Financial institutions are increasingly navigating a sea of scams and fraud. With the evolution of emerging technologies, new avenues for attack have opened, leaving banks, credit unions, and their accountholders more vulnerable.
As peer-to-peer (P2P) payments become an expectation, the risks for banks and credit unions edge higher. The real-time nature of P2P payments and the “relationship” between the scammer and the victim, makes it exceedingly difficult for banks to detect and mitigate P2P scams.
In a recent PaymentsJournal podcast, Kannan Srinivasan, Vice President of Risk Management at Fiserv, and Brian Riley, Director of Credit and Co-Head of Payments at Javelin Strategy & Research, explored the key differences between scams and fraud, the prevalence of P2P scams versus other types of scams, and the best approach for financial institutions to implementing P2P payments.
PaymentsJournalNavigating The P2P MinefieldPaymentsJournal Navigating The P2P MinefieldPaymentsJournaljQuery(document).ready(function ($){var settings_ap12593649 = { design_skin: "skin-wave" ,autoplay: "off",disable_volume:"default" ,loop:"off" ,cue: "on" ,embedded: "off" ,preload_method:"metadata" ,design_animateplaypause:"off" ,skinwave_dynamicwaves:"off" ,skinwave_enableSpectrum:"off" ,skinwave_enableReflect:"on",settings_backup_type:"full",playfrom:"default",soundcloud_apikey:"" ,skinwave_comments_enable:"off",settings_php_handler:window.ajaxurl,skinwave_wave_mode:"canvas",pcm_data_try_to_generate: "on","pcm_notice": "off","notice_no_media": "on",design_color_bg: "111111",design_color_highlight: "ef6b13",skinwave_wave_mode_canvas_waves_number: "3",skinwave_wave_mode_canvas_waves_padding: "1",skinwave_wave_mode_canvas_reflection_size: "0.25",skinwave_comments_playerid:"12593649",php_retriever:"https://www.paymentsjournal.com/wp-content/plugins/dzs-zoomsounds/soundcloudretriever.php" }; try{ dzsap_init(".ap_idx_438351_29",settings_ap12593649); }catch(err){ console.warn("cannot init player", err); } });
Differentiating Between Scams and Fraud
Incidences of scams and fraud have gained traction in recent years, and it’s easy to use these terms interchangeably to describe any type of financial wrongdoing by criminals. But there’s a distinction. The proper classification of these types of fraud can aid in developing the countermeasures to address them.
Fraud can be divided into three types: first-party, second-party, and third-party.
“First-party fraud is when the crime is committed by the owner of the account,” Riley said. “It might be a bad return, it might be a claim of non-service on a merchant, something along that line. And then you have second-party fraud, where fraud is committed by another person and there’s a relationship that the owner of the account has with the other person. It might be allowing them to use the card or something along that line.”
“But third-party fraud is really one of the most common when it comes to payments, and that’s when there’s another party that’s unrelated to the account using it in one form or another,” he said.
Within third-party fraud is a deeper classification where the act can be readily identified as a fraud or a scam. An act of fraud normally involves the illicit use of another person’s information, such as in identify theft and credit card fraud.
With scams, the focus is on deceiving victims into giving up their money or their personal information, which can occur in P2P payments like those driven by romance scams and phishing emails.