The Pharm So Hard Podcast: An Emergency Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy Podcast

The Pharm So Hard Podcast: An Emergency Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy Podcast

By Jimmy Pruitt & Oscar SantaloMedicineHealth & Fitness
Download on the App Store

The Pharm So Hard Podcast: An Emergency Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy Podcast episodes

  • Episode 8: The Transition from Pharmacy School to Residency with the Pharmacy Twins Ashley & Brooke Barlow
    Bio

    Ashley and Brooke Barlow grew up in the suburbs of Philadelphia in Huntingdon Valley, PA. Both received their Doctor of Pharmacy Degree from Jefferson College of Pharmacy.

    Ashley’s current interests include cardiology, oncology, and critical care along with a goal to pursue a career in academia. Beyond her passion for pharmacy, she enjoys getting creative in the kitchen cooking healthy meals, putting her strength to the test with weight lifting, and exploring different landmarks while shooting photographs.

    Brooke’s current interests include Critical Care, Infectious Disease, Oncology. Her interests outside of pharmacy include fitness, healthy cooking, photography, and twitter!

    Together they’ve become most known for their love of teaching clinical pearls & creating infographics that are frequently used throughout the FOAM ED community.

    Tips on Making Infographics
    Other Stories on A&B Barlow

    Pharmacy is Family: Twins Live TheFitPharmacist Life!

    • https://thefitpharmacist.com/pharmacy-is-family

    Surviving Stress: Tips for Staying Sane through Pharmacy School and Beyond

    • http://www.ashpintersections.org/2019/10/surviving-stress-tips-for-staying-sane-through-pharmacy-school-and-beyond/

    The ABCs of LVADs for Pharmacists

    • https://www.tldrpharmacy.com/content/the-abcs-of-lvads-for-pharmacists

    Hypertensive Emergency: Pearls and Pitfalls for the ED Physician

    • http://www.emdocs.net/hypertensive-crisis-pearls-and-pitfalls-for-the-ed-physician/

    The post Episode 8: The Transition from Pharmacy School to Residency with the Pharmacy Twins Ashley & Brooke Barlow appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    27 min
  • Episode 7: Implementing and Expanding ED Clinical Pharmacy Services with Nicole Acquisto
    Nicole M. Acquisto, Pharm.D., FCCP, BCCCP
    ED Clinical Pharmacy Specialist
    ED Pharmacist Project Links

    http://www.medicalhf.org/epharm/index.html

    https://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/advances2/vol4/Advances-fairbanks_20.pdf

    https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/pharmacy-practice/resource-centers/emergency-care/Justification-referenced-document.ashx

    https://www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/cquips0802.html

    ASHP ED Pharmacy Resources

    https://www.ashp.org/Pharmacy-Practice/Resource-Centers/Emergency-Care/Articles-and-Guidelines/Establishing-Emergency-Medicine-Pharmacy-Services-and-Medication-Safety

    https://www.ashp.org/Pharmacy-Practice/Resource-Centers/Emergency-Care/Articles-and-Guidelines

    The post Episode 7: Implementing and Expanding ED Clinical Pharmacy Services with Nicole Acquisto appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    40 min
  • Episode 6: Opioid Stewardship Part 2 with Oscar Santalo and Olga Ivanova
    Oscar Santalo PharmD, MBA, MHA, BCPS
    Definition
    1. Opioid Sparing – providing multi – modal medications that limit the use and supply of opioids
    2. Opioids – a class of drugs that act in the nervous system to produce feelings of pleasure and pain relief.
    3. Opioid Addiction – a long-lasting (chronic) disease that can cause major health, social, and economic problems.
    4. Opioid and Pain Stewardship – the standardization of best practices to identify the best treatment options for pain management to limit the use and supply of opioids.
    5. PDMP – prescription drug monitoring program
    Background
    1. The opioid crisis and the need for Opioid and Pain Stewardship program is widely recognized
    2. Limited evidence on the structure of opioid and pain stewardship models for health-systems in the literature
    3. Some level of recommendations exist from accrediting and professional organizations
    4. Some success stories of implementing a pain stewardship committee and a pharmacist-led pain-management initiative
    What is the importance/relevance of this topic to pharmacy administration and pharmacy practice overall?
    1. CDC promotes integrated, collaborative pain management and practice models that include pharmacists
    2. NQP Opioid Stewardship action team has pharmacy involvement
    3. ASHP advocates for the roles of a pharmacist in the opioid crisis
    Examples of other programs
    1. Intermountain Healthcare (stop, caution, go approach)
      1. Stop > avoid prescribing long acting opioids for acute conditions & dose > 50 mg morphine equiv/day
      2. Caution > patients at risk for overdose or abuse
      3. Go> prescribe lowest effective, integrate multimodal therapies, patient education
    2. VA Prescribing guidelines:
      1. Review PDMP, Limit day supply of opioids, encourage to consult pain mgmt., not prescribe long-acting opioids
      2. A 500 bed hospital recognized in APhA for their program
      3. Pharmacy led program > receive pain mgmt. consults and run daily reports
      4. From 2013-2015  > Pharmacists have made 2,267 interventions, which Estimated an indirect cost avoidance of $2.7 million
      5. Initially executing 16 consults per month >  45 consults per month
      6. 59% reduction in opioid-associated rapid response calls and code blues
      7. An overall reduction in the use of high-risk medications on patients
    Implementation Strategy For Opioid Stewardship Program At Your Health System

