The Neal Larson Show

Send us Fan Mail

Neal Larson and Julie Mason spend the morning unpacking two things that have been sitting heavy: how easily we can get locked into a narrative, and how much hotter and more on-edge people feel lately—even after a holiday weekend. They circle back to a heated Memorial Day call/text exchange about Trump’s “obliterated” comment on Iran’s Fordow site, and Neal walks through the nuance: the facilities were devastated, but “nuclear capability” also includes the scattered pieces you can’t bomb out of existence—scientists, know-how, stockpiles, hidden sites, and the regime’s will (plus outside help from countries like China and Russia). The point isn’t to relitigate personalities; it’s to be careful about absolutist claims in a messy world, and to resist letting hatred (of Trump, Israel, whoever) replace analysis.

From there, the conversation widens into media literacy and civic responsibility. They talk about how YouTube/podcasts can be useful but also financially incentivized to amplify outrage, and how algorithms can embed false premises that radicalize people over time. Locally, they touch on post-election burnout, low turnout, and the frustration of voters feeling powerless against “dark money,” plus concerns about ballot confusion and whether expanded early voting windows actually increase participation. They also revisit ranked-choice voting and why they believe Idaho dodged a bullet—especially in races where a “jungle primary” could create strange outcomes. The throughline is simple: take a breath, stay skeptical (including of them), do the homework, and don’t outsource your worldview to the loudest feed.

**Highlights**
- What Trump meant (and didn’t mean) by “obliterated” Iran’s Fordo site—and what “nuclear capability” really includes  
- Why algorithm-driven media can lock people into false premises (and why outrage is profitable)  
- Voter turnout, early voting, ballot issues, and why ranked-choice voting could have made local outcomes messier  

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

On Memorial Day, Neal Larson and Julie Mason open the show by grounding the day in gratitude—then pivot into a wide-ranging, very “live radio” conversation that hits politics, culture, and the moment we’re in. They discuss Thomas Massie losing his primary despite Trump’s endorsement power, and what that says about how vulnerable incumbents can be when local dissatisfaction is already there. From there, they pull the camera back to Idaho politics—how moderates adapt in a deep-red state, why Democrats struggle statewide, and how ideological “blue/purple” influence can still show up through legislative races, party infiltration, and out-of-state money.

The tone shifts when they play Ronald Reagan’s “Soldier’s Pledge,” then the day’s biggest theme emerges: how Americans process politics now—especially around Donald Trump. They talk about the 2028-ish Democratic field speculation (Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, AOC, Buttigieg, Shapiro, etc.), the absurdity of vilifying an NFL player (Jackson Dart) simply for introducing a president, and the broader “hero/villain” thinking that’s breaking people’s brains. Two heated calls—one centered on Israel money, Massie, and the Epstein files, another from a three-time Trump voter frustrated with Trump’s language and follow-through—turn into a real-time case study of how quickly political disagreement becomes moral accusation. Neal and Julie keep coming back to the same point: it’s complicated, nobody’s pure, and if you can’t live in the messy middle—praising what’s good while criticizing what’s bad—you’re going to be manipulated by narratives all day long.

### Highlights
- Reagan’s “Soldier’s Pledge” sets the Memorial Day tone and sparks a call to reflect with family.
- Thomas Massie’s loss becomes a debate over Trump’s influence, money in politics, and local voter dynamics.
- A sharp look at the Democratic bench: likability, coalition math, and why Shapiro’s ceiling may be real.
- Culture snapshot: outrage at Jackson Dart for introducing Trump vs. what actually gets ignored in pro sports.
- The Epstein files argument exposes a deeper divide: transparency demands vs. “everything becomes a weapon.”

