The Neal Larson Show

Send us Fan Mail

Neal Larson walks us through a new “party cohesion” metric he built (with help from AI and the legislative API) to measure how often Idaho lawmakers vote with the majority of their stated party on votes that break along clear partisan lines. The goal isn’t a purity test or a “gotcha,” but a sunlight tool: if you’re running with an “R” (or “D”), how often do you actually vote like one—especially on the big, ideological fights? Neal and Julie Mason dig into early House results (enough votes to be meaningful) while noting the Senate sample size is still tiny, and they talk about refining the model to filter out procedural votes and even weight issues (immigration vs. bureaucratic tweaks) based on what voters care about.

From there, the conversation broadens into accountability and trust: if a lawmaker’s public branding doesn’t match their roll-call behavior, that’s an integrity problem—not a “we demand 100% loyalty” problem. They get into why some lawmakers avoid coming on-air to explain votes, the frustration with the Senate’s slow pace, and how local party politics and money shape outcomes (including a weird rabbit hole about Bingham County GOP activity/donations and what that says about organization and credibility). The show also touches on national headlines—Article V convention chatter cooling off, campaign finance “sunshine portal” sleuthing, and quick reactions to broader political and foreign-policy news—while circling back to the same theme: voters should stop buying the packaging and start demanding explanations backed by real data.


- Neal’s new “party cohesion score” uses roll-call data to quantify how often lawmakers vote with their party’s majority (and why he wants to filter out procedural votes).
- A practical threshold: Neal/Julie are comfortable in the mid-80%+ range—independence is fine, misrepresentation isn’t.
- The Senate has had very few qualifying votes so far, raising questions about workload, process, and transparency.
- Campaign finance transparency: how to use Idaho’s Sunshine Portal—and why PAC money can become a circular maze.
- Local party organization issues (and funding) matter more than people want to admit when it comes to who ends up representing you.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Today we’re tracking the Idaho Legislature as two major immigration enforcement bills (H700 and H704) move from the House to what Neal calls the Senate “morgue” — State Affairs — chaired by Senator Jim Guthrie. We talk through why that committee placement raises alarms, how primary-season politics may pressure the Senate to at least give the bills a real hearing, and why Neal wants a rule change: if a bill clears one chamber with a strong margin (something like 60%), the other chamber should be required to hear it and vote it, instead of letting leadership quietly bury it. From there, we pivot into a bigger frustration about Idaho’s one-party dominance and the open, organized practice of people registering Republican just to manipulate the GOP primary—plus the related issue of candidates who run with an “R” because it’s the golden ticket here, even when their voting record consistently aligns with Democrats.

That leads to the “honesty in affiliation metric” idea: not a subjective ideology score, but a simple, objective look at how often lawmakers vote with their own party versus the other one—then asking the blunt question: why affiliate with a party you vote against more than you vote with? Julie and Neal also dig into specific local controversy around Ben Fuhriman (and Dave Cannon) and their votes on H700/H704, plus the broader theme that transparency matters more than perfect agreement. In hour two we shift national: the Clintons’ public deposition audio (including Nancy Mace’s aggressive questioning) turns into a discussion of media incentives, Epstein-file politics, and why Bill Clinton saying he saw nothing improper from Donald Trump in the early 2000s is such a problem for Democrats trying to hang Epstein on Trump—because if they had real proof, they’d have used it years ago. We end with a quick hit on Iran coverage, clickbait media behavior, and the uneasy “free money” talk of possible government checks as political strategy.

