The Home of Wellbeing and Joy 🌱
Welcome to Episode 65 of The Mood Booster Podcast.
In this Friday Focus episode, Dr Marcus breaks down the psychology and neuroscience behind failure, building on Monday's honest conversation about what it really feels like to hear no, and why we are so wired to avoid it.
This episode explores the deeper mechanisms at play. We look at why rejection activates the same regions of the brain as physical pain, rooted in our evolutionary need for social belonging. Research in social psychology shows that rejection was once genuinely dangerous, which is why our brains still treat it as a threat even when the stakes are much lower. We then unpack why failure so often feels personal.
When our sense of identity becomes too attached to our outcomes, a single rejection can feel like an exposure of who we are rather than feedback on what we did. This is particularly true for high achievers, and understanding this shift from "I failed" to "this attempt failed" is one of the most important reframes available to us.
We also explore the cognitive distortions that make failure feel worse than it needs to be, including all or nothing thinking, catastrophising, and personalisation, and how contingent self worth, tying our value to our results, quietly drives fear of trying, burnout, and emotional volatility.
Combined with stress inoculation theory, the evidence is clear: failure does not just feel survivable. It actively builds the resilience we need to succeed long term. Finally, Dr Marcus brings it all together with a practical framework for reframing failure as data, setting rejection targets, and iterating faster. Because speed of iteration beats perfection every time.
Introspection and Inspiration, Presence and Gratitude, Wellbeing and Joy
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers. https://bjorklab.psych.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/04/EBjork_RBjork_2011.pdf
Bjork, E. L., Little, J. L., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Multiple choice testing as a desirable difficulty in the classroom. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.002
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134
Hsu, D. K., Wiklund, J., & Cotton, R. D. (2017). Success, failure, and entrepreneurial re entry: An experimental assessment of the veracity of self efficacy and prospect theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12166
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457
Seery, M. D. (2011). Resilience: A silver lining to experiencing adverse life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411424740
🔔 Don’t forget to follow and leave a review, it really helps us grow
👉 Instagram: @themoodboosterofficial
👉 TikTok: @themoodboosterofficial
🌍 Website: www.themoodbooster.co.uk
🎥 Prefer video? Watch this episode on YouTube @TheMoodBoosterOfficial
