents and I found that they are more structured and less generic startup deck, and the brand kit means every client gets their own
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 5, 2026
Today, we explore the critical tension between AI-driven efficiency and genuine human engagement, while also examining why automated tools fall short in delivering true accessibility and how new technologies are democratizing complex graphics for designers. Our community joins the conversation to debate the ethics of AI adoption, share humbling insights from user testing, and navigate the realities of career pivots and challenging workplace experiences. Together, we unpack these diverse perspectives to find balance between technological advancement and the enduring need for empathetic, human-centered design.
Articles Covered- The world's cheapest compliment — UX Design.cc (RSS)
- Accessibility testing takes more than a scan — UX Design.cc (RSS)
- WebGL for Designers: Creating Interactive, Shader-Driven Graphics Directly in the Browser — Codrops
Community Discussions- Help me decide CMU (MHCI/MDES) vs Berkeley MIMS/ MDES vs GT MHCI vs. UW (HCI/HCDE)
- Accessibility issues are often usability issues
- [Truth Police] Anti-AI posts in social media
- It's now technically possible to meet this requirement. And yet...
- Testing multiple video concepts
- UMich MSI and UW HCDE. Which one is better for job outcome? (If considering financial aspects too)
- Watching session replays made me realize my users don't behave like I expected
- Oracle is the worst and I don't care if I get flamed for this. They suck.
- Does anyone not enjoy using AI for work?
- I couldn't care less about AI
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 4, 2026
So designers are paying a hidden tax just to get their work approved.
And apparently the fix is... proving you belong by speaking someone else's language? Right...Yeah, and meanwhile, hiring managers say they're tired of polished portfolios that hide the mess.Well, that's gonna upset some people. Let's get into it.The TeaseFeed: So designers are paying a hidden tax just to get their work approved.
Thread: And apparently the fix is... proving you belong by speaking someone else's language? Right...Feed: Yeah, and meanwhile, hiring managers say they're tired of polished portfolios that hide the mess.Thread: Well, that's gonna upset some people. Let's get into it.In This Episode- Today's Feed tackles a structural imbalance in design, a new standard for research inclusion, and a hard truth about what hiring managers actually want from entry-level portfolios.
- Designers pay a hidden tax just to do their jobs
- True inclusion means moving past simple checklists
- Polished case studies are hiding a problem
- Also publishing recently: George Joeckel at WebAIM on a new path for digital accessibility, Kem-Laurin Lubin at UX Design.cc on designing at the edge of AI harm, and Fabricio Teixeira on agentic UX principles.
- Welcome back to the community pulse, where the real conversations are happening.
Articles Mentioned- Today's Feed tackles a structural imbalance in design, a new standard for research inclusion, and a hard truth about what hiring managers actually want from entry-level portfolios.
- Designers pay a hidden tax just to do their jobs. Vlad Derdeicea calls it the "justification tax" in a piece unsurprisingly called "The justification tax," at UX Design.cc. While engineers refactor code on merit, designers must constantly prove their work with data and business cases. This extra burden delays approvals and fuels burnout because design is the only discipline forced to translate its value into finance and engineering languages.
- True inclusion means moving past simple checklists. Dr. Michele Williams argues this in a new book titled "Accessible UX Research," announced by Smashing Magazine. The guide challenges professionals to recruit disabled participants from the start rather than just checking compliance boxes. It offers practical strategies to confront ableism and avoid biased questioning during sessions.
- Polished case studies are hiding a problem. In "Entry-Level UX Portfolios Demand Judgment Over Wireframes," at Mitoware, the argument is clear: hiring managers are tired of seeing perfect deliverables that mask the messy reality of product work. What actually stands out is showing the decision path, the constraints you navigated, and the tradeoffs between viable alternatives. If your portfolio can't survive a whiteboard test, the tools aren't saving you.
- Also publishing recently: George Joeckel at WebAIM on a new path for digital accessibility, Kem-Laurin Lubin at UX Design.cc on designing at the edge of AI harm, and Fabricio Teixeira on agentic UX principles.
Community Discussions- The real question isn't whether AI is fast, but whether speed kills the definition of good work. "Stop Letting Execs Turn UX Into AI Builders," over on r/UXDesign, is urging designers to speak up now or risk irrelevance. One commenter argues that code is moving faster than our ability to shape problems, calling this gap a goldmine if we know how to use it. But another voice pushes back hard, noting that UX only survives by delivering business results, not by defending an ideology. If AI outputs perform as well as a design team, companies will simply cut the cost. The divide is clear: are we the strategists who define the problem, or just the operators building the solution?
