
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


While much of the Western media has focused on the military implications of President Donald Trump's intervention against the Iranian regime, there is another story unfolding. It is one rarely told by the legacy press: the reaction of the Iranian people themselves.
I recently sat down with Shahin Gobadi, spokesman for the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), to discuss how recent events are being viewed inside Iran and among the organized resistance movement. The conversation revealed a perspective that stands in stark contrast to the narrative often presented in the United States. Gobadi has long argued that the Iranian regime is vulnerable and that organized resistance inside the country is stronger than many in the West realize.
What surprised many Americans is that members of the Iranian resistance are not mourning the weakening of the regime. Quite the opposite.
Gobadi explained that many Iranians see the recent conflict not simply as another military confrontation, but as an opportunity. For decades, millions of Iranians have lived under an authoritarian theocracy that has imprisoned dissidents, executed political opponents, and exported terrorism throughout the Middle East. From their perspective, every setback suffered by the ruling clerics creates space for the Iranian people to reclaim their country.
One of the most striking moments of our conversation came when Gobadi described the mood among resistance supporters.
"They are hopeful," he explained.
Not hopeful because of war itself. Hopeful because they believe the regime's grip on power has been weakened in ways that may finally allow the Iranian people to determine their own future.
That distinction matters.
Americans often evaluate military action by asking whether it leads to another "forever war." The NCRI sees the question differently. Their focus is not on foreign occupation or outside nation-building. Their objective is for Iranians themselves to replace the current regime with a democratic government.
Gobadi emphasized that the NCRI believes the future of Iran must ultimately be decided by its own citizens. He argued that international pressure, combined with internal resistance, offers the greatest opportunity in decades for democratic change. That position has remained consistent throughout the organization's public statements.
Our discussion also explored how President Trump's policies have been perceived inside Iran.
While critics in America often portrayed Trump's "maximum pressure" strategy as provocative, Gobadi suggested many opponents of the regime viewed it differently. Pressure directed at the ruling establishment, he argued, was interpreted by many Iranians as pressure on the government that has oppressed them for nearly half a century, not on the Iranian people themselves.
That perspective is often absent from American political debate.
Too frequently, discussions about Iran revolve around diplomacy versus military action while overlooking the millions of Iranians who reject the current regime altogether. Gobadi repeatedly returned to that point, insisting that the real story is not simply geopolitical competition but the aspirations of ordinary Iranians who want freedom, representative government, and an end to clerical rule.
Whether one agrees with every aspect of the NCRI's vision, it is difficult to ignore the optimism they express today. For an opposition movement that has endured decades of repression, exile, and violence, optimism is not a word that has often characterized its public message.
Yet today, that is precisely what Gobadi conveyed.
He believes the balance has shifted.
He believes the regime is weaker than at any point in its history.
And he believes democracy in Iran is no longer an abstract dream, but a realistic possibility if the Iranian people are given the opportunity to choose their own future. Those themes are consistent with recent public remarks by Gobadi, who has argued that the regime is at its weakest in decades and that organized resistance is positioned to support a democratic transition.
For Americans accustomed to viewing Iran solely through the lens of nuclear negotiations and regional conflict, it is a reminder that behind every geopolitical crisis are millions of people whose greatest desire is simply to live free.
That may prove to be the most important story of all.
Kevin Jackson has been called, the "white-collar" Joe Rogan. Given their similar backgrounds in TV, comedy, and martial arts, it's easy to see why people enjoy Kevin's show so much.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
By Kevin Jackson4.7
137137 ratings
While much of the Western media has focused on the military implications of President Donald Trump's intervention against the Iranian regime, there is another story unfolding. It is one rarely told by the legacy press: the reaction of the Iranian people themselves.
I recently sat down with Shahin Gobadi, spokesman for the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), to discuss how recent events are being viewed inside Iran and among the organized resistance movement. The conversation revealed a perspective that stands in stark contrast to the narrative often presented in the United States. Gobadi has long argued that the Iranian regime is vulnerable and that organized resistance inside the country is stronger than many in the West realize.
What surprised many Americans is that members of the Iranian resistance are not mourning the weakening of the regime. Quite the opposite.
Gobadi explained that many Iranians see the recent conflict not simply as another military confrontation, but as an opportunity. For decades, millions of Iranians have lived under an authoritarian theocracy that has imprisoned dissidents, executed political opponents, and exported terrorism throughout the Middle East. From their perspective, every setback suffered by the ruling clerics creates space for the Iranian people to reclaim their country.
One of the most striking moments of our conversation came when Gobadi described the mood among resistance supporters.
"They are hopeful," he explained.
Not hopeful because of war itself. Hopeful because they believe the regime's grip on power has been weakened in ways that may finally allow the Iranian people to determine their own future.
That distinction matters.
Americans often evaluate military action by asking whether it leads to another "forever war." The NCRI sees the question differently. Their focus is not on foreign occupation or outside nation-building. Their objective is for Iranians themselves to replace the current regime with a democratic government.
Gobadi emphasized that the NCRI believes the future of Iran must ultimately be decided by its own citizens. He argued that international pressure, combined with internal resistance, offers the greatest opportunity in decades for democratic change. That position has remained consistent throughout the organization's public statements.
Our discussion also explored how President Trump's policies have been perceived inside Iran.
While critics in America often portrayed Trump's "maximum pressure" strategy as provocative, Gobadi suggested many opponents of the regime viewed it differently. Pressure directed at the ruling establishment, he argued, was interpreted by many Iranians as pressure on the government that has oppressed them for nearly half a century, not on the Iranian people themselves.
That perspective is often absent from American political debate.
Too frequently, discussions about Iran revolve around diplomacy versus military action while overlooking the millions of Iranians who reject the current regime altogether. Gobadi repeatedly returned to that point, insisting that the real story is not simply geopolitical competition but the aspirations of ordinary Iranians who want freedom, representative government, and an end to clerical rule.
Whether one agrees with every aspect of the NCRI's vision, it is difficult to ignore the optimism they express today. For an opposition movement that has endured decades of repression, exile, and violence, optimism is not a word that has often characterized its public message.
Yet today, that is precisely what Gobadi conveyed.
He believes the balance has shifted.
He believes the regime is weaker than at any point in its history.
And he believes democracy in Iran is no longer an abstract dream, but a realistic possibility if the Iranian people are given the opportunity to choose their own future. Those themes are consistent with recent public remarks by Gobadi, who has argued that the regime is at its weakest in decades and that organized resistance is positioned to support a democratic transition.
For Americans accustomed to viewing Iran solely through the lens of nuclear negotiations and regional conflict, it is a reminder that behind every geopolitical crisis are millions of people whose greatest desire is simply to live free.
That may prove to be the most important story of all.
Kevin Jackson has been called, the "white-collar" Joe Rogan. Given their similar backgrounds in TV, comedy, and martial arts, it's easy to see why people enjoy Kevin's show so much.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

23,061 Listeners

26,043 Listeners

11,935 Listeners

63,872 Listeners

5,596 Listeners

2,469 Listeners

65,493 Listeners

16,599 Listeners

6,495 Listeners

290 Listeners

2,240 Listeners

1,827 Listeners

768 Listeners

338 Listeners

373 Listeners