The LIEB CAST

We take a deeper look at the recent sale of a banana duct-taped to a wall for $6 million at Sotheby’s. Beyond the shocking price tag, this artwork raises questions about the nature of value, the purpose of art, and the role of absurdity in challenging cultural norms. We analyze the symbolism of the piece, its commentary on consumerism, and how it fits into the larger trends of high-end collectibles and conceptual art. From the practical challenges of preserving perishable art to its parallels with speculative markets like cryptocurrency, we unpack the layers of meaning and critique surrounding this provocative statement. 

The Lieb Cast analyzes the legal fallout from the highly publicized and controversial Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul fight. Allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, and scripted manipulation have spurred multiple lawsuits, with plaintiffs claiming they were misled into buying pay-per-view access for an event that wasn’t as legitimate as it seemed.

We explore the legal implications of these accusations, from consumer protection and contract law to the potential for new regulations targeting influencer-led sports events. As the lines blur between sports and scripted entertainment, what does this mean for the future of celebrity boxing and sports marketing transparency?

On this week’s episode of The Lieb Cast, we unpack the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (F.A.R.E.) Act, the controversial new law passed by NYC’s City Council that shifts broker fees from tenants to landlords. The law promises to ease financial pressure on renters - but will it actually work?

We analyze the nuances of this legislation, discussing what renters, landlords, and brokers need to know and how this shift in broker fee responsibility could reshape the housing market. From unintended rent increases to potential changes in housing availability, we break down the ripple effects this law may have on NYC's already complex rental landscape. 

The Lieb Cast unpacks the Equal Rights Amendment appearing on the New York State ballot, offering a clear breakdown of proposed civil rights expansions. Learn about the key changes this amendment would bring.

How much money do you waste each year on subscriptions with impossible-to-navigate cancellation processes? The Lieb Cast breaks down the FTC's new "Click-to-Cancel" rule, set to take effect in 2025, which will impose significant penalties on companies that fail to make subscription cancellations straightforward. 

In this episode of the Lieb Cast, Andrew Lieb and Alex, a former dancer turned aspiring lawyer, delve into the critical role lawyers can play in empowering vulnerable individuals and driving systemic change. They explore Alex's personal journey, from witnessing harassment and discrimination in the dance industry to her decision to pursue a legal career to advocate for those who have been mistreated.

The discussion focuses on the power dynamics that often enable exploitation, particularly in industries where young, financially vulnerable individuals seek opportunities. Andrew and Alex examine the nuances of consent and the importance of understanding one's rights, even in the face of seemingly enticing offers.

Importantly, they emphasize the potential for lawyers to create lasting change through strategic litigation and the establishment of legal precedents. 

In this episode of The Lieb Cast, we dive deep into the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and its role in classifying workers as either employees or independent contractors. Using landmark cases like Clincy v. Galardi South Enterprises, Inc., where Atlanta exotic dancers reached a $1.55 million settlement, and a nearly $4.6 million ruling involving Philadelphia’s Penthouse Club, we explore the elements used to determine worker classification. These cases expose how much control an employer must exert over a worker’s conditions for them to be classified as employees—and how clubs, like these, exploited misclassifications to their advantage.

We also tackle the complex topic of sexual harassment in the workplace, triggered by the shocking lawsuit accusing Macy’s of covering up a 2008 sexual assault committed by Sean “Diddy” Combs at their Herald Square store. We’ll discuss the company's duty to report harassment and how vicarious liability comes into play when business relationships take priority over accountability. This episode is a must-listen for anyone wanting to understand how these issues intersect with corporate responsibility and employee protections.

In this episode, we dive into Elon Musk's "cyber cabs" and how automation could reshape the workforce. Next, we explore Starbucks workers' unionization efforts and the legal consequences of telling employees to "go work somewhere else." We also cover the antitrust case against Google and how AI-driven competitors are disrupting the search engine market. Finally, we tackle the legal implications of Jaguar Wright's defamation claims against Jay-Z and Beyoncé, and break down Garth Brooks' lawsuit involving rape allegations and harassment standards. 

Join the Lieb Cast as we dive into the nuances of deepfakes—those clever, yet controversial, fabrications of voices and faces. We’ll unravel the complexities of regulating these uncanny digital doppelgängers, calling for smart, globally-coordinated solutions instead of reactionary, local laws driven by fear.

Our conversation takes a fascinating turn as we explore the risks and rewards of sex parties — navigating the tricky waters of consent, legality, and potential exploitation. With technology evolving rapidly, we’ll also chat about the role of AI translation and augmented reality, questioning how well our local and national laws hold up in this interconnected world.

Plus, we’ll challenge the notion that changes in political leadership impact our lives more than what happens right in our own backyards. Using the Diddy controversy as a case study,  we’ll champion a proactive, opportunity-focused approach to tackle emerging challenges like deepfakes.

The Lieb Cast analyzes the charges brought against music mogul Diddy for allegedly violating rent control laws, as well as the potential impact of the Homes Act - new housing legislation aimed at addressing the nationwide rent crisis.