The LIEB CAST

Join the Lieb Cast as we dive into the nuances of deepfakes—those clever, yet controversial, fabrications of voices and faces. We’ll unravel the complexities of regulating these uncanny digital doppelgängers, calling for smart, globally-coordinated solutions instead of reactionary, local laws driven by fear.

Our conversation takes a fascinating turn as we explore the risks and rewards of sex parties — navigating the tricky waters of consent, legality, and potential exploitation. With technology evolving rapidly, we’ll also chat about the role of AI translation and augmented reality, questioning how well our local and national laws hold up in this interconnected world.

Plus, we’ll challenge the notion that changes in political leadership impact our lives more than what happens right in our own backyards. Using the Diddy controversy as a case study,  we’ll champion a proactive, opportunity-focused approach to tackle emerging challenges like deepfakes.

The Lieb Cast analyzes the charges brought against music mogul Diddy for allegedly violating rent control laws, as well as the potential impact of the Homes Act - new housing legislation aimed at addressing the nationwide rent crisis. 

In this episode, we'll examine the economic impacts, both positive and negative, of population changes that transform local communities. Rather than get caught up in partisan rhetoric, we'll seek to understand diverse viewpoints and identify practical solutions that address the concerns of all stakeholders, including those who prioritize border security and community well-being.

We'll discuss the importance of effective vetting processes, the challenges of transitioning new residents into productive members of society, and the need for contextual awareness when discussing these sensitive topics. Our goal is to move beyond political divisiveness and offer a thoughtful analysis that can inform a constructive dialogue on this crucial issue.

Whether you consider yourself a Republican, Democrat, or independent, this episode aims to find ways to strengthen our communities while upholding our nation's values. 

Many countries, including the most recent, Australia, are adopting "right to disconnect" laws that protect workers' personal time from being infringed by employers. Should the U.S. follow suit? Kevin O'Leary, known as "Mr. Wonderful," made headlines by opposing these laws, but isn't he so far up the corporate ladder that he doesn’t face the same pressures of having his downtime interrupted? In today's smartphone-driven world, it's crucial to define clear boundaries for when we're off-duty—not just from employers but also from clients, customers, and the public. Humans weren’t designed to work 24/7, and perhaps AI can help us create a society that respects personal time. 

Andrew and Lauren examine the Department of Justice's antitrust lawsuit against real estate technology firm RealPage. They explore how RealPage's data-driven platform could enable price-fixing and collusion among landlords, raising critical questions about the ethical use of data in the real estate industry. The discussion delves into the balance between leveraging data for innovation and the risks of anti-competitive practices that harm consumers. This episode challenges listeners to consider the broader implications of data dominance and the role of regulation in shaping the future of data-driven technologies. 

Attorney Andrew Lieb and his legal team dissect the evolving landscape of real estate brokerage in the wake of recent legal settlements. Brokers are now faced with significant changes in how commissions and concessions are negotiated, with a sharp focus on the financial realities that drive these decisions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding contractual obligations and the nuances of buyer brokerage agreements, especially as the industry moves away from traditional cooperative compensation rules. As the market shifts, brokers must adapt to ensure they remain competitive and compliant. Tune in to explore the critical strategies and legal insights necessary to thrive in this new environment. 

Real Estate Brokerage Attorney Andrew Lieb breaks down the seismic changes shaking up the real estate industry. Dive deep into the NAR Sitzer lawsuit and discover how its outcomes will impact both buying and selling brokers, as well as anyone buying real estate. Will you need to pay more or less for commissions? How will you hire a broker? What essential information do brokers need to navigate these changes? With so many new rules, The Lieb Cast is here to clarify it all. Don’t miss this crucial episode of The Lieb Cast to stay informed.

The Lieb Cast examines the first presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. They also take an in-depth look at recent Supreme Court decisions, including rulings that limited agencies receiving deference from the courts (Chevron Deference), state's rights to give homeless people criminal penalties, Executive Branch ability to influence social media content moderation without offending the First Amendment, limitation to administrative law judges, and limitations on charging Jan 6ers. Additionally, the Cast discusses Oklahoma's controversial plan to require Bible teachings in public schools - think the Establishment Clause - Love that Constitution!

The Lieb Cast examines the pending SCOTUS cases that could reshape how social media platforms moderate content, as well as New York's new legislation targeting addictive algorithms. They question who truly benefits from such laws - children, as promised, or those with political interests? And should government even be involved at all? As they explore what research actually proves social media harms society, and whether laws are being passed more to win popular votes than protect the people they affect most. An insightful discussion of the complex trade-offs around tech policy and civil liberties.

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the abortion pill, but only to establish clearer guideposts as to when doctors can challenge the FDA in a federal lawsuit. The case revolved around private plaintiffs who objected to relaxed rules around abortion pills but failed to demonstrate a personal injury, lacking standing as a result. This decision sets an important precedent: individuals must show clear harm, not just moral or ideological objections, to challenge government rules through the court system. Join The Lieb Cast as we explore the implications of this ruling for future attempts to sue agencies based on policy disagreements alone.