    Electing a physician champion, Engaging executives, establishing a committee, and creating a pharmacy-led program

    References
    1. Martin L, Laderman M, Hyatt J, Krueger J. Addressing the Opioid Crisis in the United States. IHI Innovation Report. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; April 2016
    2. Bentley E.D. Pain Management Stewardship. ASHP Leadership Conference. Dallas, Tx. October 14, 2018.
    3. Dowell D, Haegerich, TM, and Chou, Roger. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016. Centers for Disease Control Recommendations and Reports / March 18, 2016 / 65(1);1–49.
    4. Baker DW. The Joint Commission’s Pain Standards: Origins and Evolution. 2017. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission. 
    5. Johnson PE, Jorgensen JA. Pharmacy and the C-Suite: Managing the Interface.  Pharmacy Leadership Forum. http://www.ashpmedia.org/pai/csuitetoolkit/ (Accessed 2018 July 25)
    6. American Physical Therapy Association. APTA Contributes to New ‘Playbook’ on Pain Management and Opioid Stewardship. APTA. http://www.apta.org/PTinMotion/News/2018/03/12/NQFOpioidPlaybook/. Accessed November 15, 2018.
    7. Erickson, A.K. (2015). Knocking out pain: Hospital pharmacists launch new approach to pain management. Pharmacist.com. Accessed November 15, 2018.  https://www.pharmacist.com/article/knocking-out-pain-hospital-pharmacists-launch-new-approach-pain-management.

    The post Episode 6: Opioid Stewardship Part 2 with Oscar Santalo and Olga Ivanova appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    13 min
  • Episode 5: Opioid StewardshipPart 1 with Oscar Santalo and Olga Ivanova
    Oscar Santalo PharmD, MBA, MHA, BCPS