---

### Highlights
- H700/H704 advance, but landing in Senate State Affairs signals possible “quiet death” for the bills.  
- Proposal: require a committee hearing/vote in the second chamber when a bill passes with a strong margin in the first.  
- “Honesty and affiliation” metric: track cross-party voting frequency to expose strategic party labels.  
- Local heat: Ben Fuhrman’s refusal to engage media vs. his claim of “open and honest discussions.”  
- Clinton deposition + Epstein conversation: if Democrats had real Trump-Epstein proof, they would’ve used it already.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Neal Larson and Julie Mason unpack the U.S. (and Israeli) operation against Iran over the weekend, arguing it wasn’t some impulsive “assassination” but a long-overdue strike against a regime they see as an active, ongoing threat to America and Israel through missiles, nuclear ambitions, and proxy terror groups. They push back hard on the idea that the U.S. must wait for an “imminent threat” before responding, and frame Trump’s approach as the opposite of feeding the military-industrial complex—decisive force to prevent bigger wars, not start endless ones. They also stress how little the public can truly know 48 hours in, warning against armchair certainty when intelligence and operational details will never be fully public.

Later, they pivot to Idaho’s legislative fight over immigration enforcement and E-Verify, including Rep. Britt Raybould’s argument that House Bill 700’s misdemeanor penalty conflicts with federal preemption in U.S. Code (meaning states can revoke business licenses, but can’t stack new criminal penalties on top). Neal and Julie’s bigger point: lawmakers and industry groups keep finding ways to avoid disrupting the supply of cheaper illegal labor—especially in agriculture—while simultaneously claiming they “follow the law.” The show wraps with early listener polling that was overwhelmingly supportive of the Iran operation, plus live audio from President Trump emphasizing the goals: degrading Iran’s missile capacity, stopping nuclear development, and curbing Iran’s ability to fund and direct terror activity.

**Highlights**
- Neal and Julie argue the Iran strike makes the world safer and could prevent a wider war—not trigger one.  
- Debate over “imminent threat” vs. retaliatory/ongoing-threat justification for military action.  
- Idaho’s E-Verify bills: constitutional preemption concerns vs. the state’s will (or lack of will) to enforce immigration law.  
- Flash poll response: callers/texts came in strongly “yes,” often with a “no boots on the ground” caveat.  

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Today we kicked around a couple of those issues that sound simple until you actually follow them to the end. We started with a bill moving through the Idaho Legislature that would curb cities from restricting short-term rentals like Airbnb, framed as a private property rights question and another example of the state reining in local governments. That led into a bigger conversation about where authority sits in our system (statehouse vs. city hall), why “nonpartisan” local elections can make it easier for ideology to hide in plain sight, and why conservatives who want to win may need to separate themselves from fringe labels that make campaigns DOA with regular voters.

Then we got into the weeds on HOA restrictions and the tension between “less regulation” and the reality that people voluntarily sign contracts when they buy into covenants—Julie shared a personal example of selling a family cabin because the HOA banned short-term rentals. From there we shifted to a proposed bill to push Idaho law enforcement into deeper cooperation with ICE through the 287(g) program. The more we looked at what 287(g) can actually entail, the more concerns we had about mission creep, costs, training/time pulled away from local priorities, and unintended consequences—while still agreeing that violent offenders here illegally should be prioritized for removal. We wrapped with some practical reality-checks about labor, agriculture, and what “deport them all immediately” would actually mean for prices and staffing—plus a great Studio for Covers performance from Pierce Nielsen.

### Highlights
- State vs. city authority: why the Legislature *can* restrict what cities regulate, and why this short-term rental bill is being pitched as expanding property freedom  
- HOA restrictions vs. government regulation: the contract you signed matters, even if you don’t like the outcome later  
- 287(g) and ICE cooperation: concerns about turning local deputies into de facto immigration enforcement and pulling resources from local policing  
- Real-world immigration enforcement: prioritize violent offenders, but don’t pretend there’s a zero-cost, instant solution  
- Studio for Covers: Pierce Nielsen performs an original song and covers “Jersey Giant” (Tyler Childers)

