Title: The Great Poisoning
Subtitle: Fire Ants, Pesticides and the Battle for Property Rights
Guest: Trevor Hold
Recorded: September 2025
What happens when the government decides that your land is no longer entirely yours?
Across south-east Queensland, the National Fire Ant Eradication Program is waging an enormous campaign against one of Australia's most destructive invasive species. Fire ants pose serious threats to agriculture, biodiversity, the economy and human health. But in the name of eradication, the Queensland government has also created a system allowing authorities to enter private property and deploy chemical treatments without the consent of landowners.
For those living inside the eradication zone, this is not an abstract policy debate. It is happening in their backyards, on their farms, around their livestock and in their waterways.
My guest is Trevor Hold, a Queensland farmer, counsellor and leading opponent of the program. Trevor has spent years documenting what he believes are its devastating human and environmental consequences. He has organised petitions, distributed thousands of brochures and fence signs, challenged compulsory spraying and advocated a shift from eradication toward suppression and non-toxic alternatives.
Trevor's own organic farm became the site of a confrontation with authorities after he resisted spraying. He describes being assaulted by police and hospitalised while protecting his property. He has also heard from hundreds of landowners who describe anxiety, anger and a profound sense of violation as spraying teams repeatedly enter their properties.
The environmental consequences are equally troubling. Trevor has documented the disappearance of fish, crayfish, mussels and other aquatic life from waterways on his property following chemical treatments. The program uses pesticides including pyriproxyfen, S-methoprene and fipronil, raising serious concerns about their effects on waterways, livestock and non-target species.
At the centre of the controversy is Queensland's biosecurity legislation, which gives authorised officers extraordinary powers to enter private property and undertake treatments without consent in specified circumstances.
So where does legitimate biosecurity end and government overreach begin?And what happens when a campaign intended to protect Australia's environment begins leaving its own trail of environmental damage, distressed communities and contested property rights?
In this episode, we discuss fire ants, compulsory spraying, pesticides, environmental damage, property rights, biosecurity law, police enforcement, organic farming, regulatory accountability and alternatives to chemical eradication.
Links and interview references:
Australian Advocacy Group - Founded during a campaign to create better outcomes for Queenslanders by stopping the National Fire Ant Eradication Program from causing harm to human health, sensitive eco-systems, wildlife, people’s petsand farming operations through reckless, excessive and irresponsible distribution of toxic chemicals, and mandates to enter private property without consent.https://aagpilot.com/
Pesticide Use in the Imported Fire Ant Program - Environmental Assessment March 2012
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/imported_fireant_ea_march2012.pdf
https://www.beyondpesticides.org/assets/media/documents/NewsDC&ATC.PAY.fall18-web.pdf
NFAE Program Official Website - https://www.fireants.org.au/
‘Wildly toxic’ poison used on fire ants is killing native Australian animals, experts warn Senate inquiry. Guardian editorial - https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/16/fipronil-fire-ant-poison-toxic-senate-inquiry-bans
Malcolm Roberts (One Nation) questioning Minister Chisholm and Acting Secretary of the Department, Ms Justine Saunders, regarding the ongoing mismanagement of the Fire Ant Eradication Program in South East Queensland. - https://youtu.be/5wh5o_OHtHk?si=_Hzoi0HfiUhkBmsr