    Definitions
    1. Opioid Sparing – providing multi – modal medications that limit the use and supply of opioids
    2. Opioids – a class of drugs that act in the nervous system to produce feelings of pleasure and pain relief.
    3. Opioid Addiction – a long-lasting (chronic) disease that can cause major health, social, and economic problems.
    4. Opioid and Pain Stewardship – the standardization of best practices to identify the best treatment options for pain management to limit the use and supply of opioids.
    5. PDMP – prescription drug monitoring program
    Background
    1. More than 130 people die every day from an opioid-related overdose (1 person every 15 min)
    2. In 2009 the number of opioid prescriptions increased by 68% reaching 202 million
    3. In 2010 hydrocodone/APAP (Norco) was the most commonly prescribed drug in the U.S.
    4. U.S. uses 99% of the world’s supply
    What is the importance/relevance of this topic to pharmacy administration and pharmacy practice overall?
    1. Pain management is complicated
    2. Classifying pain, treatment options, and lack of pain specialists
    3. Regulatory firms and professional organizations have a significant role to play because of the guidelines they establish.
    Major Endpoints/Takeaway
    Organization
    Recommendation
    (Not All Inclusive)
    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Integrated, collaborative pain management and
    practice models that include pharmacists
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
    Expand naloxone use, distribution, and access
    The Joint Commissions
    Identify a team that is responsible for pain
    management
    American Pain Society
    Monitor patients receiving systemic opioids
    Pharmacy Quality Alliance
    Provides core measure set to recognize high risk
    patients
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network
    Provides an algorithm on how to manage pain
    American Society for Pain Management Nursing
    Organizations should develop and implement
    policies/procedures
    ED Opioid Stewardship Algorithm by Dr. Sergey Motov @painfreeED and Mahlaqa Butt
    References
    1. Martin L, Laderman M, Hyatt J, Krueger J.
    Addressing the Opioid Crisis in the United States. IHI Innovation Report.
    Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; April 2016
  • Bentley E.D. Pain Management Stewardship. ASHP
  • Leadership Conference. Dallas, Tx. October 14, 2018.
  • Dowell D, Haegerich, TM, and Chou, Roger. CDC
  • Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016.
    Centers for Disease Control Recommendations and Reports / March 18, 2016 /
    65(1);1–49.
  • Baker DW. The Joint Commission’s Pain Standards:
  • Origins and Evolution. 2017. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission. 
  • American Board of Pain Medicine (2014). Why the
  • US Should Develop a Primary Medical Specialty in Pain Medicine. 
    http://www.abpm.org/uploads/files/talking%20points%20-%20Florida%20approach%20needed%20final.pdf
  • Haffajee RL, Jena AB, Weiner SG. Mandatory use
  • of prescription drug monitoring programs.. JAMA. 2015 Mar 3;313(9):891-2. doi:
    10.1001/jama.2014.18514. 
  • Chou R, et al. Management of Postoperative Pain:
  • A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Pain Society, the American
    Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of
    Anesthesiologists’Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and
    Administration Council. The Journal of Pain, 2016;17(2):131-157
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)
  • Adult Cancer Pain. (Swarm, RA, Kamal, AH, Portman, DG, et al. National
    Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in
    Oncology: Adult Cancer Pain. Published 2014)
  • Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) (Schmitz, R. .
  • Opioid Core Measure Set. [online] Pqaalliance.org. Available at:
    https://www.pqaalliance.org/opioid-core-measure-set [Accessed 15 Nov. 2018].
  • American Society for Pain Management Nursing
  • Guidelines on Monitoring for Opioid-Induced Sedation and Respiratory
    Depression. Pain Management Nursing, Vol 12, No 3 (September), 2011: pp 118-45.

    The post Episode 5: Opioid StewardshipPart 1 with Oscar Santalo and Olga Ivanova appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    21 min
  • 5-Minute Pharmacy Pearl: Single Syringe of Diluted Adenosine for Termination of SVT

    • Dosing
      • Supraventricular tachycardia
        • adenosine 6 milligrams (mg) may be given over 1 to 2 seconds followed by a 20 milliliter (mL) rapid saline flush. If there is no response in 1 to 2 minutes, a 12 mg IV bolus dose may be repeated twice followed by saline flushes 

    • Mechanism of Action
      • Slows impulse formation in the sinoatrial (SA) node, slows conduction time through the atrioventricular (AV) node, and can interrupt reentry pathways through the AV node.

    • Pharmacokinetics
      • Onset:  20 to 30 seconds
      • Duration: less than 10 seconds 
      • Metabolism: Adenosine is rapidly taken up by most types of cells, including cellular elements of the blood (erythrocytes) and vascular endothelium, where it is rapidly degraded by deamination to inosine and subsequently to hypoxanthine
      • Elimination: Total plasma clearance occurs in less than 30 seconds following intravenous administration

    Administration Technique

    1. How to mix single syringe diluted adenosine?
      • Grab a 20-30 ml syringe.
      • Draw up the adenosine AND the normal saline in the same 20-mL syringe.
      • Administer via fast IV push (can be through a running IV line).

    Title: McDowell M, Mokszycki R, Greenberg A, et al. Single Syringe Administration of Diluted Adenosine. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 30. [ePub ahead of print]. [PMID 31665806]