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

This episode of the Neal Larson Show, with Julie Mason, dives into a lively mix of legislative proposals and public frustrations, heavily leaning into traffic woes. The hosts kick off with Senator Mark Harris's bill aimed at tackling "left lane lurkers"—slow drivers hogging the passing lane. This sparks an animated discussion, with Neal humorously suggesting the bill is a political maneuver, and listeners passionately weighing in, labeling lurkers as the "Karens of the road" and questioning the bill's enforceability given existing traffic laws. The conversation then shifts to Representative Judy Boyle's bill, a significant point for the hosts, which seeks to prevent taxpayer money from being used for union activities like deducting dues or using school resources for lobbying—a move both Neal and Julie strongly endorse, particularly against the teachers' union, arguing it ensures funds go to classrooms and not political agendas. Speaker Moyle's bill, targeting local officials who disregard laws without criminal penalties (a jab at Mayor Lauren McLean), also gets airtime, with Neal supporting the intent despite concerns about implementation.

Beyond the Idaho Statehouse, the show dedicates considerable attention to engaging listeners in a "flash poll" about driving etiquette, specifically the contentious "left lane lurkers." Callers and texters passionately express their grievances, humorously suggesting absurd penalties and revealing a collective road rage. Gas tax transparency is another key topic, with the Mountain States Policy Center's proposal for pump stickers to display state and federal taxes receiving full backing from Neal and Julie for its consumer-friendly approach. The episode also briefly touches on a James Comer press conference about the upcoming Hillary Clinton deposition regarding Jeffrey Epstein, framed as a bipartisan push for accountability. Throughout, Neal and Julie maintain an engaging, professional yet conversational and opinionated voice, making for an interactive and often humorous discussion of issues impacting Idahoans.

## Highlight List:

*   **Left Lane Lurker Legislation:** Discussion on a proposed bill to penalize slow drivers in the passing lane, sparking widespread public debate on driving etiquette.
*   **Union Funding & Taxpayer Dollars:** Strong support for Representative Judy Boyle's bill to prohibit tax money from funding union activities, especially the teachers' union, citing concerns about blurred lines and misallocated resources.
*   **Gas Tax Transparency:** Advocacy for a bill requiring gas pumps to display state and federal tax amounts for consumer awareness.
*   **Mayoral Accountability & Epstein Deposition:** Examination of Speaker Moyle's bill to hold local officials accountable and a brief update on the impending Hillary Clinton deposition regarding Jeffrey Epstein.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Neal Larson and Julie Mason open their February 25th, 2026 broadcast with a detailed analysis of a recent State of the Union address, which they generally praise for its solid structure and celebratory tone, rating it a B+/A-. They note the speech was "Trump-esque" with familiar catchphrases but appreciated that it didn't require them to "justify" the president's statements, a departure from past frustrations. Highlights included recognizing heroes such as Erica Kirk, whose husband, Charlie Kirk, was mentioned by Trump in the speech as having been "murdered for his beliefs," as well as celebrating the US men's hockey team.

The discussion quickly turns to a sharp critique of the Democratic Party's political standing and their behavior during the SOTU. Julie Mason labels the field of potential Democratic presidential nominees—including Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—as a "total clown car" lacking a clear frontrunner. Both hosts express dismay at the Democrats' perceived negativity, their refusal to applaud consensus issues (like honoring the mother of a daughter killed by an illegal immigrant or the hockey team), and their "circus-like" counter-events. The episode also delves into Idaho legislative matters, particularly debates around e-verify bills for employers and a controversial "brown face" testimony incident involving David Pettinger, sparking discussion on free speech versus racially insensitive acts and the awkward position lawmakers found themselves in.

### Highlight List

*   Hosts Neal Larson and Julie Mason analyze a recent State of the Union, rating Trump's speech positively for its structure and celebratory tone, while noting its "Trump-esque" style.
*   Strong criticism is leveled at the Democratic Party, whose pool of presidential hopefuls is labeled a "clown car," and whose lawmakers are called out for their negative reactions and refusal to applaud during the SOTU.
*   Discussion covers immigration policy, the primary duty of government to protect citizens, and the complexities of e-verify bills and employer responsibilities in the Idaho legislature.
*   The incident of David Pettinger testifying in "brown face" during an Idaho legislative hearing is examined, probing the challenging balance between freedom of expression and addressing racially insensitive acts.
*   Gavin Newsom's controversial comment about Kamala Harris and Willie Brown is highlighted, interpreted as an attempt to undermine her political ascent.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

