On March 9, 2015, in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that agencies are not required to use notice-and-comment rulemaking to significantly revise its prior "authoritative" interpretation of a regulation. But several of the Justices wrote separately to criticize sharply the doctrine of "Auer deference," under which courts give utmost deference to agencies' interpretations of regulation. -- So what is the future of Auer deference, in the aftermath of Mortgage Bankers? On this teleforum, two administrative law scholars offered their views. -- Featuring: Prof. Jeffrey Pojanowski, University of Notre Dame Law School and Prof. Christopher J. Walker, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. Moderator: Adam J. White, Counsel, Boyden Gray & Associates.