    • Methods
      • Single center, prospective, observational study was conducted from November, 1, 2016 through February 28, 2018 conducted at Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn, IL
      • The physician would identify patients with SVT and would inform the pharmacist of their preferred adenosine administration method. The selection of the administration method was solely up to the provider regardless of admission into the study.
      • There were 26 patients in the single-syringe group and 27 patients in the traditional method group.
    • Results
      • Successful conversion to NSR with the first
        dose was higher in the SS arm 73.1% (95% CI, 0.55 – 0.91) to 40.7% (95% CI, 0.21 – 0.61) (non-inferiority, p=0.0176).
        • Successful conversion to NSR with up to 3 doses was also higher in the SS arm 100% (95% CI, 1.0 – 1.0) to 70.4% (95% CI, 0.52 – 0.89) (non-inferiority, p=0.0043).
        • One patient in the conventional TS arm suffered extravasation and phlebitis compared to none in the SS arm.
    • Conclusions
      • The SS administration method is simple and no less effective than the TS method.
      • Further randomized control studies should be completed to validate these results.
      null
    • Comments from the author
    Marc McDowell, PharmD, BCPS
    EM Pharmacy Specialist & EM PGY2 Residency Director 
    • “One thing I wish we had prospectively evaluated was how satisfied the RNs were with the novel method.”
    • Another thing that I wish we could have worked in was the number of patients who presented multiple times during the study period
    • When patients showed up for their 3rd or 4th SVT they would ask us for the SS method
    • Other FOAM Posts
      • https://www.aliem.com/2019/10/trick-of-trade-combine-adenosine-single-syringe/
    • References
      • Page RL, Joglar JA, Calwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: Executive summary. Heart Rhythm 2016;13(4):e92-e135
      • Ketkar VA, Kolling WM, Nardviriyakul N, et al. Stability of undiluted and diluted adenosine at three temperatures in syringes and bags. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1998;55(5):466-70. [PMID 9522931]
      • Kaltenbach M, Hutchinson DJ, Bollinger JE, et al. Stability of diluted adenosine in polyvinyl chloride infusion bags. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011;68(16):1533-6. [PMID 21817085]
      • Lopez-Palop R, Saura D, Pinar E, et al. Adequate intracoronary adenosine doses to achieve maximum hyperaemia in coronary functional studies by pressure derived fractional flow reserve: a dose response study. Heart 2004;90(1):95-6. [PMID 14676256]
      • Choi SC, Yoon SK, Kim GW, et al. A convenient method of adenosine administration for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2003;14(3):224-7.
      • Helleman K, Kirpalani A, Lim R. A Novel Method of Intraosseous Infusion of Adenosine for the Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia in an Infant. Pediatric Emerg Care 2017;33(1):47-8. [PMID 28045841]

    The post 5-Minute Pharmacy Pearl: Single Syringe of Diluted Adenosine for Termination of SVT appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    5 min
  • Episode 4: Drugs Trends in Pharmacy with Oscar Santalo and Darla Quevedo
    Oscar Santalo, PharmD, MBA, MHA, BCPS
    Pharmacy Operations and Compliance Coordinator

    Episode 4 Description: In this episode of Pharm So Hard, Oscar Santalo PharmD, MBA, MHA, BCPS with his learner Darla Quevedo PharmD 2021 candidate from the University of Florida School Of Pharmacy discuss drug trends for 2019 – 2020.  Here they discuss the Top 25 drugs by expenditures in nonfederal hospitals in 2018, the rise of biosimilars & specialty drugs, and medications coming off of patent.  

    • Introduction
      • Overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the United States grew 5.5% in 2018, compared to 2017, for a total of $476.2 billion
      • Nonfederal hospitals accounted for $35.8 billion in prescription expenditures in 2018, a 4.8%
    • What is the importance/relevance of this topic to pharmacy administration and pharmacy practice overall?
      • Factors driving growth: (1) purchases of new products that were not available previously, (2) price changes of existing agents, including both brand and generic drugs, and (3) changes in the volume of purchases (reflecting changes in utilization)
      • High growth in expenditures for older generics: (1) drug shortages leading to demand-related price increases or shifts in utilization to the branded products, (2) product discontinuations due to either manufacturing issues or business decisions
    • Major Endpoints
      • 59 NMEs and 7 biosimilars approved in 2018
      • Specialty drug expenditures increased by 11.1% in 2018 compared to 2017, a rate is faster than the overall market growth rate of 5.5%.
      • Among the top 25 categories with the greatest increases in expenditures in 2018 compared to 2017 were drugs for neurologic disorders (32.4%), immunologic agents (18.0%), contraceptives (17.7%), and hormones (12.5%)
      • Hospitals/clinics must also be aware of drugs that have potential patent expiration each year. Generic forms of these drugs may be in the pipeline which are cheaper alternatives to their brand counterparts

    References:

    1. Schumock GT, Stubbings J, Hoffman JM, et al.
    National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2019. Am
    J Health-Syst Pharm. 2019; 76:1105–1121

    The post Episode 4: Drugs Trends in Pharmacy with Oscar Santalo and Darla Quevedo appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    15 min
  • Episode 3: Transitioning from Resident to EM Pharmacy Practitioner with Kyle Hultz
    Kyle Hultz, Pharm.D
    Emergency Medicine Clinical Pharmacist
    Twitter: PharmDAware

    In this episode of Pharm So Hard, Jimmy Pruitt, Pharm.D and Kyle Hultz, Pharm.D discuss the excitement and the challenges of transitioning from residency to the role of an emergency medicine clinical pharmacist.