This episode kicks off with Neal and Julie looking ahead to tonight's State of the Union, where the President's "America 250" theme is set to intertwine with discussions on pressing issues like tariffs, the economy, and Iran. Locally, the Idaho legislative session is a major focus. We hear their take on Senator Harris's e-verify bill, which they critically analyze for potentially offering more exemptions than enforcement, raising questions about transparency in legislation. The "blood bill," allowing self-directed donations, sparks a deep dive into the Red Cross's financial practices, including its substantial revenue from blood sales and CEO's salary, prompting a broader discussion on personal freedom versus business interests. They also touch on the peculiar opposition to a rat eradication bill from exterminators, and a controversial emergency bill by Britt Raybould that could retroactively change candidate residency requirements, drawing concern for its potential to disqualify challengers like David Worley and protect incumbents.

Beyond the legislative arena, the hosts don't shy away from national political commentary. They dissect Gavin Newsom's "960 SAT guy" comment and his subsequent social media "double down," critiquing what they perceive as a lack of genuine apology and an attempt to deflect. This segues into a broader, heartfelt discussion on how politics, particularly amplified by social media, can corrode individuals' emotional well-being and foster an overly polarized "hero or villain" mentality in society. A particularly moving segment explores the lasting impact of crime, spurred by their review of "The Scream Murders" documentary on the Cassie Joe Stoddart case, and features a powerful call from a listener sharing her own family's tragic experience with murder, highlighting the unending pain for victims' families and the complexities of juvenile sentencing. The show concludes with lighter notes on digital driver's licenses and the power dynamics of international oil seizures, always circling back to the importance of honesty and substance in public discourse.

**Highlight List:**
*   **Idaho Legislative Battlegrounds:** Critical analysis of controversial bills concerning immigration (e-verify), blood donation (Red Cross's business model), and candidate residency (potential incumbent protection).
*   **Politics, Personal Erosion, and Social Media:** Discussion on Gavin Newsom's gaffe, leading to a broader critique of how extreme political engagement, fueled by social media, can negatively impact individuals' emotional health and societal discourse.
*   **The Unending Trauma of Crime:** A poignant segment discussing the Cassie Joe Stoddert murder documentary and a listener's personal testimony, emphasizing the long-term suffering of victims' families and the difficult questions around justice for youthful offenders.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Neal Larson and Julie Mason dive deep into a diverse array of topics, kicking off with a pragmatic look at state budget cuts, particularly in Idaho. They challenge the alarmist rhetoric often employed by politicians during election cycles, suggesting that modest cuts (like 1%) won't lead to calamity and that much of the current financial squeeze stems from the "extra money" available during the COVID years, leading to a societal struggle with delayed gratification. The conversation pivots to national and international events, discussing the emotional impact of the USA Hockey team's gold medal wins, the controversy surrounding Cash Patel's locker room visit, and President Trump's poignant address to "Angel Families" honoring Lincoln Riley – contrasting it with past political missteps.

The hosts also tackle various social and political discussions, including the viral "snoring audio" during an AOC interview, escalating cartel violence in Mexico, and Governor Gavin Newsom's "960 SAT guy" comment, which they dissect as potentially racist and a prime example of latent subconscious bias. Locally, they explore proposed Idaho legislation, debating a bill that would automatically dissolve HOAs after ten years, sparking a lively discussion with callers about the pros and cons of homeowner associations. Other legislative ideas, like a daily moment of silence in schools and stronger foster care rights, are also touched upon, alongside a humorous take on Olympic curling and the viral pushback against an "anti-American flag" article from Huffington Post by a New England seafood restaurant.