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Neal Larson and Julie Mason close out a whirlwind post-election week in classic Friday form: a little Capitol Hill intrigue, a little local weirdness, and a lot of “where are we headed from here?” They kick things off riffing on Trump’s continued dominance inside the GOP—how one endorsement can flip a Senate race overnight—and what that kind of bully-pulpit pressure does to senators who don’t love being told who stays and who goes. From there, it turns into a very “us” kind of hour: poking fun at cultural tribes (yes, even the Subaru people), reacting to a local bathroom-bill lawsuit getting dropped, and taking a caller’s frustration seriously about how many voters showed up to the election knowing basically nothing—while PAC mailers and tiny penalties keep rewarding bad campaign behavior.

Then the show shifts into the fun part: Studio Four Covers brings in Rev'D Audio (Jade, Brad, Kyle, Kenny) for a live Three Doors Down cover of “Here Without You,” followed by a quick band interview and a reminder why Fridays are different around here. In hour two, they hit media and politics again—Colbert’s cancellation and the performative grief from Democrats—then dig into what Idaho’s primary results *actually* mean versus the spin. The biggest meat of the episode becomes a flash poll on data centers in East Idaho: callers are split between “we have to stay in the tech race” and “not if it spikes water and power or disrupts communities.” Neil and Julie land in a cautious, conditional “yes”: build them smart (think desert/INL adjacency), protect ratepayers and water, and don’t let insiders game the system—because like it or not, the future’s coming and we need to be part of shaping it.

### Highlights
- Trump’s endorsements and the Senate power dynamic: why senators bristle when the president picks winners and losers  
- Voter ignorance + PAC mailers: low-information voting, misleading advertising, and weak enforcement penalties  
- Rev. Audio live in-studio: Three Doors Down’s “Here Without You” + band background and how to find them  
- Flash poll: East Idaho data centers—economic upside vs. water/power impacts, surveillance fears, and community disruption  
- Media wrap: Colbert’s exit, partisan framing of Idaho primary results, and what “wins” really mean statewide

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Neal Larson and Julie Mason debrief a bruising stretch of East Idaho politics and the hangover from Tuesday’s results. Neal talks through his “mental palate cleanse” road trip to Dillon, Montana—part therapy session, part prayer, part 1980s playlist—and the bigger realization it led to: we’re sliding into a toxic “team sport” way of voting where people pick a slate or a brand instead of weighing candidates on their own merits and outcomes. That dynamic, he argues, is warping representation, feeding scorched-earth tactics, and making it harder to stop looming ballot initiatives like marijuana and abortion. He also reflects on how misinformation spreads (including in races where people get unfairly tied to the Idaho Freedom Foundation), and lands on a steadying conclusion: we still fight for good policy, but God’s in charge—and we also need to live our lives, love our families, and refuse to let politics consume everything.

The conversation opens up into calls and listener feedback: one caller admits she sat out voting entirely out of frustration over national issues and the “Save America Act,” which sparks a firm pushback that disengagement is basically forfeiting—especially when local races can come down to a single vote. Another caller raises the fog of misinformation (including around Israel/Netanyahu narratives), reinforcing how hard it is to find clean truth in a dirty information environment. Neal and Julie also take aim at low turnout, dark money, and the way “moderate” branding can mask values that don’t match the Republican platform. They end with a practical path forward: better tools and better habits—like unfollowing political rage-bait online, and building a customizable online “toolkit” that scores legislators based on the *issues you actually care about*, using real votes (not mailers, not rumors, not teams).

### Highlights
- Neal’s road-trip reset leads to a hard critique of “team politics” and slate voting in Idaho.
- The scorched-earth brand problem: IFF-style endorsements becoming campaign poison, similar to what happened with Reclaim Idaho after Prop 1.
- Low turnout + dark money + misinformation = distorted representation, even in deep-red areas.
- A listener calls for re-centering on foundational principles (Thomas Paine, Declaration of Independence).
- Neal teases a future online voter “toolkit” that weights lawmaker scores by *your* priorities, based on actual legislative votes.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Post-election day hit like a gut-check. We walk through the East Idaho results—overall a big night for incumbents, with the major standout being Tonya Burgoyne narrowly losing to Jennifer Miles, and a handful of races (especially Barbie Hart vs. Connor Cook) landing uncomfortably close. We also touch the federal/statewide top-lines (Risch, Fulcher, Simpson, Little, etc.), local levies passing easily, and what turnout looked like in some places—especially the head-scratcher of low participation in certain legislative districts where a couple hundred votes could have changed the whole story.