    The post Episode 3: Transitioning from Resident to EM Pharmacy Practitioner with Kyle Hultz appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    31 min
  • Episode 2: Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal Using Andexxa with Gary Peksa
    Gary Peksa, PharmD, BCPS
    Emergency Medicine Pharmacist

    Coagulation factor Xa [recombinant], inactivated-zhzo ( Andexxa )

    Mechanism of Action
    • Andexanet alfa binds and sequesters the FXa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban. In addition, andexanet alfa inhibits the activity of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI), increasing tissue factor-initiated thrombin generation.
    With Factor Xa Inhibitors
    With Andexanet
    Efficacy Data
    Thrombotic Events and Mortality
    • Reference & Additional Readings
      • Connolly SJ et al. Full Study Report of Andexanet Alfa for Bleeding Associated with Factor Xa Inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1326-1335
      • Andexxa (andexanet alfa) [prescribing information]. South San Francisco, CA: Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc; May 2018.
      • Ghadimi K et al. Andexanet alfa for the reversal of Factor Xa inhibitor related anticoagulation. Expert Rev Hematol 2016; 9: 115-22.
      • Lexi-comp: Andexanet alfa Prescribing Information. Last Updated 6/1/18. Assessed September 27, 2019.
      • FDA Approval Letter – ANDEXXA. May 3, 2018. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/CellularGeneTherapyProducts/ApprovedProducts/UCM606693.pdf. Assessed September 27, 2019.

    Related Foam Posts

    • https://emcrit.org/emcrit/issues-andexanet/
    • https://first10em.com/andexanet-alfa/
    • http://www.emlitofnote.com/?p=4384
    • https://www.stemlynsblog.org/jc-reversal-of-noacs-andexanet/
    • http://www.emdocs.net/reversal-of-anticoagulation-an-update/

    The post Episode 2: Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal Using Andexxa with Gary Peksa appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    23 min
  • Episode 1: Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal Using PCC with Brian Gilbert
    Brian Gilbert, PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP
    Emergency Medicine Pharmacist

    http://feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/679237017-pharmsohard-episode-1-factor-xa-inhibitor-reversal-using-pcc-with-brian-gilbert.mp3

    Pharmacology
    AgentApixabanRivaroxabanWarfarinDabigatranMechanism of ActionFactor Xa Inhibitor Factor Xa Inhibitor Inhibitor of Vitamin K dependent clotting factors (II, IX, VII, and X) Direct
    thrombin
    inhibitorTmax3–42–441.25–31/2 Life125-94012-17EliminationRenal (27%
    unchanged drug)Renal (36% unchanged
    drug)Renal, primarily as
    metabolitesRenal (80% unchanged
    drug)
    Mantha S, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013;93(1):68 77.
    Bleeding Risk
    Mantha S, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013;93(1):68 77.
    Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Products and What’s in Them?
    • Profilnine SD and Bebulin
      1. Unactivte PCC, 3-Factor
      2. Cogulation Factors
        1. II, IX, X
    • Kcentra
      • Unactivated PCC, 4-Factor
      • Coagulation Factors
        • II, VII, IX, X
    • FEIBA
      • Activated PCC, 4-Factors
      • Coagulation factors
        • II, VII, IX, X
    • NovoSeven
      • Activated factor VIIa
      • Coagulation Factors
        • Recombinant VIIa
    Clinical Literature
    Title
    Berger K, et al. A Low-Dose 4F-PCC Protocol for DOAC-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage. J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Apr 14. [Epub ahead of print]  
    Aim/Clinical ?
    The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a low-dose 4F-PCC protocol in DOAC-associated ICH, through assessment of hemostatic effectiveness and thromboembolic events.
    Design
    This was a retrospective study
    Population
    19 ICH
    patients who were 18 years of age or older and received at least one dose of
    4F-PCC for DOAC associated ICH
    Inclusion/Exclusion
    Patients who received 4F-PCC at an
    outside hospital were excluded
    Intervention
    25
    units/kg 4F-PCC per the hospital reversal guideline
    Comparison
    No comparator
    group
    Baseline Characteristic
    Included 68.2% of patients taking rivaroxaban and 22.7% taking apixaban. 50% were male and the median age was 79.5 yrs. Mean dose of PCC 2000 units
    Outcomes
    – Hemostatic effectiveness was 94.7% overall (18/19 patients). 

