In this episode, we try to untangle the ideological realignment of the Republican Party in the era of Trumpism. From Reagan’s conservatism to the rise of grievance politics, we unpack seven conservative principles—and ask if Trump ever pretended to adhere to them—delve into the Epstein files as a defining cultural myth for the MAGA movement, and question whether the MAGA coalition can survive without its orange avatar. Tune in for a candid, nuanced conversation on identity, power, and the emergence of cultural movements.

Segments & Timestamps:

00:00 – Intro & Mission of The Nuance Hour

02:00 – Defining the MAGA/Trump Coalition

06:30 – Conservatism Then vs. Now

10:00 – Grading Trump Against Mike’s Seven Core Principles

18:00 – Tariffs & Economic Contradictions

22:00 – Liberty, Government, and Rhetorical Limits

26:00 – Social Values & Trump’s Conservative Identity

30:00 – Who Is Trump? A Grievance Framework

35:00 – The Epstein File & Conspiracy Psychology

42:00 – Self-Deception Within the Coalition

45:00 – Future of MAGA After Trump

50:00 – Final Thoughts & Hopes for Conservative Renewal

Mentioned:

Mike Johnson’s seven core conservative principles

Connect With Us:

Produced and Engineered by Ken Wilson | Original Music by Robert Lanterman

Website: thenuancehour.com

Instagram: @thenuancehour

Email: [email protected]

In this episode, we dive into research on violent and non-violent civil resistance movements of the past. What lessons can we learn from successful resistance movements? Is there a critical threshold of civic involvement in the face of oppressive regimes? We also report from our experience at the Boise No Kings protest in June. Are the 50501 protests different than the Women’s March and other resistance protests of Trump’s first term? Emily does a 108 on the value of protests. 

Mentioned in this episode: 

Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict by Maria J. Stephan and Erica Chenoweth 

Questions, Answers, and Some Cautionary Updates Regarding the 3.5% Rule by Erica Chenoweth

In today’s episode, we’re tackling the Elon/Trump breakup, the rifts it reveals in the uneasy alliance between tech oligarchs and the populist far right, and immigration. It all connects, we promise. We talk through our personal opinions on immigration, including some philosophical underpinnings to our beliefs, and confront some immigration myths. 

We wrap up the episode with a good take—could it be the moment for a third party?—and a mailbag segment. 

Mentioned in this episode: 

The Right to Immigrate by Michael Huemer

Jasmine Bina on LinkedIn

What if you could lose your democracy and not even realize it?

This week, we dive into the siren call of authoritarianism—and why so many experts believe the United States may already be living under a version of it. We take a deep dive into the theory of competitive authoritarianism and explore the slippery spectrum between liberal democracy and autocracy. Is there a bright red line that, when crossed, will tell us we’re no longer living in a democracy? Is there a form of authoritarianism that uses democratic institutions to legitimize its power grabs? And what happens when even those resisting authoritarianism start embracing authoritarian tools?

Plus, we unpack why the “Is Trump losing?” question might be the wrong one—and how the real danger isn’t just who’s in charge, but how much we’re willing to give up when we think the ends justify the means.

Mentioned:

“Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism” by Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way (2002)

How Democracies Die by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt

Bright Line Watch survey of political scientists: NPR Coverage

Steven Levitksy: The Path to American Authoritarianism for Foreign Affairs

Andrew Marantz: Is It Happening Here? for the New Yorker

Zach Beauchamp: Trump Is Losing for Vox

Marci Shore, Timothy Snuder, and Jason Stanley: We Study Fascism at Yale, and We’re Leaving the US for the New York Times

Pod Save America

Authoritarianism shouldn't be a partisan issue. Full stop. In this episode, we discuss America's slide into despotism and our reaction to the Trump administration's extra-judicial deportation of immigrants without due process. We also introduce our newest team member, Kenny Wilson, who brings good looks and even better audio quality to the pod.

As always, we end our show with our Nuance Corner segments:

Trevor Story Time: Reporting from the Idaho AOC & Bernie rally

Bad Take Corner: Emily grades a Threads post on Trump's age

Reach out with your thoughts anytime: [email protected].

Mentioned:

'We conclude' or 'I believe?' Study finds rationality declined decades ago: https://phys.org/news/2022-01-rationality-declined-decades.html#google_vignette

W. Ada considers requiring ‘everyone is welcome’ signs at each school; claims teacher’s signs prohibited due to ‘design elements’: https://boisedev.com/news/2025/03/17/w-ada-considers-requiring-everyone-is-welcome-signs-at-each-school-says-teachers-signs-prohibited-due-to-design-elements/

Rev. Benjamin Cremer on Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, and X: https://www.facebook.com/ben.cremer

https://www.instagram.com/brcremer/?hl=en https://bsky.app/profile/brcremer.bsky.social https://x.com/Brcremer

In our very first episode, co-hosts Emily Fisk and Trevor Adams introduce The Nuance Hour—a podcast about embracing the gray areas and digging into the layered, messy, interesting stuff that doesn’t fit neatly into headlines. We’re talking about the topics that deserve more than a hot take. In this intro, we chat about why we started the show, what “nuance” means to us, and what you can expect in future episodes. If you’re tired of black-and-white thinking and looking for deeper, more thoughtful conversations, you’re in the right place.