But the bigger conversation is the mood underneath the numbers: the confusion a lot of conservatives are feeling watching candidates campaign as conservatives and then govern like moderates (or worse), while voters say they want limited government, lower taxes, immigration enforcement, and protection for women’s and girls’ spaces—yet keep electing lawmakers who stall or oppose those priorities. We talk about dark money and PAC influence, the way endorsements from high-profile “referee” roles (mayors, sheriffs, Secretary of State) deepen community divides, and why trying to solve spiritual/cultural rot strictly through legislation is a mismatch. Then we open the lines for profanity-free venting: frustration, disappointment, a little hope, and a renewed call for regular people to actually show up, do the homework, and vote like it matters—because it does.

### Highlights
- East Idaho incumbents mostly held; Jennifer Miles’ narrow win over Tanya Burgoyne was the key upset.
- Barb Ehardt won, but by a razor-thin margin—plus discussion of the Harriman State Park messaging hit and PAC tactics.
- “Confusion” as the defining theme: voters want conservative outcomes but keep rewarding candidates who don’t deliver.
- Concern about dark money/PAC pipelines shaping Idaho politics through “center-left Republicans.”
- Critique of endorsements by figures expected to be community referees (mayors, sheriffs, Secretary of State) and how that erodes trust.
- Caller questions about voting procedures (spoiled/spent ballots, party call-outs) and how to build confidence in election systems.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

We’re in the final stretch of Election Day with polls open and we’re basically counting down the hours until this thing is done—while still pushing hard for everyone eligible to vote to get out and do it. Neal Larson and Julie Mason remind unaffiliated voters they *can* participate by selecting a party ballot at the polls, and we spend the morning taking rapid-fire “stump speeches” from candidates who call in, email in, or stop by the studio. It’s a mix of serious, heartfelt pitches and a little levity (including an HOA “campaign” speech that honestly deserved its own award), but the common theme is giving candidates one last clean shot to speak directly to voters without getting dragged into constant crossfire.

Along the way, we hear closing messages from Rep. Rod Furniss on budgeting, taxes, energy, and committee work; judicial candidate Randy Neal making the case for contested elections and accountability; and legislative candidates including James Lamborn, Julie Ann Young, Aaron Bingham, Julie VanOrden, and Stephanie Mickelsen—each framing service, local priorities, and trust in their own way. We also dig into what’s hanging over a lot of these races: outside spending and “dark money,” how some PACs are transparent and others are essentially pass-throughs from out of state, and the resentment that can follow when voters feel like seats are being bought. We end with a strong reminder: turnout matters (sometimes down to a handful of votes), use the election toolkit/results links, and no matter who wins—Bingham County and the region will need to heal and move forward after a bruising season.

### Highlights
- Unaffiliated voters can choose a party ballot at the polls; registered party voters must vote their party ballot.  
- Rapid stump speeches from multiple races, plus a few memorable in-studio visits (including Superman).  
- Conversation on PAC layers: transparent advocacy vs. out-of-state dark money and pass-through groups.  
- Reminder that tiny margins are real in East Idaho—turnout can flip races.  
- Tools/results links promoted to help voters find ballots, polling places, and live election-night results.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

It’s election eve, and we’re all feeling that mix of “let’s get this done” energy and pure exhaustion—mostly because we’re about 48 hours away from the political ads, mailers, and doom-scroll campaign videos finally disappearing. Neal and Julie kick things off reacting to a clip from a candidate who claimed the only “official debates” he was invited to were with “Neal Larson and Julie Mason” (wrong names and all), then used that to call the show biased. From there, we push listeners to actually make a voting plan for tomorrow, reach out to three like-minded people, and remember that first-time voters can register at the polls (with the usual party-affiliation caveats). We also point everyone to the station’s “toolkit” (text **TOOLS** to **208-542-1079**) with candidate interviews, sample ballots, donation info via the Sunshine Report, and Neal’s “party cohesion index”/data sheet so people can evaluate real voting patterns instead of vibes.

