When you need to get from shoot to published the fastest, which photo editor excels at culling, importing, and exporting?
Between the shoot and the edit is the cull — the dreaded time spent sitting behind the computer, sifting through photos for keepers. Slow software only makes the tedious task worse. Importing can take several minutes, even hours, with large uploads. But, can a specific photo editor speed up the culling process?
I speed tested several programs to find the fastest photo editors. Watching photos upload is the photography equivalent to watching paint dry, but timing the process helped illuminate which programs offered the most culling speed. I focused on the importing, culling, and exporting process and briefly looked at the time required to load individual images.
I timed five popular culling programs and photo editors. Out of those five, one is a photo browser designed only for the culling process without editing tools: Photo Mechanic Plus. The other four are photo editors with RAW digital asset management built-in: Adobe Lightroom, Capture One, DxO PhotoLab, and Luminar 4.
The Photo Editors Speed Test Rubric
To test each photo editor’s speed, I worked with roughly 6 GB of data – 110 RAW files from the Nikon D850. I focused on culling rate: testing importing, building previews, and exporting. I did not test the speed of editing tools, which are typically brief enough to be difficult to time accurately.
Speed varies based on several different factors. These programs were run on a 2015 MacBook Pro running Big Sur with 16 GB of RAM. The original files were stored on a portable LaCie external hard drive via USB 3. While I’m sharing my experience, times won’t be exact on other machines.
The speed of copying photos from an SD card is largely hardware-based. Instead, we looked at the time it took to copy those 110 photos from the external hard drive to a catalog. I timed how long to add the photos to a catalog and generate a standard preview. I also looked for any lag time loading individual photos. Finally, I timed an export of 110 JPEGs, original size, quality set at 80, to the same hard drive.
Here are the winners.
Photo Mechanic Plus
Import: Less than five seconds, or 2:44 to build a catalog with previews
Export: N/A, but it takes less than 5 seconds to send to Lightroom or Capture One (after which, you would have to wait for them to upload there).
The Jist: It’s not a photo editor, but photographers can save some time by culling photos before importing them into Lightroom or Capture One.
Photo Mechanic Plus created a contact sheet of photos in less time than Lightroom could load the photo previews before the import. In about five seconds, Photo Mechanic Plus created a contact sheet of 110 pictures. Some of those photos were red, indicating that they hadn’t fully loaded yet. But, those images loaded almost immediately after scrolling.
Comparing Photo Mechanic Plus to programs like Lightroom and Capture One is a bit like comparing Apples to Oranges or Apple to Windows. Photo Mechanic is more like what Preview on Mac or Windows Photo Viewer would be like if photographers designed it. Photo Mechanic simply accesses the files on your computer. It doesn’t build a preview of the image or a catalog. The browser is simply a high-end photo viewer that allows you to quickly view, compare, tag, and cull your images.
Photo Mechanic, however, has a new program. Photo Mechanic Plus still doesn’t have editing tools, but it does build catalogs. Those catalogs open up a few more organization possibilities compared to the folder hierarchy. To organize your photos in a way that’s different than the folders, Plus is the version you’d want. Even building catalogs was the fastest option, still only taking under two and a half minutes to build previews for 110 photos. Still, the catalogs were not self-explanatory, and if you simply want to speed up imports, the cheaper, original Photo Mechanic will do ...