Matt shares his thoughts on the subject of free speech from a philosophical point of view while addressing some of the arguments made in support of censorship, and many that he believes sufficiently solidify free speech as not only necessary for democracy, but a universal and inalienable human right.
Arguments covered are criminalized forms of speech such as incitements to violence and uttering threats, the failure of specificity, the human censorious instinct, the impossible task of censor selection, the inherent conflict that arises from regulation, the concept of prior restraint, the right to listen, the intersection of rights, the failure to account for context, the fallacy of harm reduction, the negative impact of censorship on human mental well-being, the construction of illusions necessitated by censorship, differences in censorship between words and concepts and their implications, the blurring of the lines between thoughts and actions, complications that arise when the truth is hateful or if hatred contains truth, the endless accumulation of censorship without remedy, the unintended consequences of censorship, the role of agency, the implication of progress, the role of education, the elimination of empathy, the nature of offense, the disarming of the jester, the fallacy of the superhuman, the connection between rights, freedoms and morality, the incompatible nature of censorship and religious texts, the poor parsing of human value, arguments rallied in the modern era, the fallout of censorship in private industry, censorship being antithetical to pluralism, and the punitive nature of censorship.
With guest Derek Peterson.
Please subscribe to this channel for podcast episodes, argument and debate analysis, dictionary entries, and other original content.
Check out my website for The Modest Rebel Dictionary, Hardly Alone comics, written discourse, and information about my book, The Song and the Swallow: Authenticity and Love, including reviews and where you can buy it: https://www.mattymarch.com/