Then the show turns into a rapid-fire open mic for candidates—especially precinct committee officer races—who call, text, email, and even stop by the studio to deliver stump speeches. We hear from challengers and locals across East Idaho: Neal and Julie hear from a Congressional candidate, along with several legislative contenders, a coroner candidate, and PCO candidates as well. Along the way there’s plenty of inside-baseball radio humor (including a mock “stump speech” for a four-step lawn program), a quick correction about a local road-meeting location change, and some blunt commentary about out-of-area PAC money influencing even small local races—plus a strong defense of the show’s debate format and fairness after being criticized by a candidate who refused to participate.

**Highlights**
- Election-eve push: make a voting plan, recruit three people, and help first-time voters register at the polls  
- The “TOOLS” toolkit: interviews, Sunshine Report, sample ballots, and Neal’s party cohesion index/data sheet  
- Stump-speech parade: congressional challenger, local commissioner/coroner races, legislators, and lots of PCO candidates  
- Discussion of PAC/outside money targeting local races (even precinct positions)  
- Defending the show’s debates/forums and calling out candidates who avoid tough questions 

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

This one felt like the moment in the election stretch where you look up and realize you’re running on fumes—and Facebook isn’t helping. Neal Larson and Julie Mason talk candidly about how toxic the local political feed has gotten, why they’re stepping back from social media, and why they’re not apologizing for asking hard questions of candidates who want to represent tens of thousands of people and steward taxpayer dollars. They draw a bright line between legitimate scrutiny of a public record and the behind-the-scenes personal gossip they refuse to traffic in, while also pushing back on the idea that it’s “unfair” to examine votes, funding sources, and campaign behavior. A big thread through the hour is money: the difference between transparent in-state spending (like Jordan Redman openly putting his name on dollars) versus murky PAC pipelines that show up at the last minute and try to steer Idaho races without voters even knowing who’s really behind it.

The show also digs into a very specific local flare-up: a Ben Fuhriman campaign mailer implying endorsement from the grassroots group **End the Red Light District**, which worked to pass legislation dimming the red lights on wind turbines. Spokesperson Aaron Harker joins to clarify the group didn’t give permission for names/photos to be used and that the win belonged to a huge volunteer effort—not any one campaign. From there, Neal and Julie zoom back out to the bigger pattern: candidates dodging interviews, taking up too much “oxygen,” and turning straightforward governance into unnecessary drama. The week closes with a Friday “flash poll” vibe—listeners weigh in on which East Idaho races they’re watching closest and how they think they’ll actually break.

---

### Highlights
- Neal and Julie lay out why they scrutinize candidates’ public records—and refuse to be shamed for it.
- Transparent political spending vs. dark money PACs: why the source and accountability matter.
- The “Save Idaho PAC” question: out-of-state money, unclear motivations, and why voters should demand answers.
- Aaron Harker (End the Red Light District) responds to the Fuhrman mailer and the implied endorsement problem.
- Listener pulse check: which local races feel tight and which ones money might be tilting.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Senator Jim Risch joined us from Washington, D.C., and we worked through a mix of big-picture foreign policy and very Idaho-specific concerns. On China, Risch urged patience—he thinks President Trump has a plan and we’ll see announcements soon, likely on trade and possibly Iran. On Iran, he painted a picture of real internal instability (a leadership vacuum and factions competing), and he flat-out doesn’t believe durable nuclear agreements with Iran are possible. His view was more “deterrence and enforcement” than “deal-making,” with the two urgent issues being Iran’s nuclear ambitions and keeping the Strait of Hormuz open—because when that strait is threatened, regular Idaho families feel it fast through fuel prices. He supported the idea of suspending the federal gas tax as an easy, quick, limited relief step, but emphasized it’s not the real solution. We also talked public lands funding through the Great American Outdoors Act framework and a newer push (the America the Beautiful Act), with potential dollars for Idaho to tackle long-neglected maintenance like campgrounds, roads, bathrooms, and basic recreation infrastructure.

