The Oki Doke

By Docket Media

The Oki Doke is a true crime podcast built entirely from the documented record. Court transcripts. Forensic reports. Sworn testimony. Official filings. Season 1 follows a case the world was told on

... more

· True Crime

Download on the App Store

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play

FAQs about The Oki Doke:

How many episodes does The Oki Doke have?

The podcast currently has 13 episodes available.

The Oki Doke episodes:

September 23, 2026 Episode 12: Who Played Whom?
Season finale. The case did not end when the charges were dismissed. The unanswered questions became the case. Where is the original email? Season 1 was the record. Season 2 is the reckoning.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
34min
September 16, 2026 Episode 11: Still Fighting
Four civil rights claims. Fabricating evidence. Malicious prosecution. Deceiving a judge. False arrest. Not one of them has ever been evaluated by any court on their merits. Not once.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
37min
September 09, 2026 Episode 10: The Deal
Four months of negotiations. A signed settlement agreement. One hundred and forty-two required words. The six words that mattered most were never said.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
30min
September 02, 2026 Episode 9: What Came Back
All charges dismissed. Same day, the DA sent JT Jackson's devices to Kevin Hart's legal team. When the computer came back it had been taken apart. The forensic examination became impossible.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
28min
August 26, 2026 Episode 8: There Wasn't Extortion in the Emails
The lead DA investigator of the Cyber Crime Division was asked what in the emails led her to believe there was extortion. Her answer, under oath, in open court, there wasn't extortion in the emails.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
26min
August 19, 2026 Episode 7: Don't F**k This Up
The Netflix documentary aired. Tens of millions of people watched. What they were not told, the extortion charges had already been dropped before the documentary premiered.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
26min
August 12, 2026 Episode 6: On the Stand
The lead DA investigator testified under oath. Among her statements — this case was a business deal until the Instagram post. This episode examines every word she said that day.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
40min
August 05, 2026 Episode 5: Factual. Factual. Factual
On May 22nd, 2019, on a recorded call, Kevin Hart authenticated a document. The forensic expert found that document was created in Microsoft Word five days before Hart called it factual.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
30min
July 29, 2026 Episode 4: The Ruse
They told him to come pick up his things. The recording was already running when he arrived. This episode covers the arrest, the interrogation, and the email investigators claimed to have.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
19min
July 22, 2026 Episode 3: Fabricated
Three independent handwriting experts. No court seal. A page four of three. The warrant used to raid JT Jackson's home is examined document by document.
SOURCE NOTE
Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself.
Court Records on File:
9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335
Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al.
(Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700)
Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
(Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801
Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles
Related Proceedings:
Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ
Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC
Support the show
Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support
...more
24min

FAQs about The Oki Doke:

How many episodes does The Oki Doke have?

The podcast currently has 13 episodes available.