    – Hemostatic effectiveness was 92.9% for rivaroxaban, 100% for apixaban, and 100% for dabigatran reversals.

    (9.1%) developed thromboembolic events after 4F-PCC administration.

    – One patient developed an ischemic stroke 0.5 days after 4F-PCC; the second patient developed a left lower extremity DVT 7.3 days after 4F-PCC.

    -Hospital mortality was 18.2% (4/22 patients)
    Conclusion
    This study observed a high hemostatic effectiveness rate with a lower dose of 4F-PCC compared to current guideline recommendations. Two patients developed thromboembolic events within 14 days of 4FPCC administration, including one patient who received a repeat dose.
    Thoughts
    36.8% (7/19 patients) of our evaluable patients had a SAH which carries a lower likelihood for hematoma expansion. Follow-up duration of 14 days to assess for thromboembolic events, While several studies have used a longer assessment period. The hemostatic effectiveness definition was based solely on the documented interpretation of CT head imaging, which was not independently reviewed by a neurosurgeon or neurologist. Many of the patients received platelet transfusions, as this study dates included patients treated prior to publication of the PATCH trial.
    Title
    Dager WE, et al. Effect of low and moderate dose FEIBA to reverse major bleeding in patients on direct oral anticoagulants. Thromb Res. 2019 Jan;173:71-76.
    Aim/Clinical?
    To evaluate the outcomes of our dosing approach in patients prescribed a DOAC and experiencing a bleeding event.
    Design
    Single-center, retrospective analysis
    Population
    64 patients who
    received FEIBA to treat a bleeding event or mitigate potential bleeding
    during a high-risk procedure
    Inclusion/Exclusion
    Patients were excluded if they were
    not receiving a DOAC, had any form of hemophilia, were pregnant, a prisoner,
    or<18 years of age
    Intervention
    Low
    dose FEIBA < 20 units/kg  vs
    Moderate dose FEIBA (24.3 units/kg)
    Comparison
    No placebo
    group
    Baseline Characteristic
    Mean age 74 yr old, 80% on anticoagulation for Afib, 29% had ICH, 16 % had GI bleeding. 25% on dabigatran, 31% on apixaban, 44% on rivaroxaban
    Outcomes
    Of the 64 patients in the analysis, an additional dose was requested in 6 patients. (90.62% hemostasis)

    – 30 day event rates included 5 thromboembolic events (8%) and 9 (14%) patients expired.

    Follow-up CT-imaging for ICH, endoscopy/colonoscopy, or interventional radiology exams did not reveal any clinically concerning active bleeding or hematoma expansion except in 2 ICH patients with slight expansion between imaging sessions.

    Reduction of apixaban specific Anti-Xa by 76% and rivaroxaban by 56% at 3.3 hours post aPCC
    Conclusion
    25 units/kg FEIBA or lower appears to be safe and have the potential to expedite hemostasis in critical bleeding settings.
    Thoughts
    This was a single-center, non-randomized retrospective analysis with no comparator. Only a low and moderate FEIBA dosing cohort was evaluated, limiting any comparison to higher doses that have been explored.
    Future Studies
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03661528
    References:
    • Dabi A, et al. Crit Care Res Pract 2018;4907164.
    • Smith S, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Apr 2.
    • Berger K, et al. J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Apr 14.
    • Dager WE, et al. Thromb Res. 2019 Jan;173:71-76.
    • Schulman S, et al. Thromb Haemost 2018;118:842 51.
    • Santibanez M, et al. J Crit Care 2018;48:183 90
    • Allison TA, et al. J Intensive Care Med 2018 Epub ahead of print].
    • Tao J, et al. J Intensive Care 2018;6:34.
    • Majeed A, et al. Blood 2017;130:1706 12.

    The post Episode 1: Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal Using PCC with Brian Gilbert appeared first on The Pharm So Hard Podcast.

    33 min

About The Pharm So Hard Podcast: An Emergency Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy Podcast

From the publisher's feed

An Emergency Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy Podcast