- Meanwhile, the hierarchy of product teams is getting messy again. "Anyone else seeing designers fill in when there's no Product Manager?" over on r/UXResearch, highlights a growing pattern where designers are absorbing product ownership by default. The sentiment suggests that while this offers designers more influence, it also blurs the lines of accountability and burns people out. We see this shift happening in real time, and it changes what a senior designer actually does every day.
- It sure does feel like the community is wrestling with the exact moment where our traditional roles start to dissolve.
The TakeFeed: The piece on the justification tax really stuck with me. Vlad Derdeicea points out that designers carry a hidden burden engineers don't. They've got to constantly translate their work into finance and engineering language just to get approved.
Thread: That translation part is where the burnout starts. I see designers spending more time building business cases than actually solving problems. It feels like they're forced to speak a language that isn't their own just to prove they belong.Feed: I see it differently though. This friction might actually be a superpower if we lean into it. By forcing designers to understand the business case, we're creating a new kind of strategic role that pure coders can't fill.Thread: But that's a dangerous gamble. If the goal is just to justify the work, the design itself often gets compromised to fit the numbers. We end up optimizing for approval instead of optimizing for the user.Feed: And that connects directly to the thread about designers filling in for missing product managers. The industry's already pushing us toward that ownership, whether we like it or not.Thread: Exactly. So when we add the justification tax on top of product ownership, we aren't becoming strategists. We're just becoming unpaid product managers who still have to design the screens.Feed: Maybe the real win is realizing this extra burden proves our value in a way that raw code never could.
Thread: I hope so, but I worry we're just paying a higher price for a job that's already stretched too thin.AnnouncementChicago Camps is hosting UX Camp Summer on Saturday, May 30th. There's an open call for speakers so submit your idea today! It's an online event, so you can join from anywhere in the world!
Tickets are free, thanks to the generosity of the community! If it's within your budget, you can purchase a general admission ticket for only thirteen dollars and fifty cents.
Get tickets now at Chicago Camps dot org.
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 3, 2026
Today we're exploring how shifting from being someone who executes to being a strategic advisor can help designers finally overcome organizational neglect. And later, the community shares fresh UI animations while weighing in on the big choice between CMU MHCI and Berkeley MIMS.
In This Episode- Today's Feed tackles a shift in how designers earn trust, build prototypes, and choose the right code for accessible interactions
- Influence grows when designers stop being executioners and start acting as strategic advisors
- Meetings can now function as real-time prototyping sessions where conversation instantly becomes a working interface
- Confusion between two similar web standards often leads to critical accessibility failures that block users with disabilities
- Other discussions shaping the field today: Vlad Derdeicea at UX Design
- Today's Thread catches designers in an introspective mood
Articles Mentioned- Today's Feed tackles a shift in how designers earn trust, build prototypes, and choose the right code for accessible interactions.
- Influence grows when designers stop being executioners and start acting as strategic advisors. Kai Wong argues in "How being a strategic advisor helps grow design influence," that aligning with financial outcomes secures a seat at the decision-making table. That rewrites the assumption that aesthetics alone justify our value.
- Meetings can now function as real-time prototyping sessions where conversation instantly becomes a working interface. Brad Frost introduces this concept in "Real-Time UI," suggesting we leverage existing design systems to visualize components immediately. This minimizes friction and exposes weak spots before a single line of code is written.
- Confusion between two similar web standards often leads to critical accessibility failures that block users with disabilities. Zell Liew clarifies this in "Popover API or Dialog API: Which to Choose?" by insisting we use Popover for standard overlays and Dialog exclusively for modal dialogs. The distinction matters because one handles focus management automatically while the other requires manual JavaScript.
- Other discussions shaping the field today: Vlad Derdeicea at UX Design.cc on the hidden cost of constantly justifying design decisions, Nick DiLallo on what teams lose when they cut UX writers, and Nielsen Norman Group examining where generative AI falls short on critical facts.
Community Discussions- Today's Thread catches designers in an introspective mood. The conversations aren't about new frameworks or tooling; they're about whether the craft itself is shifting under their feet.
- Over on r/UI_Design, "I made the UI and animations. What do you think," is sparking a debate about polish versus purpose. The community is split between praising the motion work and asking if it actually solves a user problem. It's a good reminder that smooth animations don't fix broken flows.
- On r/hci, grad school hopefuls are debating CMU MHCI versus Berkeley MIMS, and the advice splits along a career fault line: CMU if you want research depth and academic rigor, Berkeley if you want industry access and a faster path to product roles. It's a six-figure bet on what kind of designer you want to become.
- Over on r/UXDesign, "How do product teams collaborate on prototypes," highlights a messy workflow reality. Many designers admit they still rely on clunky file sharing instead of real-time collaboration. This friction slows down the whole team when deadlines are tight.