Then we shifted hard into what’s happening in Idaho legislative races right now—and why it’s leaving us discouraged. We dug into the Sunshine Reports and followed the money: major out-of-state cash (especially routed through “the Way Back PAC”) has poured into multiple Idaho groups (like Defend and Protect Idaho, Hometown Heroes, Idaho First, and Take Back Idaho), and then into independent expenditures—mailers, ads, and digital hits—aimed at shaping local legislative outcomes. We also talked about issue-specific PACs popping up fast (like the newly created PAC for Public Lands), using hot-button local topics (Harriman State Park) to target certain conservative candidates while ignoring others who played bigger roles. The takeaway for us: this isn’t just “people donating,” it’s a coordinated influence operation that’s intentionally hard to track, and it’s distorting representation. We pushed listeners to use the election toolkit, look at independent expenditures, and—most importantly—vote and bring someone with you.

**Highlights**
- Risch: don’t expect reliable nuclear “deals” with Iran; deterrence and enforcement matter more.
- Strait of Hormuz instability is a direct driver of painful fuel prices for Idaho families and farmers.
- Public lands funding could mean real repairs: restrooms, roads, campgrounds, and recreation facilities.
- Out-of-state money (Way Back PAC) is being funneled into Idaho PACs to influence dozens of races.
- “Independent expenditures” are where you can really see PAC power in action—mailers and ads stacked on top of candidate spending.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

With six days to go before the election, Neal Larson opens with a pretty accurate picture of what this moment feels like: multiple tornadoes on the horizon—chaos in a bunch of places at once. He does a needed “we’re going to be okay” wellness check for everyone, even while admitting he badly wants conservatives to win—people who actually mean what they say, who’ll govern like the party label they run under, and who won’t take the “benefits” of affiliation while refusing the responsibility. From there, the conversation turns into a broader critique of integrity in politics, the way some lawmakers dodge accountability (including on enforcement of laws like immigration), and how special interests—especially the cheap-labor lobby—quietly shape what does and doesn’t become law in Idaho.

Neal and Julie Mason then dig into what’s making this election season feel especially gross: PAC mailers, misleading claims, “dark money,” and political branding designed to trick voters. They walk through a real example involving an anti–Julianne Young flyer and the confusion around “Idaho First,” tracing funding through layers of committees and out-of-state routes that make transparency harder on purpose. Callers pile on with what they’re seeing locally—sign shenanigans, candidates using “regular” ads for name recognition, frustration with candidates who won’t return messages, and concern that precinct races (PCOs) are quietly being targeted by people who aren’t actually Republicans. The repeated takeaway is simple: ignore the mailers, verify everything, and vote—especially in those down-ballot races that can be decided by a couple dozen votes.

### Highlights
- Neal’s reminder to keep perspective: after May 20, we’ll still have our homes, communities, and lives—don’t let the chaos hijack your mental health.
- A blunt warning about PAC mailers: misleading by design—“be smarter than the mailers.”
- “Idaho First” / PAC transparency rabbit hole: how layered funding obscures who’s actually behind attacks.
- Callers flag PCO races as a major battleground—sometimes with “Democrats running as Republicans.”
- The show’s repeated emphasis: do your own research, check the “why,” and focus on turnout.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.