The Hedge

We don't often do a post-mortem on the development and deployment of new protocols ... but here at the Hedge we're going to brave these deep waters to discuss some of the lessons we can learn from the development and deployment of IPv6, especially as they apply to design and deployment cycles in the "average network" (if there is such at thing). Join us as James Harr, Tom Ammon, and Russ White consider the lessons we can learn from IPv6's checkered history.

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-144.mp3

download

IPv6 is still being deployed, years after the first world IPv6 day, even more years after its first acceptance as an Internet standard by the IETF. What is taking so long? George Michaelson (APNIC) joins Tom Ammon and Russ White on this episode of the Hedge to discuss the current pace of IPv6 deployment, where there are wins, and why things might be moving more slowly in other areas.

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-142.mp3

download

Wide area networks in large-scale cores tend to be performance choke-points—partially because of differentials between the traffic they're receiving from data center fabrics, campuses, and other sources, and the availability of outbound bandwidth, and partially because these routers tend to be a focal point for policy implementation. Rachee Singh joins Tom Ammon, Jeff Tantsura, and Russ White to discuss "Shoofly, a tool for provisioning wide-area backbones that bypasses routers by keeping traffic in the optical domain for as long as possible."

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-141.mp3

download

Monthly update for the Hedge podcast.

Listen here—

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-august.mp3

download

Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) assign and manage numbered Internet resources like IPv4 address space, IPv6 address, and AS numbers. If you ever try to get address space or an AS number, though, it might seem like the policies the RIRs use to determine what kin and scale of resources you can get are a bit arbitrary (or even, perhaps, odd). Aftab Siddiqui joins Russ White and Tom Ammon to explain how and why these policies are set the way they are.

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-140.mp3

download

There is a rising concern about the security of open source projects—particularly in terms of open source software supply chain. Alistair Woodman, who works closely with multiple open source software projects, joins Tom and Russ to discuss the reality of securing open source projects. The final answer? Essentially, buyer—or in the case of open source software, user—beware.

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-139.mp3

download

Most network engineers take it as a "given" that the robustness principle is the "right way" to build protocols and networks—"be conservative in what you send, and liberal in what you receive." The idea behind the robustness principle is that implementations should implement specifications as accurately as possible, but they should also accept malformed and otherwise erroneous data, process the best they can, and drop the bits they cannot process. This should allow the network to operate correctly in the face of defects and other failures. A recent draft, draft-iab-protocol-maintenance/, challenges the assumptions behind the robustness principle. Join Tom and Russ as they discuss the robustness principle and its potential problems.

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge_138.mp3

download

Zero-day defects exist in every projects, whether they are open or closed source. John Fraizer and Alistair Woodman join Tom Ammon and Russ White to discuss an old defect John found in the FRR code, the history of this defect, and the problems inherent in finding and resolving defects in large, diverse code bases.

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-137.mp3

IPv6's designers built the concept of Unique Local Addresses, or ULAs, into the addressing architecture to make network address translation unnecessary for IPv6 deployments. As with many other plans of mice and men, however, the unintended consequences of what is a good idea tend to get in the way. Nick Buraglio joing Eyvonne Sharp, Tom Ammon, and Russ White to discuss the many problems of IPv6 ULA, why it isn't practical in most network deployments, and the larger question of how standards bodies sometimes fail to consider the unintended consequences of a good idea.

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-136.mp3

download

Over the last several years various Chinese actors (telecom operators and vendors) have been pushing for modifications to IPv6 to support real-time applications and other use cases. Simon Sharwood wrote an article over at the Register on their efforts and goals. While this effort began with big IP, moved into new IP, and has been called many other names. These efforts are being put forward in various venues like the IETF, the ITU, etc. Simon Sharwood, who writes for the Register, joins Tom Ammon and Russ White to discuss these efforts.

Here is a recent article where Simon is discussing these issues.

https://media.blubrry.com/hedge/content.blubrry.com/hedge/hedge-135.mp3

download