- Also on r/UXDesign, "Vibe coders in large orgs: what do you do with your prototypes," is raising eyebrows. Senior designers are worried that unpolished AI-generated mocks are bypassing proper review. The risk is that quick prototypes might set the wrong expectations for engineering.
- Finally, "Six years of experience and dealing with impostor syndrome," is a heavy topic on r/UXDesign. One poster shared how AI fears are making them fall out of love with product design. It's a raw look at how burnout hits even the most experienced practitioners.
- The mood today feels less about new tools and more about protecting our passion in a changing landscape.
The Take- [FEED] Lots of heavy thoughts today
AnnouncementChicago Camps is hosting UX Camp Summer on Saturday, May 30th. There's an open call for speakers so submit your idea today! It's an online event, so you can join from anywhere in the world!
Tickets are free, thanks to the generosity of the community! If it's within your budget, you can purchase a general admission ticket for only thirteen dollars and fifty cents.
Get tickets now at Chicago Camps dot org.
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 2, 2026
Today we're exploring why waiting for a perfect product might actually be a liability in the age of AI. And we'll hear how true UX maturity feels less like adding new skills and more like unlearning the assumptions we've held for years.
In This Episode- Today's Feed tackles a tension between perfection and speed, while asking what wisdom looks like when tools vanish
- Waiting for a perfect product is now a liability because AI slashes the cost of course correction
- While toolsets have a shelf life, wisdom remains evergreen as designers age
- Small teams remain the most effective unit for product development, even as AI augments individual capabilities
- Also publishing recently: Smashing Magazine, UX Planet, and Nielsen Norman Group
- In r/UXResearch, a thread titled "The most uncomfortable insight I've had as a UX researcher," sparked a real look at messy reality
Articles Mentioned- Today's Feed tackles a tension between perfection and speed, while asking what wisdom looks like when tools vanish.
- Waiting for a perfect product is now a liability because AI slashes the cost of course correction. Jeff Gothelf argues this in a piece called "AI rewards provisional decisions, not perfect ones," where he suggests leaders make provisional commitments aligned with human goals. He notes that while enterprise constraints exist, AI coding agents allow teams to deploy fixes in minutes. That rewrites the assumption that we need certainty before shipping work.
- While toolsets have a shelf life, wisdom remains evergreen as designers age. Darren Yeo explores this in "The wisdom curve," at UX Design.cc, by profiling a seventy-year-old colleague who pivoted from woodcraft to EdTech. He urges professionals to move past ego-driven success toward Maslow's sixth level of self-transcendence. This shift means focusing on altruism and mentoring rather than just technical mastery.
- Small teams remain the most effective unit for product development, even as AI augments individual capabilities. The author argues this in "Small Teams Win, Again," at LukeW, citing how teams of under five people achieved significant results before AI existed. Larger teams often suffer from decision-making bottlenecks that AI doesn't solve. Instead, highly capable systems likely mean we need fewer people to build products quickly.
- Also publishing recently: Smashing Magazine, UX Planet, and Nielsen Norman Group.
Community Discussions- In r/UXResearch, a thread titled "The most uncomfortable insight I've had as a UX researcher," sparked a real look at messy reality. One user shared designing for a store card application where people apply on mobile while multitasking on a bus. They noted, "Twice in my career I've had to design for use in 'not ideal' conditions." That specific constraint of testing on a moving bus versus an offshore oil rig really highlights where real work happens. Wait-wait - which one of you did design for someone on an oil rig? That’s so cool!
- Over in r/UXDesign, the conversation around "UX maturity feels less like adding skills and more like unlearning assumptions," is hitting hard. People are realizing that growth isn't just about stacking new tools but stripping away old habits. It's a sharp reminder that sometimes you have to forget what you think you know to actually move forward.
- There's also a lively debate in r/Design asking "WTF is Taste?" while another thread in r/UXDesign argues that the work feels more like "decision-making under constraints" than pure design. One commenter put it bluntly, saying, "decision-making without constraints would be art." That divide between art and problem-solving is where the real tension lives for many practitioners.
- It sure does seem like we’re hitting the down swing on the mood pendulum in the community lately.
The Take- [FEED] So here is the tension that kept nagging me today: we're told AI lets us ship imperfect work fast, but the community says design is really just decision-making under constraints
AnnouncementChicago Camps is hosting UX Camp Summer on Saturday, May 30th. There's an open call for speakers so submit your idea today! It's an online event, so you can join from anywhere in the world!
Tickets are free, thanks to the generosity of the community! If it's within your budget, you can purchase a general admission ticket for only thirteen dollars and fifty cents.
