The use of enforcement by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other federal agencies rather than administrative rulemaking to advance novel legal theories has been widely criticized. After discussing the meaning of “regulation by enforcement,” we look at examples of the use of regulation by enforcement by the CFPB and other agencies, U.S. Supreme Court precedent regarding the legality of this approach, the choice of enforcement targets by agencies, and the role of consent orders. We conclude with a discussion of best practices that agencies should consider to broaden stakeholder participation when using enforcement to combat what they perceive to be undesirable market trends.
Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel in Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Group, hosts the conversation.
View all episodes
By Ballard Spahr LLP
4.9
4545 ratings
The use of enforcement by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other federal agencies rather than administrative rulemaking to advance novel legal theories has been widely criticized. After discussing the meaning of “regulation by enforcement,” we look at examples of the use of regulation by enforcement by the CFPB and other agencies, U.S. Supreme Court precedent regarding the legality of this approach, the choice of enforcement targets by agencies, and the role of consent orders. We conclude with a discussion of best practices that agencies should consider to broaden stakeholder participation when using enforcement to combat what they perceive to be undesirable market trends.
Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel in Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Group, hosts the conversation.
9,159 Listeners
8,486 Listeners
8,650 Listeners
359 Listeners
30,672 Listeners
32,087 Listeners
6,275 Listeners
25,791 Listeners
110,759 Listeners
1,458 Listeners
10,143 Listeners
16,072 Listeners
15,481 Listeners
9 Listeners
13 Listeners