The Kalam Cosmological Argument is consider by many to be one of the best

arguments for God's existence. However, it's common for skeptics to point

out that it doesn't mention God, and so it can't be an argument for God.

Stephen Woodford's (Rationality Rules) video which claims to debunk the

Kalam cosmological argument has been passed around in the atheist community

quite a bit. Capturing Christianity's Cameron Bertuzzi responded, and

Woodford wasted little time in firing back. In this video we'll take a look

at Rationality Rules' dominant defense of his video, and answer the

question: should apologists ditch the Kalam since it doesn't mention God?