Get tickets now at Chicago Camps dot org.
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
6 min - The Feed & The Thread - March 1, 2026
Today we're looking at a growing disconnect: companies want senior talent but keep automating the work where juniors learn. In The Feed, we dig into the talent pipeline collapse, the case for better postmortems, and why genuine understanding takes more humility than we like to admit. Then in The Thread, the community is fired up about execs flattening design roles with AI and what it actually means to use these tools with intention. Buckle up, there's lots to cover for a Sunday!
In This Episode- Today's Feed tackles a harsh reality: our industry is breaking the very pipeline that creates future leaders
- Companies demand senior expertise while automating the foundational work where juniors actually learn their craft
- Postmortems are a powerful tool for learning, yet most UX teams either skip them entirely or run them so poorly they offer no value
- Genuine understanding requires time and humility, not the immediate and complete comprehension we often promise in design
- Also worth your time today: Theresa-Marie Rhyne on dancing in the clouds with Copilot and Claude, Darren Yeo exploring the wisdom curve, and Marcos Rezende on the AI adoption theatre
- The community has some strong opinions today, and honestly, it’s tough to argue with most of them
Articles Mentioned- Today's Feed tackles a harsh reality: our industry is breaking the very pipeline that creates future leaders.
- Companies demand senior expertise while automating the foundational work where juniors actually learn their craft. That's Hoang Nguyen's argument in a piece called "Everyone wants to hire seniors, Nobody wants to make them," at UX Design.cc, and it exposes a dangerous talent collapse. If we eliminate the messy early work, we're essentially starving the next generation of leaders. Hoang argues we must shift our investment toward mentorship despite the efficiency gains from automation.
- Postmortems are a powerful tool for learning, yet most UX teams either skip them entirely or run them so poorly they offer no value. Laura Klein makes this case in her article titled "Project Postmortems for UX Teams: Learning from Success and Failure," at Nielsen Norman Group. She notes that borrowing this engineering practice requires adapting it thoughtfully to create a systematic learning loop. The goal is to examine what happened and why, then identify the specific systemic changes needed.
- Genuine understanding requires time and humility, not the immediate and complete comprehension we often promise in design. Nate Sowder explores this in a piece called "Dear diary, you're the last good listener," at UX Design.cc, contrasting modern empathy with Adam Smith's perspective. He suggests we need disciplined approximation over concrete understanding, emphasizing the importance of recognizing our limits. This challenges the assumption that we can instantly know what another person feels.
- Also worth your time today: Theresa-Marie Rhyne on dancing in the clouds with Copilot and Claude, Darren Yeo exploring the wisdom curve, and Marcos Rezende on the AI adoption theatre. Lots to dig into over the weekend.
Community Discussions- The community has some strong opinions today, and honestly, it’s tough to argue with most of them.
- Over in r/UXDesign, a thread called "Execs say everyone is a designer, everyone is an engineer now. I am spent," is drawing a crowd. The frustration is real: leadership is using AI as an excuse to flatten roles, and designers are watching engineers ship native apps without them. The results? Inconsistent spacing, WCAG failures, what one commenter called amateur hour UI. The community is clear on this one: prototyping with AI is not the same as designing with intent.
- Also on r/UXDesign, someone posted "Using AI as a red-team tool instead of an assistant," and the framing is sharp. Instead of asking AI to generate designs, this practitioner uses it to break their own work, the logic being if AI cannot poke holes in your reasoning, you have not stress-tested it enough. It is a genuine flip in how designers are thinking about these tools.
- Over on r/UXResearch, the thread "How many studies do you do every year?" turned into a reality check. The answers vary wildly, but the real insight is that organizational maturity drives output more than individual effort. Mature teams focus on strategic impact; newer ones just tick boxes. If you are feeling pressured by arbitrary study counts, you are not alone.
- The common thread today: stop flattening what we do. Whether it is execs, AI hype, or metrics, practitioners are pushing back on oversimplification.
AnnouncementChicago Camps is hosting UX Camp Summer on Saturday, May 30th. There's an open call for speakers so submit your idea today! It's an online event, so you can join from anywhere in the world!
Tickets are free, thanks to the generosity of the community! If it's within your budget, you can purchase a general admission ticket for only thirteen dollars and fifty cents.
Get tickets now at Chicago Camps dot org.
About The Feed & The Thread
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch overview of what’s happening across UX.
7 min
About The Feed & The Thread
From the publisher's feed
The Feed & The Thread is a daily summary of UX articles found in the industry and some light-touch updates from the UX Community found in online forums. It’s brief, and meant as a light-touch…
overview of what’s happening across UX.