---

**Highlight List:**

*   **Idaho Budget Cuts:** Discussion on political exaggeration during election cycles and the hosts' belief that modest cuts are manageable, reflecting a post-COVID return to financial reality.
*   **American Pride & Politics:** Celebration of USA Hockey's victories, contrasting patriotic sentiment with critical media narratives and highlighting President Trump's address to "Angel Families."
*   **Political Gaffes & Rhetoric:** Analysis of Gavin Newsom's "960 SAT guy" comment as potentially racist and other examples of questionable political communication (AOC's snoring audio, exaggerated budget fears).
*   **Local Idaho Legislation:** Debate over a proposed bill to automatically dissolve HOAs after 10 years, alongside bills for a daily moment of silence in schools and enhanced foster child rights.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

The big news dropped this morning: the Supreme Court has struck down all the tariffs enacted by former President Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, with a 6-3 decision. While Neal appreciated the reminder of checks and balances within our government, Julie pointed out the "tariff derangement syndrome" some exhibit. There's still a lot of uncertainty about whether money will be refunded and the full implications of the ruling, with many media headlines jumping to conclusions before the details are fully understood. The conversation then shifted to the sensational claim by Barack Obama on a podcast that aliens are real, sparking a debate with Trump and a surprising revelation from Lara Trump about a possible prepared speech by Donald Trump on extraterrestrial life. Both Neal and Julie agreed that the alien disclosure, not the classified information angle, was the true bombshell, and questioned why the government would hide such information.

We also delved into the recent high school walkouts protesting ICE, with Neal and Julie expressing concern over what they called "misdirected youth" being used as "adult pawns" for a cause that, in their view, promotes lawlessness. They drew a distinction between excusing a child for a political rally that's part of the electoral process and skipping school for protests that advocate against established laws, especially given some of the aggressive signage seen. The show rounded out with a few other interesting tidbits, including ESPN's WNBA over MLB programming shift, the Chicago Bears' potential move, and a humorous Chili's bathroom review mishap, alongside a discussion on "woke" athletes and the concept of "bullying" in foreign policy.

**Highlights:**

*   The Supreme Court invalidated Trump-era tariffs (6-3), sparking debate over immediate impacts and the role of judicial checks and balances.
*   Barack Obama's podcast statement about "aliens being real" and subsequent reactions from Donald and Lara Trump brought the topic of government secrecy and extraterrestrial life to the forefront.
*   Local high school students staged a walkout protest against ICE, leading to a discussion on truancy, the nature of youth activism, and the perceived promotion of "lawlessness."
*   The hosts criticized the media's quick, often definitive reporting on complex issues like tariffs and the perceived anti-American stance of some athletes.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.

Send us Fan Mail

Neal Larson and Julie Mason kicked off their show covering a broad spectrum of topics, from local politics to global affairs. They began by discussing the Kansas Senate overriding Governor Laura Kelly's veto and CNN's concerning midterm predictions showing governorships tilting Republican. A significant portion of the conversation revolved around President Trump's "Board of Peace" meeting, which spurred a deep dive into escalating US-Iran tensions, the military buildup in the Middle East, and the hosts' speculations on potential US military action in Iran, touching on constitutional aspects and the contentious role of Israel in US foreign policy.

The hosts debated Senator Brian Lenny's updated voter affidavit bill, which aims to strengthen ID requirements at the polls, leading into a broader discussion on the pros and cons of mobile driver's licenses, with listeners texting in their varied opinions on privacy, security, government overreach, and accessibility. The episode also featured a fun segment announcing a Valentine's Day contest winner, a discussion about the reliability of Starlink internet, and a brief mention of a stolen ambulance incident in Boise, wrapping up with a jab at Utah's recent fuel dispute.

---

**Highlight List:**

*   **Geopolitical Focus:** Deep dive into US-Iran tensions, military buildup in the Middle East, and the ethical/constitutional debates surrounding potential intervention.
*   **Local Legislation & Technology:** Discussion on Idaho's voter ID bill and the contentious but intriguing concept of mobile driver's licenses, including listener feedback on privacy and convenience.

Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?

You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.

Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.